Heiner

DANGEROUS. Grrrrrrrrr :wink3:

:mad::nice:

Aaah!:wacko::nice:

Ok......:disappointed: We mustn't talk.

What on earth are you doing in here?:wideeyed:

Jump him!

Why 'we'? You're not 'us':nice: This ongoing comparison between Radiohead and Coldplay is very tiring. It's like stubbornly comparing a great, ripe raw milk cheese to a fresh Mozzarella or so. Johnny seems to be in need of some attention. He's never been very bright, imo.

Arcade Fire Radiohead

Good looking?

Two more days...

Yep, John Lennon may appear to have been very naive in what he was asking people to do, but I do agree, that he was not naive at all. Reminds me of a clip: Why don't you change? An interesting question. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEIfMqM5wnM]YouTube- Krishnamurti : Why don't You Change?[/ame] Back to the climate now. :disappointed:

This clip sums up the state I'm at about this issue atm. Thankies.

Nah, I hope I'll be wild at heart until I kiss death.:cool:

fuck them!:(

Heroine is pure evil! I never did that. And I think it's possible to expand your mind without doing any drugs, that's why I'm not particularly proud of my 'wilder' years.

And blaming 'the rich and greedy bastards' is yet another distracting wrong trait. All those arguments fuel the concept of 'panem et circenses' which you claim to be the problem here, to be straight honest. As much as not all the filthy rich are mere pathetic bastards, not every poor man and woman is a saint. And you know that, so why using those twisted arguments at all. Look what happened, when the certainly opressed masses were empowered in the former or still communist countries, they created bloody hell as well. Btw Nick, I'm quite thankful for your input here, as it gives the opportunity to dig out those mislead irritations, which corrupt our minds and prevent us from focussing on the crucial facts austerely. Being equipped with reflective brains, we humans are still on the road on how to use this amazing tool properly, I think. We now may have entered a stage, where we could overcome some very primitive ideas of how to use it. There was immense trial and error in the last decades ( well, yeah centuries and stuff), which was obviously necessary to experience what's sensitive and what's just not. Thanks to globalisation, things do speed up now. I can only see a great, great chance to develop both collectively and consequently tied to that individually. Again, even if we're doomed, why not go for it in grace. :wideeyed:

You would save an awful lot of money, and that's what's so intriguing about it, it's just full of effin' advantages. I can't see any downside whatsoever.

Shrooms were among the nicer things, that I've tried. (I was young and most certainly adrift :disappointed: ) But shrooms, yeah. I remember me and a friend walking around a church in a big city in the night, and the place was crowded with friendly elves and fairies, which you could only see from the corner of your eyes. But there was no doubt they were there, and they delighted in teasing us in a most tender and joyful way. :dreamy: Was a great night that.

The killer- argument tactic doesn't really help. You do critizise fear- tactics and throw in scare- tactics to proove your point, how does that add up to anything? Nobody has to wash his laundry in the rivers again, if we empower sensible (! there seem to be lot of shitty 'alternative' energy- plans) ways of getting energy for our cars and household maschines and blah.

Yes, that's a good point. Even if what Nick says was the entire truth, which I personally doubt, we still have to look out for alternative ways of providing people with electricity, as we'll run out of gas, oil and coal pretty soon. The chance of this whole topic might be, that for the first time in human history all people of all countries face the same, global problem beyond petty mutual cutting off recources and gaining some dodgy power over others. This would be a great chance to indulge on the the positive sides of globalisation. I spent some time demonstrating for this cause the last week, and most people I've met aren't fear- ridden and hysterical, they are simply concerned and would like to get a sensible result in Copenhagen, and beyond Copenhagen. Btw, I tend to think, that there are very many jobs in what is called a green revolution. And more genuine, long-lasting freedom and indipendence, for both individual and national entities.

You do know, what your signature says though, hm?

I know.

For a sickening moment I thought you meant me.

Thanks for those links!

Omg, humans suck so much.