Maybe the doom crew will pay attention to that, though I have a feeling you're wasting your breath.:rolleyes:

I haven't seen any fight in this thread. Since when are users not allowed to express their opinions? And again the same logic i used when you call Nathan: "Victor" can be used when you call a certain group of people "Doom Crew". It's very childish and could be considered offensive. You should set the example and behave in the way you wanna be treated if you want people to respect you.

Okay ... I was really trying to stay out of this thing for the longest time, but I simply can't keep my mouth shut any longer.

Mark, almost every post I have read from you in the last weeks has been nothing more than arrogant and disrespectful. I don't agree with the way you've been bashed, but that doesn't mean I have to agree with the way you treat everyone who doesn't like you for whatever reason.

I'm honestly sick of you always wanting to have the last word and calling everyone biased and every single (however logic) argument against you irrelevant.

Besides I don't see your name being green or anything and yet you often act like you're some kind of godfather of the forum, grumping about user name changes and saying how things should be done. Constantly declaring mods biased and so on and constantly saying how things should be done just shows that you lack the respect for the Admins of this forum for they are the ones who make the decisions about for example user name changes and mods.

 

The only thing I've consistently said is that if anyone shows me respect, I will reciprocate. "Not liking" someone has nothing to do with it.

There is a lot of stuff that has happened in the past that you won't be aware of.;)

If you have some more specific points to make, I will do my best to respond to them.

I have good reason to say that certain people are "biased", because they are exactly that.;)

the past is the past, move on mark!

I haven't seen any fight in this thread. Since when are users not allowed to express their opinions? And again the same logic i used when you call Nathan: "Victor· can be used when you call a certain group of people "Doom Crew". It's very childish and could be considered offensive. You should set the example and behave in the way you wanna be treated if you want people to respect you.

 

I would say it's the other way round. I'm still waiting.;)

the past is the past, move on mark!

 

I could say exactly the same to you.;)

I haven't said anything against you, just against your posts, and with arguments. You're the one judging opinions because of who posted these opinions

Well than that just makes you a

 

:smug:

 

And that's a perfect example of why you don't deserve any respect, just like Victor.:smug:

I would say it's the other way round. I'm still waiting.;)

If you continue with that attitude then you're gonna have to wait for a very long time. I'm just saying.

 

No one likes arrogance, you know?

I haven't said anything against you, just against your posts, and with arguments. You're the one judging opinions because of who posted these opinions

 

You say or imply things about me all the time, and you know it. Others have noticed that too.;)

If you continue with that attitude then you're gonna have to wait for a very long time. I'm just saying.

 

Then there really is no point in continuing any discussion, is there?:rolleyes:

 

No one likes arrogance, you know?

 

So why aren't you practising what you preach?:dozey:

And that's a perfect example of why you don't deserve any respect, just like Victor.:smug:

 

And you do deserve respect because you continue to act like a child when people ask you reasonable questions? :o

Then there really is no point in continuing any discussion, is there?:rolleyes:

 

 

 

So why aren't you practising what you preach?:dozey:

 

Are you saying you won't change at all or that you think you are perfect the way you are?

 

How am i being arrogant? That sentence is more appropiate to you when you ask people to ignore the fight threads or certain users but you never do that yourself. Contradicting yourself too much?

You say or imply things about me all the time, and you know it. Others have noticed that too.;)

 

yeah right. I'm not the one talking about the doom crew all the time. Other members? you and your imaginary friends? If they exist and don't say anything to me I can't do anything because I can't read minds

 

 

still you haven't replied ren's question

The only thing I've consistently said is that if anyone shows me respect, I will reciprocate. "Not liking" someone has nothing to do with it.

There is a lot of stuff that has happened in the past that you won't be aware of.;)

If you have some more specific points to make, I will do my best to respond to them.

I have good reason to say that certain people are "biased", because they are exactly that.;)

 

I'm pretty aware of the fact that this fight's been going on for years. And again I have to say that I don't agree with the way you've been bashed, but yet you've gotta question yourself why it never stops. People come and go, but this fight never seems to die out. Why?

And you are pretty biased towards those people too, because you don't seem to even try to answer their posts normally, even if they're trying to have a serious discussion.

 

I just like to remind you of the fact that you told Angie her name change was just a ploy to get more votes and that name changes should only be allowed once per month. Your tone seemed pretty disrespectful towards Ian, since he was obviously okay with the change.

Are you saying you won't change at all or that you think you are perfect the way you are?

 

Again, I could ask you exactly the same question.;)

 

How am i being arrogant? That sentence is more appropiate to you when you ask people to ignore the fight threads or certain users but you never do that yourself. Contradicting yourself too much?

 

No more than you are.;)

The only thing I've consistently said is that if anyone shows me respect, I will reciprocate. "Not liking" someone has nothing to do with it.

There is a lot of stuff that has happened in the past that you won't be aware of.;)

If you have some more specific points to make, I will do my best to respond to them.

I have good reason to say that certain people are "biased", because they are exactly that.;)

But gosh how old are you ??? Some 14 years old here are more mature than you ! It's a forum, it's the internet, it's ridiculous really...

 

Please someone do something :dead:

Again, I could ask you exactly the same question.;)

 

 

 

No more than you are.;)

And i'll gladly answer. I'm not perfect, i'm a human and i make mistakes but unlike you i do admit i make mistakes and i'm willing to change my attitude if i offend other people. Now i'd like to hear your answer.

 

That last line makes no sense at all. How am i contradicting myself?

I'm pretty aware of the fact that this fight's been going on for years. And again I have to say that I don't agree with the way you've been bashed, but yet you've gotta question yourself why it never stops. People come and go, but this fight never seems to die out. Why?

 

Because it all comes down to the same few people, who have never left, that's why. Their opinions will never change, so neither will the situation, unfortuately.;)

 

And you are pretty biased towards those people too, because you don't seem to even try to answer their posts normally, even if they're trying to have a serious discussion.

 

It's impossible to have a serious discussion with anyone who has an "agenda", therefore there's no point in trying.;)

 

I just like to remind you of the fact that you told Angie her name change was just a ploy to get more votes

 

Well although that was said in jest, you have to admit that the timing was rather "convenient".:lol:

 

and that name changes should only be allowed once per month.

 

I am actually of the opinion that that there should be a maximum number of "name changes" within a given time frame to avoid the confusion that tends to ensue, as there seems to have been a bit of an "epidemic" of them of late.

I know there are a few people who agree with this.;)

is it wrong to say i find this all a tad redundant? :thinking:

yeah right. I'm not the one talking about the doom crew all the time. Other members? you and your imaginary friends? If they exist and don't say anything to me I can't do anything because I can't read minds

 

Then you'll just have to believe me or not. I know it's true, which is all that matters.;)

 

 

still you haven't replied ren's question

 

Obviously you have a problem reading, as I've already explained why I'm not going to.;)

And i'll gladly answer. I'm not perfect, i'm a human and i make mistakes but unlike you i do admit i make mistakes and i'm willing to change my attitude if i offend other people.

 

Well you haven't with regard to me, so that's a total contradiction in itself.;)

^^Then, don't do it, I think we're all fine with that !

is it wrong to say i find this all a tad redundant? :thinking:

 

No. It's just all going round in circles, as usual.;)

No. It's just all going round in circles, as usual.;)

 

okay. :lol:

Because it all comes down to the same few people, who have never left, that's why. Their opinions will never change, so neither will the situation, unfortuately.;)

 

That is certainly not why since a lot of people who joined in 2008 or 2009 are heavily involved in this.

 

It's impossible to have a serious discussion with anyone who has an "agenda", therefore there's no point in trying.;)

 

Even though I risk being called biased now, I just gotta ask what was wrong with Ren's post?

Even though you two have been disagreeing for years you could at least have tried to answer normally without the ":smug:"

I didn't see it as an insult but rather a valid question and yet you tried to turn him down with yet another disrespectful post.

 

Well although that was said in jest, you have to admit that the timing was rather "convenient".:lol:

 

No, it wasn't convenient, so there's nothing to admit. She was called Texasluvsjonny before.

 

I am actually of the opinion that that there should be a maximum number of "name changes" within a given time frame to avoid the confusion that tends to ensue, as there seems to have been a bit of an "epidemic" of them of late.

I know there are a few people who agree with this.;)

 

Well then try to suggest it to Ian without sounding disrespectful and without implying that certain changes have only happened to influence the voters.