:lol::lol:

 

I thought you had to go somewhere!!:dozey:

Simon, Jack Nicholson has no boobs.

 

aww no please! that pic will get posted again now! :lol:

aww no please! that pic will get posted again now! :lol:

 

oh yeah!, Please don't! :P

I thought you had to go somewhere!!:dozey:

 

I'm back, I just had dinner!, do you want me to go back on MSN?

I'm back, I just had dinner!, do you want me to go back on MSN?

 

No, it's unimportant. You can use it if you have something to ask.

No, it's unimportant. You can use it if you have something to ask.

 

Oh ok! ;)

Hello everyone. Simon, how are you?

Peace for now.

As epiphany would say:

 

May the Chris be with you.

Amen.

Lets leave it at that.

Hello everyone. Simon, how are you?

 

Not bad thanks!, You?

Im good but can we please move this to another thread such as mine.

Uhhhh. Hahahaha.

 

I started reading this thread and I got 2 pages before I noticed how once again Mark contradicted himself.

 

 

A quote from page 2:

 

I haven't mentioned any names at any point. Anything mentioned by anyone else has nothing to do with me whatsoever.

 

A quote from page 1:

 

Great! Let's hope a certain award-winning troublemaker doesn't come in here and ruin it.;)

 

 

Such a liar. Seriously. Yeah he didn't mention Nathan's name, whilst he also didn't label anyone a freak, the intent behind the sentence is so fucking obvious.

 

 

Seriously, everyone who thinks Mark has no part in bringing this trouble, just read that example. Find the posts. You'll see first hand. None of us who had a problem with Mark the other night had even been in this thread and he was talking about how it was going to be ruined. Such a hypocrite.

let the fighting begin! :dance:

Uhhhh. Hahahaha.

 

I started reading this thread and I got 2 pages before I noticed how once again Mark contradicted himself.

 

 

A quote from page 2:

 

 

 

A quote from page 1:

 

 

 

 

Such a liar. Seriously. Yeah he didn't mention Nathan's name, whilst he also didn't label anyone a freak, the intent behind the sentence is so fucking obvious.

 

Doesn't matter how many people "think" something might be obvious, it doesn't constitute proof, though, so go suck on that!:smug:

Anyway, I don't deny I meant "your mate" (important point here in relation to your comments) in terms of the "award-winning trouble-maker" comment .

That was merely stating an undeniable fact.

 

 

Seriously, everyone who thinks Mark has no part in bringing this trouble, just read that example. Find the posts. You'll see first hand. None of us who had a problem with Mark the other night had even been in this thread and he was talking about how it was going to be ruined. Such a hypocrite.

 

Nobody's saying they're a saint here (you're far from one yourself, as it happens), but I'm afraid Nathan has been bugging a lot of people with his comments and behaviour, most of which are totally unnecessary.

By taking the bait and doing what he did, he merely proved what I had predicted.

Anyway, if he wants to have a civil conversation in future I, and I'm sure the likes of Jonny and Si too, will be happy to converse with him.

However, if he just wants to carry on as he's been doing, I'm sure he'll end up being ignored by quite a few.

I know you're going to stick up for him as he's your mate, and I wouldn't expect anything else, but you have to accept that, as his mate, you will accept quite a lot of things that "strangers" won't.

I don't think going around suggesting Si is "a dwarf" is very nice, for a start.

It's completely unnecessary, however funny you might think it is.;)

 

Apart from that, you should refer to my extended post on page 14.

 

Thanks.

let the fighting begin! :dance:

 

I'm afraid you're likely to be disappointed.;)

Coldplay Shop Opening Soon- Prospekt Road

Coldplay Shop Opening Soon- Prospekt Road

 

Great. Do I qualify for a discount?

You Get 'Em Mark!

:uneasy:

You Get 'Em Mark!

 

It's not a question of "getting" anyone. Just making a few valid points in response to Jack's, that's all.;)

Simon has a new avi

Simon has a new avi

 

Yep and it's changing again in a few minutes ;)

Doesn't matter how many people "think" something might be obvious, it doesn't constitute proof, though, so go suck on that!:smug:

Anyway, I don't deny I meant "your mate" (important point here in relation to your comments) in terms of the "award-winning trouble-maker" comment .

That was merely stating an undeniable fact.

 

 

So basically you just admitted that you did bring him up, then? Without him having said anything to you in this thread?

 

So basically, you're just as much an instigator as he is. The very thing you have a problem with him doing. You claim the fighting is needless and yet you go and bring one up yourself. If you're going to make a point about Nathan starting all these fights with unnecessary comments... WAY. TO. GO.

 

 

 

Nobody's saying they're a saint here (you're far from one yourself, as it happens), but I'm afraid Nathan has been bugging a lot of people with his comments and behaviour, most of which are totally unnecessary.

By taking the bait and doing what he did, he merely proved what I had predicted.

Anyway, if he wants to have a civil conversation in future I, and I'm sure the likes of Jonny and Si too, will be happy to converse with him.

However, if he just wants to carry on as he's been doing, I'm sure he'll end up being ignored by quite a few.

I know you're going to stick up for him as he's your mate, and I wouldn't expect anything else, but you have to accept that, as his mate, you will accept quite a lot of things that "strangers" won't.

I don't think going around suggesting Si is "a dwarf" is very nice, for a start.

It's completely unnecessary, however funny you might think it is.;)

 

Apart from that, you should refer to my extended post on page 14.

 

Thanks.

 

 

If you're saying that people will ignore him, why don't you lead them by example? You're not ignoring him in the slightest. It's understandable that you got annoyed by him. But you make out it's always him when in fact lately you've brought it up 9 times out of 10. I know Nathan more than anyone here, and I know that most of the time he only comes into these threads and continue these arguements because you guys are bringing him up again and talking about how much of a troublemaker he is.

 

You suggested (like you said before, it doesn't matter how many people THINK they're being suggested about, if one does, that's enough) that Ren, me, Lore and Nathan were freaks. I thought exactly the same thing Ren did when I read that. So no, it's not very nice, but you're, as you spoke about me, not a saint yourself, are you?

 

 

Seriously look in the mirror. You're doing everything you're critisizing others for.