Pony

the album is finished but won't be released until 2008. that's it. :wacko:

wow, i have to laugh...sorry :laugh3:

what, to die not having heard the new magnum opus?!! nonsense. :wacko: edit: love your signature. :P

so, umm, wake me up in spring :(

you can download it here: Part 1 Part 2 (thanks to Ronald from atease) :) i've come across a video of Radiohead's gig at Shepherds Bush Empire on dailymotion. the way it's shot is kinda weird...odd camera angles, the cameras focusing on random things...it's pretty cool. anyway, here's the link if anyone is interested: http://www.dailymotion.com/DeliriumSafari

haha, true, it's priceless..."free petrol", lol. Ed's HONK interview is also hilarious. :D you read the classics?!...:sneaky: i'm sure you'd love to join them, Marek, wouldn't you? :wink3:

it's a cover of Can :D

i've seen worse, but this one is pretty embarrassing, i agree. :laugh3: his desire for fame and greed for money, obviously. :dozey: haha...but seriously, must have been the stylists...what. were. they. thinking?!:confused:

Thom Thom Thom Thom Thom :sneaky: *cough*

what about it? i like it...a nice Beasty Boys impersonation :laugh3: :D

yeah, they are in different keys, but you couldn't blend the two songs together the way it was done in that "remix" if they weren't similar. the chord progression and parts of the melody are very similar, although transposed into a different key. but i'm sure it was lifted unintentionally, please don't get defensive over this. i love both bands. :wacko:

Signed, Sealed, Delivered - Stevie Wonder :wacko:

i love this picture...he looks so happy and content. :wacko:

yeah, i like the stubble, but not the beard :P shall we start a web march asking for Thom Yorke to shave off his beard? :laugh3: oh well, he's so darn sexy either way. :can't stop staring at the pictures:

haha, same here :P but it also means we'll have to wait longer until we hear it. /le sigh/ yeah, 4 years dammit! :veryangry2: although, i'm very new to radiohead "fandom" , i've only been waiting a few months, i guess i shouldn't be even talking. :laugh3:

lol but seriously, sum 41 isn't horrible. i've only heard a few songs...much better than all the emo crap dominating the charts in north america.

you're welcome. :D

well, 2 days then? ok, a week tops. it's not gonna take months like somebody suggested, that's for certain. :D and OMG judging by this: Industry folks at Pitchfork this weekend said "the new Radiohead is going to blow minds.",it looks like the people at Pitchfork Media have heard the advanced copy already. I WANT THAT CD SO BAAAAAAD!!! :whines:

more news: One of our emailers with ties to the mastering house said the band's asked that all audio files (save the masters) be deleted, concerned for a repeat of the Hail To The Thief demo leak. The only other bit of unsubstantiated info we can add to this highly speculative post: Industry folks at Pitchfork this weekend said "the new Radiohead is going to blow minds." Umm, obviously. You needed an anonymous insider to tell you that like you need a cat tied to a stick that's driven into frozen winter shit, we know. But admit it ... you're getting even more excited. Posted at 2:01 PM--stereogum.com so, looks like there'll be no leak this time, huh. :P

i dunno. i've been lurking on atease a lot lately, and there are a few folks who post there who know a lot about the recording/mixing/mastering process. here are a couple of quotes from Wonsaponatime (mr know-all of atease): "Mastering usually only takes one day. At least every previous Radiohead album and probably 99% of all records are mastered in a single session. Mixing HTTT took 2 months, btw. The reason probably is that during mixing they keep on fixing things, adding the occasional overdub etc." "Kid A was mastered in a single session at Abbey Road in London. Likewise all other albums by various bands where I know something about the mastering process were done in one day. Why? Because mastering is all about getting an overall sound to recordings that stem from different sessions, in this case also very different locations. And in order to achieve that you do it all in one go." here's another quote from a guy talking about getting his band's cd mastered: "mastering is done relatively quickly (compared to mixing an album). When we had our 2nd EP mastered, the guy had it done in a day"

actually, from what i've heard, mastering is usually done in one session and only takes a day. :P Mastering, a form of audio post-production, is the process of preparing and transferring recorded audio from a source containing the final mix to a data storage device (the master); the source from which all copies will be produced. There's more on it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastering

here's evidence that everyone ripped off Pachelbel (courtesy of someone on atease): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdxkVQy7QLM :laugh3:

The Pieces doesn't sound like the Scientist either. it's the chord progression that was "borrowed" which in their turn they borrowed from High And Dry, albeit transposed. this thread is ridiculous, to be honest. i've heard both songs a million times, and i never ever ever noticed similarities b/w Pieces and The Scientist. there are plenty of songs that have similar chord progressions, so what.

ahem... (starting at about 2:00 it gets particularly interesting) :rolleyes:

well, if they're mastering it, it's obviously finished, no? i mean, nobody would master an unfinished album. correct me if i'm wrong. :wacko: