He's not a funny or intelligent troll and he refuses to engage in actual conversations with people here so I really can't understand why he garners so much attention.

 

Things are slow :nod:

What "buddies" are you referring to? Anyway, consider this topic a farewell(?) gift.

I'm not up for a debate. Just don't understand his motives.

And you never will.

Maybe he should create his own forum to publish his musings.

 

http://thebaronsplace.cwahi.net/index.php?sid=1b23356858d6fca94ec3dc39b3e2f5a6

 

Oh wait. Yet he doesn't do it there.

These "musings" are not mine, but Iverson's, at first I laughed at his work but now I see the truth and how dire the times really are. Interpret these things as you will.

Can someone summarize what this all is about?

^ The fact that Dinarics are in fact mongoloids, duh!

These "musings" are not mine, but Iverson's, at first I laughed at his work but now I see the truth and how dire the times really are. Interpret these things as you will.

 

You don't seem capable of explaining them further.

Summary: If you have a broad head that flattens at the back, you're likely a mongol.

The origin of the Dinaric race is quite simple and easy to see for anyone willing to investigate with an open mind. And the reality is this: The Dinarics are Mongoloids. They really are Mongoloid people. The short and broad heads, higher skull vaults, moderately long faces, alveolar prognathism, excessively short mandibles, flaring cheekbones... All these characteristics serve to unite the Dinarics with their brethren from further east. This would also explain why they were never found in Europe until very, very recently, and why they have been found outside of Europe for thousands of years.

 

The vast majority of Dinarics are not found in southeastern Europe and Eurasia. They are found in southern Mexico, Guatemala, the rest of central America, Peru. Prior to the arrival of the Anglo they walked across a broad swath of the modern day United States, from Texas to Nebraska and beyond.

Some people associate Neanderthal man with Dinarics, this however is false because Neanderthal man was dolichiocephalic while Dinaric was merely a pitiful brachycephalic (broad headed) with an equally pitiful morphology.

If it was true, which I have no idea if it is, I don't see why you are using terms such as pitiful. It just makes me think that there's something sinister about your ramblings.

 

It's nature. What is pitiful about nature?