GazeboflossUK

7/7 London Bombings - The other False Flag Operation Lots of evidence points towards another 'inside job' led by british Intelligence. So.....to start here's some info about why we need an independant investigation to find out what happened and not just an narritive put forward by the government. Videos Ludicrous Diversion http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4943675105275097719 Mind The Gap http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2627422049658027269 Websites July 7th Truth Campaign Official Confusion

You can say that all you want.

No haven't been proven wrong and I don't make up this stuff. Honestly, stop being such a victim in this. I can say your extremely wrong and I have proven it.....so what changes.

Obviously there are real terrorists out there but not with the scope to carry out the large, cataclysmic and catalytic attacks we see. These attacks are state sponsored, they give the governments more power and control. They then can lie to go to war and set polices which take away any remaining power from the people....and they get away with it.....they stand to gain from these attacks. In 1993 the terror group (most of which thought that they were carrying that attack by themselves) didn't park the Ryder truck packed with high explosives close enough to the major support columns in the basement which meant it didn't blow the bottom away enough to cause the tower to lean to one side and into the other tower. Lucky for many of the people there that day..........However, very unlucky for those who were there in 2001 when the operation went mostly to plan.

You know why Bin Laden was left alone? He was working for the CIA. AND the WTC Bombing in 1993 was arranged by the FBI. This is true. Emad Salem secretly recorded hundreds of hours of his talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as being in a far better position than previously known to foil the February 26th bombing of New York City's tallest towers. He thought that it was odd that they were giving him real explosives to give to the group he infiltrated for a Sting Operation so he recorded his instructions on tape which later was used to get him and some others set free. Salem, a 43-year-old former Egyptian Army officer, was used by the Government to penetrate a circle of Muslim extremists who are now charged in two bombing cases: the World Trade Center attack, and a foiled plot to destroy the United Nations, the Hudson River tunnels, and other New York City landmarks. After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. Bill Clinton warned America in his radio address that we should not overreact to the 1993 WTC bombing. "I would discourage the American people from overreacting to this," Clinton said. Bill Clinton treated it as a petty criminal offense even though Bush 41 told him terrorists had declared war on America. CIA director Woolsey now reveals that he never had a private personal meeting with Clinton during the first two years of his tenure as head of the CIA - exactly the key period in investigating the 1993 attack. Bill Clinton did not visit the WTC towers. Bill Clinton did not even make a public appearance on national television. Bill Clinton tried to stop a reward fund for the capture of terrorists involved in the attack. From the time President Clinton took office until May of 1995, a Presidential Decision Directive, PDD 39, sat in the National Security Council, in the In Box of one of the officials with no action taken. The significance of PDD 39 is that it was the document defining what the missions and roles were of combating terrorism. Despite what happened at the World Trade Center in 1993, the Clinton administration did not finally act on [PDD 39] until after the attack in Oklahoma City. The only reason for that is because in the two weeks prior to Oklahoma City, the front page of both Newsweek and Time Magazine carried the question: 'Is President Clinton Relevant?' After the 1993 ambush in Somalia, which killed 19 and injured 84; President Clinton just tucked tail and ran away. On May 4, 1993, Clinton having taken office in January, U.S. Marine Lt. Gen. Robert Johnston handed over control of the relief mission to the UN. "It's all yours," he told the new UN commander, a Turkish general, as he departed with most of his U.S. troops in tow. Bill Clinton sent U.S. Army Rangers on a highly risky mission to take out Aidid. Aidid militia were not Somali but members of bin Laden's Al Qaeda network, who were deployed in his Mogadishu bases. Bill Clinton denied the Pentagon a request for armor support. After botching the whole mission, Clinton pulled out and Bin Laden took notice of that. Bill Clinton even gave the target of the mission, Aidid, a marine guard after the botched mission to capture him. After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. Bill Clinton cared so little that his own assistant secretary of state, Dick Holbrooke, had trouble getting him to pay attention to warnings about the impending attack on the Khobar Towers. After the Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia in 1996, Clinton had Dick Morris take a poll. "We tested 'peacemaker' or 'toughness,'" York quotes Morris as recalling. The public preferred toughness. "So Clinton talked tough." But the FBI director, Louis Freeh, became so exasperated by Clinton's failure to raise the matter with Saudi officials that he actually asked former President George Bush to do so instead. After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. Clinton used American tax dollars to pay for the trucks used in the embassy bombings. (See Below) The U.S. State Department thwarted an investigation into two suspects in the Aug. 7. 1998, bombing of the U.S. embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya, which had killed more than 250 people, including 12 Americans, according to reports from MSNBC news filed on July 29. Clinton was more concerned with obstructing justice than doing anything about such a grave terrorist attack. After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. Shortly after the bombing of the Cole, Clinton had an opportunity to take Bin Laden out and refused to. A Pentagon intelligence expert on terrorism in the Persian Gulf has told Congress that he warned of possible terrorist attacks on U.S. forces. All the investigations lead back to government agents & funding, that's why they don't arrest certain guys and let them go free.

That's the thing, your right, they do whine and complain to eachother to make it seem as if both parties are actually having a debate about something....when in truth they both stink and nothing really changes, not really. There are true Libs Democrats and true Conservatives out there....unfortunatly none of them (or 95%) are not in any power. The guys at the top have all the control and it's going to be tough to get rid of the fraudulent neo-con lapdogs that have sneaked in and hi-jacked both sides - who are happy to let your county continue into the abyss or destruction.

9/11 Gas Station Video Released - Does not show Flight 77 September 15 2006 The long sought after and much hyped Citago gas station video from 9/11 has finally been released. See below for the video and the Raw Story report. Remember that there are another 84 tapes that the FBI is withholding. The gas station had several security cameras aimed in the direction of the pentagon. Flight 77 flew directly over the gas station at an altitude of roughly 50 feet, less than 3 seconds from impact. If this is all the footage from the gas station then why was it retained under national security laws for five years? The Doubletree hotel video apparently does not contain the impact either according to the FBI. This video is due to be released on or around November 9. There is a mystery surrounding the Sheraton hotel video though. The FBI says no such video exists, but According to a CNN FOIA request however, a nearby hotel's video DID capture the impact. There were also mainstream media reports that indicated that the staff from this hotel "sat and watched the video in horror" before it was confiscated by the FBI. Is the government muddying the waters again with this latest release which has been hyped up for a long time now? This will once again whip up into a frenzy the no plane theories. If that happens and the next video, or perhaps the one after that, shows a clear impact of flight 77, then the alternative 9/11 theories that are gaining so much attention now will be widely and viciously attacked. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LJvFjsl6zk Long-sought 9/11 videotape didn't capture attack Raw Story | September 15 2006 A convenience store videotape long-sought by September 11 conspiracy theorists does not actually show the attack on the Pentagon, RAW STORY has learned. Many believed the video would show American Airlines Flight 77 -- or something else -- striking the Pentagon. The videotape, which depicts views from the gas station's six security cameras, shows that the CITGO cameras did not seem to capture the actual attack. Conservative organization Judicial Watch obtained the footage through a Freedom of Information Act request filed December 15, 2004. The request sought all records pertaining to September 11, 2001 camera recordings of the Pentagon attack from the Nexcomm/CITGO gas station, Pentagon security cameras and the Virginia Department of Transportation. In May 2006, The Department of Defense released a number of videos depicting the attack in response to a Judicial Watch lawsuit. The group filed another lawsuit against the FBI on June 22, 2006. The FBI has also agreed to release to Judicial Watch a videotape obtained from the Doubletree Hotel near the Pentagon by November 9, 2006. "With the release of this videotape, we are one step closer to completing the public record on the September 11 terrorist attacks," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a statement. "The CITGO tape evidently does not show the Pentagon attack, which the American people can now see for themselves. This videotape was the subject of intense public debate. Now that it has been released to the public, there is no reason for further speculation about what it does or does not show." The video may be viewed below. Images from inside the store have been partially obscured by the FBI to protect the privacy of store customers and employees.

Kerry May Run For President Again "Skull and Bones" Kerry says he's "prepared to kick Swift Boat's ass" :( Raw Story | September 14 2006 Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) doesn't believe that Hillary Clinton has the inside track on the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination and says he would vigorously defend himself against new attacks by the Swift Boat team, according to an interview with The Examiner. "I’m prepared to kick their ass from one end of America to the other," said Kerry, in a strong hint that he intends to run for president once again. In response to wide talk of Sen. Clinton (D-NY) being the favorite for the Democrats in 2008, Kerry says, "I don’t buy it. ... I don’t care what the dominant, conventional wisdom is today; it will not be the dominant, conventional wisdom in a year." Excerpts of the interview and article, available here, follow: # Kerry says the only reason he didn’t compete in more states in 2004 was that he ran out of money. He says this was also the reason he did not adequately respond to a series of devastating TV ads by Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth, a group that questioned Kerry’s service in Vietnam and criticized his later opposition to the war. "I’m prepared to kick their ass from one end of America to the other," he declares. "I am so confident of my abilities to address that and to demolish it and to even turn it into a positive." Kerry’s tough talk triggers laughter from John O’Neill, a fellow Vietnam veteran who helped found Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth and wrote a blistering 2004 book on Kerry, Unfit for Command. "Well, he’s got eight times as much time to prepare for us as he spent in Vietnam," says O’Neill, referring to Kerry’s short tour of duty. #

Hey, I don't really know what actually hit the pentagon.....could be a boeing airline, could be a global hawk drone......who knows?? Well, I'll tell you who knows...the US government does because they have admitted to have around 80 security tapes from the pentagon and surrounding buildings which shows what exactly hit the pentagon that day......but they won't let anyone see..........but they are happy release select frames which they claim "at long last proves what hit the pentagaon".........but when you see the video that they released it's a joke. Why wont they show us? It's a trap.....a possible trap for the truth movement.

Loose Change "Final Cut" is around now too...(but if you look online at the moment you probably will just find video clips that are rough sections that were going to be used in the final cut). Alex's documentries are very good, really, they are. And if you want a good book on 9/11 get "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9-11"' by David Ray Griffin. And try and watch BYU professor Steven E Jones' WTC Lecture online or read his amazing paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" here > http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2006/WTC-Jones19mar06.htm (it's very good) He was ordered to remove his paper from the actual University website, not because they say that he's wrong as they actually say that his science is outstanding....but they ordered it removed because the University because of the problems cause by his thoughts regarding the involvement of elements within the US government. Anyway....there's alot of good films out there but there's also a few bad ones which doesn't really help the truth movement but hinder it by talking about things like the "no plane theory" and that it was holograms.....which is pure stupidity and should be ignored.

Oh, Paul, Paul, Paul.....why must you always fuck it up.

It is, trust me....:sick:

City removes fluoride from water Karen Gleason / Del Rio News-Herald | September 14 2006 Fluoride will no longer be added to Del Rio’s drinking water. The Del Rio City Council made that decision Tuesday night after a presentation by John Morony, a retired college biology professor, who characterized fluoride as a poison and showed the council numerous research references that link fluoride to higher rates of cancer and other health hazards. Following Morony’s presentation and a brief discussion by the council, Councilman Pat Cole said, “I make the motion that we cease immediately adding fluoride to our beautiful San Felipe Springs water.” In his letter to the city requesting time to address the council, Morony recommended “that Del Rio cease fluoridating its water supply.” Morony in his letter noted that in the U.S., more than 70 communities have stopped adding fluoride to their water. He also pointed out that most European countries, Japan and China do not add fluoride to their water supplies. “Why? Basically for two reasons: fluoridated water cannot be shown to significantly reduce dental caries (tooth decay) and it has proved to be far more toxic than previously thought,” Morony wrote. Morony during Tuesday night’s meeting also presented the council with a paper titled “Scientific Facts on the Biological Effects of Fluorides.” The paper listed research references linking fluoride to a variety of medical problems, including the development of bone cancer and premature aging. The paper stated, “Fluoride consumption by human beings increases the general cancer death rate.” Morony noted that although some fluoride occurs naturally in all water, the fluoride being added to the city’s water supply “is a waste product of the phosphate fertilizer industry.” “I’m just trying to get the fluoride out of our water,” Morony told the council. At the end of Morony’s presentation, Cole asked him, “So let me clarify: if we continue adding fluoride, we are putting in our water a byproduct of the fertilizer industry?” “That’s right,” Morony said. Councilman Mike Wrob asked, “At what point did we start putting fluoride in our water?” City administrators asked Mitch Lomas, manager of the city’s water treatment plant, to answer Wrob’s question. “We started fluoridating in 1990 as a result of a decision by the city council,” Lomas replied. “At the time we did not have all the information about fluoride that we do now,” he added. Wrob then asked Lomas to give the council his opinion of adding fluoride to the city’s drinking water, a question Lomas did not answer directly. Mayor Efrain Valdez noted that the city spends about $20,000 a year buying the fluoride to add to the city water. Cole asked Lomas, “How do employees at the water plant feel about handling fluoride?” “It’s a very corrosive chemical. It eats through concrete and metal. When they handle it, they have to wear respirators and chemical-proof suits,” Lomas said. “But how do they feel about handling it?” Cole asked. “They really would rather not handle it,” Lomas replied. Cole then made her motion to cease fluoridation of the city’s water, with Wrob giving the second. After the council had voted unanimously to approve Cole’s motion, Morony told the News-Herald as he had left the council chambers, “The council’s decision is very gratifying. Now we can go back to drinking Del Rio water.”

Poll: More Americans blame Bush for 9/11 POSTED: 9:31 p.m. EDT, September 11, 2006 WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The percentage of Americans who blame the Bush administration for the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington has risen from almost a third to almost half over the past four years, a CNN poll released Monday found. Asked whether they blame the Bush administration for the attacks, 45 percent said either a "great deal" or a "moderate amount," up from 32 percent in a June 2002 CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll. But the Clinton administration did not get off lightly either. The latest poll, conducted by Opinion Research Corporation for CNN, found that 41 percent of respondents blamed his administration a "great deal" or a "moderate amount" for the attacks. (Read the complete poll results -- PDF) That's only slightly less than the 45 percent who blamed his administration in a poll carried out less than a week after the attacks. Still, most Americans appear to be fatalistic, with more than half -- 57 percent -- saying they think that terrorists will "always find a way to launch attacks no matter what the U.S. government does." The poll was carried out August 30 through September 2 by Opinion Research Corp. with 1,004 American adults questioned by telephone. The sampling error for the questions was 3 percentage points. From CNN.com

Do what exactly?

Bush Sr. stayed the hell out of Iraq ?? did he? Even in 1991? ;)

The I.T Crowd was shite wasn't it.... I do like Dave Gorman but not Danny Wallace, sorry.

Yes, I agree.....I don't know quite how they fooled alot of people into paying for some which they get for free. I filter my water using a very good filtration system and you can see the awful amount of horrible elements which the water leaves behind....especially on the 'hard' water in London. The water tastes much more fresh this way....it's amazing. When I lived in north County Durham, which is where I grew up, the 'soft' water was 100% cleaner and it was a visiable difference. I still don't know how they trick people into paying for it. But I do know that paying for water is becoming so accpeted. It's the new gold and I'm sure we'll all find that out the hard way......gulp.

Hmmm, well none of the ones I mentioned copy the US sitcoms to any large degree. But all the rubbish TV sitcoms we have do try and mimic the American style.... And...last time I checked, if you're Scottish, you're still British. :)

Well, I doubt it's because of the lack of fluoride....I don't drink tap water (especially where I live in London) and my teeth are fine AND I use fluoride free toothpaste.

Here, it's Iraq and it's always rising... http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182

No, no....there's still great british comedy about. Ricky Gevais & Steven Merchant Chris Morris Sasha Baron Cohen they are always doing great new things.

Well, there's fluoride. It has never been classified safe for human consumption and is more toxic than lead. They say fluoride helps to prevent tooth decay in children but it was used by Hitler to kill people.... It was practised by Hitler's regime is made the more credible when we know that as far back as 1938 the US Government, and ally to boot, and the government of a democratic Christian country, was considering the transformation of American citizens and others into 'zombies' by a number of proposed techniques. The US Army searched for "the perfect incapacitating agent", according to General Fellenz, "to put in the enemy's water supply". Included in the drugs tested were the hallucinogenic LSD and the amnesiac BZ (10 times more potent than LSD), and a "schizophrenic agent called bulbocapine". The "Rockefeller Report" to the United States President on CIA activities said: "The drug program was part of a much larger CIA program to study possible means of controlling human behaviour". One drug which received special attention in the 'fifties and early 'sixties, under the cryptonym of MK-ULTRA, was suxamethonium chloride (listed under a number of product names including Anectine), a halogenated anti-cholinergic agent with all the symptomatic side-effects up to and including cardiac arrest ascribed to these agents in the medical literature. Please retain the term "anti-cholinergic agent" in mind , for owing to the health implications attendant on this particular anti-metabolic activity, it figures repeatedly in this thesis. Note: An adviser to the US Government on hypnotism or psychological behaviour control, Dr George Estabrooks, later became Chairman, Department of Psychology, Colgate University. Internationally, Colgate was and remains the most ardent producer and advocate for the fluorination of a domestic product - fluoridated toothpaste.

Yeah, of course....there's a whole bunch of guys and dolls who need locked up for it....like the CFR, the real mafia.....those guys are the ones who have too much control.

Yeah, I heard about this. Hmmm. To be honest, the water is already full of poison that they don't need to, haha. But if they do take it upon themselves to put something worse into the water then I guess alot of people might become ill.... I'm not quite sure what's sparking this threat off.....why now? odd. I could just move to Scotland.