GazeboflossUK

HAHA....Wow...When I heard the riff that Jonny plays on the chrous at the beginning on the Ashley Simpson track I fell about with laughter :laugh1:

The fact that you had to ask that question means there is something fundamentally wrong here.

^ ok, but that website is been proved to be inaccurate

Another retired general calls for Rumsfeld to resign Raw Story | April 13 2006 Another retired general is calling for Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to resign, according to a front page story set for Thursday's Washington Post, RAW STORY has found. Excerpts from the article written by Thomas E. Ricks: # The retired commander of key forces in Iraq called Wednesday for Donald Rumsfeld to step down, joining several other former top military commanders who have harshly criticized the secretary of defense's authoritarian style for making the military's job more difficult. "I think we need a fresh start" at the top of the Pentagon, retired Army Maj. Gen. John Batiste, who commanded the 1st Infantry Division in Iraq in 2004-05, said in an interview. "We need leadership up there that respects the military as they expect the military to respect them. And that leadership needs to understand teamwork." Batiste noted that many of his peers feel the same way. "It speaks volumes that guys like me are speaking out from retirement about the leadership climate in the Department of Defense," he said in another interview earlier Wednesday on CNN. Batiste's comments resonate especially within the Army because it is widely known there that he was offered a promotion to three-star rank to return to Iraq and be the No. 2 U.S. military officer there, but declined because he no longer wished to serve under Rumsfeld. Also, before going to Iraq, he worked at the highest level of the Pentagon, serving as the senior military assistant to Paul Wolfowitz, then the deputy secretary of defense. Batiste said that he believes the administration's handling of the Iraq war has violated fundamental military principles, such as unity of command and unity of effort. In other interviews, Batiste has said that he thinks that the violation of another military principle of ensuring there is an adequate number of forces helped create the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal by putting too much responsibility on incompetent officers and undertrained troops.

huh? Yes, yes...I said WWII never happened.....:huh: Where do you people spawn from.

Hmmm. ok ok ok. I get it.

Ok:)...yeah. thanks :) I hope people will take alot from these last few threads. I would also hope that alot of people will look at the alternative news sites I use alot and actually 'see' that these people are trying to do alot for everybody.....and that they aren't crazy people with far out theories. Alex Jones, (who I consider to be a true american patriot) and his websites are very, very useful as they draw on lots of news sorces and he and his crew work tirelessly to work out what's going on. They HAVE TO be very accurate and get all the details/quote/references correct to survive within the alternative media...as it's alot more strict on providing actual copies of evidence. So please people...use them and read about news that actually sometimes is covered by the mainstream media everyday but never discussed or questioned or referenced against contradictory reports. Actually, you can often find out about some events before they are national news. ok...that's it. Gareth.

Yep....I've been reading about it recently.

ok, well this is where we have to disagree....I believe (and not just flippantly, I honestly have came to this decision after first believing what the governments said) that the governments themselves were behind the attacks. Hey, it makes me sad and it makes me angry...but never the less....I'm 100% sticking with it.

government??? I never mentioned them in the original story.

Trust me...I'm not against AMERICA/AMERICANS in ANY way. I'm against the leaders of your country. And mine. there is a HUGE difference...:)

Ok, I hear you.... But please, please please....I beg....go and read up about it in detail.....because let me tell you there is absolutely MASSES amount of evidence, truly. This was an orchestraed attack, not only for war, oil and power over regions but to scare the public into giving away freedoms for the sake of so-called security. It's a copy of event's from all through history.

Well done. ***BUT....Glad you can see sense on the 9/11 issue. :wink:

you absolute braindead moron. Saying what you have just said seals your position as another brainwashed youth of America. I'm just glad everyone here isn't as socially challenged to make such comments. Idiot.

No, no, no..... Alex Jones is a man with a very deep knowledge of the situation and has massed such massive documentation on the suject. Alex is HUGELY popular and has very strong backing from tons of established and revered professionals. He's very well know but hardly ever aloud on mainstream news because of the possibilty he might get some of the truth out to people. He's not the only person who knows and has enlightened me to the ture nature of the currupt people who rule us........I have actually worked alot of thris stuff out for myself. I tell you what REALLY BOTHERS ME......that more people DON'T believe or even bother to read everything they can about this stuff. THAT WHAT BOTHERS ME.

Oh, right...ok. :confused: And when has detailed research had it's meaning changed 'ignorant beliefs'?? OH, Actually I know...The Patriot Act. Idiot.

I see :)

If we use what you believe is the truth (Ahem) and that Osama from a cave is behind the horrible deaths of more than 3000+ people in a blaze of fire... Then...I hope she comes back with a big 'Fuck You' for the above comment you made... I'm not saying it but if she does say it....you deserve it. (based on what you think happened)

Drugs companies 'inventing diseases to boost their profits' By Mark Henderson, Science Correspondent London Times | April 11, 2006 PHARMACEUTICAL companies are systematically creating diseases in order to sell more of their products, turning healthy people into patients and placing many at risk of harm, a special edition of a leading medical journal claims today. The practice of “diseasemongering” by the drug industry is promoting non-existent illnesses or exaggerating minor ones for the sake of profits, according to a set of essays published by the open-access journal Public Library of Science Medicine. The special issue, edited by David Henry, of Newcastle University in Australia, and Ray Moynihan, an Australian journalist, reports that conditions such as female sexual dysfunction, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and “restless legs syndrome” have been promoted by companies hoping to sell more of their drugs. Other minor problems that are a normal part of life, such as symptoms of the menopause, are also becoming increasingly “medicalised”, while risk factors such as high cholesterol levels or osteoporosis are being presented as diseases in their own right, according to the editors. “Disease-mongering turns healthy people into patients, wastes precious resources and causes iatrogenic (medically induced) harm,” they say. “Like the marketing strategies that drive it, disease-mongering poses a global challenge to those interested in public health, demanding in turn a global response.” Doctors, patients and support groups need to be more aware that pharmaceutical companies are taking this approach, and more research is needed into the changing ways in which conditions are presented, according to the writers. Disease-awareness campaigns are often funded by drug companies, and “more often designed to sell drugs than to illuminate or inform or educate about the prevention of illness or the maintenance of health”, they say. Particular conditions that are highlighted in the journal include sexual function in both men and women. The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction, one paper claims, has been highly exaggerated to provide a new market for drugs, while the makers of anti-impotence medicines, such as Viagra and Cialis, have been involved with their presentation as lifestyle drugs that can boost the sexual prowess of healthy men. Ordinary shyness is routinely presented as a social anxiety disorder and treated with antidepressants, while newly identified conditions such as “restless legs syndrome” — a constant urge to move one’s legs — are presented as being much more common than they really are. Richard Ley, of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, rejected the accusations, pointing out that Britain has firm safeguards against disease-mongering. Many of the authors’ criticisms, he said, were aimed squarely at countries such as the United States, where pharmaceuticals can be openly advertised directly to patients. “Drug companies are not allowed to communicate directly with patients, and we do not invent diseases,” he said. “We provide information that there are treatments out there that might help certain conditions, but at the end of the day it is down to health professionals to decide if they are appropriate. “The best safeguard is that the doctor who knows the product and knows the patient’s history is the one who decides what to prescribe.” TRICK OR TREAT? MENOPAUSE Symptoms include hot flushes, night sweats and loss of libido Criticism too often “medicalised” as part of a “disorder” when it is a normal phase of life IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME Symptoms include constipation, cramps and diarrhoea Criticism promoted by drug companies as a serious illness needing therapy, when it is usually a mild problem SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION Symptoms impotence in men, lack of libido or difficulty becoming aroused in women Criticism drugs such as Viagra marketed not only for treating genuine erectile dysfunction caused by medical problems but as lifestyle improvers OSTEOPOROSIS Symptoms thinning of the bones, particularly among postmenopausal women Criticism portrayed as a disease in its own right, when it is really a risk factor for broken bones RESTLESS LEGS Symptoms urge to move legs because of unpleasant feelings, often at night Criticism prevalence of a relatively rare condition exaggerated by the media, along with the need for treatment

Great. Yeah...it is full on... It introduces some evidence about Flight 93 that I didn't think of too. ...but I think there are some other documentries which show even more reasons to be worried... 9/11: Martial Law - The Rise of The Police State (Very Good) 9/11: The Road to Tyranny (older than the above one but still really worth it) Both of these are by Alex Jones and then reason I like them is because they always link the presented information to news articles and video footage. Anyway...you can probably watch them on google video too. (http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Alex+Jones) oh and Alex Jones warns about the attacks before they happen

This seemed like the best thread to put it in with making another..... Iran Could Produce Nuclear Bomb in 16 Days, U.S. Says Bloomberg | April 13 2006 Flashback: Iran Is Judged 10 Years From Nuclear Bomb Iran, which is defying United Nations Security Council demands to cease its nuclear program, may be capable of making a nuclear bomb within 16 days if it goes ahead with plans to install thousands of centrifuges at its Natanz plant, a U.S. State Department official said. ``Natanz was constructed to house 50,000 centrifuges,'' Stephen Rademaker, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation, told reporters today in Moscow. ``Using those 50,000 centrifuges they could produce enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon in 16 days.'' In fact, Iran will move forward to ``industrial scale'' uranium enrichment involving 54,000 centrifuges at Natanz, the Associated Press quoted deputy nuclear chief Mohammad Saeedi as telling state-run television today. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said yesterday the country had succeeded in enriching uranium on a small scale for the first time, using 164 centrifuges. That announcement defies demands by the UN Security Council that Iran shut down its nuclear program this month. The U.S. and other countries fear Iran is pursuing a nuclear program to make weapons, while Iran says it is intent on purely civilian purposes, to provide energy. Saeedi said 54,000 centrifuges will be able to enrich uranium to provide fuel for a 1,000-megawat nuclear power plant similar to the one Russia is finishing in southern Iran, AP reported. ``It was a deeply disappointing announcement,'' Rademaker said of Ahmadinejad's statement. Weapons-Grade Uranium Rademaker said the technology to enrich uranium to a low level could also be used to make weapons-grade uranium, saying that it would take a little over 13 years to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon with the 164 centrifuges currently in use. The process involves placing uranium hexafluoride gas in a series of rotating drums or cylinders known as centrifuges that run at high speeds to extract weapons grade uranium. Iran has informed the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency that it plans to construct 3,000 centrifuges at Natanz next year, Rademaker said. ``We calculate that a 3,000-machine cascade could produce enough uranium to build a nuclear weapon within 271 days,'' he said. While the U.S. has concerns over Iran's nuclear program, Rademaker said ``there certainly has been no decision on the part of my government'' to use force if Iran refuses to obey the UN Security Council demand that it shuts down its nuclear program. Rademaker is in Moscow for a meeting of his counterparts from the Group of Eight wealthy industrialized countries. Russia chairs the G-8 this year.

You are joking. YOU think it's free??? IT becomes less free every day....It's becoming a police state. YOU need to get out and look around at really how free it is. (or is not, as the case may be)

got that right.

HAHA. Seriously? They are the inside joke of the news world. Straight up. Rupert Murdoch is a terrible human being.

The american mainstream media is all very racist and very selective about what they show. I think FOX News is their leader.