Tnspieler1012

My partner didn't (or was unable to) delete any song information. So I'm trying really hard not to pay too much attention. II\ know a couple people were struggling with that before, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. I'm dying to review this now. But I have some stuff to get done. I always run through it about 3 times before writing, so expect something by tomorrow evening.

Oh wow, game winner from suarez unfairly disallowed for offsides. dwama.

Needless fouls piling up for liverpool. I see a headed Fellaini winner off a free-kick in the near future.

Skrtel escapes with a rash challenge in the back of the box.

it's funny because you actually are.

Haha, Timmy Howard rushing out like Victor Valdes on the Sterling foul.

I can't get this fucker out of my system. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ad1oVmuMZg]Andrew Bird - Three White Horses - YouTube[/ame]

reilly's so old, he remembers the very first oldies thread.

Longest premier league game in history apparently. Lulz.

12 added minutes at Etihad. I've only had it running as audio underneath music in my computer background. An injury I'm guessing?

Hypothetically, If one subscribes to the ridiculous idea that I can personally change the band's music by posting here...should their fans not be open and honest if coldplay care so much about the opinions of their fans? Those venting negative opinions of Mylo Xyloto were often those who had loved the band more and for a longer time than the new fans who gave it 10/10 reviews. Are you suggesting that they lie and swallow any crap the band dishes out, asking for more? In any case, isn't praise more restrictive than criticism in this regard? As they've become a more popular band, so their music has become more mainstream (who would've forseen a duet with rihanna 7 years ago). With that comes more money, and a greater obligation to appeal to the masses.

Why would you want to refrain from negative opinions? I'm guessing the same reason you left the forum for a year. How does one have one's own form of logic? No one ever said you couldn't speak your mind. We just found what you said laughable. Particularly where you say we are somehow curtailing the rights of coldplay by voicing negative opinions about mylo xyloto. I mean...where did you possibly get the idea that Chris Martin would somehow suffer as a result of a coldplaying post? This self-righteous, greater than thou tone isn't winning you any points. Dear me. 1. Your speech was mostly a series of blunt, unsupported declarations that, as a philosophy major, I took affront to. If you're going to make generalizations about human rights, at least include some citations. 2. What logic? Your premises and assumptions about the website itself were absurd, and even if they were sound, there was no actual logical structure or syllogism to be found. Just so you don't leave oblivious to why we reacted as we did... How does this remotely apply to negativity in a coldplay forum? You sound like people are trying to burn down their studio. Do you truly believe this fansite will effect anything that the band members do? I'm sorry, but that's just loony (as you so eloquently put it) How is exercising free speech suddenly an act of violence or force? Are you reading what you type? If you post a song, and I think you're an awful singer, how is that restrictive of your personal freedoms? Silly silly. Moving back.... 100 bucks if you show me where reilly said you were wrong for not conforming. If I go into a crowd and start going on an irrational political rant, the antagonism I would receive is not because of my exercise in nonconformity, but my sheer stupidity. Know the difference. I guess it was sort of entertaining... No one's asking you to leave. Again, who is making you leave or shut up? Was your thread deleted? If I stage a 1 man protest to save the dinosaurs in front of the white house, and people laugh, has my right to free speech been hindered, Mr. Logic? I'm telling you quite calmly that you clearly know very little about logic and sound argument.

I was so chagrined as a chess fan to hear a random Kasparov reference in that song.

pretty much that.

I find Romney far too bellicose. Always emphasizing how we must have the most powerful military in the world, when I would rather that money be used for pretty much anything else. It's not a matter of feel. From the Bush tax cuts, to spending, to the patriot act, to the war on drugs to foreign policy (libya as parrotdies mentioned), there are several areas of his administration where simply very little has changed (not to say there aren't some big differences as well). That said, I'm more afraid of what Romney openly wants to do than what Obama will probably end up doing if reelected. Cool beans. Our point was that you didn't say it at all. Naturally we're going to be skeptical of you and your opinion if all you say is

Again, that's just the average. It can be 10 minutes or 5 hours if so choose. The only person who might complain is your recipient.

Don't remember ever reading that it MUST be between 50-70 minutes. They're just recommended guidelines. I always made 80 the absolute limit.

Haha, pretty sure I've never been below 70 minutes.

Where on earth did you get this idea? I'm trying to generate a perfectly interesting conversation. You complain about other people turning nasty, and then just shrug me off when I ask you a genuine question about your views. As reilly said, it's frustrating.

You won't get attacked by viruses or anything. I think you have to create an account nowadays (it's free), and then just upload your mix (preferably in a zip folder) and send black rose the link.

^ rapidshare?

So basically... 1. You said something. 2. reilly appeared to disagree. 3. You get scared and jump out the window because of the vague possibility of future nastiness? Chillax and don't be afraid of a meaningful intellectual conversation (presuming you're not afraid of backing-up your assertions). It's when people don't see contrast as a personal threaten that I'm reminded that this forum can be sometimes seldom fun sometimes often... I feel you shaking from this side of your monitor. Here, have a sip of my vanilla sencha. So, are you conceding the strong similarities between Obama and Romney, and just saying that Obama is the lesser of two weevils?

Lolwut. Seemed pretty harmless to me.

Phil? Is that you? :wacko: