September 12, 200619 yr Terror group threatens England's water GLASGOW, Scotland, Sept. 10 (UPI) -- A Scottish terrorist organization Sunday threatened to poison England's public water supply, endangering hundreds of thousands of lives. The Scottish National Liberation Army, dedicated to Scottish independence, made the threat in an e-mail to The Sunday Times of London office in Glasgow, Scotland. "Our aim is to poison water supplies in England, not in the entire UK," the e-mail said. "We have the means to do this and we shall. This is a war and we intend to win it." Police said the e-mail came from a Canadian server, the newspaper said. Britain's Home Office also launched an investigation after the banned group's political wing published instructions on how to contaminate the water supply with toxic chemicals. The group is accused of having sent hundreds of letter bombs to members of Parliament as well as Princess Diana in 1983 and then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/2006/09/11/scottish-terror-group-threatens-englands-water/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.upi.com%2FNewsTrack%2Fview.php%3FStoryID%3D20060910-094929-9457r&frame=true
September 12, 200619 yr Yeah, I heard about this. Hmmm. To be honest, the water is already full of poison that they don't need to, haha. But if they do take it upon themselves to put something worse into the water then I guess alot of people might become ill.... I'm not quite sure what's sparking this threat off.....why now? odd. I could just move to Scotland.
September 12, 200619 yr Author Maybe they wanta piece in the action on the global terrorism movement? they dont want the terrorist from the other side of the world getting all the attention, maybe? Btw what poisons are in the water already? I heard something last year about the goverment putting some thing in it but i forgot what it was.
September 12, 200619 yr Well, there's fluoride. It has never been classified safe for human consumption and is more toxic than lead. They say fluoride helps to prevent tooth decay in children but it was used by Hitler to kill people.... It was practised by Hitler's regime is made the more credible when we know that as far back as 1938 the US Government, and ally to boot, and the government of a democratic Christian country, was considering the transformation of American citizens and others into 'zombies' by a number of proposed techniques. The US Army searched for "the perfect incapacitating agent", according to General Fellenz, "to put in the enemy's water supply". Included in the drugs tested were the hallucinogenic LSD and the amnesiac BZ (10 times more potent than LSD), and a "schizophrenic agent called bulbocapine". The "Rockefeller Report" to the United States President on CIA activities said: "The drug program was part of a much larger CIA program to study possible means of controlling human behaviour". One drug which received special attention in the 'fifties and early 'sixties, under the cryptonym of MK-ULTRA, was suxamethonium chloride (listed under a number of product names including Anectine), a halogenated anti-cholinergic agent with all the symptomatic side-effects up to and including cardiac arrest ascribed to these agents in the medical literature. Please retain the term "anti-cholinergic agent" in mind , for owing to the health implications attendant on this particular anti-metabolic activity, it figures repeatedly in this thesis. Note: An adviser to the US Government on hypnotism or psychological behaviour control, Dr George Estabrooks, later became Chairman, Department of Psychology, Colgate University. Internationally, Colgate was and remains the most ardent producer and advocate for the fluorination of a domestic product - fluoridated toothpaste.
September 12, 200619 yr Author We dont have fluoride where I live and my teeth are extremely weak so i have to brush my teeth 6 times a day and spend tons on dentist bills....so even if fluoride is bad i'd still want it in my water over paying thousands in dentist bills and not being able to eat any sugar.
September 12, 200619 yr Lucky for us we have a limited access water system, which is shared by less than 500 people which the water runs though chalk (so it gets cleaned). The water out of our taps is BETTER than pretty much every mineral water you can buy in shops :smug:
September 12, 200619 yr We dont have fluoride where I live and my teeth are extremely weak so i have to brush my teeth 6 times a day and spend tons on dentist bills....so even if fluoride is bad i'd still want it in my water over paying thousands in dentist bills and not being able to eat any sugar. Well, I doubt it's because of the lack of fluoride....I don't drink tap water (especially where I live in London) and my teeth are fine AND I use fluoride free toothpaste.
September 12, 200619 yr I drink tapwater and my teeth are fine, I brush twice a day and have used a variety of tooth pastes. According to my sources the Scottish Liberation folk are a bunch of pissheads who talk a load of crap
September 12, 200619 yr you mean to say that the scottish aren't independent? :uhoh: what the hell have they been teaching us in history all these years... goddamn, all i can think of is Braveheart now! bah.
September 12, 200619 yr This water comes out of the tap and is clean, fresh and practically free. Bottled water comes in a plastic bottle from hundreds or thousands of miles away and they charge me about the same as if it was cola. The waste of fuel involved in distributing it in trucks, the waste of plastic in the bottles and the waste of money. Now pull yourself together
September 12, 200619 yr you mean to say that the scottish aren't independent? :uhoh: what the hell have they been teaching us in history all these years... goddamn, all i can think of is Braveheart now! bah.No they're not independent, they're part of the United Kingdom, which is part of the European Union and also part of the United Nations. Now pull yourself together
September 13, 200619 yr This water comes out of the tap and is clean, fresh and practically free. Bottled water comes in a plastic bottle from hundreds or thousands of miles away and they charge me about the same as if it was cola. The waste of fuel involved in distributing it in trucks, the waste of plastic in the bottles and the waste of money. Now pull yourself together Yes, I agree.....I don't know quite how they fooled alot of people into paying for some which they get for free. I filter my water using a very good filtration system and you can see the awful amount of horrible elements which the water leaves behind....especially on the 'hard' water in London. The water tastes much more fresh this way....it's amazing. When I lived in north County Durham, which is where I grew up, the 'soft' water was 100% cleaner and it was a visiable difference. I still don't know how they trick people into paying for it. But I do know that paying for water is becoming so accpeted. It's the new gold and I'm sure we'll all find that out the hard way......gulp.
September 14, 200619 yr City removes fluoride from water Karen Gleason / Del Rio News-Herald | September 14 2006 Fluoride will no longer be added to Del Rio’s drinking water. The Del Rio City Council made that decision Tuesday night after a presentation by John Morony, a retired college biology professor, who characterized fluoride as a poison and showed the council numerous research references that link fluoride to higher rates of cancer and other health hazards. Following Morony’s presentation and a brief discussion by the council, Councilman Pat Cole said, “I make the motion that we cease immediately adding fluoride to our beautiful San Felipe Springs water.” In his letter to the city requesting time to address the council, Morony recommended “that Del Rio cease fluoridating its water supply.” Morony in his letter noted that in the U.S., more than 70 communities have stopped adding fluoride to their water. He also pointed out that most European countries, Japan and China do not add fluoride to their water supplies. “Why? Basically for two reasons: fluoridated water cannot be shown to significantly reduce dental caries (tooth decay) and it has proved to be far more toxic than previously thought,” Morony wrote. Morony during Tuesday night’s meeting also presented the council with a paper titled “Scientific Facts on the Biological Effects of Fluorides.” The paper listed research references linking fluoride to a variety of medical problems, including the development of bone cancer and premature aging. The paper stated, “Fluoride consumption by human beings increases the general cancer death rate.” Morony noted that although some fluoride occurs naturally in all water, the fluoride being added to the city’s water supply “is a waste product of the phosphate fertilizer industry.” “I’m just trying to get the fluoride out of our water,” Morony told the council. At the end of Morony’s presentation, Cole asked him, “So let me clarify: if we continue adding fluoride, we are putting in our water a byproduct of the fertilizer industry?” “That’s right,” Morony said. Councilman Mike Wrob asked, “At what point did we start putting fluoride in our water?” City administrators asked Mitch Lomas, manager of the city’s water treatment plant, to answer Wrob’s question. “We started fluoridating in 1990 as a result of a decision by the city council,” Lomas replied. “At the time we did not have all the information about fluoride that we do now,” he added. Wrob then asked Lomas to give the council his opinion of adding fluoride to the city’s drinking water, a question Lomas did not answer directly. Mayor Efrain Valdez noted that the city spends about $20,000 a year buying the fluoride to add to the city water. Cole asked Lomas, “How do employees at the water plant feel about handling fluoride?” “It’s a very corrosive chemical. It eats through concrete and metal. When they handle it, they have to wear respirators and chemical-proof suits,” Lomas said. “But how do they feel about handling it?” Cole asked. “They really would rather not handle it,” Lomas replied. Cole then made her motion to cease fluoridation of the city’s water, with Wrob giving the second. After the council had voted unanimously to approve Cole’s motion, Morony told the News-Herald as he had left the council chambers, “The council’s decision is very gratifying. Now we can go back to drinking Del Rio water.”
September 14, 200619 yr You drink tapwater?? ewwwwwwww It's alright over here. I was told that it's disgusting in certain areas in London though.
Create an account or sign in to comment