If you don't know what happened then get yo head out of the sand EM EFFER

 

They were supposed to be given the chance to come back. It seems like a lot of people were disgusted at the time, but we all had to move on with things in the climate of all the mess that had happened, now we need to remember that Sara and Julie are still banned and for a lot of reasons I don't think it's fair.

 

Firstly, the initial reasons they were banned, which weren't for persistently breaking rules over a period of time, it was the result of being pissed off and responding in a night when the forum went nuts.

 

But most importantly, it was basically a first offence for both of them. In a forum where people like Albie, Nathan and Mark had been banned at least once each but were given the chance to come back, surely these girls deserve that same chance.

 

It's fucked. Just, fucked.

 

Sign your name in your post below!

 

PETITION SIGNERZ:

 

Reilly

Whispering Shadows

Mr Lick

EmmaLouiseSmyth

i'maveryneatMonster.'

india rubber

I'mLovingGuyBerryman

Crests of Daylight

IMightBeWrong

PurpleMartinSt.

the_gloaming09

Tnspieler1012

Aliceincoldplayland

Cobalt

Zeya

Lyvie

muzika

indanomati

Briggins

Sure, why not. :dozey:

 

Has it really been a month though? :surprised:

LET THEM IN

It hasn't be a month

 

 

...or has it? :uhoh:

 

 

 

*signs name*

Add my name.

But Sara DID come back as username whoopee... so she was at least given the chance (I think that account was shut down also, but I could be wrong).

But Sarah DID come back as username whoopee... so she was at leaast given the chance (I think that account was shut down also, but I could be wrong).

 

That was banned.

 

Hey, initially she didn't do much wrong, she re-posted something Nathan had written over and over, that's it! So understandably she was pissed off and reacted poorly, making the new account and showing her frustration.

 

Remember that all she did in the first place to get banned, was re-post something. Are we not allowed to quote sources outside the forum anymore?

LIES

Moi?! :thinking:

No, Numberschick

Right on bro.

Petitions are lotsa fun :nice:

Petitions are lotsa fun :nice:

this one has a good meaning and purpose too :nice:

THIS IS NOT FUN THIS IS WAR :freak:

Right on bro.

Hey broski two heinekens

Fuckin aye chief. Jaagerbomb!

this one has a good meaning and purpose too :nice:

 

Makes it even better :nice:

 

THIS IS NOT FUN THIS IS WAR :freak:

 

:cry: Don't yell at meh! :freak:

Numberschick[/color]

 

:lol:

 

:freak:

 

I dunno how to lie.

 

I don't know the whole story though, I just know there was a huge soap opera unraveleing on the forum; I stopped watching soap operas years ago 'cuz they bore me.

:lol:

 

:freak:

 

I dunno how to lie.

 

I don't know the whole story though, I just know there was a huge soap opera unraveleing on the forum; I stopped watching soap operas years ago 'cuz they bore me.

 

Well shutup then?

 

If you were banned for doing practically nothing it wouldn't be some boring soap opera situation to you.

HayZeus Christmas I was just pointing out that she did come back... I have no steadfast opinion about the matter because I don't know the whole story. That would be like voting for a president because his/her name sounds cool without knowing anything else about them.

 

* turns into fly and clings to wall in crowded room *

*Eats popcorn*

Hell yeah.

HayZeus Christmas I was just pointing out that she did come back... I have no steadfast opinion about the matter because I don't know the whole story. That would be like voting for a president because his/her name sounds cool without knowing anything else about them.

 

* turns into fly and clings to wall in crowded room *

 

Apologies then, but your post could've asked whether or not she was 'given the chance to come back', makes my points look flawed otherwise.

 

She wasn't given any chance to stay, Ian just took his time in re-banning her (And Julie's, and Nathan's, other accounts). For a few days they got away with it, but because he hadn't banned them it didn't mean they were allowed back on.

Apologies then, but your post could've asked whether or not she was 'given the chance to come back', makes my points look flawed otherwise.

 

She wasn't given any chance to stay, Ian just took his time in re-banning her (And Julie's, and Nathan's, other accounts). For a few days they got away with it, but because he hadn't banned them it didn't mean they were allowed back on.

 

Wait- I thought Ian didn't ban Sara's whoopee account, and it was just a problem with her computer or something :confused:

 

http://www.coldplaying.com/forum/showthread.php?t=69449

Can I ask a stupid question...

 

If she came back under a different name before, what's to prevent her (or anyone else) from coming back again?