GazeboflossUK

No, I said that I WILL NOT change my mind unless they step up and show us decent proof. Which of course they haven't. Remember the footage that was meant to "finally show a plane hitting the pentagon" which I myself waited around for hours to see a few months ago.....but when it came to airing the footage it was almost the same and probably even worse than the so-called 'leaked' pentagon footage from 2001 and showed nothing new.

These reports just ignore information and lie.......even ignoring info from the company that certified the steel used the the WTC buildings. I am NOT hellbent on ANY claim I and the real truth movement make.........It's just beacuse that it is impossible that these buildings fell in the way they did and lots of people think so....I'm not going to change my opinion unless I see decent proof. Which I most certainly haven't because we have caught them lying at every point. Why do you think that there is never a big TV debate on these VERY important issues?? it's becuase the official line is SO easy to destroy. It's the people who believe the official story and go around saying that WTC building 7 fell from the top down who need to really take a hard look at what they are saying....it's as if they are being paid off to just ignore the actuall footage and evidence. I've heard them on TV/Radio say that it doesn't show a demolition and that it fell from the top down......I mean these people are either slightly stupid or are corrupt. It's one of the two.

Hey, I'll not move onto something else....because all these thing are connected. Come on man, saying that I'd simply move onto something else is weak, very weak. After all I've said about my stance and my serious research into all these governmental reports before I could see their lies - you still choose to say that I'd just give up and move onto another point.....that's just not true with me or anyone I know within the movement. This is just one of the many smoking guns that are obvious from that day. If they come up with any other story, other than one which clearly states that the building was brought down with demolition charges then I will still have the same opinion as I do now - that they are still being made to lie. Simple. These reports just ignore information and lie.......even ignoring info from the company that certified the steel used the the WTC buildings.

NIST To Probe Whether WTC 7 Downed By Blasts Forced to issue response to 9/11 truth movement questions on official website Paul Joseph Watson | August 31 2006 The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is set to conclude its investigation of the World Trade Center complex by analyzing if bombs brought down WTC 7, the 47 story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane yet collapsed in a controlled demolition style in under seven seconds. NIST today released a page on its website that is intended to answer skeptic's questions about why the towers and WTC 7 were the first and only three buildings to collapse from fire damage alone. Though the vast majority of the NIST rebuttal seeks to reinforce the notion that the twin towers were brought down from nothing other than jetliner impacts and heavy fires, NIST makes the admission that investigation into WTC 7 has been insufficient and that they are now, "considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse." The report continues by saying that, "NIST would like to determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements." While it would be a brave prediction to foresee NIST's investigation contradicting the official explanation for 7's collapse, this at least shows the growing power of the 9/11 truth movement in eliciting answers to longstanding questions. In Popular Mechanics' infamous 9/11 hit piece, they quote a FEMA building performance study as saying there were no firefighting actions undertaken in Building 7 and yet WTC complex owner Larry Silverstein's explanation of his "pull it" quote was clarified to mean removing firefighters from the building. The two statements contradict each other so they both cannot be true. NIST's discussion of the twin towers' collapse largely repeats its initial assertions that faulty fire proofing and weakened steel caused a sagging effect on the floors, causing them to pull their support columns inward. NIST seeks to distance itself however from the 'pancake theory' that was espoused in the months after the attack and has since been discredited. Will NIST seek to conduct an empirical investigation of WTC 7 or are they simply going through the motions to placate an increasingly vocal chorus raising doubts about what really happened on September 11, 2001?

Hey, I know. I do try. But everything is whacky to him. Even things which are deadly serious. And this isn't really an effort to bitch at him really. It's just how he is alot of the time. He's only one person though. He can stay how he is forever.....that's his free choice.

Don't worry, the borders will not be closed....

Well, I was going to post this link you have above ^. It's actually useful at times. The 911 Research piece on Loose Change is more often a guide to what actually should be done with the information and evidence they/we have. Sometimes in Loose Change they don't show the implications of the Info and evidence they present...and I personally (as do alot of the truth movement) think that some of the Pentagon stuff should be carefully handled as I think we are being set-up here. With the release of video's that are supposed to prove a Boeing plane hit the Pentagon - when infact they do more to fuel the debate to what really happened and the media is always happy to focus on this. I think this is a set up as the government will try to quash all the evidence that has been shown about that day by simply releasing a video (real or fake) that shows a plane did hit The Pentagon, thus hurting the real truth movement a lot - despite all the other more obvious evidence which most of us talk about. A classic honey pot trap by the government maybe. The thing is....there have been so many "other" groups set up who make some claims which really hurt the "real" truth movement. I only really stick to info which is considered to be useful to exposing the truth, rarther than go along with some people who even believe that no planes hit the WTC. Which of course is madness.......I often think who would think of such a silly idea?? (hmmmm) SO LOOK... There are people out there who do hurt the movement by creating really ridiculous claims but most of us are pretty much on the same page......you'll notice that people who try to debunk 9/11 claims always go after that ones which the REAL truth seekers never thought of in the first place. There's nothing that I believe which has been 'de-bunked'.... Certainly there are people who abuse the truth movement for their own gain but these people are really in the minority......as all the people I have talked to, met and have been following surely are in this because they believe it to be so important to everyones life and plow what little money they get back into the cause. I mean the guys from loose change as well as alex jones do give their DVD's away for free and 10,000 free copies of Loose Change Final Cut will be given free to people on september 11th 2006 in New York City at a huge rally. I mean it cost Alex Jones about $100,000 of his own money to make his lastest film yet it is up on torrent sites, google video and other places for FREE. And he allows the vids and his one book to be freely copied. So when you read about the 'No Plane Theory' just remember that I (as well as the REAL truthers) do not believe that rubbish. Things like remote controlled planes are up for clear debate as they actually are possible, due to government documents in the past citing such plans. (i.e Northwoods document) WTC 7 is a one of the real keys. Everything written by the government about how and why it fell is a joke. I am a smart, decent human being and will not be played for fool in such an obvious way. I'm not going to insult my whole upbringing and own intelligence by ignoring the obvious. PS, I've just stumbled on this interview with Davin Coburn from Popular Mechanics and Charles Goyette burns him on numerous topics... MP3 of Interview Is this why Popular Mechanics canceled some appearances?Listen to this MP3 file of Popular Mechanics on the Charles Goyette show in Phoenix. Charles has him backpedaling big time. And this is like so many interviews I've heard recently.

^ well, it is....at most times. For all I like Loose Change 2nd Edition and it does make some great points but it also makes some claims which they later have edited in their "recut" of that edition. It was a couple of parts that dealt with The Pentagon but the main issues all remain clear. I think the Final Cut - due out on Sept. 11th 2006 - is shaping up to be a whole new version with better clarity of information and lots more interviews with key people. I hope it achieves great things and there's even inside talk of a US theatre release......if they can only hold complete control of it's content, I hear.

How NAFTA superhighway is built under radar screen Officials say they see no budget 'earmarks,' because they don't know where to look World Net Daily | August 29 2006 WASHINGTON – Ask some members of Congress about plans to build a "NAFTA superhighway" connecting Mexico and Canada via the U.S. and you might hear snickers. Some officials will tell you they have seen no "earmarks" for such a plan and question whether it even exists. But the plan does exist and the NAFTA superhighway is being built – under the radar screen. One need look no further than the $286 billion highway bill signed into law earlier this month by President Bush for some of the "earmarks." The measure gave the state of Tennessee more than $111 million to help plan and build Interstate 69, called "one of the most significant transportation projects in the region's history" by the Commercial Appeal. No one in Tennessee has any doubts about plans for the NAFTA superhighway. It is being built now with federal taxpayer dollars. And the plan calls for I-69 to extend from Michigan to Texas, linking the Canadian and Mexican borders. Those supporting the plan, like Transportation Secretary Mario Cino, say it will bring an unprecedented windfall not only to the regions it traverses but for all Americans, Mexicans and Canadians. Tennessee Department of Transportation Commissioner Gerald Nicely said I-69 "could help position the western part of the state as one of the world's new economic centers of power in the global marketplace." The entire I-69 project is expected to cost $8.8 billion in current dollars, with states picking up 10 percent of the tab. So where is the money hidden? It's not really. But nowhere in any highway bill is the project referred to as the "NAFTA superhighway." Since the money is doled out to states to spend on their portion of the project, the allocations look like any other highway spending. Ultimately, the Tennessee portion of the I-69 project is expected to cost $1 billion. It will shadow the present route of U.S. 51, connecting towns like Union City, Troy, Dyersburg, Ripley, Covington and Millington before following what is now I-40/240 through Midtown, according to the Commercial Appeal. The new highway bill focuses on the portion of I-69 through Northwest Tennessee about 80-110 miles north of Memphis. A 20-mile section of that segment – a four-lane stretch of U.S. 51 between Dyersburg and Troy – already is completed. Signs label it as part of the "Future I-69 Corridor." That leaves a 19-mile section to be built from Troy to the Kentucky line before one-third of the I-69 route through Tennessee is completed. "The route's already been laid out, with survey markers planted in fields and cryptic benchmarks painted on the pavement of country roads," reports the Commercial Appeal. Detailed drawings are expected to be finished next February. Right-of-way acquisition could begin early next year. Crews could start moving earth as early as 2008. So why are some officials still questioning whether the project is real? Last week, in Kansas, Sen. Pat Roberts, a Republican who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, seemed like he was short on domestic, backyard intelligence when he was asked in Saline about the NAFTA superhighway project – again, prompted by reports in WND. "There's nothing I'm aware of in any authorization bill," Roberts said with derision. "I don't know where these things get started. This is one of those blogosphere things that makes you wonder what's going on." When the Duluth News Tribune followed up WND reports about the project by turning to a local congressman for help, Mary Kerr, an aide to Rep.Jim Oberstar, said: "There are no earmarks for a superhighway like that." But you can't hide for long a superhighway, in some places, according to plans, four football fields wide.

haha, those troll bastards!! :) * * * * *

Check your 'Ignore' list in your "User CP"

Buchanan: Bush Responsible For Next Terror Attack If Borders Stay Open War is the health of the state says best selling author as he warns of 'third world invasion' Paul Joseph Watson | August 29 2006 Pat Buchanan, currently riding high in the New York Times bestseller list with his book The Third World Invasion, told the Alex Jones Show that if there was another terror attack in the US, George W. Bush would be responsible due to his refusal to control the borders and that his place in history would be finished. Here is the exchange from the show. CALLER: "If 9/11 and the war on terror is indeed legitimate, why wasn't the border totally militarily secured on September 12th 2001?" BUCHANAN: "It's because George Bush doesn't want to secure that border - I do believe he wants an open border between the United States and Mexico - he does not share the concern of a lot of us that this is a national security problem." ALEX JONES: "Pat, won't he just get more power if there's another terror attack - that he could take more American liberties?" BUCHANAN: "I think if the terrorists have come across that Mexican border, I think his place in history is finished." ALEX JONES: "But my point is, if he got so much power out of 9/11 and got to grandstand...." BUCHANAN: "Well there's no doubt about it, war is the health of the state." ALEX JONES: "So do you agree with me that they could try to spin it, even though with common sense we would see it as another attack, they could kind of spin it and ignore the border issue and Bush could get even more power out of it?" BUCHANAN: "Well yes, sure, sure, he might put in a lot more laws and things like that but I do think people would say look, you did not seal that border just as the caller said when you had three or four, when you had five years to do it you didn't do it and now we got hit again - you are responsible this time." Buchanan went on to warn that the open borders policy is being crafted by the Republican elite in alliance with Mexico's Vicente Fox. "Fox and Bush have been colluding on this policy since before 9/11 - Vicente Fox was standing right beside Bush when Bush declared the Minutemen vigilantes," said Buchanan. Buchanan said the elite were targeting the middle class for destruction and using rampant illegal immigration to realize that goal. "I do believe that the American middle and working class of this country as I wrote in the title of an earlier book, are victims of a great betrayal - their manufacturing jobs are being sent abroad, illegal aliens are coming being invited into their country, the products of China are pouring in, American jobs are being lost, they're bringing in Indian kids and bright young kids from Bangladesh to take the jobs of Americans." "The middle class is under assault," said Buchanan as he illustrated the deliberate agenda for mega corporations to construct a new world order system. "Their ambition is to remove all national barriers and frontiers so they can move people and goods wherever they want to which they feel is most efficient for the company - so they put the company ahead of the country and they genuinely believe that what we need is a global market where these big corporations can move all over the global market and there's a global government there that runs it all - this is the new world order idea." Buchanan identified "the Crystals and the Weekly Standard and all the rest of them," along with the Rockefeller Republican hierarchy as the masterminds behind the push to eliminate US sovereignty and put in place the American Union. "I think if the Republicans do not secure these borders they're going to be wiped out - now the Democrats aren't going to do it either but you'll get a new kind of Republican party coming," said Buchanan.

Well, there were loads of talk about him being very ill......many people have said he had very bad kidneys. I think it was bad health, kidney failure.

Matt Bellamy: 9/11 was definitely an Inside Job Glasgow Mail/Billy Sloan | August 28 2006 MUSE have cracked America...despite singer Matt Bellamy's outspoken views on George Bush. The fiery British trio have rocketed to No.9 in the US Billboard charts with their great new album, Black Holes And Revelations. But Matt - whose passion for conspiracy theories has inspired their songs - has fired a broadside at wily old Dubya in The White House. He said: "I'm fascinated by conspiracy theories. We're surrounded by them. "Are we really supposed to believe that a man in a cave in Afghanistan managed to orchestrate the most unbelievable attack on the United States of all time? "I think 9/11 was definitely an inside job done by a group of high-powered people looking for an excuse to invade the Middle East for oil and other natural resources. "I think America needed another Pearl Harbor-type event in order to invade Iraq. It gave the US and UK governments the perfect excuse to go to war." I caught up with the singer when Muse - Dominic Howard, Chris Wolstenholme and Matt - played a sell-out gig at Meadowbank Stadium in Edinburgh last week as part of T on the Fringe. Now the group are coming back north of the border to play the SECC in Glasgow on November 7. On September 4, new single Starlight is released as the follow-up to their smash hit, Super massive black hole. Muse filmed the Starlight video on a cargo ship off the coast of Los Angeles and it proved a stomachchurning experience. Matt told me: "We wanted to create the idea of a band lost at sea because we see ourselves as being outside what's happening in the music scene. "The first two hours on the ship were awful. We were all seasick. It would have helped if we hadn't been drinking the night before. "But it was an epic feeling playing on a huge platform with the sea all around us." Matt was gobsmacked when Black Holes And Revelations - the group's fourth studio album - was nominated for the Nationwide Mercury Music Prize 2006. Muse have also received FIVE nominations in this year's Kerrang Awards - for best band, album, single, video and British band. Matt said: "With this album we thought it was time for a change. We wanted to open some new doors. "There was a danger we could have fallen into the trip of just going down the same musical path. "It was a nice surprise when Black Holes went to No.1 in the UK charts. We feared the record was maybe a bit too diverse for some people. "Releasing Super massive black hole as the first single was a deliberate shock tactic. It was the opposite of anything we'd done before. But we wanted to create a stir."

Yeah, there's alot of wonder about his fate..... I actually think he's kicked the bucket.....and a long time ago.

Of course it makes be sound like a 'nut' because this is the exact type of talk which alot of people have been told is "nuts"....when infact it's not. Look, this stuff is PRO America......not the sorry state that it's in today but the America of old, old, old.....sticking up for the rights of the people and their constitution - which IS actually being torn apart. And this so-called 'debunking' of the info I've been posting is madness....honestly, if you have read everything like I have (all the US reports, everything) then you can see how the "debunking" is very poorly done... BUT again, how many other people do you know who have read through hundreds and hundreds of US government and NIST, FEMA reports??.....not many, if any AT ALL.... And look friend, now this is serious - there's NOTHING missing from my life, nobody has brainwashed me and I most certainly haven't been taken advantage of..... It's actually is quite odd to hear that someone might have that opinion of me although I do obviously know this info isn't the norm....but I have to laugh it off.....I'm really a very healthy minded person but I have put alot of time into reading official reports and have came to the conclusion that we have been lied to - over and over again. I kinda bought a lot of the official story a long time ago - but I certainly DO NOT now. I believe that 9/11 was an inside job, sure - BUT I was the person who made that descision for myself, nobody else....I didn't even know who Alex Jones was until about 18 months ago. It just so happens that I stumbled upon him and he is someone who I hold shared take on the events of that day, as do many, many others (the 9/11 truth movement) - which again is something I found out about a long, long time after the events of that day. And, yes, I must say that I am urgently trying to spread the word whenever I have time. I don't get that much time because I am busy writing music/scores most of my days - so spending 30mins to an Hour a day posting in various places and trying to correct the big news websites doesn't seem bad or crazy to me. Hey, I just think this, aswell as many other topics, are very important. And I feel no shame in standing up for what I strongly believe to be true....People can say what they want against it but listen, on a very real level the info I have posted has a very strong standing and the government know it. People can call us names, get articles printed which say we are all wrong, have books written which lie about what we think, make TV shows, anything.....but it doesn't change that we have a great case and, as I've said, of course we are going to be called every name possible to try to discredit the movement but I expect that.....it's all expected.....if there weren't attempts to call us crazy then I would know something was wrong with the info we pass around. I don't know what else to say.....just remember that I'm telling you I am a stright up, down to earth person who has really informed themself on this. I'm not a 'nut' and hopefully will never be one.......and your in London too.....so remember I could always meet you and prove my sanity...ha, - if I ever so desired......but I doubt I need to do that just yet...haha.......I don't wan't people to use the 'crazy' name calling angle when it comes to September 11th as it really doesn't show a person in good light. The questions are all real, everything isn't wild accusations or crazy theories....it's truely quite the opposite.....and I really mean that. Ok, right... I'm off to play some Pro Evo 5....:)

Washington Post Doesn't Answer Why No Bin Laden 9/11 Indictment Whitewash piece seeks to dismiss questions about FBI most wanted page but doesn't address why embassy indictment took 3 months yet no 9/11 charge after 5 years Paul Joseph Watson | August 28 2006 A Washington Post article today attempts to refute and dismiss questions as to why the FBI's most wanted page for Osama bin Laden includes no apportion of blame for 9/11 - yet the Post fails to answer why there has been no formal indictment of bin Laden five years after 9/11 when it only took three months to charge him with the 1998 embassy bombings. A key cornerstone of the 9/11 truth movement's challenge that verifiable evidence proving the government's version of events be presented in court is the fact that bin Laden's wanted page on the FBI website contains no reference to 9/11, only charging bin Laden with involvement in the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. In late September 2001, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI Rex Tomb told Wired News, "There's going to be a considerable amount of time before anyone associated with the attacks is actually charged." "To be charged with a crime, this means we have found evidence to confirm our suspicions, and a prosecutor has said we will pursue this case in court." In June 2006 investigative reporter Ed Hass contacted the FBI to ask why 9/11 was not specifically mentioned on Bin Laden's wanted page on the FBI website. “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11," he was told Rex Tomb. Five years later and bin Laden has not been charged as having any association with the 9/11 attacks. By the FBI's own guidelines, they have found or been provided with no evidence to connect bin Laden to the events of that day. This includes the alleged "confession tape" which was miraculously 'discovered' in a house in Jalalabad by US troops and features a bin Laden doppelganger with a rotund frame and absent the real bin Laden's slender nose. According to the FBI bin Laden is left-handed, yet the tape shows him writing a note with his right hand. In Bin Laden's first interview after the 9/11 attacks he denied any involvement. This isn't like a kid caught thieving in a sweet shop - terrorists always claim responsibility for attacks they have perpetrated otherwise why bother killing people to send a political message? The fact that the FBI does not consider the 'confession tape' as reliable evidence of involvement in 9/11 is completely dismissed by the Washington Post who say the tape proves that Al-Qaeda have, "proudly taken responsibility for the hijackings." In July 2006, the New York Times reported that a CIA counterterror unit named Alec Station, a 10-year old subdivision tasked with finding bin Laden, had been closed down. In addition, former CIA director Buzzy Krongard told the London Times that bin Laden should stay free and it was better off for the world for him to remain at large. On two separate occasions President Bush has publicly stated that he is no longer interested in catching bin Laden. *** *** The Washington Post article is clearly an attempt to whitewash and dismiss further investigation into why there has been no formal indictment implicating bin Laden in the 9/11 attacks. At no point in the piece does the Post's senior journalist Dan Eggen address the question of why there has been no formal indictment - only stating that "Future indictments may be handed down as various investigations proceed in connection to other terrorist incidents, for example, the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001." The embassy bombings occurred on August 7th 1998 and bin Laden was indicted for them on November 4th of the same year - less than three months after the attack. Yet we are approaching five years since 9/11 and no indictment has taken place nor has any formal court hearing been scheduled or even considered. The Washington Post whitewash fails to answer the question of why there has been no formal indictment. The reason that there has been no indictment in the five years since the attack and why there will never be one is because the evidence connecting nineteen incompetent pilots acting at the behest of an ailing Sheik hobbling between a cave and a kidney dialysis machine with the most infamous terror attack in history is non-existent. Any further high-profile inquiry into what happened on 9/11, even if it is a cover-up job appointed by Bush like the 9/11 Commission, will only turn up more bizarre inconsistencies which render the official story impossible. The criminals wish for no further scrutiny of their act of mass murder and the current counter-attack against the 9/11 truth movement being run through their propaganda organs like Popular Mechanics and the Washington Post is part of that resistance.

Yes, Matt has openly stated that he's a 9/11 truth supporter and he thinks it's an inside job ......Well Done is all I can say.....it's going to help a great deal.

You know nothing, seriously. I'll ignore the rubbish you said about Alex Jones as your points are WAY off..... It ALL makes perfect sense. YES these people ARE bloodthirsty, cold hearted people who want to keep everything for themselves....it's not just about NOW and the people who are perpetrating these events NOW, it's about the future and those who will be introduced into the 'elite'.....they need to look out for their future. Look, the people who I (and many others) are trying to fight against do not care about human lives such as ours. We want to be free, they want us all in control and keep everything (including new technologies) for themselves.....and the UN....haha, don't get me started. OF course they have to SEEM as is they are doing decent things.....people who are keeping secrets and who are plotting to take our regions of the world can't just BE evil all the time, can they?

You have said so many things there that are a load of lies and are proven to be wrong. Plus all the stuff you wrote about Alex Jones is just ridiculous. THe NIST Report is a joke. (I could talk about it all night because I've actually READ IT ALL) AND "scraps of circumstancal evidence" is just being plain ignorant. Basically....you believe one thing and I believe another. And everytime you question something you just look for a websites which attempt to discredit the claims with pointless hit-pieces. Muse Frontman: 9/11 An Inside Job Glasgow Mail/Billy Sloan | August 28 2006 MUSE have cracked America...despite singer Matt Bellamy's outspoken views on George Bush. The fiery British trio have rocketed to No.9 in the US Billboard charts with their great new album, Black Holes And Revelations. But Matt - whose passion for conspiracy theories has inspired their songs - has fired a broadside at wily old Dubya in The White House. He said: "I'm fascinated by conspiracy theories. We're surrounded by them. "Are we really supposed to believe that a man in a cave in Afghanistan managed to orchestrate the most unbelievable attack on the United States of all time? "I think 9/11 was definitely an inside job done by a group of high-powered people looking for an excuse to invade the Middle East for oil and other natural resources. "I think America needed another Pearl Harbor-type event in order to invade Iraq. It gave the US and UK governments the perfect excuse to go to war." I caught up with the singer when Muse - Dominic Howard, Chris Wolstenholme and Matt - played a sell-out gig at Meadowbank Stadium in Edinburgh last week as part of T on the Fringe. Now the group are coming back north of the border to play the SECC in Glasgow on November 7. On September 4, new single Starlight is released as the follow-up to their smash hit, Super massive black hole. Muse filmed the Starlight video on a cargo ship off the coast of Los Angeles and it proved a stomachchurning experience. Matt told me: "We wanted to create the idea of a band lost at sea because we see ourselves as being outside what's happening in the music scene. "The first two hours on the ship were awful. We were all seasick. It would have helped if we hadn't been drinking the night before. "But it was an epic feeling playing on a huge platform with the sea all around us." Matt was gobsmacked when Black Holes And Revelations - the group's fourth studio album - was nominated for the Nationwide Mercury Music Prize 2006. Muse have also received FIVE nominations in this year's Kerrang Awards - for best band, album, single, video and British band. Matt said: "With this album we thought it was time for a change. We wanted to open some new doors. "There was a danger we could have fallen into the trip of just going down the same musical path. "It was a nice surprise when Black Holes went to No.1 in the UK charts. We feared the record was maybe a bit too diverse for some people. "Releasing Super massive black hole as the first single was a deliberate shock tactic. It was the opposite of anything we'd done before. But we wanted to create a stir."

Prisonplanet | August 27 2006 Related: New WTC Complex Photos Highlight Bizarre Building 7 Collapse The London Observer has published more photographs from photographer Joel Meyerowitz's book that show evidence of aircraft parts at ground zero on 9/11. Below are all the photos from the Observer website along with previous shots showing aircraft parts. These shots debunk ludicrous theories on behalf of "no planers" and 'blue screen' advocates. Claiming that no planes hit the WTC towers is damaging to the 9/11 truth movement's credibility and it is one of the first things that debunkers like Popular Mechanics seize upon when building straw man hit pieces. October 11 2001 One month after the Towers were toppled, 1,000 rescue workers are still on site at Ground Zero. Here firemen rest on a motley collection of chairs salvaged from the site. September 23 2001 A dramatic panorama of Ground Zero reveals a latterday Pompeii - and a Herculean challenge. October 5 2001 Meyerowitz constrasts epic with intimate. Chairs and tables in the Winter Gardens are still coated in the all-pervading dust. October 28 2001 Seven thousand bereaved family members attend a memorial service on Church Street seven weeks after the attack. October 28 2001 October 28 2001 December 23 2001 The bronze limbs of Rodin's 'Adam' lie next to tyres and fuselage from the plane that rammed the North Tower. 'The first man hadfound himself in Armageddon,not Eden.'

Because I wan't people to know the truth. I think it's very important. And I really don't like the word Theories because alot of my points are very well documented and it's the common trend to label them theories.....because alot of people don't research properly.

Nothing is 'Sketchy'......and again....laugh all you wan't. Chuckle until your sides split open. I don't deal with things which are "sketchy" or have no evidence as it's not helpful. Hey, I remember you posting popular mechanics stuff, that book.......do you know how wrong they are? really? The points they make are just 100% lies and they know it....I was reading some of that book.....and WOW, it's a laugh a minute....and that's true....it's really badly put together and I personally can verify that. IF YOU THINK MY VIEWS ARE ALL CRAZY THEN WHY ARE YOU SO WORRIED ABOUT ME TALKING ABOUT IT, JUST DO US BOTH A FAVOUR AND IGNORE ME