freezingcoldplay Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 Yesterday, me thinked that song should be called "Queen of China". Why? Because King go with Queen (not "Princess"). If he King, and she with him, then she become Queen. You see? OK, but then last night, I realized the following: Maybe the line "you'd be a King" is a reference to the future. The male, currently Prince, would become the King. Basically, we're gaining insight into the female character's persona. She's doesn't really care for the guy. She cares more about what he will be (and what she'll be, Queen). She speaks of rings and castles and stuff. This must be why the male character left her (hurting her), because this hurts him. The song is about a Prince, and his would-be Princess bride that's only concerned with becoming Queen (as a Princess, in the present, she can only think of her destiny as a Queen... because he'd be, at some point, a King). So he leaves her. Coldplay didn't make a Monarchy-mistake. The lyrics are deeper than they appear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyrd Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 She sings 'I could have been a princess, you'd be the king' It's both set in the future (hence the 'd') and related to eachother as in he would only become a king if she would have become a princess, at least that's how I read it. I don't understand how this would hint at her only being concerned with becoming a queen. If so, then I would expect her to sing 'I could have been a queen' instead of 'princess'. She also says how he would have a ring, not her. Also, I think people are taking this king/princess thing too literal. She's not talking about how they would become a royal couple, she's talking about king/princess as in feeling that they both would rule the world when being a happy couple. Yep, now you can find that deep as well ;) Do you think that makes sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freezingcoldplay Posted October 20, 2011 Author Share Posted October 20, 2011 She could have been a princess right now. It's not a reference to the future... she could have been a princess, right now, but he broke up with her. He'd be a King eventually, making her the Queen eventually <--- Which is all she cares about. King/Princess is not a royal couple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyrd Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 Eh okay, so not :S But I still don’t see how she cares only about becoming a queen according to the lyrics :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freezingcoldplay Posted October 20, 2011 Author Share Posted October 20, 2011 Eh okay, so not :S But I still don’t see how she cares only about becoming a queen according to the lyrics :S • She could have been a Princess • He would be King • We assume it's a love song about these two, and King/Princess sort of makes sense... both refer to Monarchy. • But, WAIT A MINUTE, a Princess is the daughter of a King. The female a King ends up with becomes a Queen! Why is the word "Princess" used? One way to make sense of it, is to treat the girl as only being interested in the title. She can't even say "I could have been a Princess... you would be a Prince." She skips that whole consideration. All she cares about, is what he will be one day, a King. Why would she care? Well, she'd be Queen! "I could have been a Princess. You'd be a King." I could have been a Princess with someone destined to be a King. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiotFever Posted October 21, 2011 Share Posted October 21, 2011 I sometimes think it means the peace between mainstream and not mainstream music ''Once upon a time, we weren't right the only thing we seemed to do is fight'' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corkus Posted October 21, 2011 Share Posted October 21, 2011 It's a Coldplay song. Stop looking for meaning in it. :P 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivet Posted October 22, 2011 Share Posted October 22, 2011 ^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZonkyTonk13 Posted October 22, 2011 Share Posted October 22, 2011 In the words of jessi michaels of operation ivy..when you're a king for a day you're a whore for a week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telepian Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 The song never said they were married/dating. It could be a father-daughter relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aschall Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 This is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filipinoandy Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 Your logic breaks down at the assumption that "could have" refers to right now. "Could" refers to a possibility - in this case, she sings about the past in which the possibility of her becoming a princess was destroyed. Thus, as a possibility, and NOT the present, it remains in the future. On top of that, you can't assume that all she wants is the title by a few lines of the song. It's like reading "Thank you for applying to our college" and assuming that that means you're accepted, but when in reality, the letter later says "We're sorry, but we regretfully say that we cannot admit you to our school." Look at the song as a whole. What you need to do is take into consideration what they mean by Princess and King. Don't take it literally. They're just metaphorical personas. What is the connotation of a princess? Girls who are called princesses are usually provided for, even spoiled, to the point where they demand a lot (however, that's not to say they act like brats, nor is that to say that all they want are material objects. Maybe the "princess" demands more time and attention from the "king"). What about a king? A man who rules over the nation and can provide. But maybe the king can't always provide for what the princess wants (maybe he doesn't have enough time to spend with her and give her the attention she wants). What the king wants and what a princess demands can conflict. With enough conflict, the king can decide to disown the princess. In doing so, the family, home, and their unity are destroyed. Where does the song support this? "Could've had a castle, worn a ring." In this case, the castle represents the grand home/family they could have continued to have together, as also represented by the ring - unity in how the ring is continuous. The two even "fell apart" The song also supports this theory in the fact that both artists sing "You really hurt me." The king was hurt because the princess, in demanding so much and conflicting with him, seemed to turn against him. The princess in this case could have been hurt by the fact that the king disowned her and left her with no place to go. All a metaphor for why the two lovers broke up - they couldn't meet each other's demands, so in conflict, they decided to break up, leaving each other hurt in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheese Nip 2 Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 I think it's interesting that the girl character says I could of had all this stuff, but no, YOU let me go. And then he's like you're holding in your hands the 2 halves of my heart. Conflicting stories there. But then, that's how breakups go isn't it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mylo Loves Xyloto Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 I have recently gotten into a fight with my dad and my step mom. She is being really abusive and evil, I would say. And this is making my father and I drift apart, to the point where we are kind of like strangers. I love him a lot, and this is really making me sad. So then I was listening to the acoustic version of Princess of China, and then it hit me. Maybe, just maybe it is about a Father and his Daughter, who are fighting, but want to resolve the problem. "Once upon a time we fell apart You're holding in your hands the two halves of my heart" They got into a fight, but the daughter still has hope. "Once upon a time we burned bright Now all we ever seem to do is fight On and on, and on and on and on Once upon a time on the same side" They were strong together, as one family, on the same side, but now all they do is fight. "I could have been a princess, you'd be a king" They feel as if they aren't a family, "I could have been a daughter, you'd be the dad" Cos you really hurt me, no you really hurt me They had both made a mistake. I don't know, but this is my interpretation of the song, sorry I made it too personal. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aschall Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 This is stupid. Do I need to say it again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mylo Loves Xyloto Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 I can respect your opinion, i don't agree though. But one quick question, if it is so stupid, why are you in this thread? All we are trying to do is just share our ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eduardof95 Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 the songs not about monarchy nor royalty, its about a love in which the woman and man felt they were each others princess and king, but unfortunately they hurt each other in a way that was irreparable... Before they're love could grow more the got one got scared of hurting the other even thought the damage was done... and now theryre blaming each other.... is it really so hard to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesTheMarshmallow Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Princess doesn't necessarily mean daughter. See: Prince Albert and Queen Victoria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truemeaning Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 (edited) Perhaps it means that he broke her heart immeasurably. Maybe she had been consequently wounded and felt no other choice except to forfeit the chance at royalty, titles, and wealth because they might never have a chance at true happiness. Thus proving that a real relationship was what she yearned for all along and benefits of status were a mere cherry on top in her eyes. She left and he let her go without fighting for her. Edited February 17 by truemeaning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now