GazeboflossUK

Excerpts from a documentry. ht_tp://d53.yousendit.com/D/0C4JAJR1UB4DO1MPN1P3Z8JQAB/9-11%20Doc.%20Excerpts.wmv Change ht_tp to http

Don't tell me I have mis-directed anger and that I'm a theorist who believes in whacky things like roswell and aliens... Don't even compare the two. God, that's ignorance. You say there is no evidence??? Ok. Believe what you believe.

ok, ok. I'm feeling for you, I really am. But I'm really just as upset. Honestly. It's not about Americans...it's about evrybody who believes in a free world. It's a nightmare scenario, it truly is. If more people don't wake up to what's going on then we really are going to suffer and suffer big. I see what happened and what is happening around the world and it keeps me awake at night. The world is in the hands of a cult of evil. And more people need to go and find this out.

Not theories. Most people laugh because it's what the president tells people to do. He calls them all crazy "theories" and everyone follows suit. And that $20 note thing is just odd....I'm not saying it's meaning anything. Just an obsevation.

Nobody can ever support these evil people. They lie, people die....and they love it. Impeach them all. Listen the lie that killed 1000's I have actually given up on listening to the other side of things now. Because it's all bull...pure steaming bull. Bush and his admin. are hell bent on evil acts because it's what they believe in and it's what gets them off. They love it. How can Bush have the sick minded thought to joke about it??? it's because he loves what he has done.

WATCH THIS 9/11 - Martial Law - The Rise Of The Police State Shows what you should be worried about.

The currupt cult that is controlling America love to have little "In-Jokes" and display things in public view for their own amusement. $20 Bill folded into a paper plane... Pentagon on fire?? Twin Towers? What are the odds that a simple geometric folding of the $20 bill would accidentally contain a representation of both terror attacks? COINCIDENCE? YOU DECIDE! What are the odds that a simple geometric folding of the $20 bill would accidentally contain a representation of both terror attacks? COINCIDENCE? YOU DECIDE!

YEAH..jesus..I know....:rolleyes: some people have short memories. It's all the same people, the government now is all part of the same cult. They love death. And anyway, they ARE thinking about using nuclear weapons. Tactical nuclear weapons...or "Bunker Busters" as they have been talked about. They have been talked about alot and are said to cause minimum civilian casualties. The “bunker buster” is a cute sounding name for a nuclear horror. Air bursts are horrible enough, doing incredible destruction through heat, shock and high initial radiation.

Yeah, that is true. 2nd only to Saudi Arabia. A huge amount of tar sands that can be made into Oil...giving Canada the world's second-largest oil reserves, taking into account these Alberta oil sands previously thought too expensive to develop - now are considered recoverable with existing technology.

Yeah, watch and read :) It's really worth it.

I was reading this and I couldn't stop thinking about how on earth they are going to get support for another military strike?? It's going to be quite a hard job trying to convince people that it's a good idea. US considers use of nuclear weapons against Iran report AFP | April 8 2006 The administration of President George W. Bush is planning a massive bombing campaign against Iran, including use of bunker-buster nuclear bombs to destroy a key Iranian suspected nuclear weapons facility, The New Yorker magazine reported in its April 17 issue. The article by investigative journalist Seymour Hersh said that Bush and others in the White House have come to view Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a potential Adolf Hitler. "That's the name they're using," the report quoted a former senior intelligence official as saying. A senior unnamed Pentagon adviser is quoted in the article as saying that "this White House believes that the only way to solve the problem is to change the power structure in Iran, and that means war." The former intelligence officials depicts planning as "enormous," "hectic" and "operational," Hersh writes. One former defense official said the military planning was premised on a belief that "a sustained bombing campaign in Iran will humiliate the religious leadership and lead the public to rise up and overthrow the government," The New Yorker pointed out. In recent weeks, the president has quietly initiated a series of talks on plans for Iran with a few key senators and members of the House of Representatives, including at least one Democrat, the report said. One of the options under consideration involves the possible use of a bunker-buster tactical nuclear weapon, such as the B61-11, to insure the destruction of Iran's main centrifuge plant at Natanz, Hersh writes. But the former senior intelligence official said the attention given to the nuclear option has created serious misgivings inside the military, and some officers have talked about resigning after an attempt to remove the nuclear option from the evolving war plans in Iran failed, according to the report. "There are very strong sentiments within the military against brandishing nuclear weapons against other countries," the magazine quotes the Pentagon adviser as saying. The adviser warned that bombing Iran could provoke "a chain reaction" of attacks on American facilities and citizens throughout the world and might also reignite Hezbollah. "If we go, the southern half of Iraq will light up like a candle," the adviser is quoted as telling The New Yorker.

:)I'M HOPING FOR LOTS OF PEOPLE TO VOTE ON THIS ONE SO PLEASE DO:) The event's of 9/11/2001 were a self inflicted wound, an inside job by the government which was used to rally public support for a "war against terror" in middle eastern sovereign nations?? ....or do you believe to the "official" report as claimed by the Bush administration? I am not someone who believes in the Yeti, Bigfoot, Aliens and similar tales - you've got the wrong guy for that. Such legends & tales are used by certain people to set up 'Straw Man' arguments because they really can't fight against this on the facts, dispite what they will say. This 9/11 stuff is very important....we've caught the government with their pants down here....there's blood on their hands...and I know lot's of people who don't want this to be true call people like me 'crazy, whacky theorists who have no common sense and are shifting the blame'..... ......and that is just complete crap, complete blindness and an unwillingness to actually do anything about this truly serious situation that is just going to get worse and worse over the next few years. This current US President made it his number one goal after the events of that awful day to tell people "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists"......and too many people have taken that command and now don't even care that their government is starting to take away their basic freedoms and rights.......I'm just absolutley petrified that when the next "fake attack" on the U.S or their interests occurs....people will buy it...hook line and sinker.....and gladly hand 'complete' control over to a leader (whoever it is) who will BE the law....who will be able to DO or SAY anything and cover it all in a wash of "It's to protect the lives and values of the American people". You hear this phrase from government all the time right? I know.....getting away with, quite literally, murder. That's a dictatorship building right there...and we can't let these evil money men hold us to ransom all longer because they WILL take the world from us completely. The truth is scary and offensive to some but it must be addressed. If you haven't read the information that points a big fat finger towards a major government cover-up then please look towards the links below and read about the events in a way that has never been fairly covered by the corporate mainstream media and is often said to be proved wrong.....they wish they could prove it wrong.....they can only get away with their lies for so long. More people are putting all the pieces together and realising that the 'offical' story is impossible. Poll figures (covered in many polls throughout this thread) show that more than 80% of people do not believe the governments version of events. MORE THAN 80%!!! That was a scientific poll too from Oct 2006. So, again....please read as much info as you can. A prediction of the attack 2 months before 9/11 ***An Amazing 9/11 Timeline by Phil Thompson HERE For loads of documented info in one of these huge investigation archives... ***READ - 9/11 Info Archive ***READ - http://911research.wtc7.net/ ***READ - OPERATION NORTHWOODS - A 1962 GOVERNMENT 'PLAN' TO CARRY OUT FAKE TERROR ATTACKS (Including Use of Hijacked planes) ***READ - NORTHWOODS document in PDF HERE ***READ - PNAC's Rebuilding Americas Defenses in PDF form. The Project For A New American Century document written by leading members of the Bush Administration BEFORE they came to power. It outlines the need for a massive Pearl Harbor type event to justify war in Iraq, the Middle East and total domination of the world. Read it HERE ***WATCH - Alex Jones warns about the attacks before they happen ***Important Historical Events previous to 9/11... ***LOTS OF RESEARCH SITES!! ***Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? - A very good paper on this issue to read (PDF) ***9/11 Mysteries - Part 1 - Controlled Demolition (The RECUT) http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-8129564295534231536&q=911+Mysteries This is an amazing video. ***Martial Law Extract WMV VERSION (QUICKTIME VERSION) ***World Trade 1 & 2 Center Demolished. (WMV Clip from 'LOOSE CHANGE' Documentry) ***Original news and amature Footage from the day.... Link to pictures that compare actual building collapse to controlled demolition ***http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/060705compareandcontrast.htm Transportation Secretary on 9/11 Norman Mineta tells the truth. By the way, this was cut on TV and omitted from the 9/11 Commission Report http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y 9/11: Press For Truth Fantastic documentary angled from the viewpoint of victims families as they struggle against lies and deceit from the Bush Administration. It does a great job of showing how really scarily obvious their cover-up is if you just pay some God Damn attention. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3979568779414136481&q=9%2F11%3A+Press+For+Truth **Also, take nothing here at face value. Research this information yourselves and come to your own conclusions :)**

^^^you've been doing your reseach too, reading and watching the same things as I, very good :)

Yeah, I've seen that site......I know, it's absolutly absurd he still is "commander and chief" of the most powerful country in the world. I mean, there's plenty of areas from which the opposition could attack him and his administration but they are too pretty incompetent. So it's left up to alot people who who aren't in government or part of a political party to make all of this stuff clear....and what do we get labelled -radicalist "extremists" or some other type of name that makes us out to be "crackpots". We have to put up with constant lying from the prime minister and the rest of the government here in the UK too. Now we can't even demonstrate.

Another good read... Leaking, Lying and Burning Covert Agents from the Oval Office: The Impeachment Clock Just Clicked Forward DAVE LINDORFF | April 8 2006 The national impeachment clock moved several minutes closer to midnight this week, with word from special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's Plamegate investigation that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's leaking of classified information to New York Times reporter Judy Miller and other journalists was approved by President George Bush himself. What makes this latest revelation important is that if Libby's claim is correct, it means the president has lied about his role, both to Fitzgerald's federal investigators, and to the American people. The former act--lying to a federal agent--could be a federal crime even though the president was not under oath. The latter--lying to the American people--was voted out of the House Judiciary Committee as an impeachable offense in the case of President Richard Nixon, and was one of the counts approved by the full House of Representatives against President Bill Clinton. While not a statutory crime, Congress has long held that lying to the public can be a "high crime" meriting of impeachment under the Constitution. Jason Leopold, in an April 6 report for Truthout, says Fitzgerald, in a filing before the federal court hearing the Libby perjury and obstruction of justice case, claimed to have evidence, in the form of recently obtained White House email messages, that Bush was at a minimum receiving reports on a White House campaign to undermine former ambassador Joseph Wilson, who had exposed the president's public lie concerning supposed efforts by Saddam Hussein to buy uranium ore from the African state of Niger. Again we are looking at multiple impeachable offenses here. If the president was involved in a campaign to selectively release classified CIA information to punish a critic, and particularly to "out" an undercover CIA operative, it would be a serious abuse of power--an impeachable offense. Bush publicly denied having any knowledge of the source of the leaks of classified CIA information or of the leak of Wilson's wife Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA undercover employee. He apparently also denied having such knowledge to interviewers from Fitzgerald's office. If he was lying, again it is an impeachable offense. Also moving the impeachment clock forward is word that the president's public approval, already in the ditch, has sunk even further, with an AP/Ipsos poll this week reporting that only 36 percent now give the president a favorable rating. The president's strongest backers are still claiming that Bush's alleged transgressions aren't serious. Unlike Clinton, they say, he hasn't "lied under oath." They forget that impeachable crimes are not the same thing as statutory crimes. The Founders made it clear that impeachment is about "political" crimes, not simple felonies. Certainly lying under oath is a serious matter, whether the prevaricator is an average citizen or a president. But from the Constitutional perspective, unsworn lying by a president, if it is about an important matter before the Congress, or to the American people--for example lying about the reasons for sending Americans to war--is a far more serious offense than simply lying about, say, an adulterous tryst, even if that lie is under oath. The same can be said about a president's lying to cover up a serious impeachable offense such as abuse of power or conspiracy--whether or not that lie was under oath. All of which means that we have moved another step towards the possibility that this president will face an impeachment proceeding. As the president's growing string of lies, abuses of power and other high crimes and misdemeanors keep coming to light, and as his standing with the American public continues to sink, the odds of Democrats regaining control of the House of Representatives this November keep rising. With them, the likelihood that a new Democratic Party-led Judiciary Committee will be presented with a bill of impeachment following Election Day grows apace. The clock is ticking. It needs to happen soon.

Good artical here....I can't see how anybody can last this long.. Last Hope For Impeachment If Democrats don't do it now they are clearly complicit Today's White House admission that George W. Bush authorized the leak of, and let's not beat around the bush and call it an 'intelligence report' like the yellow bellies at Reuters, the name of CIA agent Valerie Plame as a political stunt in retaliation for Joe Wilson's refusal to be the snake oil salesman for their rigged war, is the final nail in the coffin proving we have a dictatorship in Washington. Dictatorships are not always defined by funny hand salutes and gas chambers. The dictionary definition mentions neither, but it does mention "absolute or despotic control or power." Is a President who argues he can do anything even if it breaks the law, and an entire cabinet who agree, exercising absolute power? Is somebody who is above the law and whose advisors and cabinet members write memos stating he is above the law exercising absolute power? How about totalitarianism? Definition: "a form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator (not restricted by a constitution or laws or opposition)." Alberto Gonzales again put George Bush above the law today when he indicated that the administration could outright (not that they haven't been doing so in secret for decades) authorize wiretaps of domestic American citizen's phone calls without a warrant. This is a clear violation of the 4th amendment to the US Constitution. Bush's own advisor John Yoo is on the public record as arguing that no law could prevent the President from ordering children to be tortured by means of crushing their genitals. No, this isn't the Frist fake Fox News hoax - that was his actual argument in a December 1st debate in Chicago with Notre Dame professor and international human rights scholar Doug Cassel. Bush's Commander in Chief designation gives him the right to resort to anything, including mass genocide, if it is done in the name of protecting the American people, according to the White House. It doesn't matter if it is unconstitutional. Is this being unrestricted by laws or opposition? If the answer is yes then we are living under totalitarianism by its very definition "If anyone in this administration was involved in it (the CIA leak), they would no longer be in this administration." White House spokesman Scott McClellan, September 29 2003. By the White House's own admission Bush should immediately be removed from the Oval Office. If Bush started dropping babies out of Air Force One for fun would this be grounds for impeachment? Neo-cons and fake conservatives will continue to defend Bush to the hilt whatever he does because their childish egos are already invested in his every word and action. The invasion of the body snatchers scenario has already passed and Bush's remaining 30 odd per cent of support is likely to remain until the bitter end. If Democrats don't initiate impeachment proceedings immediately then we know without a doubt that they are complicit and have already been promised huge kickbacks in the next two elections for keeping their noses out. The handful of truly independent thinking Congressmen and Senators such as Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo need to be the ones to get the impeachment ball rolling, if only to expose the Democrats for the collaborators they are.

Just stop.

ok. i'm not wasting any more of my time talking to you. Someone else please?? :( :sick:

It's actually based on the things you say, or things you try to say. That fact that you are a mindless, pathetic, drone to your government - just how they like you. The more you write...the more we see that you truly are very blind and ignorant. And here you are again with "reality and common sense" bullshit. Your never going to make anyone believe that I'm devoid of a grasp on what is real.....so please stop. Hey, I believed what your president told us.....but then I quickly was able to find out for myself that it's NOT TRUE. It's just taking you ALOT longer. Anyway...this thread is about the IMPEACHMENT OF BUSH....not about YOU. SO...lets get back to that....

You always just come and Paste a big section of text which I doubt you really have read and compared it against information that really renders the "official story" inaccurate. And your "Lets us Common Sense and Logic" contribution..??.?? I mean come on...lets use Logic?? I am using more than just logic and comon sense. BUILDINGS THAT FALL DOWN LIKE THAT DON'T CRUMBLE TO THE FLOOR IN VERTICAL LINE!! screw it anyway....I'm sick of talking to you about it. Clearly you will never even consider anything else....other than what you are told by your government - who went to war and destroyed country (or two) to find WMD that could attack the US - killing and destroying lives - only to realise that there were no WMD. But no you are right....the offical 9/11 story couldn't possibly be a lie.......when are you going to work it out for yourself?? probably in a couple of years yet.

And down they go.. World Trade 1 & 2 Center Demolished. (WMV Clip) Looks even more clear in DVD quality. Now when I watch all the original video's I have of the buildings falling...all I notice is the explosions that occur far below the falling section. Here's a load of WTC Impact and Falling Video > http://www.areadownload.com/video/wtc.htm

No, no...please. No O.C Chat.....:(

I bet after everything you say you do this > I just imagine you do. Your living in a glossy, sugarcoated world - AKA 'The O.C'

Stop saying "whacky theories".

^^What? It's sounds like GW Bush has been giving you lessons... You sound way out of your depth in every comment you make. You don't know how to respond to anything in an intelligent way....you can only mess around with pointless word play. What you have just said means nothing and adds nothing to your "thin" argument. Nobody can ever take you seriously.