GazeboflossUK

Yeah, a sad attempt to discredit and distract from the real questions. There's lots of websites set up like this. I'd say get rid of it purely because of the reasons why the tosser posted it. You know, I bet he was having a little laugh to himself when posting it...."oh, haha, I'm so funny, I really think I'm great". Now, when ignorant people try and say that the questions I ask are disrespectful to the families of the dead I just have to tell them that infact the head of the biggest victims familes group says that 90% of the members say the questions I raise here need properly addressed...and they think the government has covered it up. However, posting rubbish like what nick has posted IS truely disrespectful because it attempts to make a joke of the whole issue when it is ANYTHING BUT A JOKE!!! It is very distasteful you're right....and what makes it more annoying is that he's attempted to 'discuss' 9/11 for so long on here and always talked about his facts & logic and all that shit (none of which he has). So this is just an attempt to have a joke at the expense of a few thousand dead Americans and their families who have been searching for truth since that treasonous event. What a fucking heartless wanker!

Radiation Hot Spots In NYC 'One alleged radiation hot spot on Manhattan's east side has the potential for becoming a political hot spot: A strong radiation spike from the area of the Israeli Embassy. Officials would not comment on why they thought that particular area allegedly showed such a stunning peak in radiation.' http://www.halturnershow.com/RadiationHotSpotsInNYC.html Were the towers blown up using low yield nuclear devices? A bomb with a very low yield Here is an article about the B61-11, a bomb with a very low yield, as low as 0.3 ton. Not saying THIS was the bomb used in 911, but just to point out that the government has been researching low-yield nuclear bombs for some time. The B61-7, from which the B61-11 was made, was first put into service in 1985. And the original B61 came into being in 1968. http://www.thebulletin.org/article.php?art_ofn=mj97mello A bomb for all reasons The B61-7, from which the B61-11 is made, has a selectable yield ranging from 0.3 to about 340 kilotons. It was first placed in service in 1985. (The original B61 entered the stockpile in 1968.) According to Chuck Hansen, one of the nation's leading independent authorities on the U.S. nuclear stockpile, the B61-7 can be fuzed for air or surface bursts, and it has "a hardened ground-penetrator nose" with a retarded contact-burst fuzing option. It can be dropped with or without a parachute. William M. Arkin and Robert S. Norris of the Natural Resources Defense Council (and authors of the Bulletin's regular feature, the "NRDC Nuclear Notebook") estimate that there are about 750 B61-7s in the active stockpile, along with about 600 B61-3s,-4s, and-10s. In recent years, some military strategists have advocated deployment and possible use of very small tactical nuclear weapons against Third World adversaries, especially in earth-penetrating roles. Some of this advocacy--perhaps most of it--has come from the weapons labs. In the Fall 1991 issue of Strategic Review, for instance, Los Alamos strategists Thomas Dowler and Joseph Howard wrote: "Would policymakers employ nuclear weapons to protect U.S. contingency forces if conventional weapons proved inadequate, or would the nature of our present nuclear arsenal 'self-deter' policymakers from using those weapons? . . . One possible answer to these questions might be the development of nuclear weapons of very low yields. . . . The existence of such weapons--weapons whose power is effective but not abhorrent--might very well serve to deter a tyrant who believes that American emphasis on proportionality would prevent the employment of the current U.S. arsenal against him. "We doubt that any president would authorize the use of the nuclear weapons in our present arsenal against Third World nations. It is precisely this doubt that leads us to argue for the development of subkiloton weapons." And in July 1992, Los Alamos conducted a high-level briefing called "Potential Uses for Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons in the New World Order." One theme of the briefing was that in future showdowns with Third World states, "we need options besides defeat or use of inappropriately large [nuclear] weapons." One option, suggested the briefing, was to develop and deploy "micronukes" with a yield of some 10 tons of high explosives; "mininukes" with a yield of 100 tons; and "tinynukes" with a yield of 1,000 tons. An earth-penetrator with a yield of just 10 tons could, according to a Los Alamos viewgraph, "hold buried leadership and C3 at risk." And it could do that while keeping "collateral damage very localized."

An little older article but I was just reading more about it and thought I'd psot it here too Radiation Hot Spots In NYC 'One alleged radiation hot spot on Manhattan's east side has the potential for becoming a political hot spot: A strong radiation spike from the area of the Israeli Embassy. Officials would not comment on why they thought that particular area allegedly showed such a stunning peak in radiation.' http://www.halturnershow.com/RadiationHotSpotsInNYC.html

That list is horrible when I think about it. I know almost every song/artist......but if they are really trying to name the best music in each field I'm sure there should be more there I don't know, surely.?.....because I don't know every single artist/song in the whole world today. Also, there's always a Ton of music that is obviously great that will never get mentioned.

IF anything does happen then I'm watching you and your cronies Mr Reid...(I know he won't read this :rolleyes:)...I fucking hate this prick. I know he's probably just another puppet of British Intel. but still....what a purely horrible little twat he is. Sometimes you just call it like it is, you know. Christmas terror attack 'highly likely' London Telegraph | December 10, 2006 Matthew Moore An attempted terrorist attack in Britain over the Christmas period is "highly likely", the Home Secretary said today. John Reid said that around 30 conspiracies were under preparation, and the current threat level was "very high indeed". He told GMTV Sunday that he did not think it an attack was inevitable, but that "the terrorists only have to get through once, as they did on July 7, for us to see the terrible carnage that it causes". "Our security services have to be successful on every occasion to prevent that happening," he said. "I try to walk the tightrope between being truthful and honest about the threat to the public but, on the other hand, to say we are doing everything possible to combat it and to try to keep our lifestyle as near as possible to the British way of life." The Home Secretary added that he thought the battle against Islamic terrorism was likely to last longer than a generation. Mr Reid's comments echo statements made by last month by Tony Blair and Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, the head of MI5, about the rising threat posed by Muslim fundamentalist terrorists. Mr Blair warned that Britain faced a "long and deep struggle" to defeat al-Qa'eda. The official terror assessment, posted on the Government's Intelligence website, currently rates the threat as "severe" - the second highest level. "We ought to be very grateful to the people in the security services who work night and day to try to protect us," Mr Reid said. "We can never guarantee that we will get 100 per cent success but we do get 100 per cent effort from the security services." Reid Paraphrase - "oh, well we stopped that UK Plane Bomb Plot (oops, sorry, my mistake alleged Plot) and there's others we have stopped too.....but there's just so many that one will eventually get through"......he's the same as the man that went before him....spewing shit about attacks all the time. It's a classic example of setting the public up to believe the lie.....the lie that British Intel. are always getting in the way of real plots....when infact they provocateur and create these so-called foiled plots themsleves so that when the Grand Attack does eventually happen nobody would ever think they would help/create/allow it because remember 'we stopped so many in the past that this was always going to happen'.....absolute traitors....but they sure put in the ground work.

I must admit I am sick and fucking tired of the bearded dwarf. I don't watch it anymore unless someone calls me up and says "they're left with the £250,000 and the £500 at the end!" or something similar, and I'm close enough to the TV. Like the other week when that girl had the £250,000 and the £75,000.....she went for it and had the £75,000. She was hot actually, If I remember. Oh, and why the fuck is it that all the contestants are obviously suffering from some sort of mental illness? I don't know. And I'm swearing like a motherfucking machine gun today. It's too much Mike Strutter. I nearly said "thankyou very fucking much" to the checkout girl in Woolworths. She also was hot, if I remember.

I'm an Air fan too. Great and clever musicians.

Check this shit.... Say Hello to the Goodbye Weapon David Hambling Wired Wednesday, December 6, 2006 The crowd is getting ugly. Soldiers roll up in a Hummer. Suddenly, the whole right half of your body is screaming in agony. You feel like you've been dipped in molten lava. You almost faint from shock and pain, but instead you stumble backwards -- and then start running. To your surprise, everyone else is running too. In a few seconds, the street is completely empty. You've just been hit with a new nonlethal weapon that has been certified for use in Iraq -- even though critics argue there may be unforeseen effects. According to documents obtained for Wired News under federal sunshine laws, the Air Force's Active Denial System, or ADS, has been certified safe after lengthy tests by military scientists in the lab and in war games. The ADS shoots a beam of millimeters waves, which are longer in wavelength than x-rays but shorter than microwaves -- 94 GHz (= 3 mm wavelength) compared to 2.45 GHz (= 12 cm wavelength) in a standard microwave oven. The longer waves are thought to limit the effects of the radiation. If used properly, ADS will produce no lasting adverse affects, the military argues. Documents acquired for Wired News using the Freedom of Information Act claim that most of the radiation (83 percent) is instantly absorbed by the top layer of the skin, heating it rapidly. The beam produces what experimenters call the "Goodbye effect," or "prompt and highly motivated escape behavior." In human tests, most subjects reached their pain threshold within 3 seconds, and none of the subjects could endure more than 5 seconds. "It will repel you," one test subject said. "If hit by the beam, you will move out of it -- reflexively and quickly. You for sure will not be eager to experience it again." But while subjects may feel like they have sustained serious burns, the documents claim effects are not long-lasting. At most, "some volunteers who tolerate the heat may experience prolonged redness or even small blisters," the Air Force experiments concluded. The reports describe an elaborate series of investigations involving human subjects. The volunteers were military personnel: active, reserve or retired, who volunteered for the tests. They were unpaid, but the subjects would "benefit from direct knowledge that an effective nonlethal weapon system could soon be in the inventory," said one report. The tests ranged from simple exposure in the laboratory to elaborate war games involving hundreds of participants. The military simulated crowd control situations, rescuing helicopter crews in a Black Hawk Down setting and urban assaults. More unusual tests involved alcohol, attack dogs and maze-like obstacle courses. In more than 10,000 exposures, there were six cases of blistering and one instance of second-degree burns in a laboratory accident, the documents claim. The ADS was developed in complete secrecy for 10 years at a cost of $40 million. Its existence was revealed in 2001 by news reports, but most details of ADS human testing remain classified. There has been no independent checking of the military's claims. The ADS technology is ready to deploy, and the Army requested ADS-armed Strykers for Iraq last year. But the military is well aware that any adverse publicity could finish the program, and it does not want to risk distressed victims wailing about evil new weapons on CNN. This may mean yet more rounds of testing for the ADS. New bombs can be rushed into service in a matter of weeks, but the process is more complex for nonlethal weapons. It may be years before the debates are resolved and the first directed-energy nonlethal weapon is used in action. The development of a truly safe and highly effective nonlethal crowd-control system could raise enormous ethical questions about the state's use of coercive force. If a method such as ADS leads to no lasting injury or harm, authorities may find easier justifications for employing them. Historically, one of the big problems with nonlethal weapons is that they can be misused. Rubber bullets are generally safe when fired at the torso, but head impacts can be dangerous, particularly at close range. Tasers can become dangerous if they are used on subjects who have previously been doused with flammable pepper spray. In the heat of the moment, soldiers or police can forget their safety training. Steve Wright of Praxis, the Center for the Study of Information and Technology in Peace, Conflict Resolution and Human Rights, notes that there are occasions when this has happened in the past. He cites British soldiers, who increased the weight of baton rounds in Northern Ireland. "Soldiers flouted the rules of engagement, doctoring the bullets by inserting batteries (to increase the weight) and firing at closer ranges than allowed," says Wright. There may also be technical issues. Wright cites a recent report on CS gas sprays which turned out to be more dangerous in the field than expected. "No one had bothered to check how the sprays actually performed in practice, and they yielded much more irritant than was calculated in the weapon specification. This underlines the need for independent checking of any manufacturers' specifications. Here secrecy is the enemy of safety." Eye damage is identified as the biggest concern, but the military claims this has been thoroughly studied. Lab testing found subjects reflexively blink or turn away within a quarter of a second of exposure, long before the sensitive cornea can be damaged. Tests on monkeys showed that corneal damage heals within 24 hours, the reports claim. "A speculum was needed to hold the eyes open to produce this type of injury because even under anesthesia, the monkeys blinked, protecting the cornea," the report says. The risk of cancer is also often mentioned in connection with the ADS system, despite the shallow penetration of radiation into the skin. But the Air Force is adamant that after years of study, exposure to MMW has not been demonstrated to promote cancer. During some tests, subjects were exposed to 20 times the permitted dose under the relevant Air Force radiation standard. The Air Force claims the exposure was justified by demonstrating the safety of the ADS system. The beam penetrates clothing, but not stone or metal. Blocking it is harder than you might think. Wearing a tinfoil shirt is not enough -- you would have to be wrapped like a turkey to be completely protected. The experimenters found that even a small exposed area was enough to produce the Goodbye effect, so any gaps would negate protection. Holding up a sheet of metal won't work either, unless it covers your whole body and you can keep the tips of your fingers out of sight. Wet clothing might sound like a good defense, but tests showed that contact with damp cloth actually intensified the effects of the beam. System 1, the operational prototype, is mounted on a Hummer and produces a beam with a 2-meter diameter. Effective range is at least 500 meters, which is further than rubber bullets, tear gas or water cannons. The ammunition supply is effectively unlimited. The military's tests went beyond safety, exploring how well the ADS works in practice. In one war game, an assault team staged a mock raid on a building. The ADS was used to remove civilians from the battlefield, separating what the military calls "tourists from terrorists." It was also used in a Black Hawk Down scenario, and maritime tests, which saw the ADS deployed against small boats. It might also be used on the battlefield. One war game deployed the ADS in support of an assault, suppressing incoming fire and obstructing a counterattack. "ADS has the same compelling nonlethal effect on all targets, regardless of size, age and gender," says Capt. Jay Delarosa, spokesman for the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate, which decides where and how the ADS might be deployed. "It can be used to deny an area to individuals or groups, to control access, to prevent an individual or individuals from carrying out an undesirable activity, and to delay or disrupt adversary activity." The precise results of the military's war games are classified, but Capt. Delarosa insists that the ADS has proven "both safe and effective in all these roles." The ADS comes in a variety of shapes and sizes. As well as System 1, a smaller version has been fitted to a Stryker armored vehicle -- along with other lethal and nonlethal weapons -- for urban security operations. Sandia National Labs is looking at a small tripod-mounted version for defending nuclear installations, and there is even a portable ADS. And there are bigger versions too. "Key technologies to enable this capability from an airborne platform -- such as a C-130 -- are being developed at several Air Force Research Laboratory technology directorates," says Diana Loree, program manager for the Airborne ADS. The airborne ADS would supplement the formidable firepower of Special Forces AC-130 gunships, which currently includes a 105-mm howitzer and 25-mm Gatling guns. The flying gunboats typically engage targets at a range of two miles or more, which implies an ADS far more powerful than System 1 has been developed. But details of the exact power levels, range and diameter of the beam are classified.

David Lynch Goes Public With 9/11 Questions Film director is disturbed by unanswered questions Infowars.net Wednesday, December 6, 2006 Film Director and cult icon David Lynch has gone public with concerns he has over the official government story of the September 11 2001 terror attacks. Lynch has stated that he is disturbed by unanswered questions concerning the Pentagon attack, the collapse of the buildings in New York and the strange ending of flight 93 in Pennsylvania. Appearing on Dutch Television on VPRO's Wereldgasten, on December 3rd, Lynch discussed and played clips from Dylan Avery's groundbreaking 9/11 documentary Loose Change. After playing a four minute segment from the documentary Lynch stated: "It's not so much what thy say, it's the things that make you look at what you thought you saw in a different light. And Those things for me, that bother me, is the hole in the Pentagon being too small for a plane, the lawn isn't messed up, and the government's not showing the plane hitting when many cameras photographed it. At the World Trade Center, three buildings came down, like demolitions, and two of them were hit by a plane, but the third one they said "do you want us to pull it?" and they pulled it and it looked just like the other two. Those things bother me. In Pennsylvania, the plane that went down, there was just a hole in the ground, there wasn't any wreckage,there wasn't any skid marks, there wasn't any tear in the earth, and no one has ever really found out about that. So every place there's questions, coming from this documentary. You don't have to believe everything in the documentary to still have questions come up... and you look back and you remember what you saw, and what you were told, and now, you have questions. It's just an event that has many questions and no answers." When asked "What about suggestions the American government was behind it?", Lynch answered: "That's too big for people to think about. it's too big. It's like something no one wants to think about." Watch the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyVTkf8TnHc&eurl= Lynch has directed well known cinematic classics such as Eraserhead, Dune, The Elephant Man and Mulholland Drive. He was also the creative force behind the Twin Peaks television series in the 80s. His films are synonymous with the questioning of the nature of reality and thinking outside the box. Often employing visually rich and surrealist stylistic elements, Lynch's works have become instantly recognizable to audiences worldwide and cemented his status as an underground hero for many. Lynch's decision to make public his views is another encouraging sign that 9/11 truth and visualizations such as Loose Change are crossing the boundary between "the alternative" and the mainstream, permeating the collective consciousness of accessible culture, just as Lynch's work has done over the past four decades. Lynch follows in the footsteps of other identifiable cultural figures who have spoken out on 9/11, such as Richard Linklater, Jesse Ventura, Matthew Bellemy, Ed Asner and Charlie Sheen.

:) I've got it in Lossless somewhere actually....I burnt it to a disc when making my back-ups but I just don't know where the DVD with it on is...:(

And here it is....again. A Triumph For Man http://www.sendspace.com/file/acxj47 01. Wheels Over Me 02. Beautiful Balloon 03. Wherever 04. Panda 05. Then I Run 06. Life Is Not Distant 07. No Shadow Kick 08. Snowflake 09. She Came Home For Christmas 10. Pink Monster 11. I Should Have Been A Tsin-Tsi(For you) 12. How Things Turn Out To Be 13. Web 14. Coffee Break :)

Erm....today... Jaga Jazzist - Oslo Skyline or Cinematic Orchestra - All Things To All Men Listened to both a couple of times while I was in the bath. :)

Bass + Big Cheese = :D

I'll uploaded that after I've finished doing something else.

..........he ate all the pies

Not listening to 'new' Coldplay that much..... A few songs from X&Y (White Shadows, Sqaure One, Low, Swallowed In The Sea, Speed Of Sound) still get the odd listen but other than that it's mostly older songs and b-sides when I do listen to them.

Hey, no problem :)

I think the fact that Father Christmas as we see him today is a creation of Coca-Cola is used by them as their seasonal advert is just as bad. Coke is very bad for you and possibly even more dangerous to women. LINK - Cola 'is bad' for women's bones

Looks like the chase is on....

Haha, you're right there. I hate it when people get all pissy about seeing the Swastika in games. A couple of my friends say "oh, I don't like it becuase of that" and they don't even say why. They are simply trying to come across as moralistic on the issue...BUT they don't even know why they don't want to see the nazi symbol!!! I think it's because they have it in their mind that it's wrong...but they don't know why. They are a bunch of pretentious tits at times!! (Friends, not Nazi's)

If you think about it....we don't actually even know if any muslims have indeed carried this type of event out either.

Yep, playing Call Of Duty online is one of my favourites.

wow, I'm glad somewhere talked about it. Funny how it missed the US News..... Also, this is all fishy and the possibility that the tough talking about 'discrimination' will cause US sercurity to step down think twice about making moves against suspects incase of lawsuits, which might allow a 'real' threat through. (by real of course I mean provoked or staged)

Haha.

Hey, I love games. Great games are a pure work of art. The storyline, the artwork & animation, the worlds they can create and the magnificent music within some games. I actually get excited about playing new games and I believe for all the right reasons. But I also don't NEED them and I know where to draw the line.