GazeboflossUK

Fake Soldier Confession Video Runs As Cover For Real Slaughter

(Long but Good article, I think anyway) Neocon Gingrich Proposes Jeb Bush as Ruler Kurt Nimmo | May 30 2006 Newt Gingrich, the neocon troll who put out a contract on America, is pushing Jeb Bush as ruler, not in 2008 but down the road, in 2012 or 2016. “I just think his natural, personal ability is so great that people are going to realize he is not his father and he’s not his brother. He’s a very unique, charismatic leader with extraordinary capabilities. … Jeb Bush may well be the most innovative (governor) in the entire country,” Gingrich averred during the taping of a St. Petersburg television show. No word if the interviewer and television crew vomited. Never mind even Republicans, when polled, don’t want Dubya’s younger brother to run, and never mind as well Jeb is connected at the hip to the same Straussian neocons who brought us the invasion and occupation of Iraq, the trampling of the Constitution here in America, and will soon enough bring us the shock and awe campaign against Iran. Jeb is infamously credited with helping to trigger the Florida S&L crisis in 1988 by defaulting on a $4.5 million loan. Try this with your mortgage and see what happens. Bush has a long and sordid history of rubbing elbows with Cuban criminals, namely Camilo Padreda, a former intelligence officer with the Batista dictatorship, and the embezzler Hernandez Cartaya (see this write-up at the Project for the Old American Century). Jeb the Younger is also connected to the prominent Cuban exile Miguel Recarey, a former CIA asset who attempted to assassinate Fidel Castro. Recarey was eventually charged with big time Medicare fraud and skipped out of the country and is now a fugitive. Bush has turned Florida into graft central and “has overseen corruption and nepotism run amok in his administration. It is now estimated that nearly 40 percent of Florida’s $48 billion dollar state budget gets kicked back in the form of contracts with private companies—many of which employ former Bush staffers,” according to POAC (see previous link). Bush declared himself the “accountability governor” and then undercut the oversight and accountability measures in Florida’s contracts and bidding process, going so “far as to cut the funding for the state auditor general and the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability.” Jeb made out like a bandit on his Enron stock. “I suppose it’s somehow fitting that while Florida’s retirement system lost more than any other state in the Enron debacle, Jeb personally benefited from his Enron stock. In the end, Jeb Bush has used Florida to turn a profit for his friends at the expense of the states future, just as Ken Lay used the employees and investors at Enron. In four short years, Florida has become the Enron of state governments and Jeb Bush is their very own Ken Lay.” Jeb facilitated the election theft for his brother in 2000. He purged felons who were non-felons (they were primarily Democrats) from voting rolls. “Florida Governor Jeb Bush and his Secretary of State Katherine Harris, created a phony list of convicted felons—57,700 to be exact—to ’scrub’ thousands of innocent people from the state’s voter rolls. Of the thousands who ultimately lost their vote through this scrub of voters, 80% were African-American, mostly Democratic Party voters. Had they voted, the course of history would have changed. Instead, however, Harris declared Bush the victor by only 537 votes.” Gingrich, a habitual ethics violator while “serving” in the House, wants Jeb Bush, a hob-nobber with criminals (a natural propensity, as Jeb hails from a notorious crime family) and runs Florida as his own personal fiefdom, to be your president, not in 2008 (this slot is reserved for the globalist queen, Hillary Clinton) but later. Neocons will continue to talk this sort of trash, and subvert the political process in order to make talk walk, until they are fumigated from government. In a sane world, the fact the Bush family supported and financed the Nazis would make them persona non grata (if not inmates), not only in the political world but society at large. Instead, they are at the very pinnacle of power and control, thus demonstrating the nation is ruled by sadistic perverts in possession of do not go to jail cards. If Jeb the Younger is “elected” come 2012 or so, the neocons will have a second chance, that is after the Clinton crime family—think Arkansas and the Mena-CIA-cocaine connection—runs amok, allowing the more traditional neolibs a chance to run the White House again. It should be noted that Hillary was adopted by none other than the fascist propaganda master, Rupert Murdoch, who will likely push her 2008 presidential bid, thus demonstrating there is little difference between Republicans, Democrats, neocons, and neolibs. Of course, America may reject Hillary, as she is rather unsavory, but such public opinion is hardly a consideration, as Bush was “re-elected” (through vote fraud) in 2004, and under normal circumstances he would have long ago been impeached and imprisoned for telling lies, murdering more than one hundred thousand Iraqis, trashing the Constitution, stealing elections, and various other sundry crimes.

There's probably gonna be thousands more dead. Sad news.

we'll see.

This whole NORAD standing down on 9/11 is complete truth and the way fighter planes, that were supposed to protect the US airspace at any slight 'off-course' movement by commercial airliners (as they do 24 hours a day, 7 days a week 365 days a year) were moved into useless positions is something that SHOULD be investigated publicly.....and not by people appointed by the government. As for MrCool's "replies"...........well, ignorance is bliss it seems.

North American Union to Replace USA Human Events | May 19, 2006 by Jerome R. Corsi President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy. Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada. President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed. The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union: At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts. What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005: In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized. To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America. The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past. The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated: The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America. Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox. Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him? RELATED: Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway EDIT - Everyone who has said "never gonna happen" should have learnt a very important lesson by now.....you are constantly being lied to by your government.

New Zogby Poll Frightens Masters Of Terror Into Releasing 'Bin Laden Tape' Nearly half of entire country sees 9/11 cover-up, 24 hours later 'Bin Laden tape' gets released Paul Joseph Watson| May 24 2006 A new Zogby International poll that shows over 45% of Americans want a new independent investigation of 9/11 has the masters of terror running scared and dreaming up new ways to blind side intrigued Americans into sticking their heads back in the sand and relinquishing their suspicions in return for government protection. The outcome of the poll was that 45% supported calls for a new inquiry on behalf of Congress or an international tribunal and that 42% believed the 9/11 Commission was a cover-up. Exactly 24 hours later, an audio tape alleged to contain the voice of dead CIA intelligence asset Osama bin Laden renforced the myth that he had personally directed 19 incompetent Arabs to carry out the attack. This is an inept attempt to bolster the 'Bin Laden did it' fraud one day after the Zogby poll was released The emergence of bin Laden tapes repeatedly coincide with watershed moments either politically or from the 9/11 truth movement. See our archive for previous examples of this ridiculous theatre. Is it a stretch to suggest that in reality the numbers swing even more in our favor? Endless stories of warrantless NSA domestic eavesdropping have created a chilling climate, whereby Americans expect to have their every communication intercepted and catalogued by Big Brother. Would more have expressed a desire for a new investigation minus this fear factor? What is amazing to consider is that after nearly five years of relentless monopoly establishment media and government promotion of the official 9/11 fable, it can't even muster the support of half the country. This completely inept and impotent performance on the part of the establishment is coupled with Bush approval ratings dipping into the 20's as even his conservative base deserts him over a policy that would have been mandated if the 9/11 attack was perpetrated by the parties alleged by the government, closing the borders. Is there a backlash on its way? The sudden emergence of the so-called Bin Laden tape was an immediate and desperate response in an effort to prop up an official story that has about as much balance as a drunken prostitute. Many have speculated that the Pentagon issue is a baited trap ready to snap the 9/11 truth movement. Mouthpieces of the elite have been busy at work attempting to rest the entire body of evidence on the foundation of whether or not Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. By placing the Pentagon joker at the bottom of the deck, the establishment is hoping to topple the whole house of cards by eventually releasing crystal clear footage, whether real or manufactured, of a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon. The movement must prepare for that by re-emphasizing the collapse of Building 7 and incendiary devices within the twin towers as the central pillar of the cover-up. This issue will no doubt encompass the central focus of the upcoming Chicago and Los Angeles 9/11 conferences, which will serve as a platform to educate the public and generate more mainstream press coverage. Tickets are going fast but are still available for Alex Jones' *star studded* (hint hint) event and can be purchased by clicking here.

WATCH THE INTERVIEW HERE This is desperately sickening.... Ex -US soldier: 'If he didn't answer the way we liked, we would shoot his youngest kid in the head' Live Journal | May 23 2006 Jessie Macbeth, a Former Army Ranger and Iraq War Veteran Tells All This 20 minute interview will change how you view the U.S. occupation of Iraq forever. I cannot possibly recommend this more highly. An Iraq war veteran tells of atrocities he and other fellow-soldiers committed reguarly while in Iraq. I have never seen this level of honesty from a U.S. soldier who directly participated in the slaughtering of Iraqis. Excerpts: "When we were doing the night raids in the houses, we would pull people out and have them all on their knees and zip-tied. We would ask the man of the house questions. If he didn't answer the way we liked, we would shoot his youngest kid in the head. We would keep going, this was our interrogation. He could be innocent. He could be just an average Joe trying to support his family. If he didn't give us a satisfactory answer, we'd start killing off his family until he told us something. If he didn't know anything, I guess he was SOL." and "For not speaking out, I feel like I'm betraying my battle-buddies that died." WATCH THE INTERVIEW HERE

Something else....you know just gathering as much as I can. This is a clip from the CameraPlanet 9/11 Archive. A firefighter at ground zero clearly says that the building must be cleared because there is a bomb inside. This adds to the weight of testimony from firefighters that bombs were evident in the WTC. http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/video_bomb_in_building.htm

Zogby Poll: Over 70 Million American Adults Support New 9/11 Investigation PRWEB | May 23 2006 Although the Bush administration continues to exploit September 11 to justify domestic spying, unprecedented spending and a permanent state of war, a new Zogby poll reveals that less than half of the American public trusts the official 9/11 story or believes the attacks were adequately investigated. 911Truth.org Urges 2006 Reform Candidates to Recognize a Powerful New Constituency The poll is the first scientific survey of Americans' belief in a 9/11 cover up or the need to investigate possible US government complicity, and was commissioned to inform deliberations at the June 2~4 "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future" conference in Chicago. Poll results indicate 42% believe there has indeed been a cover up (with 10% unsure) and 45% think "Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success" (with 8% unsure). The poll of American residents was conducted from Friday, May 12 through Tuesday, May 16, 2004. Overall results have a margin of sampling error of +/- 2.9. All inquiries about questions, responses and demographics should be directed to Zogby International. According to Janice Matthews, executive director of 911truth.org, "To those who have followed the mounting evidence for US government involvement in 9/11, these results are both heartening and frankly quite amazing, given the mainstream media's ongoing refusal to cover the most critical questions of that day. Our August 2004 Zogby poll of New Yorkers showed nearly half believe certain US officials 'consciously' allowed the attacks to happen and 66% want a fresh investigation, but these were people closest to the tragedy and most familiar with facts refuting the official account. This revelation that so many millions nationwide now also recognize a 9/11 cover up and the need for a new inquiry should be a wake up call for all 2006 political candidates hoping to turn this country around. We think it also indicates Americans are awakening to the larger pattern of deceit that led us into Constitutional twilight and endless war, and that our independent media may have finally come of age." Poll co-author, W. David Kubiak concurs, saying: "Despite years of relentless media promotion, whitewash and 9/11 Commission propaganda, the official 9/11 story still can't even muster 50% popular support. Since this myth has been the administration's primary source of political and war-making power, this level of distrust has revolutionary implications for everyone working for peace, justice and civil liberties. If we ever hope to reclaim this country, end aggression and restore international respect, we all must finally scrutinize that day when things started to go so terribly wrong. The media and movement leaders ignore this call at their peril, because tens of millions are clearly telling us here they are ready for 9/11 truth." SCOPE: The poll covered five related areas: 1) Iraq - do Americans think the Bush administration exploited 9/11 to attack Iraq? (44% do, 44% don't); 2) Cover up - did the government and its 9/11 Commission conceal or refuse to investigate evidence that contradicts their official story? (only 48% said no); 3) the collapse of WTC 7, which was not even mentioned by the 9/11 Commission and has seldom been reported in the media---had respondents been aware of this collapse and, if so, did they think it should be investigated (only 52% had known about it, but over 70% of this group believe it should have been investigated); 4) new investigation of official complicity - do respondents think we need one? (only 48% said no); and 5) mass media - how do people rate its performance, including its coverage of alternative 9/11 theories, unanswered questions and inquiry issues? (43% rate it positively, 55% negatively). (The poll sponsors see knowledge of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 as a bellwether issue, because if people do not know this elementary fact, they have probably not been exposed to any independent 9/11 research at all. Because the number of respondents who support a new investigation of 9/11 (45%)) is roughly the same as the number who knew about the collapse of Building 7 (52%), it can reasonably be extrapolated that if the entire public were exposed to independent 9/11 research, about 90 percent would support a new investigation of the events of that fateful day.) SPONSOR: 911truth.org is a coalition of researchers, journalists and victim family members working to expose and answer the hundreds of still unresolved questions concerning 9/11, especially the nearly 400 questions that the Family Steering Committee filed with the 9/11 Commission. Initially welcomed by the commissioners as their "road map," these queries cut to the heart of 9/11 crimes and accountability, specifically raising the central issues of motive, means and cui bono (who profited?). The Commission ultimately ignored 80% of these issues, however, opting only to explore system failures, miscommunications and incompetence. The victim families' most incisive questions remain unaddressed to this day. For more information on the Chicago "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming our Future" conference and other developments, see http://www.911truth.org and http://911revealingthetruth.org or contact our media coordinator, Michael Berger, at 314-308-4893. * Numerical computations conservatively based on 2000 Census data citing 174 million Americans between the ages of 18 and 64. Survey Methodology: Zogby America, 5/12/06 through 5/16/06 This is a telephone survey of adults nationwide conducted by Zogby International. The target sample is 1,200 interviews with approximately 81 questions asked. Samples are randomly drawn from telephone cd’s of national listed sample. Zogby International surveys employ sampling strategies in which selection probabilities are proportional to population size within area codes and exchanges. As many as six calls are made to reach a sampled phone number. Cooperation rates are calculated using one of AAPOR’s approved methodologies1 and are comparable to other professional public-opinion surveys conducted using similar sampling strategies.2 Weighting by region, party, age, race, religion, and gender is used to adjust for non-response. The margin of error is +/- 2.9 percentage points. Margins of error are higher in sub-groups. Zogby International’s sampling and weighting procedures also have been validated through its political polling: more than 95% of the firm’s polls have come within 1% of actual election-day outcomes.

Interesting article.....it covers both sides of this particular issue and is worth reading. It deals with (what I had also though about before) the "honey trap" that might be emerging from the government too. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/230506doesntfly.htm

Yeah, I posted it a while back but still good to link it :) Info on it was here and some other stuff here

^ exactly......people who believe that the mainstream TV media never ran the story because they "didn't have enough evidence" are kidding themselves. FOR EXAMPLE - If I saw Osama Bin Laden getting smuggled into a hospital somewhere (anywhere, saudi arabia) and I went to the Police/News - you think I would be taken seriously? Do you think that anything would come of it? no...no chance. As it all would be CIA controlled. I would be told that I was mistaken and the mainstream media (who run stories like this AFTER security/police/CIA/FBI briefings) wouldn't be AT ALL interested. Imagine if one report in a tiny news company said "Katie Holmes has swatted two flies while out shopping" - there would be a discussion on the news about it, wouldn't there? The Osama getting treatment in an American hospital in Dubai story was MEGA news....you would think dozens of articles written about this would cause TV media frenzy. But MEGA news like this is ultra sensitive on an unbelieveable scale and they are people in position at all levels to quash such stories from gaining any credibility and it ends up with people like "MrCool011" saying...."it wasn't on TV or anything so there's not really any point in caring" Pay attention and keep up man.

I know.... Some people might even see that animation above and use it to proove that plane DID hit - IF only the Bush administration had thought about doing that 5 YEARS AGO!! the evil idiots

what do you mean when you say stuff like that? Because it doesn't mean anything, does it now? You just wrongly point out that I "know alot about not being able to argue things". ok. we get it. you aren't very clever. you don't have to keep prooving this to us.

There were SO may reports. AND when you say evidence I bet you mean pictures of him meeting them and video's of them talking too.....if there were such pictures or videos then we wouldn't be having ths debate and the CIA would have been very silly to let that happen.....so lets agree that there can never be pictures or video's and that the CIA (government) would never agree to meeting him would they?? anyway... REPORTS ALL GENERALLY IGNORED BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA (what a suprise there then) UK NEWSPAPER CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July French report: terrorist leader stayed in Dubai hospital Anthony Sampson Thursday November 1, 2001 The Guardian Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro. The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere. Bin Laden is reported to have arrived in Dubai on July 4 from Quetta in Pakistan with his own personal doctor, nurse and four bodyguards, to be treated in the urology department. While there he was visited by several members of his family and Saudi personalities, and the CIA. The CIA chief was seen in the lift, on his way to see Bin Laden, and later, it is alleged, boasted to friends about his contact. He was recalled to Washington soon afterwards. Intelligence sources say that another CIA agent was also present; and that Bin Laden was also visited by Prince Turki al Faisal, then head of Saudi intelligence, who had long had links with the Taliban, and Bin Laden. Soon afterwards Turki resigned, and more recently he has publicly attacked him in an open letter: "You are a rotten seed, like the son of Noah". Bin Laden has often been reported to be in poor health. Some accounts claim that he is suffering from Hepatitis C, and can expect to live for only two more years. According to Le Figaro, last year he ordered a mobile dialysis machine to be delivered to his base at Kandahar in Afghanistan. AND http://www.rense.com/general16/bin.htm CIA agent 'met Bin Laden in July' by Toby Rose Le Figaro today claimed that a CIA agent met Osama bin Laden in a Gulf hospital as recently as last July and received "precise information" about an imminent attack on the US. According to the French daily, the agent met Bin Laden while he was being treated at the American Hospital in Dubai for a kidney infection. The agent was subsequently recalled to Washington. The hospital today vigorously denied the report, which is based on a number of sources, including French secret services and a hospital administrator. Bin Laden is said to have arrived in the UAE from the Pakistan city of Quetta, accompanied by his personal physician, four bodyguards and an Algerian nurse. He was visited by family members and leading Saudis. The paper claims he was treated in the urology department headed by Dr Terry Callaway. Bin Laden is said to have severe medical problems and "the kidney infection has spread to his liver". Le Figaro claims a mobile dialysis machine was delivered to his Kandahar hideout in Afghanistan last year. In a further twist, French secret service operatives are said to have met officials from the US embassy in Paris last August after the arrest of Algerian Djamel Beghal in the UAE. A French secret service report on 7 September warned of possible attacks, and that the order to act would come from Afghanistan. Le Figaro says very precise information on targets for attack was communicated to the CIA AND this is well documented V V V http://www.orlingrabbe.com/binladin_timosman.htm HEY THERE'S TONNES MORE OF INFO ON THIS....YOU COULD HAVE FOUND IT YOURSELF.

The CIA met with him on 2001. It was reported all over asia.....but locked out by the western media.....and we know why that was.

Jesus ...Agian....my issue diverted by someone who can't argue it - Just like the boys in the White House.

Interested to see how this pans out

A prisonplanet baby.....fight them or we eventually will be screwed.

How Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look? Is this what Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon would really look like from nearby security cameras instead of the nondescript blur footage we have been subject to? This is obviously a crude collection of doctored frames but if the government had released something similar yesterday would you have believed it? Many would. Wary therefore we are of the potential for the government to eventually release clear footage of the impact from the 84 other cameras that were dotted around the Pentagon and would have easily documented the event to debunk 9/11 skeptics. The government claims all 84 cameras either didn't capture the impact or that tape in the cameras was mysteriously empty and yet returned as normal to film the cleanup operations. Judicial Watch has said it will continue to pursue footage from the other 84 cameras. If the government is telling the truth in saying that the tapes show nothing of interest then what are they trying to hide by not releasing them?

Yeah perhaps, but if they DO release clear cut footage (from the 84 tapes snatched on 9/11) that flight 77 DID hit the pentagon then we need to remember that this doesn't clear them of envolvement. It only goes to show that they are purposely using this footage to hide all the other smoking guns relating to that horrid day in sept 2001. Releasing more bits of bad footage which spark more conspiracy talk - then attempting to quash the whole truth movement by releasing a tape with more clear evidence of flight 77 while ignoring all the other lies they have been called on is a likely tactic. If they have the other 84 tapes then they need not have released that last joke of "video footage"..... I dunno, I might be wrong and they might not be able to show the world that flight 77 hit the Pentagon.....but if they do.....it's all been planned in an attempt to hide all the other lies. It's fucked up, either way. *un-suprised*

Judicial Watch Director of Investigations & Research and former military intelligence officer Chris Farrell says the watchdog organization plans to file another lawsuit in order to obtain as many as possible of the 84 other tapes that potentially show whatFarrell conceded that his organization could be the water carriers for a honey pot operation, in which the government attracts overwhelming attention to the Pentagon issue, making it the cornerstone of the 9/11 truth movement, and then blowing it out of the water by releasing clear footage of Flight 77. Let's just call it a baited trap, it draws somebody into a situation in which they're compromised," said Farrell in describing the tactic of creating a honey pot. He agreed that we should expect to see clear footage of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon released soon. Farrell agreed that the DoD only released the tape because they wanted to for their own reasons. We have witnessed numerous times over the government claim national security in refusing to release evidence and they could have done the same in this instance yet they deliberately chose to relent and release the new tapes. Farrell (pictured) resolved to pursue a lawsuit against the FBI unless they released the 84 separate video tapes seized around the Pentagon on the day of 9/11 which are still being withheld. He expects the lawsuit to take around three months at which point the FBI would be compelled to release the tapes or claim national security in withholding them. "Three months is my guess, they'll let it go into the summer and once they're compelled through a lawsuit suddenly they'll break loose with a couple more," said Farrell. Farrell went as far as to suggest that upcoming Pentagon tapes would be used by the government for political points scoring in anticipation of the mid-term elections. "They want to present it in time for the elections, they want to get through the summer and once the summer is over three months down the road people start getting back into politics mode and elections come up that's when you'll see it dribble out." Many suspect Judicial Watch is being used as a conduit for the dissemination of carefully staged government propaganda. When the subject of Operation Northwoods was raised, Farrell became noticeably evasive and began to talk about government incompetence as if reading from a prepared script. We can't let them get away with this attempt at the diversion from the truths

US spells out plan to bomb Iran Ian Bruce / the Herald | May 17 2006 THE US is updating contingency plans for a non-nuclear strike to cripple Iran's atomic weapon programme if international diplomacy fails, Pentagon sources have confirmed. Strategists are understood to have presented two options for pinpoint strikes using B2 bombers flying directly from bases in Missouri, Guam in the Pacific and Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. RAF Fairford in Gloucester also has facilities for B2s but this has been ruled out because of the UK's opposition to military action against Tehran. The main plan calls for a rolling, five-day bombing campaign against 400 key targets in Iran, including 24 nuclear-related sites, 14 military airfields and radar installations, and Revolutionary Guard headquarters. At least 75 targets in underground complexes would be attacked with waves of bunker-buster bombs. Iranian radar networks and air defence bases would be struck by submarine-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles and then kept out of action by carrier aircraft flying from warships in the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf. The alternative to an all-out campaign is a demonstration strike against one or two high-profile targets such as the Natanz uranium enrichment facility or the hexafluoride gas plant at Isfahan. UK sources say contingency plans have also been drawn up to cope with the inevitable backlash against the Basra garrison in neighbouring Iraq.