The Tate has been challenged to put its collection of paintings by LS Lowry up for sale if it intends to continue to exclude them from its London galleries.

 

 

 

 

The actor Sir Ian McKellen threw down the challenge in a joint attack by leading figures from the art world which questioned whether the "matchstick men painter" has been sidelined as too northern and provincial.

 

Although many artists from the north of England enjoy metropolitan critical acclaim, including David Hockney and Damien Hirst, none assert the character of northern people and landscape with Lowry's dogged persistence.

 

"Over the years, silly lies have been thrown around that he was only a Sunday painter, an amateur, untrained and naive," said McKellen, who narrates a highly critical television programme about Lowry's "exclusion" to be screened by ITV1 on Easter Day. The programme is called Perspectives: Looking for Lowry.

 

"His popularity needs no official endorsement from the Tate, but it is a shame verging on the iniquitous that foreign visitors to London shouldn't have access to the painter English people like more than most others."

 

The film sees others line up to condemn the fact that the Tate has shown only one of its 23 Lowrys – Industrial Landscape, painted in 1955 and owned by the gallery for 50 years – and then only briefly.

 

Noel Gallagher, of the Manchester band Oasis, said: "They're not considered Tateworthy. Or is it just because he is a northerner?"

 

The controversy reached a crunch point when the Tate was refused permission to copy Industrial Landscape to form part of a temporary mural on the work of landscape artists. Lowry's estate, which has donated much of his unsold work to the Lowry centre at Salford Quays, has made no secret of its irritation at the continued storage of his work.

 

The Tate denied any deprecation of "northern-ness" in Lowry's work, pointing to its record of establishing Tate Liverpool and supporting new Hepworth Wakefield gallery, which opens next month. Henry Moore, the Yorkshire sculptor and contemporary of Barbara Hepworth, has also been much feted by the gallery, whose founder Sir Henry Tate, the sugar mogul, was one of Lowry's fellow-Lancastrians.

 

The Tate said it planned to give Lowry space when its galleries are extended in 2013, but Tate Britain's head of displays, Chris Stephens, said in the television programme: "What makes Lowry so popular is the same thing which stops him being the subject of serious critical attention. What attracts so many is a sort of sentimentality about him. He's a victim of his own fan base."

 

McKellen said: "If the Tate feels no responsibility to give the art-viewing public their favourite painters to view, perhaps they could let their stash go elsewhere. They could pass them on to a gallery like the Lowry, which shares its visitors' tastes. Or perhaps a touring retrospective, with a twist – the exhibits would be for sale."

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2011/apr/17/ian-mckellen-tate-lowry-exclusion

What you'd expect from those snooty nose pricks who prefer such shit like an unmade bed and other such bollocks.

To be fair Lowry is shit.

To be fair Lowry is shit.

 

Pffft!

I'm embarrassed to say he hails from relatively near me.

 

I took Alice to the Manchester Art Gallery and the tiny Lowry picture they had, in comparison to some stunning pieces they had elsewhere, well there was no comparison.

I'm embarrassed to say he hails from relatively near me.

 

I took Alice to the Manchester Art Gallery and the tiny Lowry picture they had, in comparison to some stunning pieces they had elsewhere, well there was no comparison.

 

I think his paintings captured the spirit of the working industrial north of the 20th century so incredibly.

I think his paintings captured the spirit of the working industrial north of the 20th century so incredibly.

 

They certainly did, and only a Philistine could fail to realise that.:smug:

 

No surprise that Liam Gallagher hasn't got involved......................... :rolleyes: