GazeboflossUK

what? you guys don't even make ANY sense.

Well, it's true man. Deal.

Well, be able to SEE exactly how real it was or wasn't soon enough.

I indeed think it's a massive fear operation which will be blamed on Iran or a similar enemy. I've wrote what I think about it this other threads. And it's bad, very bad.

^ I don't even need to respond to that. They should have used that in the official 9/11 commission report.

Red Alert For Staged Government Terror Attack Terror alert a trial balloon for invasion of Iran, World War III Paul Joseph Watson | August 10 2006 Today's red level terror alert in symbiosis with escalation of conflict in the Middle East is the trial balloon for a massive staged false flag terror attack, blamed on Hezbollah or Al-Qaeda, that will light the blue touch paper for World War Three. Radio host Alex Jones, who predicted a staged attack on the World Trade Center involving the use of Osama bin Laden as a fall guy in July 2001, has now gone on record with a second prediction that a staged government terror attack will occur before the end of October unless a gargantuan effort to prevent it is launched. Only through a massively increased counter-propaganda effort on behalf of all truth activists can prevent an imminent cataclysmic horror show that will make 9/11 look like a walk in the park. We have exhaustively documented that criminal elements in control of major western governments have carried out terror attacks and deliberately manufactured fake alerts for political purposes. In 2002, then White House press secretary Ari Fleischer told the Washington Times that terror alerts were issued "as a result of all the controversy that took place last week," referring to political heat bestowed on President Bush when 9/11 prior knowledge evidence first surfaced. From this point onwards smoking guns of government complicity in 9/11 became intrinsically linked with fake terror alerts. In January of 2003 FBI and CIA whistleblowers told Capitol Hill Blue that the White House was scripting phony terror alerts to maintain hysteria, upkeep President Bushs approval ratings and milk extra defense funding. The report that five Pakistani men had entered the States via Canada and were planning on carrying out a dirty bomb or biological attack was completely conjured up by the Bush administrations black propaganda office. New York Harbor was shut down to visibly pump up the fear. One of the named suspects, Mohammed Asghar (pictured left), was tracked down to Pakistan by the Associated Press. He was a fat guy running a jewellers shop and had never even been to America. World Net Daily commented, Other sources within the bureau and the Central Intelligence Agency said the administration is pressuring intelligence agencies to develop "something, anything" to support an array of non-specific terrorism alerts issued by the White House and the Department of Homeland SecurityCHB reported that FBI and CIA sources said a recent White House memo listing the war on terrorism as a definitive political advantage and fund-raising tool is just one of many documents discussing how to best utilize the terrorist threat. Since those early admissions, every single major terror alert that the US, UK or Canadian government has issued has proven to be completely fraudulent and scripted. Two months ago this website, in an article entitled 'Nexus Points Emerge For Potential Summer Attack,' predicted that, "Numerous nexus points have emerged that suggest major western governments are preparing for a summer terror attack that will come close to but not match 9/11 in scale and will provide the justification needed for an air strike on Iran before the midterm elections in early November." Government mouthpieces in the US, UK and Israel are all hyping the inevitability of a Hezbollah nuke attack on a major western or Israeli city, which will provide the perfect justification for Neo-Fascist bloodsuckers to expand the war from Lebanon into Syria and Iran. Developments today indicate that the governments of the US and the UK are engaging in a process of announcing the prevention of numerous terror plots, in order to prepare the groundwork for a real attack, under protest that they did all they could to defend the people, but that one attack slipped through. Arrests in the US, the UK and Canada of supposed terror cells that in each case turn out to be low grade morons, victims of government entrapment, or outright fabricated evidence, are part of this conditioning process. We have provided links to all our investigations of these staged terror alerts and more at the end of this article. Watershed leaps in the public profile of the 9/11 truth movement directly correlate to the staging of scripted terror alerts. Each time a new national poll is released showing more people questioning the official story of 9/11, a terror alert or a high profile terror arrest is announced. Last time around it was the arrest of Al-Zarqawi - now it's a re-hash of Operation Bojinka - a plot masterminded by admitted US government agent Ramzi Youssef. The ramifications for the freedoms of all westerners and the very lives of thousands of Iranians and Syrians, as well as US troops, are too grave to even contemplate. We must be more vigilant that ever before in an more vocal in our efforts to educate the world about who benefits from terror and where the weight of evidence points towards.

I hope it doesn't, for your own sake. But this might impact everybody on earth. (except those warmongers in their bunkers)

Soon......here we go. It's just depending on where the first mega attack will happen. And it'll be 'staged' so keep your eyes open and your ears pricked. But there's a high chance it's going to happen soon - unless we keep at them and let them know we are aware of it. That's the only way we can stop them.....talking about, posting about it, anything, I don't care...whatever it takes.

I'm really not trying to be funny. What we are seeing is the beginning world war 3 in the making. Listen to Alex Jones' US Radio Show 24/7 AND 'Live' from 11AM-2PM and from 9PM-Midnight Central Mon-Fri

He was GIVEN the explosives! It actually was mainstream news that he recorded the FBI telling him exactly what to get his men to do.....he was suspect of the supposed "sting" operation and thought the whole thing was a set-up.....and it was RIGHT!. By the way, there's more going on in the hell hole that is Israel/Lebanon.....but I guess this news is more important......even if nothing has happened.....it's all now a big media propaganda frenzy.........oh I hate my country's leaders.

Debunking Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies Nepotism, bias, shoddy research and agenda-driven politics

Debunking Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies Debunking Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies Nepotism, bias, shoddy research and agenda-driven politics Paul Joseph Watson| August 10 2006 Popular Mechanics has re-entered the media circus in an attempt to continue its 9/11 debunking campaign that began in March of last year. A new book claims to expose the myths of the 9/11 truth movement, yet it is Popular Mechanics who have been exposed as promulgating falsehoods while engaging in nepotism, shoddy research and agenda-driven politics. It comes as no surprise that Popular Mechanics is owned by Hearst Corporation. As fictionalized in Orson Welles' acclaimed film Citizen Kane, William Randolph Hearst wrote the book on cronyism and yellow journalism and Popular Mechanics hasn't bucked that tradition. The magazine is a cheerleader for the sophistication of advanced weaponry and new technology used by police in areas such as crowd control and 'anti-terror' operation. A hefty chunk of its advertising revenue relies on the military and defense contractors. Since the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq and in the future Iran all cite 9/11 as a pretext, what motivation does the magazine have to conduct a balanced investigation and risk upsetting its most coveted clientele? Popular Mechanics' March 2005 front cover story was entitled 'Debunking 9/11 Lies' and has since become the bellwether reference point for all proponents of the official 9/11 fairytale. Following the publication of the article and its exaltation by the mainstream media as the final nail in the coffin for 9/11 conspiracy theories, it was revealed that senior researcher on the piece Benjamin Chertoff is the cousin of Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. This means that Benjamin Chertoff was hired to write an article that would receive nationwide attention, about the veracity of the government's explanation of an event that led directly to the creation of Homeland Security, a body that his own cousin now heads. This is unparalleled nepotism and completely dissolves the credibility of the article before one has even turned the first page. The arguments presented in the article have been widely debunked by the 9/11 truth community as an example of a straw man hatchet job - whereby false arguments are erected, attributed to 9/11 skeptics, and then shot down. One of the most glaring errors in the Popular Mechanics hit piece appears in the 'Intercepts Not Routine' section where it is claimed that, "In the decade before 9/11, NORAD intercepted only one civilian plane over North America: golfer Payne Stewart's Learjet, in October 1999." As Jim Hoffman points out in his excellent rebuttal, "This bold assertion flies in the face of a published report of scramble frequencies that quotes the same Maj. Douglas Martin that is one of PM's cited experts!" "From Sept. 11 to June, NORAD scrambled jets or diverted combat air patrols 462 times, almost seven times as often as the 67 scrambles from September 2000 to June 2001, Martin said." The article also makes no mention whatsoever of the numerous war games scheduled for the morning of 9/11 which confused air defense personnel as to the true nature of the attack as it unfolded, as is documented by the recent release of the NORAD tapes.[/ur] A section on the collapse of the World Trade Center fails to address firefighters and other individuals who reported numerous explosions before the towers fell, squibs of debris seen shooting out of the towers well below the collapse point, and the fact that the towers fell only slightly slower than absolute free fall. The article was released before analysis conducted by BYU physics Professor Steven Jones discovered traces of thermite in steel samples taken from the World Trade Center. "Using advanced techniques we're finding out what's in these samples - we're finding iron, sulphur, potassium and manganese - these are characteristic of a variation of thermite which is used to cut through steel very rapidly, it's called thermate," said Professor Jones. The article regurgitates pancake and truss theories yet fails to acknowledge the comments of WTC construction manager Frank DeMartini (below) who before 9/11 stated that the buildings were designed to take multiple airliner impacts and not collapse. The article also completely fails to answer why pools of molten yellow metal were found underneath both towers and Building 7 subsequent to the collapses. The classic crimp implosion of Building 7, which was not hit by a plane, is glossed over as the piece again tries to mislead its readers into believing that over engineered steel buildings collapse from fire damage - an event unprecedented in world history aside from three examples in one single day. Commenting on his own interview for the magazine piece, Alex Jones said that initially he thought it was a fake interview or a crank call. Jones has given hundreds of TV and print interviews and thousands of radio interviews but his experience with Benjamin Chertoff was like no other. "People from school newspapers sound more credible and serious," said Jones. Jones had to call Popular Mechanics' office and verify that Chertoff actually worked for them. In the course of doing so he was erroneously told by Editor in Chief James Meigs that the story was not going to be a hit piece and that it was simply intended to explore the different theories surrounding 9/11. In addition, Popular Mechanics highlighted an article that Jones had posted on his website about incendiary devices in the World Trade Center. Jones' websites feature a cross-section of mainstream and alternative media articles. An article written by Jones himself is clearly labeled as such. The magazine had contacted the individuals featured in the article who told them that they had never spoken to Jones. The article was clearly attributed to its orginal author - Randy Lavello - and not Alex Jones. When Jones asked Popular Mechanics if they were going to contact the individuals again and ask if they had spoken with the original author, they dropped the subject. As part of a PR campaign to sell its newly packaged dross, the book 'Debunking 9/11 Lies,' Popular Mechanics' James Meigs appeared on the O'Reilly Factor (watch below). FOX Tries To Debunk 911 With Popular Mechanics (Comment: it's scary how the idiot O'Reilly blindly says 'Nutjob' and it's also blindly spouted out on the message board....the pitfalls of watching FOX News, you become More Stupid) Meigs and O'Reilly need to be reminded that constantly parroting the word "fact," without presenting any actual evidence, does not make something a fact. Meigs contradicts himself completely in claiming that, "No one had ever seen a one hundred plus story building collapse to the ground before," and yet less than two minutes later agrees with O'Reilly's comment that nothing unexpected about the impact of the planes or the collapses surprised analysts. Meigs concurs that it's an unprecedented event and yet claims that analysts knew exactly what was going to happen. How could they have known the ins and outs of an event that had never happened before? Meigs calls the WTC implosion, "The most closely studied collapse in world history," yet fails to address the fact that 50,000 tons of steel from the WTC, a supposed crime scene, was shipped to Asia and a further 10,000 tons to India, preventing a detailed analysis. Meigs, citing opinions of engineers, bizarrely states that, "The real surprise is that the building stood up as long as it did." In February 2005, The Windsor building in Madrid (pictured) burned for over 24 hours as shooting flames engulfed almost the entire structure and yet the building did not collapse. The core of the WTC was exponentially more robust than the Windsor building. So we have one building that burned incessantly for over 24 hours and did not fall, compared to two buildings which were structurally far superior, burned briefly from limited fires, and yet both collapsed within an average time of 79 minutes - and Meigs claims they should have collapsed sooner! Meigs claims that Popular Mechanics' investigation is "not political," and yet the foreword to their book is written by none other than GOP darling Senator John McCain. In the foreword McCain re-hashes an abhorrent amount of Neo-Con detritus that relies solely on 9/11 having happened exactly as the government claims it did. "We liberated Afghanistan from the murderous rule of the Taliban, our attackers' proud hosts. We chased Al Qaeda around the globe," barks McCain. Afghanistan is now a failed narco-state run by tribal warlords and ex-Taliban kingpins, nowhere outside of Kabul is secure, malnutrition amongst children is the highest in the world outside Africa, and opium production is at record levels. Bellicose statements about chasing Al-Qaeda around the globe are somewhat contradicted by the fact that Al-Qaeda-Iraq links were proven to be fraudulent and outgoing CIA director AB “Buzzy” Krongard told the London Times that Bin Laden should stay free. Couple this with President Bush's view on Bin Laden - "I truly am not that concerned about him," and McCain's rhetoric falls flat on its face. McCain also uses the callous tactic of saying that questioning the government's version of 9/11 insults the victims and this is also parroted in the Popular Mechanics magazine piece. Let's hear what Bill Doyle, representative of the largest group of 9/11 family members has to say on this subject. "If you want to believe what they want to snow you under on like the 9/11 Commission - that's a total fallacy," said Doyle. "It looks like there was a conspiracy behind 9/11 if you really look at all the facts - a lot of families now feel the same way." Doyle said that half of the family members - relatives of the 9/11 victims - he represents thought that the US government was complicit in 9/11. Despite the efforts of Popular Mechanics to whitewash government complicity in 9/11 via a front page feature story and a new book, recent polls clearly show an increasing trend towards a rejection of the official version of events. If we are to set aside the 30% of Americans in a poll that do not even know the year in which September 11 happened, then we are left with figures of around 36% who agree that the government was involved in the attack and only 34% of Americans who actually know in which year the attack took place that still think it was carried out solely by a rag-tag group of 19 incompetent morons who couldn't fly Cessna's at the behest of a man on a kidney dialysis machine. Popular Mechanics are sure to make a tidy sum of money from their latest publication, but their credibility is certain to dwindle in light of the fact that they are willingly acting as collaborators by aiding the cover-up of a crime that resulted in the deaths of nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11 and untold more to come as a result of how the attack changed US foreign policy.

he's a fraud

How Long Before It Turns Into BS Like Every Other Example? Look, the Associated Press reports that the dastardly new terror plot is a re-hash of Operation Bojinka - a 1995 plot to blow up 10 Western airliners simultaneously. What they don't report is that its ringleader - Ramzi Youssef - was protected by the US government in 1992. In September of 1992 Youssef entered the US with Ahmad Ajaj. Ajaj's luggage contained documents on how to make bombs and was stuffed with fake passports and ID's. Ajaj was arrested - amazingly Youssef was released. Youssef later masterminded the WTC '93 bombing after FBI agents provided the terrorists with real explosives under cover of a supposed sting operation. Ramzi Youssef is a US government agent and his Bojinka plot - supposedly foiled by his intelligence agency bosses - is now being used as the latest monster under the bed to scare US and UK citizens into surrendering what's left of their rights. Isn't it amazing that US government officials claimed ignorance of any Bojinka style plans before 9/11 and yet now they re-hash one for a faux terror alert. Government enforcers and frightened slaves are all hot and bothered about the latest supposed terror plot targeting UK flights inbound to the US. Ridiculous restrictions have been slapped on travelers, with mother's having to taste baby milk before they board planes and all hand luggage, including liquid drinks, being banned. The new alert arrives with the 9/11 truth movement on the cusp of a wave of media exposure. Evidence of government sponsored terror and how they use the fear of terror to control society is bursting out at the seams as editorials nationwide in the US are uniform in attempting to debunk research that questions the official version of 9/11. Statistical analysis has proven that every time Blair and Bush sag in approval ratings, a fresh terror alert gives them a bounce back up the charts. Every single major terror alert issued by either the US, Canadian or UK governments has proven to be either a manufactured facade, an entrapment sting or an outright hoax. Recently, a supposed plan to hijack planes and fly them into London landmarks was exposed as a concoction of UK government lobbyists and news chiefs. The July 2005 London bombings were a British intelligence operation. The alleged ringleader, Mohammed Siddique Khan, was working for MI5. Here is a compendium list of other reports where the role of governments and security agencies in manufacturing artificial terror plots is exposed - within these stories are links to even more. Seven Morons In A Warehouse Sears Tower: US Government Creates Another Al-Qaeda Cell Cooked Canary Wharf Terror Plot Recycled Canadian 'Terror Plot' Begins To Unravel Hyped Terror Raid Proves To Be Paper Tiger Toledo Terrorists and Government Entrapment Twenty-Three Intel Experts Say LA Terror Plot a Sham Bush Plays Terror Card With Bogus LA Attack Plot NYC Subway "Plot": Just Another Fake Terror Alert ALSO SEE: FAKE TERROR ALERTS ARCHIVE

Haha, you guys actually believe that because in a poll 30 percent of people didn't know what year 9/11 was that it's "Final proof if needed that america wasnt behind 9/11" The fact that you said "America wasn't behind it" from a poll that was carried out to random public members asking what year it was shows such stupidity.....I'm sorry but it really does. And saying "the goverment isn't smart enough" is JUST as bad. Everyday, reading your posts makes me feel SO good about myself but really worried for the world. It's amazing your guys actually can get about without bumping into things more. Incredible.

Wow, you hit the nail square on the head. You deserve a lolly-pop.

'ugadawg5' is a little simple I think. Go on laugh away, laugh all day if it helps. You don't understand how people can think for themselves Your like a programmed robot. "ohh, right, I have to laugh at that because I don't know how to comprehend it" What a sad life you must live. Anything you come back with is negated by you initial foolishness.

^ he does indeed. He's not a Christian anyway....it's all fake. A Vote winner. What a fraud.

As someone living in London I can tell you that we see these reports every so often and this time they've got police at the airports and it's up another level. I really think it's like as Ian said "If someone wanted to board a plane with a bomb, they will find a way. Tomorrow, next week, next month, whenever" It's just a way to put fear into the public and it actually scares me a bit but on a whole different level..... You see, as I have heavily researched & believe 'terrorism' is a Government-sponsored tool to create order out of chaos, these reports of 'foiled' attacks should give us something to worry about as they serve as a pychological operation. Now, if you notice.....these 'terror raids' and police operations to 'foil' or 'disrupt' attacks on us happen every often and, apart from the one they really messed up in London recently, the information is pretty limited about the outcome of such raids and the suspects are normally reported to be held under the lovely "terrorism act" which covers such a wide scale of offences now. Then after a week or so...nothing....reports and information about these events just disappear from the headlines and are only every brought up when we need a good old reminder. This is because there's nothing to really report and sometimes even years OLD threats are released by the government to the news outlets and I have posted articles here in the past which show this to have happened, not just in the UK but in the US too. Having large numbers of these reports that come to nothing give an impression that the government is preventing real attacks and when the big ugly staged attack is carried out.....you'll notice that there's always talk of "well we stopped 'X number' of attacks in the past year but we can't stop them all" and "this attack was inevitable, we can't stop them all getting through". The general public have been pre-loaded with fear and examples of so-called 'foiling' of big attacks that they believe all this and submit to the notion the "the government couldn't stop this attack, they did the best that they could but we need to give them more strict control over peoples lives in order that this chaos doesn't happen again" Order out of chaos. ....and of course, most of the people working within the police and related services are good honest people, they do what they are told as they think they are helping the public....that is why it's so scary, they all think they are helping us through these 'troubled times'. Little do they know that it's alot more complex and this is why we are doomed to suffer again.

You've been watch the US news alright.....(cross-thread joke)

I don't like the way it has so much of the American people eating the news out of it's dirty hands.....I am anti-bush and I'm damn proud of it......but that's not the reason I hate Fox News with a passion. Sure, I hate the way other news groups spread their poison...but in America I think Fox News leads the sickening spin and lies by a mile. I used to watch it all the time and because we can't see the US adverts over here it used to play the weather forcast loop....I knew the music in the weather thing inside-out I watched it so much.....I then worked out that the "no spin zone" was far, far, far from the truth. Hey, it's what I have come to witness..... But that's just me.

oh come on!

Well, my personal opinion is that they all are pretty bad at talking about the news......but Fox is the ring leader. I could go on forever with their shady reporting but I won't. I watch it sometimes and I just end up getting angry and shouting at my screen. I actually wish it was off air. Anyway. Thats just how I call it.

No, In ALL 100% seriousness.....Fox News is the worst 'News' channel you could watch. It really is and I hope people are aware of that. And this isn't a dig at you for watching it Nick.......but it truely is a sorry excuse of a 'News' outlet. Lets leave that there.... Back to the article I posted.... That guy is a Fox Military Analyst. There. All civil like.

Fox Military Analyst on Syria: ‘We Can Talk To Them When We Line Them Up and Kill Them’ With the Bush administration refusing to hold direct talks with Syria, Col. David Hunt, military analyst for Fox News, appeared on Hannity & Colmes last night to offer some advice to the president: “I think we can talk to them when we line them up and kill them.” Stating that “the only reason to talk to some of these guys is to just do that,” Hunt went on to argue that America should “absolutely, 100 percent” seek regime change in both Syria and Iran if they’re “not going to cooperate.” Watch it Strangely, after his tirade, Hunt acknowledged that in some cases, “we have to directly talk to these guys to find out what they want.” – Scott Keyes Someone made a good comment on this: …and what is this “…as we talked offline…” comment. He and Hannity were really warming up the rhetoric before the cameras were rolling? A little mutual hatemongering and wishful thinking re:death & destruction to really get the blood pumping? Full transcript: HANNITY: How naive is this notion — the New York Times editorial today — that the idea that we can talk to Syria, talk to these terrorist regimes. Can you talk to Ahmadinejad? Can you talk to an Assad? Can you talk to Usama bin Laden? Can you get anywhere? Is that an… HUNT: I think we can talk to them when we line them up and kill them. I don’t think — the only reason to talk to some of these guys is to just do that. However, we’re not going to wipe out, as we talked offline, the entire country, but we have to directly talk to these guys to find out what they want. If they’re not going to cooperate, yes, they have to go. HANNITY: Regime change. HUNT: Absolutely, 100 percent.