LOL @ U GUYS :lol:

another late night for me. of course i'll come back tomorrow and think i sounded stupid :lol:

hmm of course we must take into consideration file size and ratio.

 

Majson's now banned banners file size * File size / # of banned banners - The sum of all avatars / # of avatars / ratio of total avatars to Majson's banned banners = (at least 1 to 5900)

 

This shows that Majson does have a valid arguement in that out of the file sizes of the total avatars on the board, Majson's banned banners are quite miniscule.

 

ph34r m4 1337 m47h ski11z!! :P :D

I have added my banners back to my Sig simply because i have noticed avatars increasing in file size, so that most are now bigger in filesize than my banners. If there is a problem with this, PM me and we can talk that way.

 

that's in my sig, just below my banners (or where they were) I don't think that's being too unreasonable

 

Unreasonable? I'll tell you what would be unreasonable:

 

1) You have a banner, then:

2) Someone else sees that banner and thinks it would be a good idea to have one of their own;

3) Posters jump on the band wagon and before you know it everyone's got an image;

4) The images turn into gif's and are bigger than their own avatar that you're referring to;

5) The board becomes the slowest page on the internet and people get pissed off

6) Pissed off people moan and post elsewhere.

 

You can see the snowball effect yes? I'm sorry if you're upset that you can't have you're banners but I've got no choice but to do it for the reasons I've given above. As for PMing you, you took no notice last time I asked you to take them down, otherwise we wouldn't be having this conversation now.

 

Bottom line: Your decision should be good enough in most cases, and this is certainly well within those bounds.

the answer is 4....it's always 4