the link: http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2006/07/milking-it.html

 

agency rebuttal: http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2006/07/milking-it.html

 

 

Without getting too technical, it was noticed that one of the photos taken at 7:21 by the AP shows a dead girl in an ambulance. Then, in a picture taken at 10:25am ... 3 hours later .... it shows the same girl being loaded into an ambulance. Yet another picture shows the same girl 20 minutes later, being carried by a rescue worker ... with no ambulance around.

 

In the ambulance ... out of the ambulance ... no ambulance at all. What does this tell us? The photos were staged. They're propaganda. Who would do such a thing? Hezbollah, of course. And why would the media be a willing accomplice in such a bold attempt to invent negative media coverage against Israel? Because they hate the United States and/or Israel, or because they're just plain on the side of the Islamofascists.

 

Now that the wire services and their photographers have been called out on it, they're all dancing on the head of a pin trying to explain away the discrepancy. They've been nailed as willing participants in the Islamic terror propaganda efforts.

 

- boortz.com

 

 

see how hezbollah takes advantage of such situations?

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE 'FAITHFULL' BBC AND SKY-NEWS (UK)...WHO WERE ACTUALLY THERE!!!......

 

They reported the deaths from having their reporters see it all......and these 'News' companies spin it to make Isreal look legit.

 

What the hell is going on

Did I ever say that Qana did not occur or that lots of people died?

 

NO.

 

I just said that Hezbollah is staging photos of the incident.

 

Quit putting words in my mouth.

Whatever else, the event in Qana was a human tragedy. But the photographs do not show it honestly.

 

I agree with that statement.

 

Rather, they have been staged for effect, exploiting the victims in an unwholesome manner. In so doing, they are no longer news photographs - they are propaganda

 

They are anti-war propaganda but that statement is wrong.

 

We know civillians of all ages died in that attack and people should see what happens when mistakes are made. Tragic but its war.

 

I dont think they were faked but i do think they have been used to great exaggeration.

Whatever else, the event in Qana was a human tragedy. But the photographs do not show it honestly.

 

I agree with that statement.

 

Rather, they have been staged for effect, exploiting the victims in an unwholesome manner. In so doing, they are no longer news photographs - they are propaganda

 

They are anti-war propaganda but that statement is wrong.

 

We know civillians of all ages died in that attack and people should see what happens when mistakes are made. Tragic but its war.

 

I dont think they were faked but i do think they have been used to great exaggeration.

 

I do think they were faked in this instance, but I share your sentiments.

I wouldn't put it past Hezbollah to do such a thing.. Anderson's producer touched on a similar story like this on their 360 Blog..

 

but the media will (and not that its right) air anything before checking all the facts just to be the first to break the story.... If its a reliable newsource.. (I'd like to think CNN is one of them...) then they'd check the facts before.. but in this business... its whatever sells... unfortunately.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE 'FAITHFULL' BBC AND SKY-NEWS (UK)...WHO WERE ACTUALLY THERE!!!......

 

They reported the deaths from having their reporters see it all......and these 'News' companies spin it to make Isreal look legit.

 

What the hell is going on

 

They were also there when 9/11 happened and according to you that was staged. So why couldnt this have been staged?

Well, yeah, I agree that the mainstream media only do what is in it's best interest.

They were also there when 9/11 happened and according to you that was staged. So why couldnt this have been staged?

 

 

I still have problems swallowing this one... but it seems so 'coincidental'... I would hate to think that flying planes into the buildings was staged... the buildings collapsing... probable...

well if you believe part of the theory then you really have to believe it all.

^ if thats directed at me.. I'll say this...

 

 

I believe that the terrorist plotted to hijack and slam the planes into the towers.. yes.... do I believe that the buildings collapsed because of the planes... no. There had to be more to that story.. and more than a goverment run investigation....

^ if thats directed at me.. I'll say this...

 

 

I believe that the terrorist plotted to hijack and slam the planes into the towers.. yes.... do I believe that the buildings collapsed because of the planes... no. There had to be more to that story.. and more than a goverment run investigation....

 

Guess science isnt enough proof for you.

sure this could have been staged, we all know lebanon and hezbollah want help from the UN. But look at all the stagings the news does all the time! There were plenty of accounts in Afghanistan of news people filming troops randomly burning ammunition, and then saying that they were heavily engaged...

science may ass.... there's no scientific proof that proves they fell because of the planes..... thats a fact. Did they fall.. yes. Was it because of an explosive of some sort... probably. By whom? Thats the mystery....

scientist have proven it was possible for a plane to take down the buildings on its own

true... but not in this case..... ;) --there is no scientific proof in this instance that the planes is what allowed them to collapse.

Its been shown by scientist that the planes could collapse the tower, thus making no need for another explosion to do the trick. plus there isnt a hint of evidence to show there was another explosion and its been researched. so im gonna side with science on this one.

it wasn't the PLANES that brought down the towers. it was the raging inferno caused by burning jet fuel that weakened the structural support of the steel beams.

 

when these beams buckled, the mass of the tower above the impact point fell onto the rest of the building, destroying it. not that hard to figure out. simple physics. there have been countless documentaries proving this, even one featuring the architect of the towers, Minoru Yamasaki.

it wasn't the PLANES that brought down the towers. it was the raging inferno caused by burning jet fuel that weakened the structural support steel beams.

 

when these beams buckled, the mass of the tower above the impact point fell onto the rest of the building, destroying it. not that hard to figure out. simple physics. there have been countless documentaries proving this, even one featuring the architect of the towers, Minoru Yamasaki.

 

 

Yeah but a far out conspiracy theory means more to them then facts and reason

Its been shown by scientist that the planes could collapse the tower' date=' thus making no need for another explosion to do the trick. plus there isnt a hint of evidence to show there was another explosion and its been researched. so im gonna side with science on this one.[/quote']

 

You made so many inaccurate errors there nick that I'm not even going to entertain them.

 

 

 

Plus, back to topic.

Its been shown by scientist that the planes could collapse the tower' date='[/u'] thus making no need for another explosion to do the trick. plus there isnt a hint of evidence to show there was another explosion and its been researched. so im gonna side with science on this one.

 

 

operative word being 'could have caused the collapse'.. could have is not 'definitive'... ;) ;)

 

...and there are eyewitness accounts of explosions going off...

 

 

I once thought as ugadawg5 said... that the heat melted the steel and stuff... but there are too many inconsistancies to uphold that theory....

 

... and 3rdly.. back to topic.. :nice:

please explain how weakened steel being unable to support the weight above it is an inconsistency?

 

and the govt. taking down the towers with explosives; there are no inconsistencies there, now are there!?

 

wow, the govt. must have known exactly where the planes were going to hit the towers; they placed those explosives in the exact right spot!

I never accused the govt though..... :P I do think the govt knew this was going to happen that day. No one could have expected what was to happen after.

there were a few people in the govt, ie fbi personel, that may have been trying to warn higher ups of an imminent strike with planes, but on the whole the govt. did not know the specifics of the attack or when it would happen.

 

if they did, they would have shut down all flights out of boston and dulles and quarintined the airports until they found the hijackers. the government would not have sat by and let its people be slaughtered. the people in the govt. are not monsters.

 

innefficient, money-hoarding, over-taxing bastards, but not monsters.

What does any of this have to do with Qana?