Professor Peedston

i would love to go, but you know, i'm not rich. it seems like half of the bands in my record collection that still exist are playing there. dear lord they even got kraftwerk! GAH!

let's see... well last week i bought me some: Tortoise - It's All Around You (cd) Broadcast - Work and Non-Work (vinyl) Stevie Wonder - Fulfillingness' First Finale (vinyl)

Sigur Ros - "Ti Ki"

actually i cheated on a girlfriend once, too. ok, maybe a few times... then i found out she'd been cheating on me too, and then i ended up dating the girl i cheated with for two years anyway... so everything turned out ok, i guess. :lol: let's see... i also threw sand in a kid's eyes when i was in pre-school. *shrugs*

yeah, and i think that's incredibly dumb. we either need an equivalent term for males, or we (society in general) need to stop holding females to such ridiculous and hypocritical standards. i'd prefer the latter, obviously. :lol: and i do the same thing as you, i don't just go up to any random girl who looks like she's not "with" somebody.

maybe this is the year for revenge... i'm bracing for robert esche's inevitable collapse in net, though. it would be the only appropriate thing to do for a flyers goaltender.

George Gershwin - "Rhapsody in Blue"

Labradford - "Twenty"

yeah, the only reason it's funny is because the guy has such a dead on impersonation of james hetfield.

i guess if anybody here would know it would be the south american. :D (carla)

our society has some incredibly stupid and arbitrary "laws," and one of them is that a girl can't approach a guy. maybe that was fine 600 years ago when "chivalry" was the word of the day, but for all the "gender equality" stuff we've been trying to strive for, it seems odd that it's ok for a woman to make the same pay, have the same job, vote, etc., etc. (and i know it's technically still not equal in a lot of regards), but she's not allowed to ask out a guy, because that would make her a slut. maybe i'm just bitter because i'm so shy and have a tough time meeting people. :rolleyes: i think that was kind of off-topic but oh well.

yeah, that's one thing he does that i hate, the accusatory and pointless interview. as if he was somehow expecting the policeman to say "well, despite the fact that i'm not properly equipped, trained, or even employed to handle anything other than street crime, i think you've got a point, let's go arrest every person who owns a car with an internal combustion engine." and of course, moore actually has a point. smog IS a problem in major US cities. but wouldn't his and our time be better spent if he'd gone to city hall or tried to interview somebody at the EPA, rather than going up to some LAPD member and acting like it's his fault?

The only limit is YOURSELF at coldplaying com...

Boards of Canada - "The Devil is in the Details"

i'd like to say something rude about detroit, but it's pointless when you've got that stanley cup finals sweep in 1997 to throw in my face. :rolleyes:

hello once again everybody. we'll keep this thread near the top in case somebody is angry at me so they can remind me that i'm nothing more than a harmless idiot. :lol:

haha i love that site. "The unattainable is unkown at zombo com!"

that's funny, i'd always just assumed that chocolate and all that came about when marketers started having a tough time selling resurrection-related merchandise. :P

http://www.beatallica.com A heavy metal band who sound EXACTLY like Metallica playing a bunch of Beatles songs and making clever lyric changes. Yeah I know, it's stupid, but it's pretty funny for the first 30 seconds or so. :P

i had to re-evaluate my opinion of nirvana when i realized that if nirvana hadn't existed we wouldn't have to put up with garbage like nickelback or puddle of mud. :P

THE MAN THE MAN PART 2 and of course, the sentimental favorite for any philadelphian. ;)

who's the man? that's who. he's beating the best (martin brodeur) at his own game, you can't argue with that. :D maybe bob clarke should have traded roman cechmanek sooner. :rolleyes:

michael moore is a terrible journalist. anything he does is so obviously biased that it can't possibly be a fair representation of how things actually are. he's nothing more than the left-wing version of a bill o'reilly or rush limbaugh. i do, however, agree with most of his underlying points, i just think it's a shame that he tries to prove them in such a terribly ineffective manner. a more intelligent filmmaker could easily make the same statements michael moore makes much more effectively simply by presenting the facts as they are, no bias. about marilyn manson: he's way too intelligent to be making such idiotic "offensive for the sake of being offensive" crap. maybe him and michael moore should switch places. :lol:

i want you i want you so baaaaaaaaaaaad i want yoooouuuuuu i want you so baaaaad it's driving me crazy driving me mad...