GazeboflossUK

Should have really gave that Penis a raise... Man cuts off penis in restaurant A man cut off his penis with a knife in a packed London restaurant. Police were forced to use CS gas to restrain the man when they entered the Zizzi restaurant in The Strand on Sunday evening. A Metropolitan Police spokeswoman said the man was aged between 30 and 40 and that his injuries were self-inflicted. The man was then taken to hospital in south London where his condition is stable. It is understood surgeons were unable to reattach his penis. A spokeswoman for Zizzi said the man was not thought to have any connection with the restaurant. She said: "At around 9pm on Sunday, a man walked into the Zizzi restaurant on The Strand, down the stairs to the basement restaurant area and tried to enter a kitchen. "Members of staff stopped him, at which he ran into a second kitchen area. "The man then picked up a kitchen knife and slashed himself across the wrist and groin areas before running back into the restaurant, where he continued to stab himself. "This happened in a matter of seconds and was obviously extremely frightening and distressing for the many customers and staff in the restaurant at the time." She added: "Apart from the man, we understand that no-one else suffered any physical injuries." From: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6586879.stm

An Envoy To The Open Fields is on the album.......unless you have an odd release..? It's on all versions I have and all versions I have seen. Interesting.

The other voice you hear is J Mascis and he's on the album version of the song. He's more famous for being in the band Dinosaur Jr, who are a big favourite of Mew. I guess it was a dream come true for Mew to get him to appear on the album. He also sings a bit on An Envoy To The Open Fields.......you should be able to make out his tone.

no, no it's Jonas Bjerre from the band "Mew"

Pincher Nineeleven.co.uk Forum Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:46 pm 1) The VT campus as a whole was not 'locked down' after the Hirschler & Clark slayings only Amberley Hall was. 2) It was widely reported that this lax security was due to the police interviewing Hirshler's boyfriend off campus. 3) More probably this was due to the FEDERAL AUTHORITIES that ordered Blacksburg police to stand down. 4) First reports on CBS News suggested that Cho's package was spotted in the NBC mailroom because it had been addressed with the wrong zip code. NBC then allegedly handed it over to the FBI. 5) However, when Cho's DVD was screened on Thursday, the FBI 'complained' that NBC had not given them sight of it and had not consulted them about it. 6) Blacksburg police abandoned a news conference on day of screening telling waiting media about revelations to be made later on NBC. The following day however Blacksburg protested that NBC had gone ahead without informing or consulting them either. 7) A female assistant (another anonymous, off the record briefing) at Blacksburg post office remembered Cho coming in with the package and having to look up the NBC Rockefeller zip code for him. Must have got it wrong then if the NBC mailroom report is to be believed. viii) My hunch is that both the timestamp and Blacksburg postmark were probably forged. The package was probably securely delivered from a 'front' organisation in New York. The DVD and manifesto were too important to the exercise to be left to chance. 9) During the Amberley and Norris Hall hiatus Cho probably went to see his handler who would have assessed whether he was fit to continue with his mission. He would then have been given more ammo and other essential equipmemt (ie the chains) and incriminating evidence and sent on his way. 10) Cho was not mad. He had profound aphasia (a friend was later reported as saying that his manifesto speech was the first time that she had ever heard him utter a full sentence) and was diagnosed with autism at the age of eight ( a condition which impairs communication, understanding and interaction with social and physical reality - sufferers exist largely in a world of their imagination). 11) His autism was not revealed by official sources (though through his medical records they must have known about it) but rather informally and almost by accident by relatives living in South Korea. The official media, by and large, are still ignoring this information. And Cho's doctors, schools, VT staff and the Carilion behavioural unit appear equally as tight lipped. Why? 12) Because no autistic could carry out such an operation unprogrammed or unaided..

It's a Faultline song from their album 'Your Love Means Everything'. Chirs also sings on another song on the album 'Your Love Means Everything Part 2'.

John Kerry hints Building 7 Was Deliberately Demolished?? Massachusetts Senator's conclusion directly contradicts 9/11 official story & multi-billion dollar insurance lawsuit Paul Joseph Watson & Aaron Dykes Monday, April 23, 2007 At a recent speaking engagement in Austin Texas, Senator John Kerry responded to a question about WTC Building 7 by concluding that according to his information, the building was brought down as a result of a controlled demolition, directly contradicting the official line that the structure fell as a result of fire and debris damage. WTC Building 7 was a 47-story building in the WTC complex that collapsed at 5:20pm on September 11. The building had been structurally reinforced and was not hit by a plane yet collapsed in a uniform implosion within its own footprint in a matter of seconds after sustaining relatively light debris and fire damage following the collapse of the twin towers. News networks like BBC and CNN were reporting that the building had collapsed before it fell, indicating that the media were being handed a script of events that had yet to even unfold. Ground zero EMT's, firefighters and police were all told hours in advance to clear a collapse zone for Building 7 as it was going to be "brought down." Questioned on WTC 7 by members of Austin 9/11 Truth Now at a Book People event in Austin Texas, Kerry responded, "I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things, that they did it in a controlled fashion." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLnaogsm60A Kerry is basically saying that the building was intentionally demolished to prevent a random collapse from damaging nearby buildings, but that premise has never been explicitly admitted, with officials clinging to the notion that the collapse was expected but was not aided by means of explosive charges, because to admit to a controlled demolition would be to expose foreknowledge of 9/11 itself. Whether Kerry is basing his response on inside knowledge or hearsay is largely irrelevant, the fact that a sitting United States Senator is openly contradicting the official 9/11 story as well as a multi-billion dollar insurance lawsuit strikes at the root of the controversy surrounding Building 7. In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building's collapse alone resulted in a payout of nearly $500 million, based on the contention that it was an accidental event caused by the fall of the twin towers. EMT's, firefighters and first responders all knew the building was pulled, anyone with an ounce of common sense can watch the videos and understand that building's don't commit suicide - and yet Silverstein, the government, and their propaganda arm Popular Mechanics, are wedded to the myth that the structure fell as a result of fire damage. They are beholden to this explanation because any revision on their behalf would undermine the entire sequence of events on 9/11 and call into question other aspects of the official story. Their credibility rests on sweeping the issue of WTC 7 under the rug, which makes it our responsibility to keep beating the Building 7 drum. Official reports from both NIST and FEMA state that they cannot explain why Building 7 fell, but maintain that it was related to a terrorist attack on the complex on 9/11. However, the FEMA report concludes that, "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. The best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." NIST is currently undertaking a study of WTC 7 to determine if bombs or incendiary devices were used to bring down the building. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8W0N-qH0ac4 Controlled demolitions expert Danny Jowenko was shown footage and building schematics of Building 7 by Dutch television and immediately concluded that its collapse was a result of deliberately placed explosives. Preparing to demolish even a moderate sized building takes weeks of preparation. A building as large as WTC 7, a 47-story skyscraper, must have taken at least as long. Therefore, the idea that the building was demolished in response to fires spread from the twin towers is not a satisfactory response, as the building could not have been set up for unexpected demolition in only a few hours, much less while fires burned inside. All personnel were withdrawn from the area very early, meaning the explosives which can clearly be seen in the videos were placed days or weeks before 9/11. Kerry was also asked about the research of Dr. Steven Jones, who has tested both samples of steel from the twin towers as well as recovered dust, which have both tested positive for the chemical signature of Thermate, which is used to cut support beams in localized reactions during a controlled demolition. Kerry stated that he was not aware of the research and is "open to hearing anything based in fact and evidence." Since John Kerry is a fellow Skull and Bones member with President Bush, allied to the fact that he took a dive despite massive evidence of vote fraud during the 2004 election, we won't hold our breath on the possibility of Kerry being a torch bearer for a new investigation into 9/11, but his conclusion that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished adds substantial weight to a 9/11 enigma that officials are terrified will reach critical mass. COMMENT: My opinion is that John Kerry might be confused when questioned about this and he may be referring to a different building.....but even if his is, the fact that he skirted the issue and seems to know very little is fairly concerning. After all - he is a Senator. Update - But he does mention a "wall" in his comment on Building 7 - and that wall is the sea wall, which that could have been damaged as a result of Building 7's collapse. So it looks as if he was talking about WTC Building 7 - but his reason for the controlled demolition is new one - and it also tries to take the heat of Larry Silverstein who made over 5 Billion from the full WTC destruction.

Of course there should. It's OUR country - WE should be given all the chances in the world to choose who WE want and who WE don't want. It's all about the good old boys club and money. It's sickening.

It's not an easy question for me to answer.....there's just nobody who even thinks they can challenge the current bunch of anti-human scum.. But since Michael Meacher is someone who has spoken out about the bogus war on terror, mentioned the PNAC Document and has also expressed huge concerns over the official "stories" of both 9/11 & the 7/7 Bombings - then I would have to choose him. (just look at this Guardian article for what he thinks - his comments were pretty much ignored and were't ever talked about on TV....) BUT - He's not going to be the Labour leader and since Gordon Brown has already been prepped, given the go ahead and now is allowed to run for PM. It's pretty much all staged folks.

Nicolas Sarkozy & Ségolène Royal look like they are winners. Large turnout too.

Yeah, that's not Coldplay.

A little bit off the thread Topic but.... Yes. I noticed how very cheap the PS3 feels. That's one thing which I am quite suprised at. And Honestly....I would actually feel pretty let down if I had blown £425 + a game or two (so £500+) on the console. I mean, it really does feel like junk. I'm not saying the PS3 is junk exactly but man it's not something of beauty. Although knowing Sony, they probably made the PS3 a bit cheap and ugly to hold so that they can release a second version - so that they can try and make back some of the money they lose on every PS3 sale. It's like that with the XBOX 360 too - Micro$oft only make money from software and peripheral sales. That's the price Micro$oft and Sony are willing to pay in the attempt to be seen as the market leaders. And that's another thing - in terms of sales Nintendo actually are a fair bit ahead in the new console race. And Nintendo don't run their console sales at a loss either.

Yes, but...there's loads of very strange things going on...as I posted above. Like this picture for example. Who is the other guy and why is he in US Marines clothes. And why has it been plulled from the net? Plus many other things.

Small Corporate Media Lie Concerning VT Massacre Kurt Nimmo Saturday April 21, 2007 Although it may seem like a small, insignificant detail, the fact the VT killings are not the “largest domestic massacre in US history,” as the media tells us, says a lot about not only the laziness and shoddiness of corporate media journalists, but also the urgency of the effort to spin and pass off lies as truth, blow things out of proportion, and generally fear-monger in an attempt to kill off the Second Amendment. In 1927, in Bath Township, Michigan, school board member Andrew Kehoe, who was upset by a property tax that had been levied to fund the construction of a school building, blew up the Bath Consolidated School, killing 45 people and injuring 58, mostly grade school children. Like Cho Seung-Hui, Kehoe killed himself after accomplishing his dastardly deed. “As rescuers started gathering at the school, Kehoe drove up, stopped, and detonated a bomb inside his shrapnel-filled vehicle, killing himself and the school superintendent, and killing and injuring several others,” notes Wikipedia. In a now established pattern, the corporate media is working closely with the government to build the official story, never mind the inconsistencies, glaring omissions, and plain stupid explanations we are expected to accept as fact. If the Bath School disaster demonstrates anything, it is that the corporate media will omit certain facts in an effort to push the official version of events, as they did on September 11, 2001 and the years since. Now, closing in on six years out from that event, to question the official version is considered by many in the corporate media to be a form of treason and disrespect for the dead. In likewise fashion, to question or not sympathize with the victims of the VT incident is considered a punishable offense, as Colorado student Max Karson discovered soon after the event.

That's why I would love to see what he would say....I think he'd just say "I need to use the bathroom" and he'd sneak out of the window.

He wouldn't even get a word in. Although - he would because I'd love to hear some of his answers to my questions. But I think Tony Blair has, up until now, gotten away with so much criminal activity that when he leaves No. 10 I bet he gives a huge sigh of relief. Little does he know that many people are NOT going to let it go.

I most certainly would.

From one piece of New World Order trash to another.

This.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoLCIB8BQrw ;) :dead: Goodnight.

It's a waste of paper... ..as far as I am concerned.

9/11 Heroes Get Screwed Over Again Court Backs EPA Chief in 9/11 Toxins Case JOSEPH GOLDSTEIN New York Sun Friday, April 20, 2007 A federal appellate court has decided that it was not "conscience-shocking" for the head of the Environmental Protection Agency to have reassured New Yorkers that the air near ground zero was safe following the September 11, 2001, "terrorist" attacks, even if the air was toxic. Yesterday's decision by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals throws out a lawsuit against a former leader of the EPA, Christine Whitman. The panel of three judges reasoned that the government's interest in returning New York to normalcy following the attacks should protect it from lawsuits alleging that the government made false statements about air quality. The court did not make any factual finding as to the quality of the air, or as to whether the EPA had intentionally misled the public, which Ms. Whitman has denied doing. "When great harm is likely to befall someone no matter what a government official does, the allocation of risk may be a burden on the conscience of the one who must make such decisions, but does not shock the contemporary conscience," the circuit's chief judge, Dennis Jacobs, wrote. "These principles apply notwithstanding the great service rendered by those who repaired New York, the heroism of those who entered the site when it was unstable and on fire, and the serious health consequences that are plausibly alleged." Whether a government official's actions are "conscience-shocking" is a legal standard that decides whether an official is liable, in certain types of lawsuits. "I always thought that if you accepted they were lies — lies to get these people working down there — that those lies were inherently conscience-shocking," the lawyer who brought the case, Stephen Riegel of Weitz and Luxemberg P.C., said. The lawsuit was a class action on behalf of those who searched for survivors and cleaned up ground zero following the attacks. The men now suffer respiratory ailments, Mr. Riegel said. A spokesman for the Justice Department declined to comment. The court's holding in this case suggests that it will also dismiss a similar suit brought on behalf of residents near to the World Trade Center. The ruling yesterday is unlikely to have a result on another class action on behalf of workers at ground zero, which was brought under a different legal theory, Mr. Riegel said. The panel also included judges Reena Raggi and Robert Sack.

He's killed himself.....and also an employee. This guys image isn't plastered all over the news (coz he's not foreign) and they are even starting to break away from this story for long periods.

AP Texas News April 20, 2007, 2:45PM Gunman prompts evacuation of NASA building HOUSTON — A Johnson Space Center building was evacuated Friday after reports of a gunman inside, Houston police said. Police were called about 1:40 p.m. for building 44, which houses communications and tracking development laboratory, news reports said. Johnson Space Center security officers and Houston police, including a SWAT team, were dispatched to the scene. NASA spokesman James Hartsfield said the building was "one of the smaller" office buildings on the JSC campus, where Mission Control is based. He declined to speculate on how the person got a gun inside NASA security or his motives. The identity of the armed man is not yet known. © 2007 The Associated Press http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/4734453.html *UPDATE* Gunman kills hostage at Nasa base A gunman has killed a hostage and himself during a stand-off at Nasa's Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas. Police, who had surrounded the scene and entered when they heard a gunshot, also found a second hostage, a woman, who was alive but tied up with tape. Police Capt Dwayne Ready said officers were called to the scene at about 1340 (1840 GMT) after a man was seen with a gun and two shots heard. The gunman was not identified but was reported to be an employee at the site. He was described as a white male aged between 50 and 60. -Two found dead- Capt Ready said police were making contact with the suspect when they heard a shot. "Believing that the suspect may have shot himself the decision was made to make entry," he said. "As our Swat team members made entry they did indeed determine that the suspect shot himself one time to the head. He appears to be deceased at this time. "Also, on the same floor there was one other hostage that was shot - we believe that may have occurred in the early minutes of this whole ordeal - and another hostage that was unharmed." The survivor was female while the dead hostage was male, he said. Police could not confirm the identity of either the suspect or the hostages. -School secured- A Nasa contractor, Jacobs Engineering, earlier told the BBC that one of its employees was involved in the incident. After the gunman was reported, Building 44, housing communications equipment and engineering offices, was evacuated and staff across the sprawling complex were told to remain inside their buildings. The Houston police department told the BBC they sent a helicopter, a canine unit and a special weapons team to the space centre. Negotiators were also on the scene and a bomb squad was sent as a standard precaution. The Johnson Space Center contains Nasa's mission control which oversees the agency's space flights. An intermediate school near the building was also secured for several hours. The stand-off came less than a week after a gunman killed 32 students and teaching staff at Virginia Tech university before killing himself. The BBC's Adam Brookes in Washington says there has been a rash of security alerts across the US, which is also marking the eighth anniversary of the Columbine school massacre in which 15 people died.

Yes, haha, very good ;)

Yes, thank you Tracie. I discuss issues with many people - in my day to day life, online (via message boards etc..) and for the most part people act like adults - but there are always people (mostly online, where they can hide) who just jump down peoples throats at the first hint of anything they don't understand. I mean, most times it doesn't really bother me personally - but it does become frustrating when serious issues get turned into rounds of personal attacks (and personal attacks alone) with no attempt AT ALL to bring the information into discussion. I'm just glad that the Internet at least allows me or anyone to simply go somewhere else if you want a real discussion about complex issues that involve intricate details, where new information can be learned. And also - like I said would happen..... UK Police call for tougher gun crime laws Helen Carter London Guardian Friday April 20, 2007 One of the UK's most senior police officers has called for new laws that would compel the public to give information to the police about gun crime - whether they want to or not. Article here ----------------------------- And also in the US Hypocrite Kucinich Drafts Legislation To Ban Guns... He Entertains notion that bloodthirsty Neo-Fascists carried out 9/11, then says the people should hand over the only protection against them... Dennis Kucinich has shot himself in the foot, pardon the pun, by alienating a huge majority of his most vocal and active online supporters, the 9/11 Truth Movement, in drafting legislation that will completely ban the purchase, sale, transfer, or possession of handguns by civilians. ------------------------------ AND.... We have been receiving numerous calls and e-mails alerting us to the fact that VA Tech is pulling links from its website concerning their relationship with the CIA. Reports from November 2005 confirm that the CIA was active in operating recruitment programs based out of VA Tech. Several professors from VA Tech are involved in government programs linked with NASA and other agencies. Wikipedia also pulled a bizarre recently taken photograph of Cho wearing a U.S. Marines uniform. Such details only fan the flames of accusations that Cho could have been a Manchurian Candidate, a 'mind-controlled' assassin. Hmmm, Interesting. ALSO.. Inaction of Officials "Unfathomable" Long-Term University Police Officer Alleges VA Tech Black Op JonesReport | April 19, 2007 Scott Ritsema In an eye-opening spur-of-the-moment interview, done on the April 17 Alex Jones radio show, former “long-term” university police officer, George French, questioned why police did not immediately seal off the campus on the morning of the VA Tech shootings. French has written on the subject of school attacks in the past and possesses valuable experience in and knowledge of university police procedures and norms, lending credence to his comments given Tuesday. Referring to various styles of campus layouts, including open campuses that have many access points, French stated that it is “routine practice at every campus to seal it off.” “Setting up a series of roadblocks, controlling access to very large pieces of property, is very much routine on any university campus in Canada and in the United states.” French continued: “after a double homicide, when you're looking for a dangerous fellow with a firearm, I find it unfathomable that a series of roadblocks weren't set up…to prevent the felon from escaping.” “It's beyond belief,” French stated. “If you had a snowstorm, the whole education system can be shut down with a few phone calls.” Maps of the VA Tech campus show that “a series of 12 or 15 road blocks” is all that would be needed, and should be implemented immediately by local police in the event of a shooting. However, this basic, standard response was not followed that morning. Referring to numerous American university policy procedures and handbooks that he has personally read, French explained, “they have very serious plans in effect to use all county, state, and local law enforcement to come to the aid of the university.” French cited another case, the Ecole Polytechnique Massacre in Montreal, where officers were “ordered not to intervene” and “told to wait outside…I think it was a black op then.” In Blacksburg also, we saw police “cowering and hiding.” Cautioning, that “we can only hypothesize at this point,” French could find no logical conclusion other than deliberate inaction on the part of officials. “We have another coordinated, allowed event…the parallels are so common in each case; you can write the script in advance.” AND MORE... Local authorities were told to take no action to pursue killer... Police and EMT workers at Virginia Tech tell us that campus police were given a federal order to stand down and not pursue killer Cho Seung-Hui as Monday's bloodshed unfolded. Though wishing to remain anonymous for obvious reasons, we have received calls from police and EMT's who tell us that a stand down order was in place, and this is also confirmed by eyewitness Matt Kazee, who is a student at VA Tech. Kazee talked to local EMT's and police who told him the same thing, that the order was to wait until federal back up arrived before any action was taken. This explains the complete non-response of the police in the two hour gap between Cho's first two murders and the wider rampage that would follow later that morning. The policy of federal control over the University was put in place following a previous shooting in August 2006 in which a police officer and a hospital security guard were killed. In addition, a former long-term University police officer, George French says that it is routine to seal off a campus on which a suspected gunman is loose. “Setting up a series of roadblocks, controlling access to very large pieces of property, is very much routine on any university campus in Canada and in the United States,” said French. “After a double homicide, when you’re looking for a dangerous fellow with a firearm, I find it unfathomable that a series of roadblocks weren’t set up…to prevent the felon from escaping.” French could find no logical conclusion other than deliberate inaction on the part of officials. “We have another coordinated, allowed event…the parallels are so common in each case; you can write the script in advance.”