GazeboflossUK

HOW COME THESE DAYS THE TRUTH HAS BECOME "ONE SIDED"!!!!

It's wholly reliable. It's more researched, sourced and documented than the TV you watch.

Well, yeah, I agree that the mainstream media only do what is in it's best interest.

ooh right....ok.....but may I point out that I wasn't talking about the Israel/Hizbollah situation..... But yes....back on topic.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE 'FAITHFULL' BBC AND SKY-NEWS (UK)...WHO WERE ACTUALLY THERE!!!...... They reported the deaths from having their reporters see it all......and these 'News' companies spin it to make Isreal look legit. What the hell is going on

WRONG THREAD!!!!BUT It's a 'conspiracy site'? It deals with government lies, yes. It also links to many other news sites. SO it's devoted to government cover-ups and 'big brother' and the global elite.....so what.....it's all 100% valid. Where do you get your news from??? Your being lied to and you don't even care. Shame on you.....really....it's right kick in the teeth for you....and it'll really start to hurt one day. You said "Its full of dramatic headlines and dramaitc pictures. The theme is America is evil and corrupt.".......no shit. It's the truth. It's is dramatic and it's though to deal with......but it's better than being a mindless sheep, isn't it......it is. You really should actually do the reading yourself. You can't win on the facts so stop trying silly "hit pieces" which mean nothing. Everything is sourced, everything is documented. Your on the wrong side and eventually you'll know it. oh and you learn from 'Reuters'......ok, it's all a bit clearer now....lol Actually do some real reading. NOW GET AWAY FROM THIS AND BACK ON TOPIC!!!!!!!!!!

Third of Americans suspect 9-11 government conspiracy THOMAS HARGROVE / Scripps Howard News Service | August 2 2006 Flashback: Zogby Poll: Over 70 Million American Adults Support New 9/11 Investigation More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll. The national survey of 1,010 adults also found that anger against the federal government is at record levels, with 54 percent saying they "personally are more angry" at the government than they used to be. Widespread resentment and alienation toward the national government appears to be fueling a growing acceptance of conspiracy theories about the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Suspicions that the 9/11 attacks were "an inside job" _ the common phrase used by conspiracy theorists on the Internet _ quickly have become nearly as popular as decades-old conspiracy theories that the federal government was responsible for President John F. Kennedy's assassination and that it has covered up proof of space aliens. Seventy percent of people who give credence to these theories also say they've become angrier with the federal government than they used to be. Thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them "because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East." "One out of three sounds high, but that may very well be right," said Lee Hamilton, former vice chairman of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also called the 9/11 commission.) His congressionally appointed investigation concluded that federal officials bungled their attempts to prevent, but did not participate in, the attacks by al Qaeda five years ago. "A lot of people I've encountered believe the U.S. government was involved," Hamilton said. "Many say the government planned the whole thing. Of course, we don't think the evidence leads that way at all." The poll also found that 16 percent of Americans speculate that secretly planted explosives, not burning passenger jets, were the real reason the massive twin towers of the World Trade Center collapsed. Conspiracy groups for at least two years have also questioned why the World Trade Center collapsed when fires that heavily damaged similar skyscrapers around the world did not cause such destruction. Sixteen percent said it's "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that "the collapse of the twin towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the two buildings." Twelve percent suspect the Pentagon was struck by a military cruise missile in 2001 rather than by an airliner captured by terrorists. That lower percentage may result from an effort by the conservative Washington-based Judicial Watch advocacy group to debunk the claim. The group filed claims under the Freedom of Information Act and got two fill loops released from Pentagon security cameras. "Some people claim they can't see anything, but I see a plane hitting the Pentagon at incredibly high speed," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "I see the nose of the plane clearly entering the frame of one video and the tail of the plane entering the Pentagon in the other video." Many conspiracy Web sites have posted the video loops and report the films are inconclusive or were manipulated by the government. "Some folks will never be convinced," Fitton said. "But I'm hoping that these videos will dissuade reasonable people from falling into a trap with these conspiracy theories." University of Florida law professor Mark Fenster, author of the book "Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture," said the poll's findings reflect public anger at the unpopular Iraq war, realization that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction and growing doubts of the veracity of the Bush administration. "What has amazed me is not that there are conspiracy theories, but that they didn't seem to be getting any purchase among the American public until the last year or so," Fenster said. "Although the Iraq war was not directly related to the 9/11 attacks, people are now looking back at 9/11 with much more skepticism than they used to." Conspiracy-believing participants in the poll agree their suspicions are recent. "I certainly didn't think of conspiracies when 9/11 first happened," said Elaine Tripp, 62, of Tabernacle, N.J. "I don't know if President Bush was aware of the exact time it was going to happen. But he certainly didn't do enough to stop it. Bush was so intent on having his own little war." Garrett Johnson, 19, of Manassas, Va., said it was "well after the fact" before he started questioning the official explanation of the attacks. "But then people I know started talking about it. And the Internet had a lot to do with this. After reading all of the different articles there, I started to think we weren't being told the truth." The Scripps Survey Research Center at Ohio University has tracked the level of resentment people feel toward the federal government since 1995, starting shortly after Timothy McVeigh bombed the federal building in Oklahoma City. Forty-seven percent then said they, personally, feel "more angry at the federal government" than they used to. That percentage dropped to 42 percent in 1997, 34 percent in 1998 and only 12 percent shortly after 9/11 during the groundswell of patriotism and support for the government after the attacks. But the new survey found that 77 percent say their friends and acquaintances have become angrier with government recently and 54 percent say they, themselves, have become angrier _ both record levels. The survey also found that people who regularly use the Internet but who do not regularly use so-called "mainstream" media are significantly more likely to believe in 9/11 conspiracies. People who regularly read daily newspapers or listen to radio newscasts were especially unlikely to believe in the conspiracies. "We know that there are a lot of people now asking questions," said Janice Matthews, executive director of 911Truth.org, one of the most sophisticated Internet sites raising doubts about official explanations of the attacks. "We didn't have the Internet after Pearl Harbor, the Gulf of Tonkin or the Kennedy assassination. But we live in different times now." Matthews' Web site averaged 4,000 "hits" a day last year, but currently has at least 12,000 visits every 24 hours. The site, according to its online policy statement, is dedicated to showing the public that "elements within the U.S. government must have orchestrated or participated in the execution of the attacks for these to have happened the way in which they did." Participants in the poll were asked to respond to "several serious accusations that some people have made against the federal government in recent years." Five conspiracy theories were described and participants were asked if each was "very likely, somewhat likely or unlikely." The level of suspicion of U.S. official involvement in a 9/11 conspiracy was only slightly behind the 40 percent who suspect "officials in the federal government were directly responsible for the assassination of President Kennedy" and the 38 percent who believe "the federal government is withholding proof of the existence of intelligent life from other planets." The poll found that a majority of young adults give at least some credence to a 9/11 conspiracy compared to less than a fourth of people 65 or older. Members of racial and ethnic minorities, people with only a high school education and Democrats were especially likely to suspect federal involvement in 9/11. The survey was conducted by telephone from July 6-24 at the Scripps Survey Research Center at the University of Ohio under a grant from the Scripps Howard Foundation. The poll has a margin of error of 4 percentage points. (Thomas Hargrove is a reporter for Scripps Howard News Service. Guido H. Stempel III is director of the Scripps Survey Research Center at Ohio University.)

READ THIS ARTICLE....it took me two hours. 9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes How did the U.S. Air Force respond on 9/11? Could it have shot down United 93, as conspiracy theorists claim? Obtaining 30 hours of never-before-released tapes from the control room of NORAD's Northeast headquarters, the author reconstructs the chaotic military history of that day—and the Pentagon's apparent attempt to cover it up. VF.com exclusive: Hear excerpts from the September 11 NORAD tapes. Click PLAY after each transcript to listen. (Click text to go to the article)

WATCH THIS. 9/11 Truth: In-depth Kevin Barrett Interview on Wisconsin TV This is the best, fairest, most thorough and in-depth interview I've seen on American telelvision in a long time. It makes you realize just how low we've sunk that the way Sean Hannity "interviews" his guests is normal for this day and age. AND THE NEWS VIDEO - HERE Sorry about the flip4mac overlay. I don't like it either. Friends don't let friends encode videos in crappy Microsoft formats.

Al-Jazerra is under CIA influence......they are the ones that play all these fake Osama Bin Laden tapes............they have to keep a negative US approach though as it allows them to be respected within the middle-east by the people who have been told to hate the US. And by providing a video to American networks of Osama bin Laden declaring 'holy war' against the United States the very day bombs began falling in Afghanistan, it at last brought itself into the American living room. It's an mainstream Arab version of CNN. And if Saddam or Castro knew about it (which they probably know very little) how would they ever have their full and frank comments broadcast to anyone when the mainstream media is owned and ran by the people who are benefiting from the post 9/11 wars. Plus Saddam was even blamed partly by the US government (and the media ran with it) for the events on 9/11.....they wouldn't ever give him the time of day.....imagine Saddam sitting down for an interview about it??? Or ever being given a platform to say anything??? no. There are lots of countries whose leaders have pranced around the knowledge that it indeed was an inside job....but not exactly saying it in so many words. Imagine how much trouble actually coming out and stating "the US government were responsible for the events on 9/11" would cause for ANY country, let alone a middle-eastern country. I actually wish they would as it needs to be done...

Yeah, yeah.....we are all nuts :rolleyes: Dispite all the things I post that aren't. I've got better things to do.. bye.

Ok then. There's more of you now - so you win..... Damn.

Mad? Who?....no no. Not me. I've posted enough to care not whether you and a couple others bring up this "EVIDENCE". It's that quick thoughtless answer I'm used to from some people.

Anti-semitic!! Long time no hear. He's back. :rolleyes: AND SPELL IT RIGHT.

No, you didn't...but it's all the same stuff...kinda. Ok then.....so we are playing this game Mr Smut... Read all this within these sites.....because I have. http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html http://911research.wtc7.net/ http://www.911review.com/ http://septembereleventh.org/ Easy isn't it, huh? That should keep you going for weeks and weeks, trust me.

I know that it's "REAL".....so to speak. I guess I was making another point that passed by.

Come on! You've posted all this stuff before.....lol....your widing me up. I know it......lol. Cheaky chappy.

Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism.....it's those god damn Terrorists!!!! :rolleyes:

Read them and weep?? I'm crying as I type. You don't think I've read all that stuff before? Because I have and we've discussed it all ages ago. And... Fahrenheit 9/11 is a piece of white-washed turd and something which I never have mentioned. They are not theories my friend......and it's doesn't matter.......everyone will see that they are not theories eventually. I think you better look at the real facts and stop just linking me to pages which have info that has already been proven a lie. "First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi Your between the "then they laugh at you" and the "then they fight you" stage.

Another Israeli Myth Exposed: There Were No Hezbollah Rockets In Qana Meanwhile, northern Israeli residents say they have more chance of winning the lottery than getting hit by a Katyusha missile Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | August 1 2006 There were no Hezbollah rockets and no Hezbollah militants in the village of Qana that was leveled by the Israelis on Sunday night, according to village residents and Red Cross workers stationed in the area. Another apologist fabrication to justify Israeli atrocities has been exposed as a total fraud. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert claimed Sunday Hezbollah were, "hiding places for rockets inside the village and the village itself is a safe haven for those who launch rockets." Israeli media mouthpieces and drooling Neo-Cons have repeatedly tried to portray Israel's rampant war crimes as a right to self-defense, even in light of mounting atrocities and the deliberate targeting of aid workers, ambulances, UN observers, and women and children who slept in their beds and never woke up. "There were no Hezbollah rockets fired from Qana - this was the justification given by the Israelis for bombing the shelter and again carrying out a massive bombardment all that night long and well into the next day of that entire village," Dahr Jamail told the Alex Jones Show. Jamail is a Christian Lebanese American independent journalist who has worked for the Guardian, the Independent, and the Sunday Herald. "They claim that it was Hezbollah's fault, that they were forced to murder these innocent people because Hezbollah continues to fire rockets into Israel." "I spoke with two residents at the scene of the bombing, two people who were nearby, who lived in the village and they said of course there were no Hezbollah rockets fired from this village because when Hezbollah does that all of the villagers clear out immediately because people are well aware that once those rockets are fired Israel is going to retaliate with a massive air strike on the entire area." "So no rockets were fired according to the residents there." Jamail also verified this contention by speaking to aid workers in the nearby city of Tyre. "These claims were backed up not only by residents but when I talked to the Lebanese Red Cross they said the same thing - they said no when we go into these villages usually we can find evidence if there is any - we will find rocket launchers, we will find guns, we will even find some Hezbollah fighters," said Jamail. "One of them who was actually the training manager of the Red Cross down there, he said there was 100 per cent no evidence - that city was clear - there was no evidence of any rockets fired from there whatsoever." Jamail said that "without a doubt" Israel was intentionally targeting civilians, with a particular focus on medical workers and rescue workers. He said that the policy was based on blood thirst and collective punishment with an overarching agenda to pull Iran and Syria into the mire so Israel can justify subsequent attacks on those countries. For those still choosing to live in cloud cuckoo land and believe the fallacy of the 'right to self-defense' argument - consider the words of one resident of Kiryat Shmona, a town on the northern most border of Israel. “I’M STAYING. [!!!!!!!] I have more chance of winning the lottery than being hit by a Katyusha [missile].[!!!!!!!] We are suffering too much from Hezbollah. They should get in there, finish the whole thing and get it done once and for all.” More chance of winning the lottery than being hit by a Hezbollah missile. Compare that to the untold horror that has been inflicted on a nation of innocent people whose very day to day existence has been turned into simple question of survival. Prison Planet.tv members can listen to the entire interview with Dahr Jamail by clicking here. Please consider becoming a subscriber by clicking here.

Bare in mind that the UK, Germany & the Czech Republic just voted against a imminent cease fire Israeli opinion after Qana - MIND BOGGLING The Truth Will Set You Free | Aug 1 2006 And you thought the massacre was outrageous - you aint seen nothing yet. To underscore Israel’s defiance of international opinion, Mr Olmert declared last night: “The fighting is continuing . . . There is no ceasefire and there will be no ceasefire in coming days.” He added: “We will pursue Hezbollah at any place and at any time and we will not permit it to regain its capacities . . . We are paying a high and sad price in [Lebanese] human lives, in destruction [but] we will not renounce our right to live normally without the threat of terrorism.” Mr Olmert’s defiance is rooted in ROCK-SOLID domestic support. Polls show 80-95 per cent support for continued strikes, with no evidence that the Qana killings or last week’s bombing of a UN observer post caused a flicker of the needle. Not to be out-done by their madman-in-chief, the Israeli public chimes in with their own fetid quotes. . . “The Israel Defence Forces is the most moral army in the world” Oh dear :stunned: --Eli Yishai, Trade and Industry Minister * * * “We Won't Fold” --Ma’ariv newspaper * * * “We are not hesitating, apologising or relenting. If the rocket fire at Israel continues from Qana, we will continue to bomb Qana. Today, tomorrow, the day after that. HERE, THERE and EVERYWHERE. The children of Qana could be sleeping peacefully in their homes now, if the messengers of Satan had not taken over their land and turned our children’s lives into hell” --Ben Caspit, Ma’ariv * * * “Every air force sortie WAS JUST ASKING FOR an on-camera tragedy like the one at Qana yesterday. IT WAS JUST A QUESTION OF TIME and it is clear that the tragedy is playing into the hands of Hezbollah” --Nadav Eyal, Ma’ariv * * * Ehud Olmert today faces the first real test of his leadership since the outbreak of the war in Lebanon. Will he panic in the face of the international media lynching over the deaths of civilians at Qana, and order a halt to the war, or ****will he keep his composure and continue with the military action UNTIL HIS POLITICAL AIMS ARE ACHIEVED.**** Ten years ago a panic-stricken Shimon Peres ordered an immediate halt to Operation Grapes of Wrath [after the first Qana disaster]. In the end, the convoluted agreements reached with Hezbollah then were the root cause of the present fighting --Hagai Huberman, Hatzofe newspaper Let's see. I seem to recall our own personal madman declaring that "Terrorists" are people "who will blow up innocent people in order to achieve tactical objectives." It seems fairly obvious that Israelis are terrorists without parallel. “I think the war’s a necessary evil. It needs to happen to make the border safe. Unfortunately the ‘evil’ is innocents getting hurt. But I blame Hezbollah for that” --Stephen Smith, a broker Nevermind that under this financial wizard's twisted cost/benefit analysis it's always the Lebanese people who DIE, for Israel's benefit. And finally, the most DAMNING quote of all . . . “I’M STAYING. [!!!!!!!] I have more chance of winning the lottery than being hit by a Katyusha [missile].[!!!!!!!] We are suffering too much from Hezbollah. They should get in there, finish the whole thing and get it done once and for all” --Freddy Masika, lottery kiosk operator in Kiryat Shemona BINGO, buddy! You just hit the jackpot! Kiryat Shemona is in the northern-most part of Israel. He just proved that Israel is turning a nation into rubble - right before our eyes - and murdering hundreds if not thousands of innocent civilians to prevent rocket attacks that are less likely to hit one of its citizens - in the northern-most part of Israel - than its citizens are likely to win the lottery. When was the last time any of you won the lottery? I rest my case. The state of Israel is an abject failure - time to go back to the drawing board. Please, spread it far and wide.

One for all the US 'truthers'....you can help. TALK RADIO MASS-MOBILIZATION! 9/11 Blogger | July 31, 2006 (The following activism appeal was sent in by the owner of False Flag News.com [site currently being updated] and enthusiastically endorsed by Webster Tarpley. Tune in to KPFK this afternoon around 12:30pm Pacific time for a live demo.) Nag the Neocons-Grab the Gatekeepers: Radio Mass Mobilization For The 9-11 Roundtable on C-SPAN TUE 6:10PM EDT What if you could stop the next false-flag terror attack and the descent into World War III? On Tuesday August 1, C-SPAN will re-air the 9-11 Roundtable discussion at 6:10 pm EDT. This is an opportunity we cannot squander, because it may be our best opportunity to expose millions of Americans to the truth about September 11 as a new world war approaches. Anyone who likes to be considered a real 9-11 truth activist must flood the radio stations over the next two days with one point in mind: alerting listeners to the 9-11 conference Tuesday at 6:10 PM on C-SPAN. Call in to neocons like Sean Hannity & Michael Savage, and make them squirm while alerting their millions of listeners. Get on the phone and badger left Air America jockeys like Randi Rhodes and Al Franken who have avoided 9-11 truth for so long. While mentioning the evidence of an inside job is important, the key must be constantly re-stating the August 1, Tueday 6:10 C-SPAN information. One key tip: Remember your audience. When calling neocon stations, talk about the evidence pointing to an inside job, but avoid shrill name-calling of Cheney/Bush and instead try phrases like "real conservatives should investigate 9-11, and they can do so Tuesday on C-SPAN at 6:10. This is not a left/right issue." When calling the lefty shows, you can probably be more open with your rhetoric, but do not forget to keep mentioning the date, time, and network. Repetition is key! (Did we mention C-SPAN, Tuesday at 6:10 PM?) In both cases, try to stress the scholarly nature of the conference and the credibility of the speakers. These next two days are not the time for excuses or self-pity. Last night I called in on Drudge's national show and got the word out to hundreds of thousands, while he could only meekly compare me to Oliver Stone. I called WBZ in Boston and forced the neocon host to say "Wow, those are good points." We must overtake the airwaves in the next two days in order to save the lives of those who will be killed in the next false-flag terror operation, and the ensuing global war. So get off the message boards, and on to your phones! End the defeatism! Reach millions of middle Americans, not just ten of thousands of like-minded activists in the blogosphere. We have a day and a half to get this done. 100 people making 10 calls a day could be the difference between millions waking up to the truth about September 11. Will you be amongst those 100 who will save the planet? Or will you just sit at your computer waiting for the next false-flag and nuclear Armageddon? Go pick up the phone! As one person you can alert millions! (all times Eastern, if you see a mistake, note it and make a comment) NEOCON RADIO HOSTS: 9am-12pm Glenn Beck 888-727-BECK 8:30am-1pm Neil Boortz 877-310-2100 8am-11am Laura Ingraham 800-876-4123 10am-1pm G. Gordon Liddy 800-GG-LIDDY 12-3pm Rush Limbaugh 800-282-2882 12-2 Bill O'Reilly 877-9-NO-SPIN 3pm- 6 pm Sean Hannity 800-941-7326 6pm - 9pm Michael Savage 800-449-8255 LEFT RADIO HOSTS: Amy Goodman/DemocracyNow! 9am-10 am (212) 209-2900 [email protected] Mark Riley and Rachel Maddow 5am-9am 1-866-303-2270 Al Franken 12pm-3pm 1-866-303-2270 Randi Rhodes 3pm-7 pm 866-303-2270 Majority Report with Garafalo and Seder 7pm-10pm 1-866-303-2270 Mike Malloy 10pm-1am 1-866-303-2270 Try your favorite local call in show as well! Get creative: try college radio, urban radio, anything where you can reach people. More talk radio networks in major markets can be found here: http://www.radiotalk.org/newstalk.html http://www.radiotalk.org/alltalk.html

Because Fox News says "they are gonna nuke us". ;) I mean it's ok for the US to use Depleted Uranium in it's weapons which is a byproduct of the enriching of natural uranium. When most of the fissile radioactive isotopes of uranium are removed from natural uranium, the residue is called depleted uranium. It causes radioactive problems in the area used for years ans years.

Which ones do you want to see come true? Frankly, I want none of them. That's why getting this news out and about is important - it's more likely to put off the criminals who are behind the schemes.

Secret 2001 Pentagon Plan to Attack Lebanon Plan for "Serial War" revealed by General Wesley Clark by A Concerned Citizen July 23, 2006 GlobalResearch.ca "[The] Five-year campaign plan [includes]... a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan" (Pentagon official quoted by General Wesley Clark) According to General Wesley Clark--the Pentagon, by late 2001, was Planning to Attack Lebanon "Winning Modern Wars" (page 130) General Clark states the following: "As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan. ...He said it with reproach--with disbelief, almost--at the breadth of the vision. I moved the conversation away, for this was not something I wanted to hear. And it was not something I wanted to see moving forward, either. ...I left the Pentagon that afternoon deeply concerned." Of course, this is fully consistent with the US Neocons' master plan, "Rebuilding America's Defenses," published in August 2000 by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) And, as PNAC's website ( http://www.newamericancentury.org ) notes, that the lead author of that plan, Thomas Donnelly, was a top official of Lockheed Martin--a company well acquainted with war and its profit potential. It's no surprise that Republicans are starting to talk about withdrawing troops from Iraq; the troops will be needed in Lebanon. And maybe Sudan and Syria?