Hey Amanda :D :P Are you not going skiing today or am I going crazeee??? :idea2: :lol:

 

yay i got attention! haha i should bounce around more often. :lol:

 

hehe no you're going crazy :P

 

 

hehe no, i went skiing yesterday :D :)

How was skiing Amanda ?

great!! :D

 

you can all check my thread for details. :lol: :P

well it was great except for the time problems.

 

but the skiing part was great :P

U2!!!!!!!!! COME ON THE IRISH!!!!!!

:D :D :D

 

you really cant compare one band to another, both bands differ, diferent styles.

:lol: Hey Carla!!! How are you?? wow it's been ages since I've chatted with you :P

 

I'M VERY GOOD (JUST STRUGGLING TO MAKE THIS PAGE WORK PROPERLY! :angry:) HOW ARE YOU? AND YES, IT HAS! :rolleyes: :lol:

there are two ways to look at this:

 

1. contributions to music in general- U2 has been a household name for 20 years now. they had a sound that was theirs and theirs alone... coldplay have released two albums, one of which isn't that great, and neither of which are particularly original (which isn't to say they aren't good, but it's not the stuff of legend)... unless they get a HELL of a lot better than they are, they'll never come remotely close to being the next U2. hell, have you actually listened to "moses?" that song couldn't rip off U2 more if it tried. chris martin even seems more and more like a poor man's bono, both in terms of stage presence and political awareness.

2. popularity - in this regard, coldplay already are the next U2, or close to it. but i would doubt if they're as big in 2024 as they are in 2004, whereas U2 will probably still be doing some ridiculous rolling stones style tour with two or three original members and all the songs transposed down because bono's voice can't hit the high notes anymore.

 

that's my rant on that.

:lol: :lol: :lol: IT SEEMS YOU WERE THE ONLY ONE TAKING THE QUESTION SERIOUSLY! :lol:

so either i'm a moron or everybody else is a moron.

 

probably both. :lol:

:lol: :lol: ME NO MORON! YOU DEDUCE THE OTHER! :lol:

1. contributions to music in general- U2 has been a household name for 20 years now. they had a sound that was theirs and theirs alone... coldplay have released two albums, one of which isn't that great, and neither of which are particularly original (which isn't to say they aren't good, but it's not the stuff of legend)... unless they get a HELL of a lot better than they are, they'll never come remotely close to being the next U2. hell, have you actually listened to "moses?" that song couldn't rip off U2 more if it tried. chris martin even seems more and more like a poor man's bono, both in terms of stage presence and political awareness.

 

Agreed.

ANOTHER WHICH IS EITHER A MORON OR..... WELL THERE'S NO OTHER OPTION! :D

Stop spamming.

I hope they never become like U2 i can't stand U2 :confused:

AH, NO! YOU MESS UP WITH U2 AND YOU MESS UP WITH EVERYONE HERE! :D

................. whereas U2 will probably still be doing some ridiculous rolling stones style tour with two or three original members and all the songs transposed down because bono's voice can't hit the high notes anymore........

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol: