It may be fun when nothing is about you, but not so much when it is, especially when it's related to things you'd much rather forget.

 

:hug:

Aw Crests :jbcm:

 

Also

 

I kinda wish this was fun for me.

 

this is why one should never get to friendly with ppl on forums:shrug:

this is why one should never get to friendly with ppl on forums:shrug:

 

hahaha wut

:lips:

 

 

this is why one should never get to friendly with ppl on forums

 

Haha what?

I probably won't read all of this, certainly not right now because I just got home, but I did say to Alexa I'd get back to her about earlier comments, which I probably will do, but then I brief over the thread and read this:

 

I told Nathan I'd paste this, and when I say "I told him" it's because I DID TELL HIM I'D DO IT, HE DIDN'T MANIPULATE ME, K GUISE?

 

And I just think, fuck it, this is just childish sarcasm, why should I bother? Nobody has implied that that 100% of Nathan's friendships are based on manipulation, as if that even needs to be said.

 

On a side note, haha wtf has this thread become, who woulda thunk it Sawa? It was originally (Jokingly) about mods being faegs and then PING I make a few jokes about Nathan and here we are with a text of information.

...making all your "mature, ABSOLUTELY TRUE" facts...

By the way, is that better Reilly? Or should I use "He's almost never ever in the whole time mentioned"? Do I have to say that I'm making up imaginary haters so you feel like you were absolutely right?

Want me to use stupid internet meme/typing to seem relaxed?

Well Reilly, not everyone posts like you do.

Mark chooses to make puns, you choose to comment on every point while trying to seem mature, and I choose not to mention points I understood/don't have to comment on.

But hey, you're the one who's right about everything huh? I guess I'm someone who isn't as clever or mature as you are.

You think you're above everyone here and you can do as you please, going all nuts on Mark (someone I'm not defending), being arrogant or "attacking" people here, mocking Ian and recently going all over Dfit00's incident again.

 

Over-dramatic fucking nutjob.

 

As for the rest of your posts, it was all basically "I don't know anything about the situation and neither do you" or "You attack people which is horrible and yes I know I do too", what the fuck am I even supposed to make of this? I get it, you have a principle of not talking about things you don't understand, then why did you start talking about it?

 

Why did you assume I wasn't involved? That's the whole issue really, you said I shouldn't say anything about a situation I wasn't involved in, but I was involved, the whole situation started from me telling Nathan something, so when you realised this you probably should have just shut the fuck up then instead of going on to make judgements on my character and me as a person, personally insult me, and say the word 'mature' about 1200 times.

 

You took an argument about Nathan and somehow warped it into it all being about me, from the few people I've talked to about this we're kinda like, WTF DID REILLY DO? I know they would be inclined to say that talking to me, but taking a step back, I did nothing wrong here, you got overly defensive because it was about Nathan, and picked holes through a bunch of irrelevant shit and made the argument essentially turn into this maulch that I'm typing now.

 

I didn't realise you think I'm such a ****, but I'm not going to start flaming on you as a character and I haven't done on Nathan as a person (Just on a few things he's done) just because we disagree over things, because that's just low, but at least now I know what you really think.

And I just think, fuck it, this is just childish sarcasm, why should I bother? Nobody has implied that that 100% of Nathan's friendships are based on manipulation, as if that even needs to be said.

 

Ren is an example of someone who though I was manipulated by him. We sorted it out via PM but still, when I say something, NOT EVERYTHING IS REFERRING TO YOU and I'm not actually making stuff up. If I say that some people dislike Nathan, it's because it is true, etc. If you make imaginary issues with people in this board then I'm sorry for you.

So yes, some people do think he manipulates/influences teenagers.

You're just too full of yourself.

 

I just realised you're a **** right after you jumped at me for simply asking a question, feeling like I was actually attacking you.

You exaggerate and always take everything wrong.

This is what I don't get with people who say I think everything is about me- where did I say that your comments were aimed directly at me or that your first one was attacking me personally? I didn't feel either, as Ren was online I thought you were being sarcastic towards him in an un-necessarily pricky way which just pissed me off, as for the first one attacking me, I responded to your question thoroughly, giving my reasons as to why I brought up Nathan, that's supposedly what you wanted. You asked a question, I gave the answer, directly, no sarcasm, bashing or smugness, just a bunch of points that if you read again you'll see why they were necessary.

 

You like to think that I assume everythings about me, in your head it might be illegal to reply to someone even if they aren't talking directly to you, but I don't see why people can't reply to whoever they want, stop using these fucking principles of yours to enforce on everyone else like you're the morality police. If I want to write about Nathan or Mark or Dfit I will, if it's wrong or incorrect then I'll apologise, and other people are free to write their opinion on me or anyone else if they have one, I don't think I'm above anyone on here I think we all have the right to post our opinions and what right do you have to specify for us the circumstances in which we can hold opinions on other users?

 

The most retarded fucking thing is that you don't even disagree with what I wrote, you hate how I brought it up and feel it was un-necessary, and you've even written in sarcastic quote marks about my "MATURE TRUE OPINIONS" but you actually don't even disagree with them, that's absolutely warped.

 

Why did you assume I wasn't involved? That's the whole issue really, you said I shouldn't say anything about a situation I wasn't involved in, but I was involved

 

If you're going to keep responding I at least want an answer to this, it's apparently why you're so butthurt, because I'm talking about a situation and people which you assumed I don't have a clue what I'm talking about, but I do, and like re-posted Ren posts in this thread, Nathan never had anything to say over it because it was just simply true.

Would you deny something you know that happened? I guess not. I don't. It's not retarded if I admit he did all those things, it would be immensely retarted and biased if I told you he wasn't mean to people here or anything like that. I mocked you trying to be mature cos you indirectly called me immature and pointed out how much of an adult you are and how maturely you handle things. That's what pissed me off cos while you might try to give a mature approach, other times you're just plain immature and do stupid things, like when you handled your issue with Dfit and actually you recently attacked him again, so it was out of place.

 

My problem with you isn't you telling me all the stuff you think, my problem was that you practically responded to my post in a bitchy manner when I wasn't even looking for that lenghty post and your jerkness, and your assumption that I was offended cos you pretended to be all manipulative like people say Nathan does. I don't give a shit if you wanna tell me off when I say something stupid or I talk about something I know nothing about. My problem was YOU BEING A FUCKING JERK when my question wasn't arrogant/looking for issues, I was merely curious, for fucks sake. That is what you can't understand, cos your post provoked all of this, if you had only taken it as my usual sarcasm/normal posts you would've said "It's fun ****!" and cool, move on, but no, you had to take it as a personal thing.

 

You were involved at least a tiny bit. If you were 100% involved and it was your issue and yours only I'd shut the fuck up. But no, you also talk about it as if you knew him or the whole issue, but you just know what your bff Rennie told you. I dislike when people talk about things like that. That's why I make emphasis on you talking about your issues with Dfit00 or anything else instead of this.

I don't understand why you think Reilly provoked all of this when it was YOU who got super defensive over your precious Nathan after Reilly had made a joke about him.

I don't understand why you think Reilly provoked all of this when it was YOU who got super defensive over your precious Nathan after Reilly had made a joke about him.

 

 

Do you even read the posts? I was curious dammit.

Also, mind your own business.

No, you just don't like seeing people talking negatively about Nathan.

Yes Kelsie, cos I actively made a campaign to get him back in here when all of you wanted him out, cos I insulted you when you questioned him and cos I insulted all of you and Ren when you took part that day when he got permanently banned.

 

Like I said, I don't deny what he did and in no way I say it's correct, if you got the nastiest impression of him that's ok.

It just pisses me off how people talk about stuff like they know it all, about him or me, or anyone. I dislike it.

I'm sorry but if the nasty side of him was pretty much the only side of himself he showed on the forum, then that's what people are going to talk about and that's all they're going to know of him. It's his own damn fault that we don't know him as the sweet person you know him to be. And if it bothers you that people bring up the things he did, then too bad for you I guess.

Did I ever denied he was mean here? No. If it bothers you that he's "my precious Nathan" cos he was the meanest person here the I'm sorry for you. I didn't talk to him here, I did it all outside and if you find a problem with that then again, I'm sorry.

I don't have a problem at all that you're friends with him, just the fact that you think he's above criticism because those who criticize him didn't know "the real Nathan." I talked to him outside of CPing too and he was nice, but that doesn't change my opinion of the things he did on here.

God dammit. Read.

I dislike when people talk about stuff when they don't know all about it. Do you see me defending Reilly when Dfit tells him he's pathetic? No. I don't go all "Yah you creep" or talk about it/mock it like many people here do. I wasn't looking to talk about Nathan's history here as well cos I know bits and pieces and it will be out of place for me to talk about stuff I don't know all about.

It's about anything really. I was curious to know why people keep bringing stuff up like they were fully involved in all the issues that go in this forum.

I prefer to mind my own business. That's why I don't talk about any kind of problem that happened here, Nathan related, Reilly related, Mark related, anyone related.

You are talking so much shit it's getting unbelievable, and I'm not going to just go "Ya mkai that happened" when a lot of what you are saying hasn't happened.

 

After all this time we KEEP talking about Nathan?! First off, I can't remember the last time I mentioned him, probably a few months (Which is a long time when you take into consideration that he still attempts to post on here) and before that just isolated incidents. Secondly, I don't recall anyone even mentioning him lately, what have I missed? Thirdly, people tagged Nathan as a pedo? No, but he did hypocritically strongly influence a young girl on here to get involved in his forum agendas despite her feeling uncomfortable, and Nathan who usually wants to leave no stone un-turned shy'd away from this (And recently got another girl banned by convincing her to give him her password just so he could post on here WTF). Fourthly, I stand beside my point that this MSN convo makes me look like Nathan in that same sort of way- not a pedo but someone who can be cunning and conniving in getting other people to do their work for them (When I was just joking with Sara about making a thread). Fifthly my joke about getting people to PM eachother about Mark being a pedo is a half-truth at the least, the way he hyped such tiny information into such a big deal (Going from the reality of a girl on here telling me Mark sent her a picture of himself with a singer- to Mark sending pictures of his genitals) was genius, absolutely horrible but genius, and this did cause PMs of this false rumour to circulate.

 

And finally, yeah I'd just like to point out again that rarely is Nathan mentioned, and I'd like to know who's been talking about him so much because I haven't. Um, up until this post.

 

I can only assume that you must be fucking sensitive, show me exactly what part of that post is BITCHY, or where did I take anything personally? What the fuck are you even talking about? You asked a question and I gave a detailed answer, how could I have even taken it personally when I only talked about Nathan? The post isn't even about me!

 

It's retarded because your argument at one point is "All I did was ask a question" so I answered your question! There it is, answered, directly, to the point, not even a hint of sarcasm used, it's reasonable and fair but you are such a fucking drama queen so it's impossible to not upset you. I didn't say one word in that post which was personally insulting to you, or sarcastic, or bitchy, if you took it that way then that's something beyond my control.

 

But Alexa you fucking realise now that my post wasn't bitchy, or inciting, it was a straight answer, that's all it was, and now you're saying the whole problem is ME BEING A FUCKING JERK but you must feel like a real douche because as you can see right there, I wasn't being a fucking jerk, you were just being totally fucking overemotional and when you look back on it again I didn't do anything wrong.

 

Yes, I could've just brushed it aside, is that what you wanted? Because you asked a question, and you've said you were curious for the answer, but the answer I gave was apparently so thorough that it was almost TOO INFORMATIVE for your brain and therefore automatically bitchy, personal, insulting, etc.

 

I am disillusioned and I want you to make it very clear how that was bitchy or how it was 'practically' bitchy (As you now refer to it upon realising that it actually wasn't bitchy whatsoever all I did was answer your fucking question).

 

I mocked you trying to be mature cos you indirectly called me immature and pointed out how much of an adult you are and how maturely you handle things.

 

Where did I point out how much of an adult I am? I'm presuming this is something where I was simply like "You're being immature and I wouldn't act like that" and now you're fucked uppityness has warped that into me crusading about how more developed and brilliant I am then you, because clearly something I said made you feel very small and you've clearly taken it badly, again there's nothing I can do if you choose to receive things in such a negative and troubled manner.

 

I mean just reading it again I "indirectly" called you mature? And for generally calling people immature I deserve this kind of response:

 

Mark chooses to make puns, you choose to comment on every point while trying to seem mature, and I choose not to mention points I understood/don't have to comment on.

-

But hey, you're the one who's right about everything huh? I guess I'm someone who isn't as clever or mature as you are.

 

So the first thing is to point out how exactly I was being bitchy in my response, the 2nd is to point out how exactly I called you immature AND how I pointed out how mature I am. I'm being so precise because I'm fucking sick of seeing you write shit like "practically bitchy" and "indirectly insulting" because you don't have a leg to stand on and I either want it cleared up where I went wrong, for you to just admit you fucked up, or just stop talking the purely nonsensical bile you are coming out with.

 

You were involved at least a tiny bit. If you were 100% involved and it was your issue and yours only I'd shut the fuck up. But no, you also talk about it as if you knew him or the whole issue, but you just know what your bff Rennie told you. I dislike when people talk about things like that. That's why I make emphasis on you talking about your issues with Dfit00 or anything else instead of this.

 

Well here you are being a total hypocrite, you don't know how involved I was, who I spoke to, what information I have and where it came from, yet you are making the judgement call of how involved I was. The whole thing started because of me, Nathan regularly spoke to me and informed me of Mark's latest mishaps which of course was all fabricated bullshit, and it does completely correlate with everything Ren wrote (And as for you writing about he's my bff, god you are a douche, I have talked more with Nathan then Ren in the past).

 

How do you know how involved I was? That's the 3rd point, what right do you have to make such a call, because you hate it when people give opinions on things that they know nothing about but here you are doing exactly that, sensemuch?

 

From the very start you've made fuck all sense:

 

What bothers me is that you people mention him from time to time as if you actually got the time to know him, you have the worst possible image of him, yeah well deserved, but he's not the evil maniac you think he is.

 

So OK we're so wrong for having this horrible image of a person and that's absolutely fine and justified but just because wait I'm lost DEAD ON

 

Back on topic, yes clear up those 3 points please I'm just sick of you going on these sporadic rants which rarely even relate to anything.

God dammit. Read.

I dislike when people talk about stuff when they don't know all about it. Do you see me defending Reilly when Dfit tells him he's pathetic? No. I don't go all "Yah you creep" or talk about it/mock it like many people here do. I wasn't looking to talk about Nathan's history here as well cos I know bits and pieces and it will be out of place for me to talk about stuff I don't know all about.

It's about anything really. I was curious to know why people keep bringing stuff up like they were fully involved in all the issues that go in this forum.

I prefer to mind my own business. That's why I don't talk about any kind of problem that happened here, Nathan related, Reilly related, Mark related, anyone related.

 

I know what I saw, I formed my own opinions on it, and I say what I think about what other people do or have done whenever I want to, okay? I don't care if you prefer to mind your own business. And how am I supposed to know all about stuff before talking about it? Am I supposed to go to the person directly and ask them everything before I criticize them, am I supposed to be able to read their mind? If people do stupid shit like Nathan did, I'll call it out as much as I want to.

I was curious to know why people keep bringing stuff up like they were fully involved in all the issues that go in this forum.

 

You fucking dick you already admitted that people don't KEEP bringing it up, this is the first time since it's happened that it's been even vaguely discussed and in your mind we still KEEP bringing it up. This 'KEEP' was the first point we even tackled in this thread and are you learning? Are you fuck, in your mind it's still poor little misunderstood Nathan vs the big forum bashers who speak about him 24/7.

 

You brought up a question, I answered your question, I can at least understand why you think it was un-necessary to go into such detail but I wasn't being a FUCKING JERK to you or anything, again you just took it so personally for no reason and then started getting defensive about Nathan and telling me I'm becoming like Mark (Productive part of the debate there- no reason given) and of course it's all ended in anyone but you definitely being a ****.

Where has Mark been lately anyways?

I'm tired Reilly.

I'll let you win cos you're simply stubborn/deluded.

 

 

Kelsie:

Yes, you have the right to voice your opinion, but, as a question, if anything happened and you were involved, would you actually want me (an unrelated person) talking about it from time to time and mocking it? Would you think it's ok to pretend I know you and whatever happened?

Where has Mark been lately anyways?

 

Playing tennis?

OK I'll make it more concise:

 

How was the post bitchy?