Josh42

Nope, don't want to pay for any of it. Nationalized health care, war, public roads, government employees. You're once again bringing up my point that if it's something you don't want to pay for, you shouldn't be force to pay for it.

Hey Kelsey long time no see I hate you.

He already stated that he's a socialist so I don't think he really cares...

:P

Yes. Anarcho-capitalism. Of course, but a government monopoly is not the solution.

:p

lol'd

Night bud, hope to talk to you again.

We wouldn't be in the mess if it weren't for government. "Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth. Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose." -John Maynard Keynes

Bingo.

I've been rejected by both many times... :(

Companies are going to pay MORE than they do right now. Do you not understand what I've said about four times now? The rich have more money. They use this extra money to give the poor more jobs, often with higher pay than they do now. No one's going to work if they aren't getting paid what they deserve.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_hlMK7tCks]YouTube - Monty Python's "Life of Brian" (Stoned to death...)[/ame]

Exactly.

Well you've gotta think of it this way.. Right now, the only thing that's stopping Jon Doe from mugging you in a dark alleyway is the risk of getting caught and being sent to jail for a few years. In an Anarchy, he's running the risk of having someone shooting him in self defense. Crime becomes dangerous in Anarchy. Further, without government handouts, people would become more personally responsible for the things they do, and they'd go out and get jobs. Right now, once the government gives them a little, they just want more, more, more, to the point at which they lose all sense of responsibility. All of the violent thugs would kill each other off in the first few years anyway.

Lmao...

Uh, yea. We're losing 40% of our GDP to senseless taxes.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYojs78Tf9Y]YouTube - Dream on - Aerosmith[/ame]

Anyone else like Cut Copy?

I think your dream of a government who actually cares about people is less realistic than my dream of voluntary exchange and pure capitalism in an Anarchist society.

Yea, it may not in our lifetime, but 500 years down the road it'll be the only system people know. Name one thing which is government run that works better than it did before the government took it over, then we can talk about the state controlling my health care. The beauty of Anarchy is that the unemployment rate would be next to nothing. Think about it. 40% of an American's income right now goes to taxes. Take that money, put it in their pockets, and the economy would flourish. Plus, if I had that extra 40%, I'd GLADLY give a lot bigger chunk of it to charity.

Lol you called me Josh!

There's a place called Wal-Mart...a lot of A-list hollywood actors LOVE to shop there. It's pretty exclusive.

I get high with a little help from my friends!