Doesn't matter how many people "think" something might be obvious, it doesn't constitute proof, though, so go suck on that!:smug:

Anyway, I don't deny I meant "your mate" (important point here in relation to your comments) in terms of the "award-winning trouble-maker" comment .

That was merely stating an undeniable fact.

 

I'm sorry but this is absolutely ridiculous, because we can't 100% prove that you meant me, even though anybody on the forum could tell that comment was aimed at me, we aren't allowed to comment on it? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.

 

You can't get out of insulting/bitching about someone by simply giving them an alias.

 

As for Jack not being allowed to comment because he is my friend, yes we are friends, that doesn't mean we agree on everything, far from it in fact. I wouldn't blindly defend Jack if he was wrong about something (we actually had a disagreement on here even about a thread he started) and he wouldn't do the same to me, that "point" you are making does not discredit what he has to say at all.

 

 

 

 

Nobody's saying they're a saint here (you're far from one yourself, as it happens), but I'm afraid Nathan has been bugging a lot of people with his comments and behaviour, most of which are totally unnecessary.

 

As I said yesterday, which you in a spark of genius decided to ignore, define unnecessary please. Where is this supposed mass of people? Simon and You are the only ones who seem to still have an issue with me, not to forget Johnnycp17

 

 

By taking the bait and doing what he did, he merely proved what I had predicted.

 

Oh check you out, Mr Puppeteer, I'm sure any "bait" that you planted that I bit at was not the brilliant thing you think it was, if you would be so kind as to point out this bait I would be grateful.

 

Anyway, if he wants to have a civil conversation in future I, and I'm sure the likes of Jonny and Si too, will be happy to converse with him.

However, if he just wants to carry on as he's been doing, I'm sure he'll end up being ignored by quite a few.

 

I am doing this now, I haven't needlessly attacked or abused anyone in the threads where the big arguments are taking place. Yet you still employ your "I think I know everything about Nathan so I'll ignore him" attitude, even though to anyone with a glimmer of logic, this shows that you are not taking the high ground that you think you are, but instead backing out of a reasonable debate because you don't think you can outwit me without resorting to your little loopholes.

 

I know you're going to stick up for him as he's your mate, and I wouldn't expect anything else, but you have to accept that, as his mate, you will accept quite a lot of things that "strangers" won't.

 

See above, this is simply not true, the only difference there is from us being friends is that he knew from the start my style of humour, whereas people on here are just starting to slightly "get" me now.

 

I don't think going around suggesting Si is "a dwarf" is very nice, for a start.

It's completely unnecessary, however funny you might think it is.;)

 

Well you'll see I actually backed up on that statement...

 

Edit: Haha Jack posted when I was typing this, he's right, you instigated this, you are the one attacking people, but you get away with it because you change their name to "award winner" or "Freak" or my personal favourite "The Usual Suspects"

I'm afraid you're likely to be disappointed.;)

 

lol i was joking. :dozey:

 

 

better yet, who isn't joking now a days?

me.

that's a shocker.

shock is the only thing that keeps them interested.

 

and that's assuming people are interested to begin with.

i like boxes.

 

 

 

hahahahaha hohohoho.

So basically you just admitted that you did bring him up, then? Without him having said anything to you in this thread?

 

So basically, you're just as much an instigator as he is. The very thing you have a problem with him doing. You claim the fighting is needless and yet you go and bring one up yourself. If you're going to make a point about Nathan starting all these fights with unnecessary comments... WAY. TO. GO.

 

He could have ignored the comment. His choice entirely.

 

 

If you're saying that people will ignore him, why don't you lead them by example? You're not ignoring him in the slightest.

 

I will be from now on, unless he's being civil.

 

It's understandable that you got annoyed by him. But you make out it's always him when in fact lately you've brought it up 9 times out of 10. I know Nathan more than anyone here, and I know that most of the time he only comes into these threads and continue these arguements because you guys are bringing him up again and talking about how much of a troublemaker he is.

 

I know what his game is. It's extremely transparent.

 

You suggested (like you said before, it doesn't matter how many people THINK they're being suggested about, if one does, that's enough) that Ren, me, Lore and Nathan were freaks. I thought exactly the same thing Ren did when I read that. So no, it's not very nice, but you're, as you spoke about me, not a saint yourself, are you?

 

Seriously look in the mirror. You're doing everything you're critisizing others for.

 

As I've said before, you can read anything into anything you want. I don't actually care whether you think it referred to you or not. As I said, it's still all purely supposition.

If you want to "ignore" me for this, then bring it on. I can live with it.

There are more than enough people on here who appreciate me.

:smug:

i like boxes.

 

 

 

hahahahaha hohohoho.

 

 

IT'S FUNNY BECAUSE EVERYBODY KNOWS BOX IS SLANG FOR VAGINA

He could have ignored the comment. His choice entirely.

 

but mark... that's still talking about him.

He could have ignored the comment... Yeah...

 

 

Except for that's the whole point. You could have ignored every comment he made.

 

You chose not to. So really, this is all your doing.

 

 

It doesn't matter what he said. These "unappropriate and unnecessary" comments he made, because it was your choice to ignore them. And you chose not to. So basically, you are everything you dislike about him.

 

 

Except you also make really bad jokes.

 

 

 

Sorted, I'm happy to ignore you, now.

^ exactly.

*sigh*, When will this end?...None of this would have happened if it wasn't for Nathan's remarks!, He is the one who has started it!, Can't you see that?

*sigh*, When will this end?...None of this would have happened if it wasn't for Nathan's remarks!, He is the one who has started it!, Can't you see that?

 

I wouldn't have remarked if Mark hadn't been so disgracefully unfunny, he didn't have to respond to my comment, he is the one who has started it!, Can't you see that?

I'm sorry but this is absolutely ridiculous, because we can't 100% prove that you meant me, even though anybody on the forum could tell that comment was aimed at me, we aren't allowed to comment on it? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.

 

As I said, you're free to do what you want. I don't give a t*ss. The choice is yours.;)

 

You can't get out of insulting/bitching about someone by simply giving them an alias.

 

If the cap fits........................... :rolleyes:

 

As for Jack not being allowed to comment because he is my friend, yes we are friends, that doesn't mean we agree on everything, far from it in fact. I wouldn't blindly defend Jack if he was wrong about something (we actually had a disagreement on here even about a thread he started) and he wouldn't do the same to me, that "point" you are making does not discredit what he has to say at all.

 

Say what you like, he's your mate, and that counts for a lot in these circumstances, I'm afraid.:smug:

 

 

As I said yesterday, which you in a spark of genius decided to ignore, define unnecessary please. Where is this supposed mass of people? Simon and You are the only ones who seem to still have an issue with me, not to forget Johnnycp17

 

I know of one or two others, but I'm not going to "out" them. If they want to take issue with you in public, they will.;)

 

 

Oh check you out, Mr Puppeteer, I'm sure any "bait" that you planted that I bit at was not the brilliant thing you think it was, if you would be so kind as to point out this bait I would be grateful.

 

Merely the fact that things were quiet because you hadn't turned up, that's all, and it was true.

 

 

 

I am doing this now, I haven't needlessly attacked or abused anyone in the threads where the big arguments are taking place.

 

Then maybe you should look again.

 

Yet you still employ your "I think I know everything about Nathan so I'll ignore him" attitude, even though to anyone with a glimmer of logic, this shows that you are not taking the high ground that you think you are, but instead backing out of a reasonable debate because you don't think you can outwit me without resorting to your little loopholes.

 

I've never suggested I "know everything about you". Actions speak louder than words. If you're prepared to show the "better side" you apparently have, I'll be more than happy to converse with you.

I don't really care either way.

 

 

See above, this is simply not true, the only difference there is from us being friends is that he knew from the start my style of humour, whereas people on here are just starting to slightly "get" me now.

 

The others can make up their own mind whether they're happy to talk to you.

Nothing to do with me at all.

 

 

 

Well you'll see I actually backed up on that statement...

 

Edit: Haha Jack posted when I was typing this, he's right, you instigated this, you are the one attacking people, but you get away with it because you change their name to "award winner" or "Freak" or my personal favourite "The Usual Suspects"

 

I've said all I'm going to on that matter. Take it or leave it.;)

No, none of THIS would have happened if Mark had taken his own advice and ignored the comments. Can't you see that?

 

 

He's starting all of these new arguements.

but mark... that's still talking about him.

 

It's a free world.;)

No, it's not.

 

 

Except you also make really bad jokes.

 

 

 

 

To be fair I have to agree with this guy, I have read one or two shockers(sorry)

He could have ignored the comment... Yeah...

 

 

Except for that's the whole point. You could have ignored every comment he made.

 

You chose not to. So really, this is all your doing.

 

 

It doesn't matter what he said. These "unappropriate and unnecessary" comments he made, because it was your choice to ignore them. And you chose not to. So basically, you are everything you dislike about him.

 

 

Except you also make really bad jokes.

 

 

 

Sorted, I'm happy to ignore you, now.

 

Great. See if I care.;)

Next, please!!:rolleyes:

Mark shouldn't have to ignore the comments!, In Real life he wouldn't and neither would most people!

To be fair I have to agree with this guy, I have read one or two shockers(sorry)

 

As I said, it's all about opinions. ;)

Wow, you ignored all of my points completely and avoided answering them, thanks for proving my point about you Mark.

 

Seriously, how can anyone have respect for him now?

Mark shouldn't have to ignore the comments!, In Real life he wouldn't and neither would most people!

 

Are you blind to hypocrisy?

Nathan, Mark is over 30 years your senior and is a veteran of Coldplaying, show him some respect!

As I said, it's all about opinions. ;)

 

That is true:)