Tnspieler1012

The fact that we're here is a compliment to Ian. Generally, this a tremendously well run forum and site, can't stress that enough. But when Mark convinces him to censor the posts Nathan can see, and three people suddenly get banned for unconvincing reasons while Ian and Mark carry on as if it's the best thing that ever happened. It's appropriate to say 'what the hell?' It seems the more utilitarian action would be for Ian to spare himself the trouble of constantly interfering, and presume a laissez-faire attitude. Nathan's most antagonistic threads are usually a reaction to reasonably unfair things.

:rolleyes: :lol: :smug:

lolreally? I can't help but apply animal farm imagery to the lounge as of late.

Again, people clearly aren't getting the root of what they're complaining about. So I'm not a human being in the real world?

Would anybody here like some delicious craisins? Wash your hands first please. :)

me next! me next!

this + How is it 'ruining the board'? It is the ability to converse and disagree that keeps boards like these alive, I wouldn't come here otherwise. If all you want to do is agree that you love coldplay day in and day out, stay in the coldplay section. Most of this so-called fighting and incivility is often the direct result of people trying to stifle meaningful conversation. Ironically you've come here to assert your own opinion, but God help me if I disagree, for that would constitute an argument, and we can't have that can we... No one is creating drama for drama sake, drama is merely the inevitable result of people saying what they really believe. The whole point of a forum imo is to serve as a place where one can express themselves with greater sincerity and honestly than real-life. If you're going out of the way to avoid any type of friction with people you'll never meet for the shallow sake of 'getting along' than it's clearly you that has a problem. Furthermore, as others have pointed out, you have no idea what went on here. Multiple people had their accounts disabled, and people have a right to discuss and be upset about that. Obviously Ian has the authority to do what he wishes, but don't tell people not to care about what is obviously important to them. Is that your approach to life? then (forgive me for my bluntness) shut up.

exactly like that

Ima gonna choke a bitch

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1b26BD5KjH0]YouTube- Apocalypse Now Intro (The Doors - The End)[/ame]

Quote: Originally Posted by Tnspieler1012;4097867 In all seriousness, is Sara's ban temporary? and if so, how long? And rainbow sprinkles and ice cream on the side, and berries, and whipped cream...

Nick, hold me! The scary man took Sara away in his carriage and I don't know what to do!!

pretty please with sugar on top.

yes, but it's not really germane to current forum events. It's like talking about Baseball during the peak of 9/11.

Inn all seriousness, is Sara's ban temporary? and if so, how long? I haven't the slightest intention of defending Nathan, but to take Sara is f-ing ludicrous.

my thoughts exactly.

We know what you think, Mark.

In Memoriam [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv1I4q6lOpo]YouTube- The Breakfast Club - Ending Scene[/ame]

Holy Fuck!

Mickelson goes -5 in 3 holes. Poulter is +3 for his last 2. and Couples is -3 for holes 14 and 15.

I have to ask, how many people saw Nathan's quickly-killed "Freedom of Speech Thread"?

It's terrible to censor or restrict the medium in which art is expressed, but unless one's artistic freedoms are 100% controlled, it's still art.

lol. I feel sorry for Leibniz because he'll always be known as the guy who got pwned by Candide even though he did a whole lot of other stuff, but I gotta go with Voltaire. Hegel or Kierkegaard?

^ Is it winning?

government win, John Mayer fail.