What' date=' because he agreed with your perception of adulthood. Suddenly, because I don't agree with you, my arguments are null and void?[/quote']

 

No, because you are a mindless drone is why your arguments are null and void.

http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewShortStory.asp?AuthorID=22304&id=13527

 

Tell me this Sean: do you disagree with what is said on that site?

 

 

yes, I do.

I'll give this Phantom guy some kindof credit' date=' but all you are doing is hanging onto his coat-tails. You really dont know whats going on.[/quote']

 

No, of course - you're right (as always)!!:rolleyes:

No' date=' because you are a mindless drone is why your arguments are null and void.[/quote']

 

That's a pretty good response, and I actually laughed at that. Nice one.

 

I disagree I'm a mindless drone though merely because this thread is similar to one that I created.

No' date=' because if you'd actually read my responses, I considered the whole "am I mature enough to call myself an adult" argument that you and your friend put across and said that it was slightly naive, for reasons that I gave.[/quote']

 

You didnt consider it from the start, your first response was:

 

"18...or whatever the age of majority is in the country in question"

 

And in my opinion, that is very naive.

What's going on :wideeyed:

 

 

 

 

Adults fighting about being adults. omg irony. LMFAO :heart:

 

:laugh4: you can join in if you want, but you're on our side.

 

And I'm only 14 years old, not adult.

You didnt consider it from the start, your first response was:

 

"18...or whatever the age of majority is in the country in question"

 

And in my opinion, that is very naive.

 

By posting that, I did actually, you just didn't pick up on it, and decided to give me loads of unwarranted hassle instead

haha no you didn't, you honestly thought I didn't get your sarcasm, don't try and deny it based on syntax. But even considering the "if" you picked out, it would still make my response valid, and doesn't warrant this hostility you keep on giving me, which I still don't understand

 

Is this the way you guys usually deal with new/returning members?

 

Actually I did understand. I've done it before, and now you just wrote a whole paragraph to waste time, when you know that I understood exactly what you meant in its original context.

 

A double-sarcasm does not make your response valid, it makes you just as childish as anyone you are undermining here.

That's a pretty good response, and I actually laughed at that. Nice one.

 

I disagree I'm a mindless drone though merely because this thread is similar to one that I created.

 

WTF ARE YOU ON ABOUT!!?!?!?!?

 

AND IF YOU THOUGHT THAT WAS MEANT TO BE FUNNY, YOU ARE MESSED UP IN THE HEAD.

I thought the other one would be the one to first say that' date=' but please don't say anythin like that, it isn't funny[/quote']

 

That is my response to your first answer, did you even look at that???

By posting that' date=' I did actually, you just didn't pick up on it, and decided to give me loads of unwarranted hassle instead[/quote']

 

So this: "18...or whatever the age of majority is in the country in question" was your way of reasoning with the idea that there is no official answer to this thread?

 

You tried to kill everyones answer by being a smartass from the very beginning. There is no way your original post was open to other ideals, you are narrow minded and factual, and theres just no room for that in a creative atmosphere.

 

Maybe you should try and submit some Wikipedia articles, they'd love you there.

 

There was simply nothing to pick up on, your post was basic and factual, dont pretend otherwise.

 

But pretending seems like a natural trait for you, so go for it.

http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewShortStory.asp?AuthorID=22304&id=13527

 

Tell me this Sean: do you disagree with what is said on that site?

 

WELL?

Actually I did understand. I've done it before, and now you just wrote a whole paragraph to waste time, when you know that I understood exactly what you meant in its original context.

 

A double-sarcasm does not make your response valid, it makes you just as childish as anyone you are undermining here.

 

At the end of the day, I'm not undermining anyone. It's you guys that are bitching about my offer to the debate.

WELL?

 

I answered this by saying "Yes, I do" a page back. Try looking.

read my first response

So this: "18...or whatever the age of majority is in the country in question" was your way of reasoning with the idea that there is no official answer to this thread?

 

You tried to kill everyones answer by being a smartass from the very beginning. There is no way your original post was open to other ideals, you are narrow minded and factual, and theres just no room for that in a creative atmosphere.

 

Maybe you should try and submit some Wikipedia articles, they'd love you there.

 

There was simply nothing to pick up on, your post was basic and factual, dont pretend otherwise.

 

But pretending seems like a natural trait for you, so go for it.

 

For the last time, just because you didn't understand my post, doesn't make it wrong, and the mere FACT that I discussed the whole "are you responsible enough" argument proves that. Really we're going around in circles here.

I answered this by saying "Yes' date=' I do" a page back. Try looking.[/quote']

 

do you work for the government by any chance?

read my first response

 

And I didn't understand your first response about "the other one" which is why I chose to ignore it

do you work for the government by any chance?

 

Thankfully, no

At the end of the day' date=' I'm not undermining anyone. It's you guys that are bitching about my offer to the debate.[/quote']

 

I know that is officially what happened, but in the word of reason, you tried to kill the debate, not offer something to it.

 

Legal issues are just pointless when it comes to this, and I know you like to be on your high horse and study law and force this upon others, but obviously its not welcome when we actually want to discuss something FAIRLY INTERESTING, something you may not be able to grasp.

End

Alright, I'm finishing on this, I never said your post was wrong, which you seem to be hooked on, I am merely making the point that your post was so correct that it was dull in nature and beggin to be made fun of. Happy?

 

I could have said 18, anyone could have, but the point is that you think you are special for saying something that is clearly so obvious that it did not even need to be said.

 

Congratulations, your stating the obvious post was correct, you can live now.

thankyou

I think you're an adult when your mind has fully matured which I believe is about when you're 25 years old or something. I don't think it matters how mature your personality is because adults are immature also.

I know that is officially what happened, but in the word of reason, you tried to kill the debate, not offer something to it.

 

Legal issues are just pointless when it comes to this, and I know you like to be on your high horse and study law and force this upon others, but obviously its not welcome when we actually want to discuss something FAIRLY INTERESTING, something you may not be able to grasp.

 

I didn't FORCE it on anyone! I merely gave my opinion. And I happen to find law interesting. If I'd created this thread and said "I think that you're an adult at 18", I certainly wouldn't persist on attacking you for saying that you need to consider responsibility.

 

At the end of the day, all this hostility is coming from you, and I'm forced to defend myself, rather unfairly. You're not even considering my arguments, and instead ganging up on me with your friend.

 

Can I assume that neither of you actually are over 18 yet, and as such have no idea of the real world, and as such do not appreciate that whether you're responsible or not, you are STILL an adult.