October 29, 200916 yr Author Yo shane, this thread confirms how idiotic you are when it comes to 'fighting' on forums... sorry :bigcry: yeah I'm the biggest idiot in the world..... :dozey:
October 29, 200916 yr That just goes to show how deluded and completely out-of-touch you are.:laugh3: The fact is (and as has been proven recently), there has been virtually no conflict since a certain person was banned/disappeared, just as I predicted, except when a certain other connected person tried to cause trouble a week or so ago. And as I said, your opinion counts for nothing as far as I'm concerned, as it's always been totally biased and almost always exaggerated. As for this particular thread, it isn't a "fight" thread at all as far as I can see. Just completely harmless and pretty pointless.;) It was a pretty valid question tbh. You're just being a dick. :/
October 29, 200916 yr No it wasn't, and you're just being as pathetic as always. :smug: If anything, you're the one that's incapable of posting without looking for trouble, as proven by your comment here and your failed attempt at sabotaging the awards.:rolleyes: In fact, since Victor's demise, you've been pretty much the only source of real conflict, unsurprisingly. It was a pretty valid question tbh. You're just being a dick. :/
October 29, 200916 yr That just goes to show how deluded and completely out-of-touch you are.:laugh3: The fact is (and as has been proven recently), there has been virtually no conflict since a certain person was banned/disappeared, just as I predicted, except when a certain other connected person tried to cause trouble a week or so ago. And as I said, your opinion counts for nothing as far as I'm concerned, as it's always been totally biased and almost always exaggerated. As for this particular thread, it isn't a "fight" thread at all as far as I can see. Just completely harmless and pretty pointless.;) "Argumentum ad hominem is the logical fallacy of attempting to undermine a speaker's argument by attacking the speaker instead of addressing the argument" Too bad you don't reply in a smart way to Ren just because you hate him
October 29, 200916 yr ah I see now, this makes perfect sense I am an attention seeker because I try to stop the fighting' yep , that makes a lot of sense :rolleyes: Great attempt at trying to stop fights! Actually this is ridiculous cuz you say it's stupid calling people names on internet forums, but's even more stupid caring about being called moron or whatever else you've been called on internet forums. Yo shane, this thread confirms how idiotic you are when it comes to 'fighting' on forums... sorry :bigcry: Eddie, dear, your post is full of win! :nice:
October 29, 200916 yr "Argumentum ad hominem is the logical fallacy of attempting to undermine a speaker's argument by attacking the speaker instead of addressing the argument" There is no argument, so that's a huge fail for a start.:laugh3::laugh3::laugh3:
October 29, 200916 yr We should have a thread called "the fighting thread" Where you go when you fight :wacko: You could even quote posts and fight with them in there. That way ther ewould only be one thread with a fight :P
October 29, 200916 yr he asked a valid question but you just replied saying that he's bla bla bla... No he didn't, he's just spouting off the same old meaningless drivel he always does, the same as you. Therefore I'm just treating it with the contempt it deserves, as usual.:smug:
October 29, 200916 yr We should have a thread called "the fighting thread" Where you go when you fight :wacko: You could even quote posts and fight with them in there. That way ther ewould only be one thread with a fight :P It would never work, as there are too many "loose cannons" around.:rolleyes:
October 29, 200916 yr *changes subject* So this is how the posts in this thread are divided between us :wacko: Notion 51 mc_squared 20 india rubber 15 Crests of Daylight 14 colduser 12 Lore 10 izlovescheesecake! 10 HappyPickle98 7 EmmaLouiseSmyth 5 ceolsige 4 MrNick 4 dfit00 3 Julie 3 MK 3 Josh42 3 Dee 3 Cobalt 3 Carla 2 noonsun 2 Ceckers 2 PePe57 2 Knight Of Cydonia 2 RICK8 1 Electric.Candy 1 parachutes_ 1 BerrymanGirl1 1 william_3000 1 Zeya 1 Italian Plastic 1 ivet 1 ariadnasquire 1 chuck kottke 1 Yossarian 1
October 29, 200916 yr *changes subject* So this is how the posts in this thread are divided between us :wacko: Notion 51 mc_squared 20 india rubber 15 Crests of Daylight 14 colduser 12 Lore 10 izlovescheesecake! 10 HappyPickle98 7 EmmaLouiseSmyth 5 ceolsige 4 MrNick 4 dfit00 3 Julie 3 MK 3 Josh42 3 Dee 3 Cobalt 3 Carla 2 noonsun 2 Ceckers 2 PePe57 2 Knight Of Cydonia 2 RICK8 1 Electric.Candy 1 parachutes_ 1 BerrymanGirl1 1 william_3000 1 Zeya 1 Italian Plastic 1 ivet 1 ariadnasquire 1 chuck kottke 1 Yossarian 1 Your point being?:confused:
October 29, 200916 yr I was just changing the subject, and I like statistics :shrug: I've posted alot in here :thinking:
October 29, 200916 yr I love fighting over the internet! :cheesy: *slaps Crests* *kicks Mark in the nuts*
October 29, 200916 yr I was just changing the subject, and I like statistics :shrug: I've posted alot in here :thinking: Fair enough. Anyway, if Shane really only created this thread "to have a laugh", then fine.................................. :rolleyes:
October 29, 200916 yr I love fighting over the internet! :cheesy: *slaps Crests* *kicks Mark in the nuts*
October 29, 200916 yr Your point being?:confused: Same thing about why Shane created this thread.... I love fighting over the internet! :cheesy: *slaps Crests* *kicks Mark in the nuts* What about me? :uhoh: :disappointed:
October 29, 200916 yr Same thing about why Shane created this thread.... Well according to him, it was for "a laugh".;) What about me? :uhoh: :disappointed: Maybe you're invisible........................... :rolleyes:
October 29, 200916 yr Well according to him, it was for "a laugh".;) He FAILED big time then. Maybe you're invisible........................... :rolleyes:
Create an account or sign in to comment