June 15, 200620 yr The point is with SO many people wearing sunglasses ALL of the time its hard to know who is blind. when the majority of people with sunglasses are not. therefore it is extremely sad to mock bush for a common mistake' date=' one which any of us could have made easily. i doubt most of you would have known he was blind unless you were told.[/quote'] Yes, but it's 100% ok to mock Bush because he damn well deserves it for every bad, bad things he has done and will continue to do. YOU really shouldn't feel so bad for him as he would happily allow you to die in the bid for world domination, trust me.
June 15, 200620 yr Wow. What a fool. At least he apologized for this wrong doing. haha I don't think it's a matter of his familiarity with reporters who travel with him or whether or not he has the perception to tell if a person is blind. But the fact that it is a press conference and the professionialism that comes along with it. It's just stupidity, a case where someone talks without thinking first and especially the case because it was in front of an audience and the media. SO if you are wrong in your "joke" about his sunglasses, you are going to look dumb. It's also kind of childish. I mean yeah you would expect a little kid to do it.
June 15, 200620 yr You missed my point, I'm not LEFT or RIGHT or MIDDLE GROUND......I'm 'for' the good and the truthful and against the evil and lying leader we have today. Be that Republicans or Democrats.......In the current state of things I AM NEITHER Get it?? (probably not) no no no. you are EXTREME left. its funny you think otherwise. you're a funny funny guy to think otherwise. you couldnt be further from the middle ground.
June 15, 200620 yr Wow. What a fool. At least he apologized for this wrong doing. haha I don't think it's a matter of his familiarity with reporters who travel with him or whether or not he has the perception to tell if a person is blind. But the fact that it is a press conference and the professionialism that comes along with it. It's just stupidity, a case where someone talks without thinking first and especially the case because it was in front of an audience and the media. SO if you are wrong in your "joke" about his sunglasses, you are going to look dumb. It's also kind of childish. I mean yeah you would expect a little kid to do it. what is more childish is the fact you guys are attacking him for it. kinda like when kerry was attacked for getting a fake tan during the election. its sad and pathetic and just plain childish. a guy made a honest mistake that anyone could easily make. and it truly pathetic to attack him for it. that is the only childish thing.
June 15, 200620 yr Bush rigged the 2000 election, that's a pretty much given fact But he won the 2004 election fair and square because the other person wasn't good enough to win over voters
June 15, 200620 yr Cool down, mrcool. I didn't attack. Just pointing out that never would I expect this from an adult. any adult. just from a child who doesn't know better. AT LEAST HE APOLOGIZED. Is that sympathetic enough?
June 15, 200620 yr Bush rigged the 2000 election, that's a pretty much given fact But he won the 2004 election fair and square because the other person wasn't good enough to win over voters you wish.
June 15, 200620 yr Besides we all know Bush does make mistakes, but he does some good things, sadly the bad things are all we hear about in the press
June 15, 200620 yr How do you know he rigged the 2000 election?? :o It's not hard to see if someone is blind,bush needs to check himself!!!
June 15, 200620 yr How do you know he rigged the 2000 election?? :o It's not hard to see if someone is blind,bush needs to check himself!!! wow. it can be very hard sometimes. when the dudes sitting with sunglasses.
June 15, 200620 yr Bush rigged the 2000 election, that's a pretty much given fact But he won the 2004 election fair and square because the other person wasn't good enough to win over voters Well, yes, your probably right there....George's cousin Kerry was a very bad candidate. Both aren't really 'presidents' anyway.
June 15, 200620 yr Well, yes, your probably right there....George's cousin Kerry was a very bad candidate. Both aren't really 'presidents' anyway. He was a 'bad' candidate, but certainly no worse than Bush. I personally would have picked John Kerry over another 4 years of Bush, any day of the week. :thumbsdown:
June 15, 200620 yr Eh... Bush's sense are really honed, I see. I for one think it's pretty easy to tell if someone is blind... sunglasses or not... it's the way they go about. And if Bush hasn't realized that one of his reporters that follows him around was blind or not, he's either really thick or tried to make a sad joke. And if anyone else, not just Mr. Bush, didn't realize that someone see alot is blind, I'd call them thick, also. It's not a bias I have against Bush, haha.
June 16, 200620 yr Not really. ive had kids been my same class since grade school i dont know. everyone has people around them alot that they never know. its common. do you talk to those kids??? Do they ask you questions? Do they call you by your first name?? How antisocial can you be if you don't??? bad example.. try again. He's been with these people for 6 years.
June 16, 200620 yr do you talk to those kids??? Do they ask you questions? Do they call you by your first name?? How antisocial can you be if you don't??? bad example.. try again. He's been with these people for 6 years. No. it has nothing to do with being anti social. but there are so many people in this world, you cannot know everyone around you and everything about them. simple fact of life. not to mention he's the effing president who has to know 30,000 people. just like most bosses at large offices dont know alot about their workers.
June 16, 200620 yr you're talking shit... he did too know him.. he called him by his first name... :rolleyes:
June 16, 200620 yr you're talking shit... he did too know him.. he called him by his first name... :rolleyes: yes and we all know because you know someones first name you know all about them...thanks for clearing that up. now i think you are the one talking shit...
June 16, 200620 yr Author Bush rigged the 2000 election, that's a pretty much given fact But he won the 2004 election fair and square because the other person wasn't good enough to win over voters completely agree. the first election was rigged, the second seemed clear to me, Kerry just wasn't a strong opponent
June 16, 200620 yr completely agree. the first election was rigged' date=' the second seemed clear to me, Kerry just wasn't a strong opponent[/quote'] kinda reminds me of when i was in grade school and kids would complain people were cheating when they lost in basketball......truly sad. there is no evidence to support this, just sore losers.
June 16, 200620 yr *pfft* is all I can say...... how many times did they have to recount the votes??? AND no to mention they didn't even include the absentee votes..... don't get me started... lol
June 16, 200620 yr *pfft* is all I can say...... how many times did they have to recount the votes??? AND no to mention they didn't even include the absentee votes..... don't get me started... lol all it sounds like is a little kind complaining because they lost.
Create an account or sign in to comment