Pseudonym Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 Which was a better live performance, Live 2003 or Glastonbury 2002? Personally I like Glastonbury 02 more just cuz of the raw emotion and being outside in the huge arena and the cold weather and everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deaths_friend Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 Live 2003 cos it was in sydney :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tnspieler1012 Posted April 19, 2008 Share Posted April 19, 2008 2003, because it was a smaller venue, had a larger set, a more refined set, came after the album and, above all....kicked ass. placing songs side by side live 2003 is far better (although I did love don't panic at glasto), not to mention tracks like one I love, everything's not lost, a rush of blood to the head etc. They're both brilliant. but live 2003 takes the cake for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saffire Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 I watch the Live 2003 shows on the DVD and wish I had been there so bad... The atmosphere was so perfect and the set list was phenomenal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Open-Politik Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 I have to say Live 2003, every song EVERY song was brilliant and perfect and couldnt be any better. What an amazing DVD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PianoRocker Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 Well both. Live 2003 was very good... But Politik was better in Glastonbury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-overlay.thumb.png.655b81ee5d7c1b7ed4cccb4ebc64b6cf.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now