Everything posted by noonsun
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
That's not being mean at all.
-
the thread that will never reach 2000 pages and i can't think of anything cool to say cos i'm drunkk
Oh! Well in that case CARRY ON! :D
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
*patpat* It's okay, I googled myself, to check.
-
the thread that will never reach 2000 pages and i can't think of anything cool to say cos i'm drunkk
wot the fack is going on heer part deux :inquisitive:
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
I assumed you copypasted that from the first page of google results? :P
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
It kind of sucks because my point is good and I didn't get to do any intellectual mudslinging :sad:
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
Well, the seriousness life of this thread was very short. :shifty:
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
We should ban me for liking a pretentious band like Battles :shame:
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
Oh, there are no fun people up there, silly.
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
Ha, where?
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
I think it would be closer to "Justice was finally done as I have constantly predicted it would be :smug:" XD
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
Well you don't know that, if everyone's suddenly against him he might change his tune, and not trying is certainly not going to do any good.
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
Ha, I expected as much. This is a rather touchy issue apparently. I'm surprised Mark hasn't said anything yet actually >_> idk where he is, probably "playing tennis" or something.
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
I want to start the thread now, though, and besides, maybe he'll post why in here for everyone to see.
-
the thread that will never reach 2000 pages and i can't think of anything cool to say cos i'm drunkk
WELL YOU SHOULD JOIN IN THEN, CREST! FIGHT FOR YOUR FUCKING RIGHTS :army: :D edit: Just so none of you think I'm retarded, I am not seriously taking this as seriously as that post would indicate :sweatdrop:
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
Another one of my points. Ian's not telling anyone. To be fair I only PM'd him a while ago, we should give him a chance to state his case, I suppose.
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
WELL YES BUT MY POINT IS IAN NEEDS TO BAN MORE PEOPLE BECAUSE IF HE IS ONLY GOING TO BAN ONE PERSON HE NEEDS TO BAN MORE BECAUSE OTHERWISE HE'S BEING UNFAIR. My point is still valid, you all. <_<
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
^There. Well the mods need to start IP banning others also, is my point. :shifty: edit: And thanks Lore, by "mods" I mean Ian, since he seems to be the Cheif Banner here.
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
According to him he was IP banned. But he's probably lying to me, the lying little fucker. >_>
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
I did. Voicing my own opinion isn't pointless, it's clearly already sparked discussion, so shut up.
-
the thread that will never reach 2000 pages and i can't think of anything cool to say cos i'm drunkk
I think I just started a war :army:
-
To The Mods (well mostly Ian)
You need to start banning other people. Because, see, if you ban virtually only one person (ie Nathan for those who don't know, he got banned again) you need to ban others, because there are plenty of members who deserve to be banned equally on this forum. I won't name names because I'm pretty sure the mods have a fair idea, but if Ian (who I believe is the banner in question) is going to go around stomping out one of the interesting people on this forum he should stomp out all of them. I'm only looking for equal representation here. There are plenty of people here that I can think of who "deserve" to be banned as much if not more as Nathan. Or, alternatively, you could let Nathan back, probably less work. Idk what he did this time around, I asked Ian about a half hour ago but no reply. Personally I'd like a reason as to the circumstances if the banning this time around, I'm curious; and a few others are too. I mean if Ian just banned Nathan because he was largely disliked he should probably ban about half of this forum, since everyone here is basically disliked by at least one person. And if Ian banned Nathan because he personally disliked him he is just being a poor and unfair administrator. But what do I know, nobody's said why he was banned or anything. If you are going to ban people for "meanness" I suggest you get right on it, there are several here, including me, awaiting your judgement. Flame war commence.
-
the thread that will never reach 2000 pages and i can't think of anything cool to say cos i'm drunkk
Nathan got ban'd again. o_O
- the thread that will never reach 2000 pages and i can't think of anything cool to say cos i'm drunkk
- the thread that will never reach 2000 pages and i can't think of anything cool to say cos i'm drunkk