hotdensestate

If neither of the original pair loves each other, how is it possibly immoral? edit: And you don't necessarily know upon entering a serious relationship if you can keep it up. Love fades.

Because your face is fucked up. Funny or non?

That sounds like a silly pun. Silly Russel Brand.

Why are so many people going to college now? :bigcry: I feel left behind!!

My recipient still hasn't even signed in in the past ten days. And I still can't find the post where she even signed up. *twitches madly*

Depends on the situation. Monogamy is hard. A lot of people who don't love the people they're with cheat on them, and I don't think that's immoral in and of itself, but it does hurt the person they're with, particularly if that person still loves them. But breaking up in that kind of situation isn't always the best thing (children etc). It's complicated. Would I forgive somebody who cheated on me? I don't know. Possibly.

Hardy har har.

Hm, are you sure? Did you get a special insurance? I know with the normal warranty they don't fixed water-damaged iPods. Was it actually damaged by water specifically?

My recipient hasn't logged in for ten days. Also, I searched this thread, she hasn't even posted in it apparently. Trying to find the post where she even said she was going to sign up...

Calling women "women" is really awkward for me and I think it is for most people (this is why they are called "girls" by a bunch of men even when they're like 30). I don't know why. "Men" isn't as awkward, at least not for me. I call myself a girl but I kind of am, because I'm 16.

Cool, I'll listen in an hour or so. :braces: Thanks a lot!

:thumbsup: That's right, keep complaining about your college life to us understanding Coldplayers.

They couldn't pick a more creative country than Brazil to host a World Cup??

I want a review :bigcry:

Not me, I just want to feel awesome when I am woken up.

I want songs that, if you are woken up to them, make you feel like you can conquer the world.

They won't fix water-damaged iPods. You voided the warranty the second it got wet.

Did you all skype last night? I went to bed at like 10:30. It was so amazing. It was lots better than skyping. So you all can suck my balls.

All screenshots from /b/ contain ladies' butts, though, tbf.

LOL, I'm in high school. :blush:

Me.

Shit.

Awwight. I hope my mixtape gets a review... D:

Cool! Thanks. Going to look into a few of these artists a bit more. I appreciate you making it for me, even though a lot of it didn't really hit home. :nice: I'd be happy to review the second one also.

I'm not saying it's simplistic. I'm saying the idea of a society being able to exist without some form of government arising is naive... there are always going to be thugs taking peoples' money for protection (similar to the tax system we have in place now.) I'm comparing the naiveté of thinking you could have a stable system without thugs taking people's money with the (more widely practiced) naiveté of thinking a socialistic system could work (which it can't). I didn't say that very clearly. Less government is better. No government could never work. Governments WILL always be there, in one form or another. Governments look out for people as little as they can with still successfully getting away with it (...remaining in power). Of course, if governments can't be held to a standard by the people (they generally can't) their power should be reduced. But if, eg, the United States (just using this example as I live here) government was taken down, we would get a bunch of small-scale thugs controlling the weak, which would be worse than the system we have in place, because right now, the public can hold the government up to at least a few standards, and generally speaking the government can't get away with murdering people for not, eg, paying taxes. (Jail, yes. Jail is bad, but not as bad as murder. I know you are going to say "but people would defend themselves" -- what about the weak?) Unorganized governments of thugs and petty rulers are worse than our basically-democratic system because we have at least a little control over our government. Our government has issues, but destroying it is not the solution. To think that destroying our current government entirely would really improve things for people is naive, in my opinion. (To be honest, this is basically philosophy. A perfectly anarchic society is as impossible as a perfectly socialistic society -- which is why I think it's silly to be a full anarchist, and equally silly (or a bit sillier) to be a full socialist. We obviously disagree but I stand by my views until I see enough evidence otherwise.)