I don't have a clue how all this came up but i bet it's bloody silly...and i dunno why mark would be annoyed and that to ren who is a lovely chap

 

i miss the peace :(

... that's better.

 

 

I'm pretty sure I saw a really different post in here

Good question.. :/

Once again I state that nobody's calling you a "freak". Freaks do have a habit of emerging at night. That's it.

Ok, fine. It's just how you used that word after our argument last night not very subtle.

 

If you think it's about you you're quite obviously paranoid. Other than that I don't have to give any indication of who I might, or might not be talking about.;)

I not the only one who thinks that. Anyone intelligent could clearly see you were refering to us( i got to read some comments before they were edited). And i think you should mention who you were talking about otherwise i'll assume you attacked us indirectly again.

mark.. why don't you use people's names to talk about them?

 

If I want to refer to anyone in particular then I will. If people want to misinterpret general statements or believe it's about them, that's nothing more than paranoia.

 

 

it's more freak to be here every second of the day though.. I went to bed.. you were here I woke up you were here I came here afetr lunch.. you were here

 

So? That doesn't have anything to do with anyone. I don't have to justify my presence or otherwise.;)

you're just a coward... and you keep talking about people even if they're not here... and make yourself look like the poor victim.. if I don't feel attacked I'll ignore you.. but if I keep seeing comments like that I can't stop replying

Ok, fine. It's just how you used that word after our argument last night not very subtle.

 

Purely a coincidence.

 

 

I not the only one who thinks that. Anyone intelligent could clearly see you were refering to us( i got to read some comments before they were edited).

 

I haven't mentioned any names at any point. Anything mentioned by anyone else has nothing to do with me whatsoever.

 

And i think you should mention who you were talking about otherwise i'll assume you attacked us indirectly again.

 

Then you will be assuming wrongly yet again, I'm afraid.

I don't have a clue how all this came up but i bet it's bloody silly...and i dunno why mark would be annoyed and that to ren who is a lovely chap

 

i miss the peace :(

Oh don't worry man, we've had issues from way back so it's ok you don't really get it but the main thing now is that I don't like when people talk behind my back or uses certain words to attack indirectly.

 

And this goes for all of you guys, i know you like mark a lot and that's ok, that doesn't mean that just because you like him, i automatically hate you all. I think you are great people and have nothing but respect for you all :nice:

:uneasy: I thought this will be a nice thread.

it was.

 

I'm pretty sure I saw a really different post in here

 

:shame: you did.

 

 

 

 

 

*note to self: i think mark likes arguing.

you're just a coward... and you keep talking about people even if they're not here... and make yourself look like the poor victim.. if I don't feel attacked I'll ignore you.. but if I keep seeing comments like that I can't stop replying

 

If you keep replying to mistaken assumptions and think everything is about you all the time you're likely to be very busy.

I suggest you don't waste your time on such things.

Ok, fine. It's just how you used that word after our argument last night not very subtle.

 

I KNOW! i was actually planning on telling him that exact same thing! :(

If you keep replying to mistaken assumptions and think everything is about you all the time you're likely to be very busy.

I suggest you don't waste your time on such things.

 

 

let's see

 

 

last night you were discussing basically with me nathan ren and a bit with jack

 

 

then you talk about the freakS

 

 

you said to ren that it has nothing to do with him

 

 

there's a big chance you're talking about me then...

 

and maybe if you're not.. talk about nathan when he's online, he can't reply now

Purely a coincidence.

Oh really? How convenient.

 

I haven't mentioned any names at any point. Anything mentioned by anyone else has nothing to do with me whatsoever.

Basically ,you drop the bomb and then you pretend we turn a blind eye eh? That's not how it works.

 

Then you will be assuming wrongly yet again, I'm afraid.

If we consider what happend yesterday , i'd say my assumtion is not far from the truth.

Oh don't worry man, we've had issues from way back so it's ok you don't really get it but the main thing now is that I don't like when people talk behind my back or uses certain words to attack indirectly.

 

If you want to assume everything refers to you, then you quite clearly have a serious paranoia problem.

:uneasy:

 

*leaves thread*

^ i'm about to do the same.

 

 

just curious if anyone might like to answer.

 

 

 

is there ever going to be a point where enoughs enough?

Oh don't worry man, we've had issues from way back so it's ok you don't really get it but the main thing now is that I don't like when people talk behind my back or uses certain words to attack indirectly.

 

 

That's understandable..i hate that aswell :\

Oh really? How convenient.

 

 

Basically ,you drop the bomb and then you pretend we turn a blind eye eh? That's not how it works.

 

Yes it is. I'm not responsible for the mistaken misinterpretations of others, just as you aren't responsible for unrelated statements made by others on here.

 

 

If we consider what happend yesterday , i'd say my assumtion is not far from the truth.

 

Well anyone can read anything into any statement. Doesn't prove a thing. If you still want to assume something is refers to you even when you have been assured it doesn't, then this is completely pointless.

If you want to assume everything refers to you, then you quite clearly have a serious paranoia problem.

I dare you to pick anyone neutral and make that person read the argument we had last night and then read the comment you made here. If you weren't referring to us then enlight us please.

I dare you to pick anyone neutral and make that person read the argument we had last night and then read the comment you made here. If you weren't referring to us then enlight us please.

 

he wont.

he won't because for him if you're not in his group.. you're a mobber, part of a gang, an usual suspect or an hypocrite

let's see

 

 

last night you were discussing basically with me nathan ren and a bit with jack

 

 

then you talk about the freakS

 

So? That isn't a banned word as far as I know.

 

 

you said to ren that it has nothing to do with him

 

 

there's a big chance you're talking about me then...

 

and maybe if you're not.. talk about nathan when he's online, he can't reply now

 

The point is, it could be referring to just about anyone. So unless you want to go through the names of every member in existence, I suggest you stop there as it achieves nothing.

Yes it is. I'm not responsible for the mistaken misinterpretations of others, just as you aren't responsible for unrelated statements made by others on here.

I'm just a man, i'm not perfect and i could be wrong, that's why i'm asking you to tell me who you were referring to when you said that comment. That's all i ask .

 

 

Well anyone can read anything into any statement. Doesn't prove a thing. If you still want to assume something is refers to you even when you have been assured it doesn't, then this is completely pointless.

Your argument fails there because even those who like you, pointed out how obvious you were with such comment. Anyone can do the maths, you know?

he wont.

 

And I don't need to.