Everything posted by GazeboflossUK
-
MSNBC Olbermann: “The President of the United States owes this country an apology"
You might think he's full of crap but he's right. And for those who related the website to the video - look you really are showing some real stupidity. And these sites aren't "bad" it's just about 4 of you on here don't like what you hear. Simple.
-
World first: Prime Minister admits lying to public!!
Shame that when our leaders are caught lying most people just say "Yeah, they're politicians, that's what they do". We should take a leaf out of the Hungarian peoples book......and I'm not saying in such a voilent way.....but I'd like to see more of angry response.
-
MSNBC Olbermann: “The President of the United States owes this country an apology"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asVqqz7cFDw Olbermann: “The President of the United States owes this country an apology” Crooks and Liars | September 19 2006 Keith Olbermann delivered another stunning special comment tonight, this time attacking Bush’s Rose Garden press conference from last Friday. Olbermann: Finally tonight, a Special Comment about the Rose Garden news conference last Friday. The President of the United States owes this country an apology.There are now none around him who would tell him - or could. The last of them, it appears, was the very man whose letter provoked the President into the conduct, for which the apology is essential. An apology is this President’s only hope of regaining the slightest measure of confidence, of what has been, for nearly two years, a clear majority of his people.
-
'Bayer' knowingly dropped AIDS contaminated medicine on the European market
The New York Times said it was practically impossible to determine how many hemophiliacs in Latin America and Asia were affected by the company's sale of Factor VIII concentrate after February 1984 when the new product came out. However, in Hong Kong and Taiwan alone, more than 100 hemophiliacs were infected with the HIV virus after using Factor VIII, and many since have died, according to records and interviews obtained by the paper. Cutter also continued to sell the older product after February 1984 in Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Japan and Argentina, the daily alleged…. The Cutter documents were produced in connection with lawsuits filed by American hemophiliacs, which had gone largely unnoticed until the daily said it began asking about them. In the United States, according to the Times, thousands of hemophiliacs were infected with AIDS from contaminated blood-clotting medicine.
-
9/11 - The Inside Job **NEW INFO & UPDATES WHEN THEY HAPPEN**
Watch this and watch it all - in a serious manner. It's very good. 9/11 Mysteries - Part 1 - Controlled Demolition http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003
-
Israel / Lebanon / Iran / Syria - Middle East conflict!
Military Orders Suggest Iran Attack Newsmax | September 18 2006 Two recent orders by the American military have led some observers to conclude that the U.S. is preparing for an attack on Iran. One order was a "Prepare to Deploy" command sent to a submarine, an Aegis-class cruiser, two minesweepers and two mine hunters, telling the ships’ commanders to be ready to move by Oct. 1. The other was a request from the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) for a fresh look at long-standing U.S. plans to blockade two Iranian oil ports on the Persian Gulf. The orders created a buzz within the military because there are few places in the world where minesweepers could be significant – chief among them, the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf, where about 40 percent of the world’s oil passes each day. "Coupled with the CNO’s request for a blockade review, a deployment of minesweepers to the west coast of Iran would seem to suggest that a much discussed – but until now largely theoretical – prospect has become real: that the U.S. may be preparing for war with Iran,” according to a special report in Time magazine. The U.S. military routinely makes plans for many different scenarios, and the vast majority of them will never be carried out. "And yet from the State Department to the White House to the highest reaches of the military command, there is a growing sense that a showdown with Iran – over its suspected quest for nuclear weapons, its threats against Israel and its bid for dominance of the world's richest oil region – may be impossible to avoid,” Time reports. The magazine’s reporters interviewed dozens of experts and government officials to find out what an attack on Iran would consist of – and what its repercussions might be. First of all, most observers believe the attack would not involve ground forces and would instead be a massive air campaign against Iran’s 18 to 30 nuclear-related facilities. But many of the targets are hardened, and would have to be struck repeatedly to ensure that they were destroyed or severely damaged. Some sites are in populated areas, and civilian casualties would be a certainty, according to Time. And there would be no guarantee that the strikes would destroy all nuclear-related sites, because some sites could be undiscovered. What’s more, the attacks would spark retaliation from Iran that could include ordering a Hezbollah attack on Israel and stepping up the funneling of money and weapons to the Taliban in Afghanistan and insurgents in Iraq. The likelihood that Iran would also seek to close the Strait of Hormuz is high, and a disruption of the oil supplies flowing through the strait could send oil prices skyrocketing. That in turn could spur a stepped-up military effort by the U.S. that could even include the "worst case” use of ground forces in an effort to topple the Iranian regime, retired Marine General Anthony Zinni told Time. For that reason, Zinni believes an attack on Iran is a "dumb idea.” And that is why the U.S. has sought to emphasize a possible diplomatic solution, Time concludes. One Bush administration official told the magazine: "Nobody is considering a military option at this point. We're trying to prevent a situation in which the President finds himself having to decide between a nuclear-armed Iran or going to war. The best hope of avoiding that dilemma is hard-nosed diplomacy, one that has serious consequences."
-
Gunmen foiled in attack on U.S. Embassy in Damascus
Here's some of the US polices....from 2000 for the future century ESTABLISH FOUR CORE MISSIONS for U.S. military forces: • defend the American homeland; • fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars; • perform the “constabulary” duties associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions; • transform U.S. forces to exploit the “revolution in military affairs;” To carry out these core missions, we need to provide sufficient force and budgetary allocations. In particular, the United States must: MAINTAIN NUCLEAR STRATEGIC SUPERIORITY, basing the U.S. nuclear deterrent upon a global, nuclear net assessment that weighs the full range of current and emerging threats, not merely the U.S.-Russia balance. RESTORE THE PERSONNEL STRENGTH of today’s force to roughly the levels anticipated in the “Base Force” outlined by the Bush Administration, an increase in active-duty strength from 1.4 million to 1.6 million. REPOSITION U.S. FORCES to respond to 21st century strategic realities by shifting permanently-based forces to Southeast Europe and Southeast Asia, and by changing naval deployment patterns to reflect growing U.S. strategic concerns in East Asia. MODERNIZE CURRENT U.S. FORCES SELECTIVELY, proceeding with the F-22 program while increasing purchases of lift, electronic support and other aircraft; expanding submarine and surface combatant fleets; purchasing Comanche helicopters and medium-weight ground vehicles for the Army, and the V-22 Osprey “tilt-rotor” aircraft for the Marine Corps. CANCEL “ROADBLOCK” PROGRAMS such as the Joint Strike Fighter, CVX aircraft carrier, and Crusader howitzer system that would absorb exorbitant amounts of Pentagon funding while providing limited improvements to current capabilities. Savings from these canceled programs should be used to spur the process of military transformation. DEVELOP AND DEPLOY GLOBAL MISSILE DEFENSES to defend the American homeland and American allies, and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world. CONTROL THE NEW “INTERNATIONAL COMMONS” OF SPACE AND “CYBERSPACE,” and pave the way for the creation of a new military service – U.S. Space Forces – with the mission of space control. EXPLOIT THE “REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS” to insure the long-term superiority of U.S. conventional forces. Establish a two-stage transformation process which • maximizes the value of current weapons systems through the application of advanced technologies, and, • produces more profound improvements in military capabilities, encourages competition between single services and joint-service experimentation efforts. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING gradually to a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, adding $15 billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually.
-
Dems Move To Quash 1st Amendment, Assualt OnThe Constitution
You know it's a different type of "Bloodthirsty". And why leave somewhere that you call home. Defend it.
-
Dems Move To Quash 1st Amendment, Assualt OnThe Constitution
I know....as I've said in another thread, I'm out. I'll continue to articles but I'm not getting drawn into endless loops of discussions - where I bring something new and then someone else uses something old against it.....it's wasting my time on what is technically 3 maybe 4 people.... So, yeah.
-
The One Truth That 9/11 Deniers Won't Face
"conspirsy nuts" And you wonder way I don't want to talk about it anymore. I suggest you read some books to answer those questions because I'm done with you children.
-
9/11 - The Inside Job **NEW INFO & UPDATES WHEN THEY HAPPEN**
"Your theories have been proved wrong by many sources" Where? How many times does the media support what I have been posting about??? hardly ever. but proper reporters sometimes actually do some good work and they do report on matters truthfully......and what happens about it? Nothing because people just brush it off as simply nothing......so how are we every going to get our points across? the alternative media is the only viable way at present.
-
The One Truth That 9/11 Deniers Won't Face
Wow, some of your points are terrible. And I gladly would sit here and write another massive post showing you why but I really am becoming less interested to in explaining this to 2-3 people on this board. Ask someone else. And this isn't me just backing down, far from it.....I'm just genuinely shocked at the lack of understanding of some areas by some people. "America had access to it [oil] anyway - UN food for oil" Yeah....ask someone else.
-
9/11 - The Inside Job **NEW INFO & UPDATES WHEN THEY HAPPEN**
"If youve ever worked for a corporation you'd know, it takes half a dozen people to change a lightbulb." Ok, if your going to use such examples to explain a government cover-up then I guess you need a new topic for that. This DID go wrong because we have caught them out so many times.
-
7/7 London Bombings - The other False Flag Operation + 21 July Info
I'm sure this wasn't a laughing matter until you jokers got involved. Please.
-
The One Truth That 9/11 Deniers Won't Face
Yeah, that's not really true is it.
-
7/7 London Bombings - The other False Flag Operation + 21 July Info
I don't believe to relevant to this topic.
-
9/11 - The Inside Job **NEW INFO & UPDATES WHEN THEY HAPPEN**
No, that argument doesn't fly.
-
9/11 - The Inside Job **NEW INFO & UPDATES WHEN THEY HAPPEN**
What? so two buildings hit in different parts with fires not hot enough to weaken the steal and with any number of variables going on would explode (sorry, collapse) in exactly the same way? In an impossible time? There's too much wrong with what the official line that the points made in the video shouldn't be ignored...
-
7/7 London Bombings - The other False Flag Operation + 21 July Info
The people of spain knew that their government wasn't to be trusted and they kicked them out of office.
-
7/7 London Bombings - The other False Flag Operation + 21 July Info
haha, I love the X-Files actually. But it's just a pretend TV show.......a good one though.
-
Israel / Lebanon / Iran / Syria - Middle East conflict!
If they wanted to destroy other arab nations they could have done so already" No they couldn't just go and destroy arab nations if they wanted to.....it would need a major event for them to get away with random country destruction. Which actually might happen soon if Israel gets their way.
-
Kerry May Run For President Again......uh oh.
"Just because Saddam had WMDs after all, it doesn't mean Bush didn't lie about them. As ridiculous as it sounds, this appears to be the instinctive, defensive reaction of many Liberals to this news. They so badly need to believe that President Bush lied in order to legitimise their hatred of him that they're capable of this sort of twisted reasoning. The rationale seems to be that WMDs don't count if they aren't exactly where the CIA told us they were, as if they couldn't be moved." That's exactly what I would say if I was trying to defend a lying murdering dictator. It's not about people needing to believe things.....what an asshole.
-
Israel / Lebanon / Iran / Syria - Middle East conflict!
Israel Pushing U.S. To Invade Iran American Free Press/Mike Blair | September 16 2006 The Bush administration and the British government are under increasing pressure from the Israelis to conduct an illegal air strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities, according to a number of reports in Europe’s largest newspapers. In London, The Sunday Telegraph and the daily Telegraph have reported that war clouds are spreading as Iran continues its nuclear development and Israel reacts to it. According to The Sunday Telegraph Israel has appointed Maj. Gen. Elyezer Shkedy, commander of the Israeli air force, to direct military action against Tehran. Meanwhile, the Telegraph reports that Britain is holding secret talks “at which senior defense chiefs and government officials will consider the consequences of an attack on Iran.” The Pentagon is also drawing up plans for an attack. U.S. military ground forces are already bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq, and in dozens of other deployments abroad. Still, irresponsible air strikes against Iran’s nuclear sites, which would inevitably result in massive, insoluble geopolitical, military, energy and economic problems, are planned by Bush administration numbskulls. Israel, as usual, is counting on U.S. backing—and it is making it obvious that if there is no strike on Iran it will act on its own. In a recent visit to the United States, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned “friend and foe alike” that Israel is prepared to “take on any country or combination of countries” to protect itself. The Israelis refer to the “Iran Front,” The Sunday Telegraph reports. “Israel is becoming extremely concerned now with what they see as Iran’s delaying tactics,” an Israeli-Iran analyst told the newspaper. “The [israeli] planners think negotiations are going nowhere, and Iran is becoming a major danger for Israel. Now they are getting ready for living with a nuclear Iran or letting the military take care of it.” According to the British publication “Gen. Shkedy will coordinate the intelligence gathered by Israel’s foreign spy agency Mossad and military sources, in order to draw up battle plans. . . . He will command the campaign from a ‘hot seat’ in the Israeli army’s headquarters in Tel Aviv.” Uri Dromi, a former air force colonel and analyst, told The Sunday Telegraph: “It’s natural that Shkedy is nominated in this role, because the air force is Israel’s only force that can reach and sustain a military operation against Iran. . . .Everyone is playing with dates and time frames . . . but the list of options is becoming shorter. I think we have one year open [to launch military action].” Israel reportedly has an arsenal of at least 200 nuclear warheads and as many as 400. The Telegraph reported wishfully: [it is] believed that an American-led attack, designed to destroy Iran’s ability to develop a nuclear bomb, is ‘inevitable’ if Tehran’s leaders fail to comply with United Nations’ demands to freeze their uranium enrichment program.. Tactical Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from U.S. Navy ships and submarines in the gulf would, it is believed, target Iran’s air defense systems at the nuclear installations. That would enable attacks by B2 Stealth bombers equipped with eight 4,500-pound enhanced BLU-28 satellite-guided bunker busting bombs, flying from Diego Garcia, the isolated U.S. Navy base in the Indian Ocean, RAF [Royal Air Force] base Fairford in Gloucestershire and Whiteman USAF base in Missouri. It is understood that any direct British involvement in an attack would be limited but may extend to the use of the RAF’s highly secret airborne warning aircraft. The belief in some areas of Whitehall is that an attack is now all but inevitable.
-
9/11 - The Inside Job **NEW INFO & UPDATES WHEN THEY HAPPEN**
Setting aside the divisive controversy over what exactly hit the Pentagon that day, there is one unmistakable truth about 9/11 that no one - not even the government - can deny. The total disintegration of every piece of concrete in the twin towers means that the official version of how they came down can only be described as either a Miracle or a Lie. Even the portion of the Pentagon, which was allegedly hit by a plane similar to those that hit the towers, did not distintegrate but instead collapsed with its concrete walls and floors largely intact. (I say allegedly because, not having seen all the evidence, reasonable people can differ.) However, no one can deny that only a miracle could bring down the towers as it did - completely pulverized, solely as a result of structural failures. If, on the other hand, you have a mind of your own and have the good sense to question the nature of miraculous events - especially those that conveniently serve special interests - then after watching the videos below, and this one on pyroclastic flows, you can only conclude - it's a LIE. Structural Failure vs. Controlled Demolition http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkk8uE-wB2E "Watch both buildings collapsing straight down, directly into the path of most resistance - which is all the floors and all the mass of the building itself." * * * "In order for the floor to fall down, thousands of [metal] joints would have to break simultaneously. And then if you look at the speed with which this came down - less than 10 seconds - you blink your eye and thousands of joints have popped, somehow. The only way you can explain that is with explosives." --Eric Hufschmid, Metal Cutting Expert http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_cC37d5kOs "You have two hundred and ten story office buildings. You don't find a desk. You don't find a chair. You don't find a telephone, a computer. The biggest piece of a telephone I found was about half of a keypad and it was about this big [the size of a post-it]." --Joe Casaliggi, Engine 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5kF9ldtgrc "This was the South Tower. This was 104, 106 stories, all of it - this is what is left. Up there was the North Tower. And you look and you see - there's no concrete. There's very little concrete. All you see is aluminum and steel. --George Pataki, Governor of New York Seeing is believing - it's a lie. Pass it on.
-
7/7 London Bombings - The other False Flag Operation + 21 July Info
How come your such an idiot? Ignore him, he's trying to move away from the issue......this is why we are fucked.....becuase of people like him. Is it too much to ask to want to know what happened? This is a normal reaction, when did people become so sedated. All we want is truth and answers......all MrCool want's is a bit of a laugh. It's always the same.