I support your and everyone´s right to discuss this. As I previously wrote, a lot of private matters get discussed in this forum anyway, so why making all the fuss about some dough? :)

 

Thank you. :] And that's what I'm saying. It's not a major-deal. I was just wondering is all.

Not really. I mean, why should what anyone makes be private? Everyone here in the US has to disclose it to the government anyway. I'm sure they do the same thing in England so what's the difference? Privatization just messes up things anyway. Ah how I long for a socialist state. ~

 

And it might just be the performance shares. i'm not sure, but that's why I asked. I don't see how what I did was so wrong. It's not like I made another tracklist thread or something talking about the JS lawsuit. I'm just curious is all. I know Coldplay's not about money. But they SAID sometime back they share it equally. And I for one find that both humble and brillant. If that's not the case anymore, it has negative implications for my ideological point of view regarding them outside their music. So it matters.

 

I completely agree. I love the democratic kinda-socialist way they share everything equally. Or at least that's what they say. Even though I think it's not really our business, I'd like to hear that they at least do what they said several times and share equally.

Not really. I mean, why should what anyone makes be private? Everyone here in the US has to disclose it to the government anyway. I'm sure they do the same thing in England so what's the difference? Privatization just messes up things anyway. Ah how I long for a socialist state. ~

 

And it might just be the performance shares. i'm not sure, but that's why I asked. I don't see how what I did was so wrong. It's not like I made another tracklist thread or something talking about the JS lawsuit. I'm just curious is all. I know Coldplay's not about money. But they SAID sometime back they share it equally. And I for one find that both humble and brillant. If that's not the case anymore, it has negative implications for my ideological point of view regarding them outside their music. So it matters.

 

 

I just think that it is their own damn thing what they do with their money and how they share it. It's their money after all, and I find it a bit rude to ask what they do with it. I understand that it ruins your ideological point of view, obviously, but you don't know them personally and I am sure not everything is perfect in their little world. It's just that we don't know everything and that is normal, that's all. It's private.

Interesting how some people perceive money as a private thing. I really don´t think it´s more personal that someone´s feelings or opinions. So if anyone is interested in how they share their earnings, do ask the Oracle. After all the band already disclosed this information publicly in the past and that is why this thread was created after all as the new info does not match what they previously said. Anyway, I would be curious to hear what the Oracle says, should she wish to comment on this.