General Smut

Where was it filmed? I know Waterloo bridge and the Reebok Stadium, but where was the rest of it filmed?

23 Square One 10 White Shadows 16 Fix You 13 Talk 12 Speed Of Sound 13 A Message 3 Low 26 Swallowed In The Sea 12 'Til Kingdom Come +Talk -square 1

Ive seen the trailers - whats it about?

It seems like a fun action film that doesnt take itself too seriously. Sounds ok by me, i dont like blood or gory films so i probably wont see it, but if i did like blood and gore then i would.

Monty Pythons Holy Grail 8/10

You have a bf? Darn... Your pretty and your bf seems nice! Whos the other bloke? Oh and Lampost- whats that sticking out your fly?

I would love Wales to qualify - i have welsh blood in me! and also giggsy - he deserves the chance to play on a big stage. Heres an article on the San Marino game. I'm not happy with the idea. http://uk.sports.yahoo.com/07092006/2/photo/germany-provide-13-reasons-hopers.html

I'm feeling vain Thats me and thats King Danny l of Lovely. (the guy in the uniform)

That last point is a charge aimed at lots of celebs who when on hard times sell sob storys to the press! We all know its done for publicty - why is Alex Jones different? We as a nation were disgusted ( i wasnt i didnt care) when Micheal Barrymore broke down on BB. We all said he was doing it for the money! And he predicted that a major terrorist (9/11) attack was immient - June 2001 - 3 months before it happened - hardly what i'd call immenient.

8.5

Yea happy Birthday, hope it goes well!

Sea Monkeys! Your least favourite animal (dont say spiders)

Yea and one of his many, many predications come true then it becomes a major predication. Why listen when his quotes and hundreds of predications are on the net? You use obscure quotes yourself so whys this different? Hes out to make money. Cant you see that?

Some more stuff from the rotten libary which supports the theory Some Credible Conspiracies There are a number of stories in circulation about specific warnings prior to 9/11, as well as numerous questions about how and why things blew up or fell down the way they did. Some have been covered in the mainstream press, others are perennial e-mail forwards. The most credible claims include: Sibel Edmonds, an FBI translator hired after 9/11, was appalled to discover that a giant stack of documents the FBI possessed prior to September 11 indicated very clearly that a major attack was coming, and that it involved airplanes. Edmonds was subsequently told to work slower -- because she was making her colleagues in the department look bad. She was then fired for reporting a security breach by one of her colleagues. Sadly, this story is completely true and was confirmed by the Justice Department, which then retroactively classified its confirmations so that Edmonds couldn't use them in a civil suit over her termination. In July 2001, a moderate Taliban minister warned the U.S. that al Qaeda was planning a "massive attack." Shortly thereafter, Egyptian intelligence warned the CIA that al Qaeda had recently sent 20 operatives to the United States, and that some of them had trained as pilots. San Francisco Mayor Wille Brown received a call from someone identified only as his "airport security" on September 10, 2001, warning him in a nonspecific manner about air travel, as reported by the San Francisco Chronicle. Some follow-up articles, reported by random non-journalists on the Internet, claim that the call came from Condoleezza Rice, but those reports are apparently based on nothing. (Editor's Note: Please don't e-mail us to tell us what those reports are based on. Really.) Many people have questioned the collapse of WTC7, an adjacent building in the World Trade Center complex that housed a CIA station, among other things. Most of these theories are accompanied by the usual kinds of specious analysis that the building "couldn't possibly" have collapsed due to the apparently insignificant stresses caused by the total collapse of the world's two tallest buildings just a few hundred yards away. Some have proposed that the building was bombed, others cite police transmissions that seem to indicate the building was demolished by emergency crews. These unresolved questions are more credible than the Pentagon missile theory, but no solid evidence has yet emerged to prove foul play. The official lore of September 11 has it that United Flight 93 crashed after the passengers stormed the cockpit in an effort to retake control of the plane from its hijackers. (Whether they made it into the cockpit is not clear.) But there have been persistent and credible suggestions that the flight may have been shot down by the U.S. military. In the confusion of 9/11, there were several points at which internal government communications indicated there may have been a shootdown, and Flight 93 was apparently headed for the White House. Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the military to shoot down any hijacked planes approaching the White House, and in a conversation with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld a few minutes later, official transcripts quote Cheney as saying, "It's my understanding they've already taken a couple of aircraft out." Rumsfeld responded that he could not confirm that statement. The official story is "there was no shootdown," but a reasonable person can wonder.

I like the part where it says an entire agency would have been needed to handle the paperwork. Its from rotten.com, make of it what you will but they arent Bush fans, its quite a reliable souce - facts from the rotten libary are on wiki. The only part of Meyssan's premise that is really compelling is the motive -- to provide a rationale for the U.S. to invade Afghanistan and Iraq and steal their oil. Everything else in Meyssan's theory contradicts the notion that the conspirators possessed even the a shred of common sense. If the U.S. was really behind the attack, wouldn't it make sense for them to just hijack the planes themselves? Come on! Why in God's name would they undertake a massive plot using sci-fi technology costing probably billions of dollars, when they could just hijack the planes themselves for only the cost of life insurance? For that matter, if they remote-controlled two jets to crash into the WTC, why not just do the same thing at the Pentagon, instead of hitting it with a missile and then pretending it was a plane? How could the conspirators be such morons and yet execute the most successful cover-up in human history? (OK, maybe the second most successful.) The obvious answer is probably also the correct answer: They can't, they didn't, and this whole line of thought is even less worthy of your consideration than the secret of Area 51. The Usual Suspects While Meyssan's rantings are pretty far beyond the pale of reason, the general idea that the attacks were sponsored by the CIA or the Israeli intelligence service, the Mossad, is extraordinarily widespread, particularly in the Arab world. Variations on this idea have been published in Egypt's government-run newspapers and aired on Arab television all over the region. Even the king of Saudi Arabia has hinted as much, recently blaming a spate of al Qaeda-linked terrorist attacks on "Zionists." One variation on Meyssan's theories also embraces the logic-challenged notion of remote controlled planes, but argues they were controlled by the Mossad instead of the CIA, in order to goad the U.S. into attacking Israel's enemies. Although this theory still suffers from being terminally elaborate, the Mossad is at least a slightly better suspect than the CIA, which couldn't even kill Castro, let alone 3,000 people in a synchronized attack on live TV. The main problem with all this speculation is that it's based on the idea that al Qaeda was not responsible for the attacks. This flies in the face of a mountain of evidence. Even if we grant that evidence presented after the fact by U.S. government officials is automatically suspect, there is ample documentation to support al Qaeda's role in the attacks. The most obvious example: Khalid Shaikh Mohammed admitted to planning the attacks in an interview with Arab media. al Qaeda documents reported by al Jazeera also confessed the attack. Hundreds of al Qaeda-linked propaganda pieces celebrate the attacks. The hijackers left suicide videos which were subsequently circulated by al Qaeda-linked Web sites around the world. Furthermore, the historical record clearly indicates that al Qaeda had long been planning exactly this kind of attack, including copious material in the public record long before 9/11 ever happened. Ramzi Yousef was planning to crash airliners into U.S. landmarks, including the Pentagon and the World Trade Center, and that plot was reported years before 9/11 ever happened. al Qaeda-linked terrorists were looking at ways to crash airplanes into U.S. buildings as early as 1993, when the FBI and the Egyptian government were clued into a plot to steal an airplane and crash it into the U.S. embassy. And while you can't always trust what the government tells you, the sheer volume of U.S. documentation released after the 9/11 attacks is staggering. In addition to the extremely improbable scenarios under which the CIA or the Mossad would actually have executed the attacks, an entire agency of the U.S. government would be needed just to handle the hundreds of thousands of pages of document forgeries now in circulation supporting most elements of the official story. In addition, the mythical conspirators seem to have carefully planted a series of whistleblowers who would inexplicably pop up to blame the government for its mind-blowing but strictly bureaucratic failures to prevent the attack. Just for verisimilitude? It boggles the mind. The conspiracy theorists do have one explanation which makes all of the above problems go away: Everyone in the media is working for the Mossad. Including this author. OK, Fine. But Still... Of course, a 9/11 conspiracy doesn't have to involve remote control planes, false flags and Jewish spies infiltrating Rotten.com. There are a number of more modest proposals in circulation. Many conspiracy theorists argue that the U.S. had advanced warning of the attack, but allowed it to proceed anyway. Let's just get one thing straight right up front: This is a much easier case to make. That doesn't mean it's right, of course. But you don't have to skip your medication in order to wonder. A favorite among Americans on the far right and far left, this theory usually proposes that the U.S. allowed the 9/11 attacks to take place so that the Bush administration could revoke the constitution, declare martial law, conquer the Middle East and cancel the elections. A problem with this plan, so far, is its obvious failure. After all, the Constitution hasn't been revoked (just severely diluted). And the Middle East hasn't been successfully conquered (though not for lack of trying). Martial law hasn't been declared (although thousands have been rounded up with no charge and detained without legal counsel). And the elections weren't canceled (though there's the usual debate as to the validity of their results). Um, did we say "obvious" failure? Let's move on. The idea that the American government would allow a massive attack on its homeland for political purposes isn't new. For decades, rumors have swirled that government was warned of the attack on Pearl Harbor, but allowed it to take place anyway, in order to catapult the U.S. into WWII. And it's a lot easier to cover up an ignored warning than to cover up remote controlled planes and false-flag hoodoo.

How many people have you guys met of myspace? Ive met several.

POP QUIZ: How does Alex Jones predict the future? He goes to the secret websites where the New World Order tells him everything it's going to do!

Studying a subject does not qualify one to make statements like you do. How do we know your research isnt flawed? And why do you keep on repeating this garbage? Random quotes from across the net about the "9/11 truth movement" Far from being a movement centered around a theory, the 9/11 Truthers are really just a bunch of people exchanging fantasies. Our conspiratorial friends will doubtless go to their graves believing 9/11 was a tricky inside job pulled off by the most incompetent administration in galactic history--and that they were the only ones in the world smart enough to see it. They'll go on making their false accusations of mass murder and feeling righteous. How this will affect their karma, only God knows. But if they had any real evidence, at least two of them could agree on the story. Even you admit theres lots of truth movers who have different opions. Your mate Alex Jones is the modern day Nostrodamus "Everything I said was gonna unfold is now unfolding." --Alex Jones "There is going to be more. This is only the kick-off." --Alex Jones, Infowars, Sept. 13, 2001 "Within 2 years I'm predicting...that you're going to see a suitcase nuke in this country. You're probably going to see a release in a few years of something communicable. & I am predicting that you will see a lot of conventional bombings...in the next year or so." --Alex Jones, Infowars (10/18/01) "Suitcase nukes are a virtual certainty." --Alex Jones, Infowars (5/16/02) They're preparing for new terrorist attacks that are much larger. & they're planning to bring in foreign armies." --Alex Jones, Infowars, 7/11/02 "They're really setting us up for a smallpox attack... It's not a question of if & when it's gonna happen." --Alex Jones, Infowars, 9/26/02 Heres more of Alex Jones predictions. "This is only the beginning. In the next few years, in this second phase--the period of escalating violence. They're gonna allow limited nuclear exchanges." "There's going to be more. This is only the kickoff." (9/13/01) "Within 2 years I'm predicting...that you're going to see a suitcase nuke in this country. You're probably going to see a release in a few years of something communicable. & I am predicting that you will see a lot of conventional bombings...in the next year or so." (10/18/01) "I'm telling you now...there's a very good chance there gonna blow something up overseas or here." "The evidence is all tilting toward...blowing up a building. They're really setting us up for a smallpox attack." Chemical attacks are "almost a guarantee in the next six months or so." (9/26/02) "They're preparing for new terrorist attacks that are much larger. & they're planning to bring in foreign armies....The U.S. government is going to engage in large terrorist attacks domestically & probably internationally...They may kill millions of Americans." There was going to be a nuclear release in Iraq, an international depression, formation of a world government, probably a nuclear release in Iraq, an international depression, a world government formed. Also, "They may kill millions of Americans." (7/11/02) They're going to blow more stuff up. (4/13/04) "I predict Arnold is gonna save children at a school shooting, or there'll be some type of bombing, & he will land by helicopter & run in & direct things. I predict it....I see it all aligning. I see it all coming together. I see their plan, clear as day....He'll fly in & things will be burninig & he'll run into it & save someone." [circa March of 2005. Kinda proves Alex is living a fantasy, doesn't it?] Alex also said (several times) they were going to roll out Osama bin Laden "on ice" before the 2004 election. Hes said so much stuff - law of averages dictate one will happen! I could go on an on When will you get it into your head that Alex James is only intrested in making money from his theories?

Go on explain it. Explain how the people laying the dyanmite in WTC7 had no idea what they were doing. Or the suppliers who sold them the dynamite. Explain who these mystery men are behind George Bush - name them!

Oh it just has. Its King Danny l of Lovely.

I'm thinking why cant i get my avater to work?

Be careful if you have kids as well! http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0906ChildFlight06-ON.html Uncontrollable 6-year-old pulled from flight Canadian Press Sept. 6, 2006 07:10 AM TORONTO - A 6-year-old child who kicked up a fuss on board an Air Canada flight on the weekend as the jet sat on the runway at Toronto's Pearson Airport was escorted off the plane. The incident took place Sunday morning, according to a Sun Media report, as 62 travelers on an Airbus 320 waited to depart for Cancun, Mexico. Air Canada spokesman John Reber said the child was traveling alone and had been escorted aboard the plane without incident by airline staff. advertisement But Reber said the child became uncontrollable once the plane began to move and passengers were told to fasten their safety belts. A decision was made to remove the child from the aircraft and return him to his family, who were still in the airport waiting for takeoff. The flight's departure was delayed by about half-an-hour.

Love Teenage Mutant Hero Turtles (turtles in a haff shell, Turtle Power!)

I'm not the one desperate to believe that a group of mysterious americans above the president are blood thirsty bastards who would kill their own citizens to wage war in some other country. Thats what you believe, i believe it sounds like a plot from some B-movie.

I take that as a no then. Its true if you want to change a lightbulb you have to fill forms in, notify someone, who then calls someone who sends someone else and someone else checks it, someone signs the bills of, someone loses the paperwork someone else finds it and reports it etc... can you imagine how many would be involved at the top? a few in control of hundreds in control of thousands. All who knew what they were doing. there would be thousands of people who knew about 9/11. THOUSANDS not a few as you claim.