Judicial Watch Director of Investigations & Research and former military intelligence officer Chris Farrell says the watchdog organization plans to file another lawsuit in order to obtain as many as possible of the 84 other tapes that potentially show whatFarrell conceded that his organization could be the water carriers for a honey pot operation, in which the government attracts overwhelming attention to the Pentagon issue, making it the cornerstone of the 9/11 truth movement, and then blowing it out of the water by releasing clear footage of Flight 77.

 

Let's just call it a baited trap, it draws somebody into a situation in which they're compromised," said Farrell in describing the tactic of creating a honey pot. He agreed that we should expect to see clear footage of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon released soon.

 

Farrell agreed that the DoD only released the tape because they wanted to for their own reasons. We have witnessed numerous times over the government claim national security in refusing to release evidence and they could have done the same in this instance yet they deliberately chose to relent and release the new tapes.

 

Farrell (pictured) resolved to pursue a lawsuit against the FBI unless they released the 84 separate video tapes seized around the Pentagon on the day of 9/11 which are still being withheld. He expects the lawsuit to take around three months at which point the FBI would be compelled to release the tapes or claim national security in withholding them.

 

"Three months is my guess, they'll let it go into the summer and once they're compelled through a lawsuit suddenly they'll break loose with a couple more," said Farrell.

 

Farrell went as far as to suggest that upcoming Pentagon tapes would be used by the government for political points scoring in anticipation of the mid-term elections.

 

"They want to present it in time for the elections, they want to get through the summer and once the summer is over three months down the road people start getting back into politics mode and elections come up that's when you'll see it dribble out."

 

Many suspect Judicial Watch is being used as a conduit for the dissemination of carefully staged government propaganda. When the subject of Operation Northwoods was raised, Farrell became noticeably evasive and began to talk about government incompetence as if reading from a prepared script.

 

We can't let them get away with this attempt at the diversion from the truths

Interested to see how this pans out

Im not.

Im not.

Way to have an open mind.

^^because you're wetoded

It has nothing to do with an opened mind.

^^because you're wetoded

 

Yeah he is....its not his fault though, his mind is so open it fell out.

It has nothing to do with an opened mind.

 

uhm. If you're not willing to hear things out, you're closed minded. Dur.

 

Yeah he is....its not his fault though' date=' his mind is so open it fell out.[/quote']

 

1) I put two ^'s, so I was talkin' 'bout you.

2) that was the corniest thing i've ever heard

uhm. If you're not willing to hear things out, you're closed minded. Dur.

 

 

 

1) I put two ^'s, so I was talkin' 'bout you.

2) that was the corniest thing i've ever heard

 

I'm fully willing to hear things out....ive said this many times you have to look at both sides of the arguments to find the truth.

 

Yeah and the whole "wetoded" thing wasnt? funny.

I'm fully willing to hear things out....ive said this many times you have to look at both sides of the arguments to find the truth.

 

Yeah and the whole "wetoded" thing wasnt? funny.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Okay, whatever. You're gonna point out something wrong with every post I'm going to make, so forget it. :blush:

Okay' date=' whatever. You're gonna point out something wrong with every post I'm going to make, so forget it. :blush:[/quote']

 

You're very right, I am. Like on this post.

okay :dance:

Yeah he is....its not his fault though' date=' his mind is so open it fell out.[/quote']

 

love how you start with the personal insults. is that all you have left?

love how you start with the personal insults. is that all you have left?

 

No, im just stooping to your level for once. Trying out your way of acting, you know seeing what its like.

^there you go again... :rolleyes:

What the hell is wrong with you???

 

:lol:

^there you go again... :rolleyes:

 

There you go again....You're doing the exact same thing as i am. so dont even try the high and mighty bullshit.

What the hell is wrong with you???

 

:lol:

 

Me? i get personally attacked for my political views all the time, and i stoop to their level and somethings wrong with me? hahaha you gave me bad rep for acting like them.

There you go again....You're doing the exact same thing as i am. so dont even try the high and mighty bullshit.

 

How was that a personal attack? I was just stating that that was a personal attack in itself.

 

And you're not "stooping to our level". I've had many successful arguements with other people, and I think others here have also.

 

You, my friend, seem to get into a little fit with everyone. That's just everyone elses fault, isn't it?

How was that a personal attack? I was just stating that that was a personal attack in itself.

 

And you're not "stooping to our level". I've had many successful arguements with other people, and I think others here have also.

 

You, my friend, seem to get into a little fit with everyone. That's just everyone elses fault, isn't it?

 

First of all you called me retarded. No its half my fault, but equally there fault as well. you see i get attacked personally all the time for my political views, thats the only reason, and seeing as how this is an extreme left board and i am a conservative these things tend to happen. i try most the time to keep without personal attacks, but i dont always do that due to human nature, but the same is with many on here.

 

you dont get into a fit with everyone because you share the same political views as them....if i had the same political views as you all,the case would be different.

 

I stooped to your and his level by making a person attack, like you did to me. and like he did to me many times because i had a different poltical views.

Whatever,your username certainly is misleading..

Whatever' date='your username certainly is misleading..[/quote']

 

hmmm you get mad at me for personal attacks, and yet you do the same....now what do we call that??? hmm seems a wee bit hypocritical to me....

First of all you called me retarded. No its half my fault' date=' but equally there fault as well. you see i get attacked personally all the time for my political views, thats the only reason, and seeing as how this is an extreme left board and i am a conservative these things tend to happen. i try most the time to keep without personal attacks, but i dont always do that due to human nature, but the same is with many on here.[/quote']

 

I agree, calling you retarded was a bit of a personal attack. I tried to use a light-hearted conotation with the "wetoded", but it didn't go across the same as I intended, and that's not your fault.

 

this was also uncalled for

 

Yeah he is....its not his fault though, his mind is so open it fell out.

That's an obvious personal attack. You weren't reffering to anything he posted, that was just a plain insult.

 

No, im just stooping to your level for once. Trying out your way of acting, you know seeing what its like.

and that was also completely uncalled for. Kyle had the complete right to say you were using personal insults.

 

Not everyone is personally attacking you--they're disagreeing with you. There's a difference between a personal attack and a disagreement.

 

I agree that I personally attacked you, and I'll try to avoid it.

 

I think the way you argue ticks people off a bit. And I know, most arguements tick people off, because most people, just because they're human, want to turn out to be right... but saying "personally attacking" is "stooping to our level" is a bit insulting. Don't you agree?

 

The perfect debate wouldn't have any personal attacks included, but it's in the human nature to resort to something else when we run out of constructive things to say. Everyone falls victim to that. I fall victim to it, like I have in this thread.

 

Arguements are pointless, unless the group of people argueing are each willing to gain something (knowledge, wisdom, anything...) after the arguement.

 

Arguements that just gain enemies aren't that great.

 

I admit, that I close myself off and my sole purpose in an arguement sometimes is just to prove the other person wrong, and this coming a bit too close, if it hasn't come to that already.

 

I really don't feel like continuing this arguement--appearantly nothing much is coming out of it, from both my part and yours. Don't ya agree?

 

No hard feelings, mrcool. :)

No' date=' im just stooping to your level for once. Trying out your way of acting, you know seeing what its like.[/quote']

 

Just curious. When have I ever personally attacked you?

Just curious. When have I ever personally attacked you?

 

That's what I was thinking. :thinking:

 

I was gonna say "Kyle has never personally attacked you" since I had never seen you personally attack him, but I didn't know if you have else where....