Prince Myshkin

I've posted about this before, minus the Deism bit. Nothing against them. Whilst I can't conceive of a God with any interest in human life, or any form of consciousness, I don't mind other people being able to. I am aware of this, but religions are not needed. They are outdated, and the only effects they can lead to, that can't be found from within from your own moral compass, aside from a sense of community (which can be generated in other ways) are negative in my eyes. Supporting them only serves to prolong their life-spans and help poison the lives of millions. Whilst there will be other ways for people to do that if religion wasn't there, that does not mean it should be allowed to have a free ride without being challenged, and not have to answer to it's critics. Without religion, not all the problems it creates would be replaced with other ones, and therefore it is worthwhile to continue to pressure it, in an intellectual way. Move this to another thread.

But why would a God not allow practicing homosexuals in humanity, but would in the rest of the animal kingdom. And why would a God care about humans anyway, when you consider everything that has come before us and will come after us? Why does he need some form of moral conscience? And why are humans so vain as to assume any form of connection with a God if there was one? Do you not find that awful? Who are these special people who God talks to and let's them know all these wonderful snippets of information on the rules to live our lives? Why are things so strict when it comes to sex and does a gay man having gay sex really result in him going to hell forever? Wtf? That'd be what I'd have posted if I was in the relevant thread haha.

How long have you felt this way, if it's not such a personal thing to ask?

Supporting machines which are inherently sexist, homophobic and infringe on peoples lives to such an extent is absolutely no harm done? Fair enough. But we've been through this.

Belief of such baffling ridiculousness is extreme in my eyes, though of a different level when compared to people with extremist religious views, naturally. Belief in a God much less so. But you don't have to be part of a religion to believe in a God, not that I personally do anyway, though I have nothing against people doing so.

Edited. I have a headache haha.

I go as far as to say the piano version is shit. So cheesy. Fog is a top 5 b-side. No comparison.

Not disputed. Nor have I done anywhere in the thread. In agreement with almost all of it, and not in disagreement (as such) with any of it.

Thank you, for taking the time to read. Sometimes I wonder if people bother haha.

Yes, it is the people who are afraid who say he isn't a Muslim, but that is just because you are distancing your self from him. He was a Muslim. This does not mean it was your fault though, of course. I'm pretty sure nobody is saying that. But to say he wasn't a Muslim just because he interpreted it a different way is just a get out clause. Many Catholics disagree with the Pope's view on things, but they don't claim he isn't a Catholic. And from what I've seen, whether it's cricket scandals or bin Laden, Pakistan never seem to think they have done anything wrong and always seem to think it's a massive conspiracy against them, and only them and therefore spend a lot of time feeling sorry for yourself. The truth is, it is very hard to pull off such a conspiracy in the 'oppositions' country (if that's how you are viewing yourself) and get away with it, without you being able to see through it and find evidence of it, and we shall see if Pakistan manages it. The world is now watching for them to prove America wrong.

On a scale of one to ten, ten being bad, they are at least a 7.2. They can survive the sun exploding too, so I wouldn't put it past them to last that long.

I bet he's glad he's lasted long enough to see this.

I disagree, but I'm not getting into it here. I've said all I want in other threads. I find the concept of religion in all it's forms rather extreme in its very nature.

Eyes peeled for 'good day to bury bad news' style press.

Well personally I think that what this could lead to could affect everyone, so it's worth at least looking into it a little, but no, if you aren't interested in it then you aren't interested in it. I saw more Facebook statuses about the Royal Wedding than I have about this, but me not caring about it didn't make me ignorant. I just didn't care.

Nah, Sam Allardyce first.

Well I don't see it as justice, but I'll agree to disagree as I can't be bothered.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/may/02/pixies-to-record-new-material The Pixies set to record new material

I don't see how all of the people using the word see it as justice. If they do then they are fools or at best electioneering.

S******. Edit: I forget that word get's blocked. s n i g g e r.

*waits for Mark to find some kind of light hearted Daily Mail story on it that bares little significance aside from novelty*

Well that isn't what justice means. Yeah, conspiracy theorists will have a field day but if it wasn't him/nobody was killed, evidence of that would come out. It'll be him.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/02/osama-bin-laden-death-pakistan-isi Osama bin Laden's death will haunt Pakistan

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/02/bin-laden-body-buried-sea Bin Laden's body buried at sea

FBI slow on taking him off the most wanted list. Come on! I wanna see who replaces him.