GazeboflossUK

Hello, As some of you might remember, I was a pretty busy bee on here a long time ago. Anyway - time has past and I now have my own company, a small label at present and we have recently just put out our first singles and debut LP, "How Can We Fix This?" by the band SHIELDS. It's good alt pop stuff, I think anyway. I thought - I bet some Coldplay fans would quite like this so I'm unashamedly promoting their music to you now, haha. Have a listen and see what you think (if you fancy): You can listen on Spotify or Apple Music/iTunes and most other streaming platforms, like Deezer etc There are a bunch of videos on too, like the one below for example. But check out the album as it has a bunch of different sounding tracks. I love "I Don't Know What You Want" as well as the title track on there. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id=z9rY4waVSvw;list=PLXAakU6qhyMMvvPVkNLQbO_iRXNA_Dben Anyway - Cheers, Gareth Band site is: behindshields.com Social: Facebook Twitter Instagram Label is at kaleidoscope-music.co.uk

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0eqlf5k6Tg&feature=colike]Shields - Mezzanine [HD] - YouTube[/ame] New video by Newcastle based band, SHIELDS. Like!! WATCH IN HD!

Vote Ron Paul

Satam al Suqami, Wail and Waleed al Shehri (two brothers) Both Alive, Abdul Aziz al Omari Alive, Fayez Banihammad (from the UAE), Ahmed al Ghamdi, Hamza al Ghamdi, Mohand al Shehri Alive, Saeed al Ghamdi Alive, Ahmad al Haznawi, Ahmed al Nami Alive, Majed Moqed, and Salem al Hazmi Alive (the brother of Nawaf al Hazmi).

The Operation Northwoods document, if anything, is a clear example that people at the top end of government do think about such scenarios in a serious manner. I have a full copy of the actual document myself and it's an interesting read. Many other declassified, publicly available documents have also showed that "false flag" or staged events have been carried out before. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is just one example where most mainline people accept that their government lied about an attack. On the night of February 27, 1933 the Reichstag building was set on fire. At the urging of Hitler, Hindenburg responded the next day by issuing an emergency decree "for the Protection of the people and the State," which stated: "Restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press; on the rights of assembly and association; and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications and warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed." Inside the building, a thorough search conducted by the police resulted in the finding of a naked Marinus van der Lubbe. Van der Lubbe was a Dutch insurrectionist, council communist and unemployed bricklayer who had recently arrived in Germany, ostensibly to carry out his political activities. The fire was used as evidence by the Nazis that the Communists were beginning a plot against the German government. Van der Lubbe was beheaded but recently he was ruled not to have been the likely arsonist. Other widely known false flag events... During the Italianstrategy of tensionin which several bombings in the 1970s, attributed to far-left organizations, were in fact carried out by far-right organizations cooperating with the Italian secret services (see Operation Gladio, 1969 Piazza Fontanabombing, 1972 Peteano attack by Vincenzo Vinciguerra, 1973 assassination attempt of former Interior Minister Mariano Rumor, 1980 Bologna massacre, etc. and various investigations, for example by Guido Salvini). In France, the Masada Action and Defense Movement, supposedly a Zionist group, was really a neo-fascist terrorist group which hoped to increase tension between Arabs and Jews in France. So, governments have always created the PROBLEM so that we have a REACTION and they give us the SOLUTION - and most people fall for it. This doesn't prove that some criminal element within the US and around the world were responsible (even though other evidence suggests they likely were) but it does negate the argument that "the government would never lie about something that big and kill its own people like that".....because that have and they will do it again. And we are all being distracted from the issue - by rusbbish TV and insignificant celebrity news. The Roman ruling elite staged huge, free circus events to distract their people from the fact that they were literally starving....we have a media circus that lies, reports on Britney Spears and Michael Jackson (RIP), all while a bunch of murderous bunch of criminals slowly ruin our lives.

Ex Italian President; CIA And Mossad Ran 9-11 Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, has told Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad, and that this was common knowledge among global intelligence agencies. In what translates awkwardly into English, Cossiga told the newspaper Corriere della Sera: "All the [intelligence services] of America and Europe know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part in Iraq [and] Afghanistan." Cossiga was elected president of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide election to become president of the country in 1985, and he remained until 1992. Cossiga's tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment, and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio. This was a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 1960s, 1970s and '80s. Gladio's specialty was to carry out what they termed "false flag" operations-terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition. In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security." Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9-11 in 2001, and is quoted by 9-11 researcher Webster Tarpley saying "The mastermind of the attack must have been a sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel." Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga's assertion that the 9-11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge among global intelligence agencies is illuminating. It is one more eye-opening confirmation that has not been mentioned by America's propaganda machine in print or on TV. Nevertheless, because of his experience and status in the world, Cossiga cannot be discounted as a crackpot.

Yeah, Charlie Sheen is brilliant and I am so happy he is back, asking the big questions again. The media reaction should tell you that something is up as they don't even address his questions and just attack him on non related stuff - or call him an idiot. Now, I assume most people can see past the media spin??? I hope so as this is an exciting time to be on the right side of history.

And I pretty much agree.

AE911Truth with Richard Gage, AIA LIVE STREAMED from The Commonwealth Club of California AE911Truth with Richard Gage, AIA LIVE STREAMED from The Commonwealth Club of California TOMORROW, Tuesday, Sept 8 starting at 5:45PM Pacific http://brightpathvideo.com/AE/LiveStream.html http://www.ae911truth.org/ Dear AE911Truth Supporters, 1. An important event for the 9/11 truth movement will occur on Tuesday night in San Francisco when Richard Gage, AIA, speaks at the oldest public forum in the nation, The Commonwealth Club of California. Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth will web-cast this event live on the Internet from our website AE911Truth.org. We follow in the footsteps of the great David Ray Griffin, who first broke the 9/11 Truth barrier at the Commonwealth Club last year. In just under 40 minutes we will present the scientific evidence for the explosive controlled destruction of the 3 World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11. We will examine the behaviour of these buildings as well as the explosive evidence found in the debris. More evidence may be found on our website and DVD. A screening of this historic moment will be presented in New York City at 56 Walker Street. Also, everyone is encouraged to tune in on your own computer as Mr. Gage explains why the official conspiracy theory put forth by NIST is not supported by the evidence, and that explosive controlled demolition is, very unfortunately, the only viable explanation for the WTC destruction in New York City on September 11, 2001. Pre-register! If you are local and coming please make sure to get your tickets today as it might be sold out. We’ll see you live at 5:45! http://brightpathvideo.com/AE/LiveStream.html 2. Richard Gage will also be a guest on the Alex Jones Show the next day, Wednesday, Sept 9, at 11:00 AM Pacific to discuss the recent National Geographic Channel hit piece 9/11: Science & Conspiracy.

Yeah, and I think the whole point of the film (even with it's flaws) was that he doesn't "run" things - and that presidents are under the thumb of corporate, elite bankers.

You shouldn't have even bothered. You did compare my belief to the unicorn thing and then just afterwards said "I'm not comparing"..... I did say however that some theories are ridiculous, true (like if someone did believe in the unicorn thing for example) - but when there is some cold, hard facts and some truly sound science involved, people should take another look. I'm also saying that the term conspiracy theory is now instantly seen as wacky......and it's been done intentionally

Amen!

Look..... ...a principle of law is a codified philosophical ("principle"), which represents the core of a law as found in a constitution, in precedent, or else is interpreted to arise from either or both. Again, you guys are coming across as idiots with the things you are writing - I'm not saying you are idiots but it just appears that way. So let me get this straight.... 'You use the term "conspiracy theory/theorists" as a one-sided derogatory term. While some “conspiracy theories” certainly are preposterous the term “conspiracy theory” is far too convenient for putting down speculations that are simply uncomfortable for the status quo. No one would dispute that conspiracies can and do exist. As David Ray Griffin points out in his excellent books about 9/11, all explanations of this tragic event, including the official one, are in fact “conspiracy theories.” But somehow it is only those that contradict the government position (no matter how rationally) that get labelled with this pejorative term. Similarly, regarding the JFK assassination, any suggestion that Oswald wasn’t acting alone would by definition be a “conspiracy theory.” And yet, the official version is riddled with ridiculous inconsistencies and loose ends. Yes, Oswald could have been a lone nutcase; but that “conspiracy of one” explanation is only a loose fit for the known facts, and many other possibilities remain. It is vital that we continue to ask questions and seek truth in such important cases. That doesn’t mean that we have to abandon all our critical faculties; quite the contrary. But it does mean that we must risk occasionally being slapped with a facile and derogatory label like “conspiracy theorist". You also put forward the idea that I must be an anarchist because I do not believe that the official story of 9/11 is true? They are not synonymous. You either are not understanding me or are watching too much Glenn Beck (in the US)

Watch "The Obama Deception". Surprisingly, it has a whole host of stars and respected thinkers/writers - as well as some well researched points. It doesn't really make much difference who is in the Whitehouse as "president". Bummer eh? Double Click the video to watch a bigger version [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw]YouTube - The Obama Deception HQ Full length version[/ame] The Obama Deception is a hard-hitting film that completely destroys the myth that Barack Obama is working for the best interests of the American people. The Obama phenomenon is a hoax carefully crafted by the captains of the New World Order. He is being pushed as savior in an attempt to con the American people into accepting global slavery. We have reached a critical juncture in the New World Order's plans. It's not about Left or Right: it's about a One World Government. The international banks plan to loot the people of the United States and turn them into slaves on a Global Plantation. Covered in this film: who Obama works for, what lies he has told, and his real agenda. If you want to know the facts and cut through all the hype, this is the film for you. Watch the Obama Deception and learn how: - Obama is continuing the process of transforming America into something that resembles Nazi Germany, with forced National Service, domestic civilian spies, warrantless wiretaps, the destruction of the Second Amendment, FEMA camps and Martial Law. - Obama's handlers are openly announcing the creation of a new Bank of the World that will dominate every nation on earth through carbon taxes and military force. - International bankers purposefully engineered the worldwide financial meltdown to bankrupt the nations of the planet and bring in World Government. - Obama plans to loot the middle class, destroy pensions and federalize the states so that the population is completely dependent on the Central Government. - The Elite are using Obama to pacify the public so they can usher in the North American Union by stealth, launch a new Cold War and continue the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.

hahaha, I'm sorry. :embarassed: Although I do get very, very mad sometimes...That help? :idea2: There are some laws that should be abolished...especially in the US (areas of the income tax laws, perhaps :thinking:). I can never understand how a successful bid by one person in the US that beat the income tax law can still mean that others have to pays on their earnings. I know the state laws can sometimes cause confusion but when it can be proven unconstitutional in one state it just seems wrong that other people have failed to win....