GazeboflossUK

Plus his spelling of governments was wrong all times :p

;) hehe...It's cool huh.

Oh dear. Your not knowing of what is happening doesn't help the way you answer. :laugh1: It's doesn't matter if "people are too different"...everything is controlled by the same people. Everything. And you can live with the world going down the toilet. Become a "slave"....your already half way there.

You do understand that what it's says happened in his post is a mistake......but I would expect nothing less from you than an inability to read properly.

I don't think she was meaning that..

I know...The E.U the U.N are all currupt. Plus...again you seem ok with it. This is the plan for a one world government attempting to come together man. Get with the program...:rolleyes:

haha...."aaalways makes a five!" :) I think you might have been in some sort of youth camp for writing that...lol

U.S. Plan For Flu Pandemic Revealed Multi-Agency Proposal Awaits Bush's Approval Big Article here Official PandemicFLU website here http://www.pandemicflu.gov/ (you'll never forget that site :rolleyes:)

Yeah, :cool: I was reading what it was about a while ago. You see....Major players in Holywood are now on our side. Lot's of them are going to either come forward with 'public' support and others with movies like this. They are attempts to wake people up to what's actually happening today. I'll try and see it asap....I might go on wednesday.

It's another crime that goes on the huge pile of horse shit. 1.9 million students aren’t being counted, Minorities are seven times as likely to have their scores excluded as whites, the analysis showed. They can get away with it even when it's fact, even when it's widely reported. Everyone can't be in a coma??

Oh really...:pleased: yes, I haven't seen it but I have been advised to go and check it out. Now I have to. ;)

enough is enough ^What you said........ Yes. It does need to be done. It's the most important thing I think I have ever known and it's not as if you can persude these cretins to just be nice and good....they are FAR, FAR too deep into the whole thing to even care. They need to be shown up for their absolute blatent lies and crimes which shocking enough are mostly free for anybody to see....but do some people care at all?? no.....it's absolutely deflating. And it's the UK too. Our leaders are just as willing to cut out our freedoms whenever possible - everyones in on the big joke and we have been laughed at far too long now and enough is enough.

No. They blamed Al Queda (who are a CIA controlled outfit) THEN attacked Afghanistan not Iraq. People are always forgetting the Afghanistan fiasco. The US [and it's allies] have basically silenced Afghanistan now and taken over all the poppy fields, CIA is shipping and selling the opium in America. Oh..and don't forget control of those Oil Pipelines..... Attacking your own country in such a hurtful way is tried and tested means to get a political agenda through...in this case (9/11) it's to scare the American people as well as some clueless politicians into voting for & willfully giving up freedoms for the sake of so-called security. This security is all imposed under the guise of The Patriot act - which basically is eating away at all the basic rights - and the more attacked and scared America feels then the more amendments the Patriot Act will have until the county gives all it's power over to it's fuhrer, it's leader (whoever is president) and he can bascially be above the law while the military run the streets. A Dictatorship. It's starting to happen even now....and it's a bad time. We need to stop it....I don't want to see it happen to every free nation.

haha :)

U.S.: Rumsfeld Potentially Liable for Torture Reuters | April 17 2006 Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld could be criminally liable for the torture of a detainee at Guantanamo Bay in late 2002 and early 2003, Human Rights Watch said today. A December 20, 2005 Army Inspector General's report, obtained by Salon.com this week, contains a sworn statement by Lt. Gen. Randall M. Schmidt that implicates Secretary Rumsfeld in the abuse of detainee Mohammad al-Qahtani. Based on an investigation that he carried out in early 2005, which included two interviews with Rumsfeld, Gen. Schmidt describes the defense secretary as being "personally involved" in al-Qahtani's interrogation. Human Rights Watch urges the United States to name a special prosecutor to investigate the culpability of Rumsfeld and others in the al-Qahtani case. "The question at this point is not whether Secretary Rumsfeld should resign, it's whether he should be indicted," said Joanne Mariner, Terrorism and Counterterrorism Program director at Human Rights Watch. "General Schmidt's sworn statement suggests that Rumsfeld may have been perfectly aware of the abuses inflicted on al-Qahtani." Gen. Schmidt said that Secretary Rumsfeld was "talking weekly" with Gen. Miller about the al-Qahtani interrogation, and that the secretary of defense was "personally involved in the interrogation of [this] one person." Schmidt's statement indicates that Rumsfeld maintained a high level of knowledge of and supervision over al-Qahtani's treatment. Although Schmidt said that he believed that Rumsfeld did not specifically order the more abusive methods used in the al-Qahtani interrogation, he concluded that Rumsfeld's policies facilitated the abuse. The Pentagon has acknowledged that al-Qahtani's mistreatment was not unplanned. "Al-Kahtani's interrogation was guided by a very detailed plan, conducted by trained professionals in a controlled environment, and with active supervision and oversight," wrote Jeffrey Gordon, a Pentagon spokesman, in an email to Salon.com. "Nothing was done randomly." Human Rights Watch has obtained an unredacted copy of al-Qahtani's interrogation log, and believes that the techniques used during al-Qahtani's interrogation were so abusive that they amounted to torture. The interrogation log reveals that al-Qahtani was subjected to a regime of physical and mental mistreatment from mid-November 2002 to early January 2003. For six weeks, he was intentionally deprived of sleep, forced into painful physical positions (known as stress positions) and subjected to forced exercises, forced standing, and sexual and other physical humiliation. After refusing water, al-Qahtani was forced to accept an intravenous drip for hydration and, on several occasions, was refused trips to a latrine, so that he urinated on himself at least twice. He was also threatened with forced enemas, and on one occasion was forced to undergo an enema. "A six-week regime of sleep deprivation, forced exercises, stress positions, white noise, and sexual humiliation amounts to acts that were specifically intended to cause severe physical pain and suffering and severe mental pain and suffering," said Mariner. "That's the legal definition of torture." In 2005, the Judge Advocates General of the U.S. Army, Navy and Marine Corps told the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services that the techniques used on al-Qahtani violated the U.S. Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation, and would have been illegal if perpetrated by another country on captured U.S. personnel. The U.S. State Department also regularly condemns as torture the same techniques in its annual Country Report on Human Rights, citing their use in countries such as North Korea and Iran. Human Rights Watch believes that Secretary Rumsfeld, Gen. Geoffrey Miller – a senior commander at Guantanamo in 2002 and early 2003 – and the interrogators who took part in the interrogations could be criminally liable under federal or military criminal law for torture, assaults and sexual abuse. (The Inspector General's report is focused on Gen. Miller's conduct.) Rumsfeld could be liable under the doctrine of "command responsibility" – the legal principle that holds a superior responsible for crimes committed by his subordinates when he knew or should have known that they were being committed, but fails to take reasonable measures to stop them. A special prosecutor is needed because Attorney General Alberto Gonzales was himself deeply involved in the policies leading to the abuse of detainees, a conflict of interest that is likely to prevent a proper investigation from being carried out. U.S. Department of Justice regulations call for the appointment of an outside counsel when such a conflict exists and the public interest warrants a prosecutor without links to the government. "A special prosecutor should look carefully at what abuses Rumsfeld either knew of or condoned," said Mariner. On December 2, 2002, as the Pentagon has previously acknowledged, Rumsfeld approved 16 interrogation techniques for al-Qahtani and other detainees, including the use of forced nudity, stress positions and "using detainees' individual phobias (such as fear of dogs)." Al-Qahtani, who is alleged to have been a "20th hijacker," was denied entry to the United States in August 2001. Pentagon spokesman Gordon told Salon.com on Thursday that al-Qahtani was an "al-Qaida terrorist" who provided a "treasure trove" of information during his interrogation. (The information al-Qahtani is said to have provided, however, is still classified.) Human Rights Watch expressed concern that the Pentagon has never released the full version of Gen. Schmidt's report on abuses at Guantanamo. The report's recommendations were rejected by the head of U.S. Southern Command, Gen. Bantz J. Craddock, who said in July 2005 that the al-Qahtani interrogation did not violate military law or policy.

How wrong can one person be? Ultimately wrong it seems. Saying COMMON SENSE to diminish every point people make in an attempt to make other people appear to not have a sensible thought it a poor tactic. 'Your' investigation into the event's of 9/11? I think you mean the 'Official' Commsion Report (with is what you always reference) is political bollocks. Anyway I'm not too bothered about the your stance on this because of what is going to happen with the truth movement. It's going to come out soon anyway.....and to be honest...your not going to stop it. :) And you say that all these terrible diseases like THE BLACK DEATH was unstoppable and you are right it WAS unstoppable....but not now...we can fight it with a jab. We have developed so much since then and in many ways. The street conditions in our cities were horrific during that time, absolutely disgusting. Now it's alot different......we have so much more knowledge on disease and actually creating harmful (population destroying) germs. We are now all scared into hysteria. You say that WAR and DISEASE are natures way of keeping the population down?? Well you are sort of right.....but when you say nature it should accurately be the corporate banks that run, own and fund the government in your country (both leading parties funded by the same people) and also the E.U and the U.N. It's a lose/lose situation for the people at the moment. And I don't believe you blamed Bush directly for everything that happened.....you might have thought that 'they could have stopped those planes' but you wouldn't have thought of all the details that are going to be exposed soon enough. Remember - President Bush is just a puppet. He's not making any major changes himself...he's just the public figure and the one who has to sign everything. You see, your wrong because you don't know enough.......you haven't actually done any decent research. You need to know about how things are actually being ran in the world today to understand the disgusting actions of the government - who actually have been stolen from you. AND ALL THOSE BAD REP POINTS YOU KEEP GIVING ME? T.S

You know something....he's so middle ground, middle of the road, weak & accepting of what going to happen that it's really pity we should have. I mean, we agree on the fact that these things are being pumped up on purpose and he says things like "BUT. a majore pandemic will happen in teh future, it WILL happen sometime soon. we need to be ready for it." Why don't you just lie down somewhere nice and soft for a little napp.

This footage from the beginnng of this clip is superb in a quite obviously fitting, horrible way... The first Black and White section is what I'm talking about. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=251601268800367924&q=alex+jones&pl=true "and what is the real name of Hunoria" .......realize what's happening. AND you might as well watch the full clip if you can stomach an hour :)

of course :) But those are the least of my thoughts.....big game tomorrow :) 2-0 to us?? EDIT (Not quite right, but :)) sounds good.

spam??? I guess.

Another Bush 9/11 Lie Exposed James Bovard | April 14 2006 The transcript the feds released this week of the final minutes of Flight 93 proves that President Bush brazenly and consistently lied to the American people about how that flight ended. The transcript shows that the Arab hijackers chose to crash the plane into the ground after the American passengers stormed the cockpit. There is no guarantee that the transcript is accurate, and the government has already been caught fabricating evidence at terrorist trials in the post 9/11 era. But the government’s own version of events damns Bush. The transcript was available in early 2002, if not earlier, and was shown at that time by federal officials to some of the survivors of the people killed when Flight 93 went down. Bush turned the 9/11 attacks into a moral allegory. He continually invoked the story of Flight 93 to persuade Americans of the need to reform their lives. In a speech at a Lacrosse, Wisconsin high school on May 8, 2002, Bush announced: "I think the most telling event on September 11th, and one that I hope a lot of people remember, is what happened on Flight 93. Basically, what I’m saying is, it’s important to serve something greater than yourself in life. It’s important to serve a call greater than yourself and a cause greater than yourself. Flight 93, we had average citizens flying across the country, and they realized their plane was fixing to be used as a weapon on the Nation’s Capital. They called their loved ones on the phone. They said a prayer and told them they loved them, said a prayer, and they drove the plane in the ground to serve something greater than themselves. That’s the American spirit I know. That’s that sense of sacrifice that makes this country so strong." Everyone not comatose during all of 2002 likely heard Bush’s Flight 93 spiel: On March 18, 2002, Bush, speaking to factory workers in O’Fallon, Missouri, declared that Flight 93 would help launch a new "period of personal responsibility." In Knoxville on April 8, 2002, Bush declared, "Flight 93 told me a lot about America. . . . It is that spirit that is alive and well in America, and it’s that spirit that makes me so optimistic about the future of this great country." At an April 29, 2002, California political fundraiser, Bush invoked Flight 93 as proof of the "new culture" of "serving something greater than yourself in life" and claimed that "Out of the evil done to America is going to come incredible good" because "we are such a good nation." The next day at another fundraiser, Bush declared that "Flight 93 really, in many ways, epitomized the best of America." At yet another Republican fundraiser, this one in Florida on June 21, 2002, Bush declared that Flight 93 was "the most compelling story, of course, in my judgment, after 9/11 or during 9/11." And on September 17, 2002, at a school in Nashville, Bush expanded his parable to include the love of freedom: "It’s a lesson of people loving freedom so much and loving their country so much, that they’re willing to drive a plane into the ground to save other people’s lives." Yet, at the least, there was never any evidence that Flight 93 passengers chose to commit suicide (as opposed to fighting to capture control of the plane from the hijackers). Bush’s obsessive focus on Flight 93 shifted public attention to heroic citizens and away from incompetent bureaucrats. But Bush had no excuse not to know that his Flight 93 allegory was a sham. FBI director Robert Mueller told a closed congressional hearing in 2002 that Flight 93 crashed a few minutes after one of the hijackers "advised [Ziad] Jarrah [the hijacker piloting the plane] to crash the plane and end the passengers’ attempt to retake the airplane." An August 2003 Associated Press report noted that the FBI’s interpretation, "based on the government’s analysis of cockpit recordings, discounts the popular perception of passengers grappling with terrorists to seize the plane’s controls." No one did more to popularize the bogus version of events than Bush. The FBI director’s conclusion was not made public until the report of the joint congressional intelligence committees was released in late July 2003. How many Americans, hornswoggled by Bush’s lies about Flight 93, volunteered to join the military and ended up dying for Bush’s lies on Iraq? Post 9/11 America shows what happens when a nation worships its leader and permits him to tell one lie after another, distorting facts and manipulating the public’s emotions. If Bush had not been treated so respectfully after 9/11, he could not have easily lead the nation to war against Iraq. If Bush had not been permitted to exploit government failure, the government would not have become much more powerful.

Ok. Believe what you want. I don't care anymore.