GazeboflossUK

It's actually looking like this guy was under some kind of mind control.... You know, Derren Brown style, x10000 Remember that stunt "Zombie" by Derren Brown. (watch it here http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7688956389104405762) It's like that....but real and obviously far more complex. Mix in Psychotropic drugs (which is always the case with these things, and he was also on these but without records made of it) and god knows what else. This thing ticks all the correct 'black op' boxes and there's gonna be far more info out on this soon. Imagine someone like Derren Brown but an evil organisation, with unlimited money, ability to use drugs and god knows what else. A CIA black op. sqaud. It is also the fact that the cultural brainwashing of violent video games and psychotropic drugs directly contributed, as it does in all these cases. And all of this just so further states to pass gun control laws........although it will probably work...and it IS needed if the globalists want to turn the US into a police state. And this stuff will be combined with all the recent UK gun stories over here.....so even more security releated laws can be passed here too. Seriously, there info on this that you can't make up.....and it's all stuff I was guessing would come out. I'm almost pinching myself. *goes back to info grabbing* Shit. In the words of Thom Yorke "This is fucked up"

Prove to me it wasn't then? Calm down there. You seem to be all jittery, hot air and very little real information (and not just this time). Don't just spout out things that have no weight to them.....do you really think I can take you seriously? What you post can not be even compared to my posts (on an intellectual level - mine being far superior).....you just are all insults like "I hope you get struck dead by lightning", 'if you think this then you are a nut job' or that I should die - something along those lines. Really, how silly. It's not very flattering, I must say. I'm sure you could somehow better yourself in this respect. It is well documented that disturbing questions remain over the incident at Columbine. It is clear that authorities had prior knowledge of what was going to happen. Observers were in the area hours before the shooting took place. Articles from the Associated Press stated that ballistics from Columbine show that six of the thirteen victims were possibly shot and killed by Jefferson County SWAT. In addition, it was never properly explained how Klebold and Harris were able to transport over 100 bombs into the school before the shootings began. In the aftermath of Columbine there were calls for vastly increased gun control laws, more than 15 state legislatures passed significant gun control bills or dropped NRA-supported bills. I'm not anti-gun - I don't want the U.S to lose the second amendment because it sets global precedents. I'm doing some decent work/research of my own - I'm not led by the hand by anyone or anywhere, I take information from everywhere to get a picture of things. Stop wasting your time calling me 'stupid', making jokes about potatoes and such - you have a criminal leadership, worry about that instead.

I know Americans, so.... Stop the North American Union You Tube Tuesday April 17, 2007 Video encouraging patriotism, the halting of illegal immigration and the destruction of the North American Union. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-euwgvoh5SE

A COMBINATION OF THINGS I WROTE IN ANOTHER THREAD WHICH REALLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUT IN THIS ONE. (I DIDN'T SEE THIS THREAD) There's a huge attempt to make this terrible shooting about "laws".....when it really is a social/society/culture issue. And you would think that people could work this out.....I mean it's obvious that this event still could have happened if guns were banned......I mean, the person (or persons) invloved in this thought it ok to kill 32 people.....that's the issue. And besides the reasons why he wanted to do it....you have to think about this: A professor had warned University officials about his behaviour. 'One' (or was it just him?) guy chained multiple entrances shut a across a large building in a high-traffic time of day. Not a single person noticed or reported the above. 'One' guy fired almost 200 rounds of ammo (an E.R Doctor said that every victim was shot AT LEAST 3 times) Cops with assault rifles spent OVER TWO HOURS hiding behind trees and their cars while a gunman shoots up a school uninterrupted.There were people who were aware of his behaviour - and police did let him get away with his spree for quite a long time. Just watch the cops on the video's....they do nothing. This guy was on a mission. I just don't want this to be used and turned into mass gun seizure in the US - it's a plan which has been put forward by the fake conservatives for a long time. Columbine was a government engineered op...(in my honest opinion - and people, do NOT go mad unless you've looked at it, seriously)...and I don't see why this is any different...BUT...I guess lots of research is needed.....because not everything is the government......but many things are. Anyway...I don't want to get too much into that here. This thing is sad, whatever the cause. Any bet there was some kind of federal hold put on the police etc....before they could do anything. Just out listen for it, I'd bet a lot of money on this. From a fellow investigator.... VT Killing Spree + 2 days and already the discrepancies are piling up... 1) It seems that it was the police who advised Cho to seek counselling after two women filed complaints that he was stalking them (end of 2005). Remember, we were previously told by Lucinda Roy, his English tutor, that she referred him there after reading disturbing assignments written by him. 2) The police said they advised counselling after receiving a phone call from someone claiming to be Cho's friend who said that he was suicidal. Yet all reports thus far have stated that Cho was a misanthropic recluse who wouldn't even speak to his own room mates. Both have had interviews aired and neither mentioned him seeking counselling let alone reporting him as suicidal to police. Who was Cho's concerned friend? 3) Under some pressure today from journalists, a Blacksburg police spokesman revealed that Cho had been assessed at a mental health facility. When pressed further whether he had ever been detained as a patient he stated he believed that he had and, when pressed further still, he said that the facility might have been in the city of St Albans. BUT... He refused to give any referral, admission release dates etc, stating that this was 'protected information' (mental health care is shrouded in secrecy but this statement is misleading). 4) Crucially the police spokesman did not say whether it was the Cook Counselling Center at VT that had referred him for mental health assessment and still no one from the center has come forward to clarify whether Cho had visited them or not. 5) Within 36 hours of the shootings the police confirmed that ballistic tests had proved that the same Glock pistol had been used at the Amberley and Norris Hall crime scenes and that Cho's finger prints were found on the weapon. I am no expert in forensics but this seems an extraordinarily quick turn around. Yet... Amazingly today, the police spokesman started to gently row back from the assertion that Cho was the Amberley house shooter and breathed new life into an earlier theory that the killings at Amberley and Norris could have been unrelated. But how can this be if the ballistics and fingerprints tests show that Cho was at both scenes? 6) A Taiwanese student reported that he heard Cho rowing with Emily Hilscher shortly before he shot her, thus becoming his first 'unofficial' victim. This source stated that Cho had a crush on her and that he might have become jealous as a result of her forming an attachment with someone else (other reports go further, but in the light of what we know about Cho and the note that he left behind, which made no mention of Hirschler, these are certainly baloney). Apparently, according to some reports, the police were informed of this in a 911 call. So why did they go looking for another suspect off campus? 7) As yet, no comprehensive reports about Cho's family or pre university life have surfaced. His high school has been preternaturally quiet. Is this because the media portrayal of Cho is not one they recognize? My Theory Cho may have had problems adapting to life in VT or had some emotional crisis. He probably visited the Cook Counselling Center. There, he either had the misfortune of falling into the hands of a 'spotter' or was genuinely referred to a mental health assessment center (in which case his department and personal tutor must have been informed) where the 'psychiatrists' took over. The crucial thing here, of course, is the timing. My belief is that much of Cho's deranged literary efforts and probably the stalking episodes too was the product of prolonged and frequent post hypnotic suggestion. He may also have been subjected to ECT and , who knows, at the time of the killings may have been dosed up with a powerful neuro-transmitter controlling agent (does IPSODAL really exist?). It may emerge over the next few days that Cho's treatment did indeed pre date all of his aberrant behaviour described above. -Pincher *One only has to remember back to the UK police statements regarding Charles De Menezes, all manner of high level police officers wheeled before the worlds MSM, regalling us with, De Menezes sprinting and hurdling barriers, De Menezes failing to stop when ordered to, De Menezes having a long heavy overcoat with wires protruding from underneath and acting suspiciously. As we now know, after waiting years for the 'home run' inquiry, all that the police said was a pack of lies.* -Long Tooth FACT: We ARE lied to. So do your own research. SO... 1. Shoot people 2. Make video. 3. Transfer to computer. 4. Burn disk. 5. Wrap package. 6. Go to post office. 7. Buy postage. 8. Put postage on package. 9. Mail package. 10. Shoot more people.

Wednesday, April 18, 2007 Military Leaders Question 9/11 Numerous high-level U.S. military leaders have publicly questioned 9/11. The following is just a small sample*: Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan said that the official story of 9/11 is "the dog that doesn't hunt" (if you suspect he is a closet liberal, take a look at his bio) Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions, stated that 9/11 was an inside job (he also said "If our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the twin towers would still be standing, and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. [T]hat is treason") U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director, decorated with the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal stated that "there is no way that an aircraft . . . would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control ... Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a 'conspiracy Theory' does not change the truth. It seems, 'Something is rotten in the State.'" President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, who also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member of the Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review, and who was awarded Distinguish Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals, is a member of a group which doubts the government's version of 9/11 20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case officer stated that "9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war", and it was probably an inside job (see Customer Review dated October 7, 2006). U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe said "We've never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I've seen that for a long time." Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official finds various aspects of 9/11 suspicious Lieutenant colonel, 24-year Air Force career, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute said "Of course Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism." Two-Star general questions the attack on the Pentagon U.S. Marine Corps lieutenant colonel, a fighter pilot with over 300 combat missions flown and a 21-year Marine Corps career, believes that 9/11 was an inside job, and said: "This isn't about party, it isn't about Bush Bashing. It's about our country, our constitution, and our future. ... Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more it looks as though they were murdered by our government, who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away. If you ridicule others who have sincere doubts and who know factual information that directly contradicts the official report and who want explanations from those who hold the keys to our government, and have motive, means, and opportunity to pull off a 9/11, but you are too lazy or fearful, or ... to check into the facts yourself, what does that make you? .... Are you afraid that you will learn the truth and you can't handle it? ..." U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program, with a 20-year Air Force career said the following: "I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government .... Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it. We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!" Former army captain and intelligence officer said this: "As a former Army officer, my tendency immediately after 911 was to rally 'round the colors and defend the country against what I then thought was an insidious, malicious all-Arab entity called Al-Qaida. In fact, in April of 2002, I attempted to reactivate my then-retired commission to return to serve my country in its time of peril... Now I view the 911 event . . . as a matter that implies either A) passive participation by the Bush White House through a deliberate stand-down of proper defense procedures that (if followed) would have led US air assets to a quick identification and confrontation of the passenger aircraft that impacted WTC 1 and WTC 2, or worse ... B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of government, starting with the White House itself, in creating a spectacle of destruction that would lead the United States into an invasion of the Middle East ..."Numerous military leaders from allied governments have also questioned 9/11, such as: Assistant German Defense Minister Canadian Minister of Defense High-ranking general and the chief of NATO regarding bombs in the Twin Towers (in Danish) Commander-in-chief of the Russian Air Force Chief of staff of the Russian armed forces This is just a sampling of military leaders who question 9/11. And hundreds of high-level government officials, such as senators and congressmen, FBI, CIA and other high-level intelligence officers, heads of allied governments, government scientists, terrorism experts and even 9/11 Commissioners question 9/11. See this web page, the top of this webpage, and this website.

It does refer to the US here but the EU makes an appearence in the article. It should be noted that those in the US have direct ties to many across Europe and the rest of the world. It's a global group who are declaring a war on our freedom.

Federally Funded Boffins Want To Scrap The Internet Seeking further funding from Congress for "clean slate" projects Steve Watson Infowars.net Tuesday, April 16, 2007 Researchers funded by the federal government want to shut down the internet and start over, citing the fact that at the moment there are loopholes in the system whereby users cannot be tracked and traced all the time. Time magazine has reported that several foundations and universities including Rutgers, Stanford, Princeton, Carnegie Mellon and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are pursuing individual projects, along with the Defense Department, in order to wipe out the current internet and replace it with a new network which will satisfy big business and government: One challenge in any reconstruction, though, will be balancing the interests of various constituencies. The first time around, researchers were able to toil away in their labs quietly. Industry is playing a bigger role this time, and law enforcement is bound to make its needs for wiretapping known. There's no evidence they are meddling yet, but once any research looks promising, "a number of people (will) want to be in the drawing room," said Jonathan Zittrain, a law professor affiliated with Oxford and Harvard universities. "They'll be wearing coats and ties and spilling out of the venue." The projects echo moves we have previously reported on to clamp down on internet neutrality and even to designate a new form of the internet known as Internet 2. This would be a faster, more streamlined elite equivalent of the internet available to users who were willing to pay more for a much improved service. providers may only allow streaming audio and video on your websites if you were eligible for Internet 2. Of course, Internet 2 would be greatly regulated and only "appropriate content" would be accepted by an FCC or government bureau. Everything else would be relegated to the "slow lane" internet, the junkyard as it were. Our techie rulers are all too keen to make us believe that the internet as we know it is "already dead". Google is just one of the major companies preparing for internet 2 by setting up hundreds of "server farms" through which eventually all our personal data - emails, documents, photographs, music, movies - will pass and reside. However, experts state that the "clean slate" projects currently being undertaken go even further beyond projects like Internet2 and National LambdaRail, both of which focus primarily on next-generation needs for speed. In tandem with broad data retention legislation currently being introduced worldwide, such "clean slate" projects may represent a considerable threat to the freedom of the internet as we know it. EU directives and US proposals for data retention may mean that any normal website or blog would have to fall into line with such new rules and suddenly total web regulation would become a reality. In recent months, a chorus of propaganda intended to demonize the Internet and further lead it down a path of strict control has spewed forth from numerous establishment organs: In a display of bi-partisanship, there have recently been calls for all out mandatory ISP snooping on all US citizens by both Democrats and Republicans alike. Republican Senator John McCain recently tabled a proposal to introduce legislation that would fine blogs up to $300,000 for offensive statements, photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards. It is well known that McCain has a distaste for his blogosphere critics, causing a definite conflict of interest where any proposal to restrict blogs on his part is concerned. During an appearance with his wife Barbara on Fox News last November, George Bush senior slammed Internet bloggers for creating an "adversarial and ugly climate." The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence. The Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror. In a speech last October, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills." His solution is "intelligence fusion centers," staffed by Homeland Security personnel which will go into operation next year. The U.S. Government wants to force bloggers and online grassroots activists to register and regularly report their activities to Congress. Criminal charges including a possible jail term of up to one year could be the punishment for non-compliance. A landmark legal case on behalf of the Recording Industry Association of America and other global trade organizations seeks to criminalize all Internet file sharing of any kind as copyright infringement, effectively shutting down the world wide web - and their argument is supported by the U.S. government. A landmark legal ruling in Sydney goes further than ever before in setting the trap door for the destruction of the Internet as we know it and the end of alternative news websites and blogs by creating the precedent that simply linking to other websites is breach of copyright and piracy. The European Union, led by former Stalinist and potential future British Prime Minister John Reid, has also vowed to shut down "terrorists" who use the Internet to spread propaganda. The EU data retention bill, passed last year after much controversy and with implementation tabled for late 2007, obliges telephone operators and internet service providers to store information on who called who and who emailed who for at least six months. Under this law, investigators in any EU country, and most bizarrely even in the US, can access EU citizens' data on phone calls, sms', emails and instant messaging services. The EU also recently proposed legislation that would prevent users from uploading any form of video without a license. The US government is also funding research into social networking sites and how to gather and store personal data published on them, according to the New Scientist magazine. "At the same time, US lawmakers are attempting to force the social networking sites themselves to control the amount and kind of information that people, particularly children, can put on the sites." We are being led to believe that a vast army of maniac pedophiles or terrorists are on the loose and we must do away with all forms of privacy in order to stop them. This is akin to saying that blanket cctv prevents crime. As if to say "if we film everyone all the time, even innocent people, then no one will ever commit any crimes." Increasingly we are seeing this in every aspect of our lives. Recording, tracking and retaining our data in the name of keeping us all safe. Everyone is now treated as guilty until proven innocent. Make no mistake, the internet, one of the greatest outposts of free speech ever created is under constant attack by powerful people who cannot operate within a society where information flows freely and unhindered. Both American and European moves mimic stories we hear every week out of State Controlled Communist China, where the internet is strictly regulated and virtually exists as its own entity away from the rest of the web. The Internet is freedom's best friend and the bane of control freaks. Its eradication is one of the short term goals of those that seek to centralize power and subjugate their populations under a surveillance panopticon prison, whether that be in Communist China, Neoconservative America or the Neofascist EU.

Creative are terrible though - quality wise - and they don't care if your products break because they just ignore you. My advice is to get a similar alternative.

From a fellow investigator.... VT Killing Spree + 2 days and already the discrepancies are piling up... 1) It seems that it was the police who advised Cho to seek counselling after two women filed complaints that he was stalking them (end of 2005). Remember, we were previously told by Lucinda Roy, his English tutor, that she referred him there after reading disturbing assignments written by him. 2) The police said they advised counselling after receiving a phone call from someone claiming to be Cho's friend who said that he was suicidal. Yet all reports thus far have stated that Cho was a misanthropic recluse who wouldn't even speak to his own room mates. Both have had interviews aired and neither mentioned him seeking counselling let alone reporting him as suicidal to police. Who was Cho's concerned friend? 3) Under some pressure today from journalists, a Blacksburg police spokesman revealed that Cho had been assessed at a mental health facility. When pressed further whether he had ever been detained as a patient he stated he believed that he had and, when pressed further still, he said that the facility might have been in the city of St Albans. BUT... He refused to give any referral, admission release dates etc, stating that this was 'protected information' (mental health care is shrouded in secrecy but this statement is misleading). 4) Crucially the police spokesman did not say whether it was the Cook Counselling Center at VT that had referred him for mental health assessment and still no one from the center has come forward to clarify whether Cho had visited them or not. 5) Within 36 hours of the shootings the police confirmed that ballistic tests had proved that the same Glock pistol had been used at the Amberley and Norris Hall crime scenes and that Cho's finger prints were found on the weapon. I am no expert in forensics but this seems an extraordinarily quick turn around. Yet... Amazingly today, the police spokesman started to gently row back from the assertion that Cho was the Amberley house shooter and breathed new life into an earlier theory that the killings at Amberley and Norris could have been unrelated. But how can this be if the ballistics and fingerprints tests show that Cho was at both scenes? 6) A Taiwanese student reported that he heard Cho rowing with Emily Hilscher shortly before he shot her, thus becoming his first 'unofficial' victim. This source stated that Cho had a crush on her and that he might have become jealous as a result of her forming an attachment with someone else (other reports go further, but in the light of what we know about Cho and the note that he left behind, which made no mention of Hirschler, these are certainly baloney). Apparently, according to some reports, the police were informed of this in a 911 call. So why did they go looking for another suspect off campus? 7) As yet, no comprehensive reports about Cho's family or pre university life have surfaced. His high school has been preternaturally quiet. Is this because the media portrayal of Cho is not one they recognize? My Theory Cho may have had problems adapting to life in VT or had some emotional crisis. He probably visited the Cook Counselling Center. There, he either had the misfortune of falling into the hands of a 'spotter' or was genuinely referred to a mental health assessment center (in which case his department and personal tutor must have been informed) where the 'psychiatrists' took over. The crucial thing here, of course, is the timing. My belief is that much of Cho's deranged literary efforts and probably the stalking episodes too was the product of prolonged and frequent post hypnotic suggestion. He may also have been subjected to ECT and , who knows, at the time of the killings may have been dosed up with a powerful neuro-transmitter controlling agent (does IPSODAL really exist?). It may emerge over the next few days that Cho's treatment did indeed pre date all of his aberrant behaviour described above. -Pincher *One only has to remember back to the UK police statements regarding Charles De Menezes, all manner of high level police officers wheeled before the worlds MSM, regalling us with, De Menezes sprinting and hurdling barriers, De Menezes failing to stop when ordered to, De Menezes having a long heavy overcoat with wires protruding from underneath and acting suspiciously. As we now know, after waiting years for the 'home run' inquiry, all that the police said was a pack of lies.* -Long Tooth FACT: We ARE lied to. So do your own research.

Any bet there was some kind of federal hold put on the police etc....before they could do anything. Just out listen for it, I'd bet alot of money on this.

1 death is enough.....especially when there is seemingly no reason for him to target these particular people. There were people who were aware of his behaviour - and police did let him get away with his spree for quite a long time. Just watch the cops on the video's....they do nothing. This guy was on a mission. I just don't want this to be used and turned into mass gun seizure in the US - it's a plan which has been put forward by the fake conservatives for a long time. Columbine was a government engineered op...(in my honest opinion - and people, do NOT go mad unless you've looked at it, seriously)...and I don't see why this is any different...BUT...I guess lots of research is needed.....because not everything is the government......but many things are. Anyway...I don't want to get too much into that here. This thing is sad, whatever the cause.

That's a sweeping statement though... He could have used ANYTHING to kill people - gun, knife, sword, poison...you name it. This guy was a depressive - and can not be held up as a rational human being. I do agree that students shouldn't be allowed to have such weapons on campus - Coz why would they need them there.

No, sorry, I think I'll just have to completely disagree with you here. It's a tough subject but Having a gun and wanting to kill people in cold blood are two very different issues.

And also....remember 157 more people died from bombs in Iraq today.

Also, this guy (as always with these types of things) was on Prozac.........this is black op's.......almost certainly. This is looking like a 'gun control' exercise......just get smart and watch how far this story goes and make note of what people will use it for. 2nd amendment destruction. http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=834 read this too. I think some might try and spin this in the muslim direction.

Exactly. There's a huge attempt to make this terrible shooting about "laws".....when it really is a social/society/culture issue. And you would think that people could work this out.....I mean it's obvious that this event still could have happened if guns were banned......I mean, the person (or persons) invloved in this thought it ok to kill 32 people.....that's the issue. And besides the reasons why he wanted to do it....you have to think about this: A professor had warned University officials about his behaviour. 'One' (or was it just him?) guy chained multiple entrances shut a across a large building in a high-traffic time of day. Not a single person noticed or reported the above. 'One' guy fired almost 200 rounds of ammo (an E.R Doctor said that every victim was shot AT LEAST 3 times) Cops with assault rifles spent OVER TWO HOURS hiding behind trees and their cars while a gunman shoots up a school uninterrupted.

If guns were banned, would it stop a person who wanted to shoot and kill others from doing so?

I've had to use many of my friends computers in the past and in my experience - on some basic soundcards - you can select "wave recording" by: Opening up the Windows "Volume Crontrol" Going to options (tick Advanced Controls if you can) Also on the options menu - click 'Properties' Select the correct soundcard in the drop-down menu there (if not already) Changing the controls from 'Playback' to 'Recording' Put a tick next to all the control types in the box below Then click okYou should now be able to see a volume control where you can put a tick next to the desired recording device.....AND in many cases you can select "Wave" or "Wave Out" or anything similar. Then you might be able to use any recording software program and get a input level into it. This may not help you but it's worth a shot.

I'm liking this - Paul using a Fender Jaguar. :cool: Can't wait for the return.

Yep, I've been following this for a long time...........the planned Dollar devaluation is coming along nicely then. Any Americans here should buy Gold coins........which has gone up in value.

Yeah. Well, you have to allow for people who act like that sometimes. I thought I made my point clear and calm enough - and I think it was absolutely valid.

Are mobile phones wiping out our bees? Geoffrey Lean and Harriet Shawcross London Independent Sunday April 15, 2007 It seems like the plot of a particularly far-fetched horror film. But some scientists suggest that our love of the mobile phone could cause massive food shortages, as the world's harvests fail. They are putting forward the theory that radiation given off by mobile phones and other hi-tech gadgets is a possible answer to one of the more bizarre mysteries ever to happen in the natural world - the abrupt disappearance of the bees that pollinate crops. Late last week, some bee-keepers claimed that the phenomenon - which started in the US, then spread to continental Europe - was beginning to hit Britain as well. The theory is that radiation from mobile phones interferes with bees' navigation systems, preventing the famously homeloving species from finding their way back to their hives. Improbable as it may seem, there is now evidence to back this up. Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) occurs when a hive's inhabitants suddenly disappear, leaving only queens, eggs and a few immature workers, like so many apian Mary Celestes. The vanished bees are never found, but thought to die singly far from home. The parasites, wildlife and other bees that normally raid the honey and pollen left behind when a colony dies, refuse to go anywhere near the abandoned hives. The alarm was first sounded last autumn, but has now hit half of all American states. The West Coast is thought to have lost 60 per cent of its commercial bee population, with 70 per cent missing on the East Coast. CCD has since spread to Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece. And last week John Chapple, one of London's biggest bee-keepers, announced that 23 of his 40 hives have been abruptly abandoned. Other apiarists have recorded losses in Scotland, Wales and north-west England, but the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs insisted: "There is absolutely no evidence of CCD in the UK." The implications of the spread are alarming. Most of the world's crops depend on pollination by bees. Albert Einstein once said that if the bees disappeared, "man would have only four years of life left". No one knows why it is happening. Theories involving mites, pesticides, global warming and GM crops have been proposed, but all have drawbacks. German research has long shown that bees' behaviour changes near power lines. Now a limited study at Landau University has found that bees refuse to return to their hives when mobile phones are placed nearby. Dr Jochen Kuhn, who carried it out, said this could provide a "hint" to a possible cause. Dr George Carlo, who headed a massive study by the US government and mobile phone industry of hazards from mobiles in the Nineties, said: "I am convinced the possibility is real." The case against handsets Evidence of dangers to people from mobile phones is increasing. But proof is still lacking, largely because many of the biggest perils, such as cancer, take decades to show up. Most research on cancer has so far proved inconclusive. But an official Finnish study found that people who used the phones for more than 10 years were 40 per cent more likely to get a brain tumour on the same side as they held the handset. Equally alarming, blue-chip Swedish research revealed that radiation from mobile phones killed off brain cells, suggesting that today's teenagers could go senile in the prime of their lives. Studies in India and the US have raised the possibility that men who use mobile phones heavily have reduced sperm counts. And, more prosaically, doctors have identified the condition of "text thumb", a form of RSI from constant texting. Professor Sir William Stewart, who has headed two official inquiries, warned that children under eight should not use mobiles and made a series of safety recommendations, largely ignored by ministers. NOTE: IMAGINE if mobile phone signals are causing massive problems....would the multi-billion pound mobile phone industry (as well as the huge Internet/WiFi firms) ever willingly admit to it? NO. Would governments be pretty desperate to keep any dangers away from the pubic to stop the demise of a massive industry and maintain a heathly stock market and keep an economical disaster at bay? YES.

The first American to make a comment and you didn't even read the first post properly. where I said.... "I'm only laughing at the individuals in the clip...this ain't a anti US post......." And because "it is funny". But if your going to be like that...then...I'll point out why it's also worrying... If almost anyone answers some of those questions that badly in then it's a travesty but in a rich (well, not really) country like the United States of America I think it really highlights what many studies have shown; that large amounts people in the western world (and in great numbers across various part of the US) know far less about the greater world and what indeed is really going on around them. I think it's actually an important issue. But this was meant to be a fun thread so.... Here :gorgeous: - She's looking at you kid...

Yeah, I know it's pretty old but....fuck, it's funny and I aint seen it in a while. The pin in 'Iran' on the map and the subsequent geographical blunders are amazing. Also, the running black guy who says "Who's throwing the rocks?" when addressing Israel and Palestine......classic. and, well....all of it is disturbingly hilarious. Although, the guy who says "Al-Qaeda is a wing of the Masonic Order" might actually be showing a very shrewd observation.

I'm only laughing at the individuals in the clip...this ain't a anti US post.......honestly. But it is funny.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJuNgBkloFE