^Haha Great siggy Marek

 

Some how, it works....but it can't, cus it ain't real

 

yay thanks,i dont like comaring it to those great covers

Well, it would be a very nice cover.

Maybe it is real i don't know but if it is not.. who is so creative with covers?

It is very nice.

has the person even given a source yet?

^i highly doubt theyre going to give a source because the source is most likely photoshop at their IP address...

(i think that's correct use of "IP address"... :confused: :rolleyes:)

I keep asking the same thing..

SOURCE?

I quite like the cover.

:D

 

I hope its real.<3

It's a fake. How come that user has not replied to all these posts?

Its believable but from the circumstances, latest prospekt journal etc. its probably just an artist's rendition of what they think it should be.

It could be a single cover, or maybe a poster, but I would expect something with depth for an album cover. All of Coldplay's album covers have been suggestive of something more than meets the eye, but the artwork is here doesn't look like anything more than some pleasantly sun-dappled flowers. (If there is a sand-sculpted woman in there, I didn't see her) In addition, the supposed album title of 42 seems like it's catering way too directly to recent guesses.

It's not abstract enough to be a Coldplay cover.

the other coldplay album covers doesn't have the album title in it.. so maybe this one won't have it neither

new cover

 

What is it ?

All of Coldplay's album covers have been suggestive of something more than meets the eye, but the artwork is here doesn't look like anything more than some pleasantly sun-dappled flowers. (If there is a sand-sculpted woman in there, I didn't see her) In addition, the supposed album title of 42 seems like it's catering way too directly to recent guesses.

 

I think you just hit the nail on the head

I don't understand how anyone can even think to believe this most unreliable of sources.

 

Besides, one key component missing from this album is their trademark "Albertus" font. They've used it on EVERYTHING for the last 7 years. I understand they might be moving from their previous styles, but seriously, they probably won't move from that too.

Good point.

 

I don't believe for one minute that this is the cover, but wouldn't it be funny if it was? I'd laugh my ass off going back and reading this thread.:lol:

Yeah, when we know what the cover is, it'd be like "Those idiots, speculating over suc a simple matter"

 

It feels weird to think about knowing something you don't actually know....