Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Coldplaying

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

GazeboflossUK

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GazeboflossUK

  1. I don't even think that there will be a song that can't be described as 'Hispanic'.
  2. Haha, this news did make me laugh. I bet the guys in the band are laughing at the articles. It'll be the least "Hispanic" sounding "Hispanic" album ever created.
  3. Glad you had a great time! Welcome back too :kiss:
  4. "should" Who the fuck gets off on trying to tell women what they can and shouldn't wear and at what age? Another pointless "study". Imagine if that was your life - to think about study's you can carry out - and then announce your ground-breaking results to the world..."Women over 28 should bin their mini-skirts!!!" I'm sure there are more better things to do with you mind, for crying out loud. I guess half-witted airheads find this sort of thing very useful.
  5. Most of my arguments are based around past events and their relevance to todays world. I agree. People need to be made aware of things that are dumped into the memory hole.
  6. Well, it does warm but only to 10-12 degrees C, at best. Most of the time it's lower than that, however - down to about 4-5C
  7. Amateur Entomologist.... It's been wet and humid in London and the south-east but mosquitoes were always a feature of sticky summer nights sleeping in London for me. You'd hear the high pitch tone they emit as they fly near your head/ears. Annoying. But mosquitoes actually don't need the heat. The area of the earth with the highest concentration mosquitoes?? The Arctic tundra. ;)
  8. I knew about this because it's something I've been reading a lot about recently. But - it's been wet this summer, sure. But it hasn't been 'hot' - at all, yet.
  9. Well, yes...indeed. The amount and the size of the lies in that clip is quite staggering. However, I know of dozens more which could have made that video much, much longer.
  10. How to create an angry American (or anyone for that matter!!) It Should make you mad! They are taking the piss out of us!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgfzqulvhlQ
  11. I really think this album is going to be great, from what I've heard too. It's took them long enough.
  12. Yes, it can be done in a single day but it's all about how good the person is at mastering you album. A master of a mix is only as good as the ears of the engineer and I guess if it turns out bad then they might need to do it again. It depends on how much money you have and how long you are willing to take.
  13. Police say there's nothing suspicious about the event. The mainstream TV news and papers are going to have a field day with these images, however. :rolleyes: "Memories of 9/11" yadda, yadda, yadda. They are even talking about terror attacks as I write this!!! Fear mongering bastards!!! Watch the BBC News 24 Live Stream here (story might have ended by now) - Buildings Evacuated After Midtown Explosion By Sewell Chan Smoke from the explosion could be seen between Park and Lexington Avenues near 34th Street. (Photo: Eric Okamura) UPDATED, 6:40 p.m. Fire Department officials said that the explosion this evening near Grand Central Terminal appeared to be either a transformer or a manhole explosion and that they had issued four alarms. Fire officials are reporting that one civilian was injured and taken to Weill Cornell Medical College at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital; the severity of the injuries was unknown. Service on the 42nd Street shuttle has also been disrupted, according to New York City Transit. “There have been reports of a transformer or some other kind of an explosion near Grand Central,” said Michael S. Clendenin, the spokesman for Consolidated Edison. The authorities have cleared the block of East 41st Street between Third and Lexington Avenues. Errol Cockfield, a spokesman for the Empire State Development Corporation, said that smoke or steam was visible from the agency’s offices on the 37th floor of 633 Third Avenue, between 40th and 41st Streets. “There has been a sustained thundering sound for 15 minutes and steam is billowing into the air,” Mr. Cockfield wrote in an e-mail message. “We can see it from our offices on the 37th floor at 633 Third Avenue. People are running helter-skelter.” 6:25 p.m. | Charles F. Seaton, a New York City Transit spokesman, said that all subway trains on the Nos. 4, 5 and 6 lines were bypassing Grand Central Terminal at the direction of the police. Paula Forteau, a nanny, said she was at Third Avenue and 38th Street after a supermarket run when “I heard a loud noise, a rumbling noise. Everyone started running downtown. There was one loud noise, and then it just continued. I saw a cloud of white smoke.” 6:18 p.m. | Several office buildings were evacuated around 6 p.m. this evening following what appears to be a transformer explosion that sent thick black smoke billowing around the area, according to news agencies and eyewitnesses. Police and fire units were sent to the scene. Caryn Tutino, a news designer for The Times, was waiting for a bus outside the New York Public Library, at Fifth Avenue and 40th Street when the explosion occurred. “All of a sudden, we just heard this explosion and all these people came down running down 41st Street, and screaming,” she said. “It looked like it was coming from Grand Central. I looked down 41st Street and saw a huge black cloud of smoke.” Ms. Tutino said that the people seemed panicked and upset.
  14. Nah, Nah, Nah, Mastering can take time. It's a hard job that requires a lot of skill. Trust me. You can really fuck up a mix if you don't do it right. However - get a good mastering engineer and you can come away with something that sounds far better than it did beforehand. And I'm sure they want to be there to make sure it's a good job.
  15. NOW, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE COMPLETELY IN DENIAL ABOUT THE LIES THAT WE ARE BEING SPUN EVERY DAY IN THE MEDIA, THIS ONE IS FOR YOU!! Ok, now read this....and take note. This recent 'release' of footage that shows Osama Bin Laden was claimed as NEW by many in the government and mostly described over the media as 'new' - came with widespread claims and speaches by Neo-Cons that Bin Laden/al-Qaeda is still out there and is a threat. Well, this so-called 'new' video IS OVER FIVE YEARS OLD!!!! Why did IntelCenter, the middleman between "Al-Qaeda" and the media, a group that has government and Pentagon ties, re-release old footage and why did the media report it as new when it had already aired twice before? They should have pointed this out to US ALL!!!!! Though some reports included the proviso that the tape could contain old footage, the importance and ceremony attached to the re-release of the Bin Laden tape over the weekend left the distinct impression that the footage was new and that it correlated with the alleged increase of "chatter" amongst terrorist organizations indicating that a new attack is imminent, a message that was again pushed by the U.S. government following the release of the National Intelligence Estimate yesterday. In reality, the tape was being released for the third consecutive time, having first popped up in 2002 before re-airing again in 2003. The footage of Bin Laden was filmed six years ago in October 2001!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Associated Press ran the tape as a top story on Saturday under the headline "Bin Laden Appears in New al-Qaida Video". ABC News, noting that "a brief clip of an older-looking Osama bin Laden is contained in a new al Qaeda videotape," when in reality the graying in Bin Laden's beard was exactly the same as when he appeared in a 2001 videotape, while also wearing the exact same jacket. Euro News, broadcast in dozens of countries around Europe, described the footage as "apparently new" The footage was not new and any small amount of cursory research would have verified that fact, and yet the media went full board with the story, creating the illusion that it was new, while rabid Neo-Cons lauded the tape as another reason for keeping U.S. troops in Iraq while fearmongering about upcoming terror attacks at home. The footage first appeared in May 2002, having been released by a Pakistani security official to the Al-Ansaar Islamic news agency, based in Birmingham, England. This CBS video clip clearly shows the same footage as the apparent "new" tape. Firstly, here is a screenshot from the 2002 tape (right) compared to the new tape (left). Notice the sloping mountain in the left background. Sources indicate that the footage was shot in either October 2001 or March 2002, with the earlier date being the favorite as Bin Laden's appearance matches with the footage from a different tape that was released in October 2001. Al-Jazeera said they had the footage as far back as October 2001, but chose not to air it as they saw it as "not newsworthy" and "nothing more than a PR stunt." Six years later, and with the footage having been released on two separate occasions already, the western media insinuated that the tape was new and splashed it everywhere as a top headline. IntelCenter were also behind the release of the "new" Osama tape - having previously released the same footage (the second time it had appeared) in October 2003! IntelCenter issued a tacit warning that the footage may be re-hashed when they released the "new" tape to the media, but they failed to mention the fact that they released portions of the exact same clips in October 2003. The screenshots of Bin Laden which clearly correlate with the "new" tape were on their website all along, and yet they still labeled the footage as "significant". IntelCenter knew the tape was definitely old, yet their meandering uncertainty left doubts that the media exploited to the full in claiming the footage may be new. Here is a screenshot from IntelCenter's site...in 2003: The screenshot from IntelCenter's website from a tape released in October 2003 clearly match with screenshots from the "new" tape, a fact completely ignored by both IntelCenter themselves and the mass media. Even a senior Bush administration official admitted to Newsbuster, "Intelligence agencies have determined the video was previously aired as a portion of a longer show first on MBC TV (Middle East broadcast station) on April 17, 2002," and yet retractions to the supposition that the footage was new are nowhere to be seen in the media. "What's the result of the MSM's sloppy "air-first-verify-later" approach? The world’s most evil and despicable terrorists are given tons of free air time and print exposure," adds Newsbuster. Even if you believe that Al-Qaeda itself is deciding to re-package old footage and constantly re-release it, and that this isn't a crude propaganda ploy on behalf of IntelCenter in collusion with the Neo-Cons, why are the government and the media consistently affording lavish attention and giving prominence to such activity, aiding the terrorists to spread their propaganda ad infinitum? It would be foolishly naive to think that the re-release of this tape - for the third time running - has little to do with the fact that the Bush administration has been ramping up the fearmongering and hinting at the inevitability of another attack over the past two weeks - ostensibly for political purposes to mute dissent. Six months after the failed "surge" in Iraq and with Bush's approval ratings sliding to all time lows while calls for impeachment reach a crescendo, a slew of information threatening a new Al-Qaeda attack gets released and up pops Osama - in a tape that is re-hashed for a third time - to validate the Neo-Cons insistence that to leave Iraq is to hand the terrorists a victory. That tape is released by an organization with clear links to the military-industrial complex who had knowingly released the same footage years earlier. Is all this a coincidence, or does such chicanery and crass manipulation of the electorate and the political process demand an immediate Congressional investigation as to why the U.S. government and its lapdog media fronts are working with the terrorists to artificially boost their profile while scaring the holy crap out of the American people at the most politically opportune moments?
  16. Haha, yeah - Bye!!!....exactly. Well said. We don't need, or want people like him. He needs to grow up - and wake up. "all you dumbfuck lib morons really make me not want to listen to coldplay anymore" - That's just one sad little child there. 'Lib' haha (it's not a question of that AT ALL)
  17. Always nice to read some fantastic insights from you. :thinking: Never anything meaningful from you, just petulaunce - and frightenly large doses of ignorance. Pity.
  18. Former Reagan Official: Bush May Stage False Flag Events To Reinstate Draft "Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?" asks Roberts Tuesday, July 17, 2007 Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration Paul Craig Roberts has gone further than ever before, warning that the Bush administration could be about to stage false flag events and terror attacks in order to reinstate the draft, announce a dictatorship and attack Iran. Roberts has been dubbed the "Father of Reaganomics" and is also a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service. In his weekly syndicated column, Roberts suggests that unfolding events and the nature of the rhetoric emanating from government quarters suggests that a major staged terror attack could be just around the corner. Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?" writes Roberts. If the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the Middle East and to entrench the "unitary executive" at home, it will have to conduct some false flag operations that will both frighten and anger the American people and make them accept Bush's declaration of "national emergency" and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the administration could simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed without hindrance. A series of staged or permitted attacks would be spun by the captive media as a vindication of the neoconsevatives' Islamophobic policy, the intention of which is to destroy all Middle Eastern governments that are not American puppet states. Success would give the US control over oil, but the main purpose is to eliminate any resistance to Israel's complete absorption of Palestine into Greater Israel. Think about it. If another 9/11-type "security failure" were not in the works, why would Homeland Security czar Chertoff go to the trouble of convincing the Chicago Tribune that Americans have become complacent about terrorist threats and that he has "a gut feeling" that America will soon be hit hard? Roberts concludes that coming "terrorist" events within the next year will be the means for overthrowing constitutional democracy unless Congress moves to impeach Bush and Cheney immediately. Paul Craig Roberts Roberts' warning is dovetailed by a series of high profile individuals expressing the need for more terror as the only recourse for saving a doomed foreign policy and reversing anti-war sentiment in the U.S. that is now dominating the country. In a July 8 Toronto Star piece, Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario, said that "The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago." "If nothing happens, it will be harder still to say this [the occupation of Iraq] is necessary," he added. Delaney's comments are in a similar vein to former Republican Senator Rick Santorum's statements to a radio show last weekend, in which he said that "unfortunate events" would occur along the lines of the recent car bomb attempts in the UK, that will change American's views of the war. Last month, the new chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party Dennis Milligan said that there needed to be more attacks on American soil for President Bush to regain popular approval. Yearning for more terror was also explicitly expressed in a 2005 GOP memo, which hankered for new attacks that would "validate" the President's war on terror and "restore his image as a leader of the American people." It seems painfully clear that the Neo-Cons are still obsessed with the notion of using staged terror as the only ultimate means of facilitating their dark agenda, and that thousands and potentially millions of Americans could be about to pay with their lives to realize such a nightmare.
  19. The full list of nominations are as follows: Arctic Monkeys - 'Favourite Worst Nightmare' Klaxons - 'Myths Of The Near Future' Amy Winehouse - 'Back To Black' Maps - 'We Can Create' The View - 'Hats Off To The Buskers' Jamie T - 'Panic Prevention' Dizzee Rascal - 'Maths & English' Bat For Lashes - 'Fur And Gold' Young Knives - 'Voices of Animals And Men' Fionn Regan - 'The End Of History' New Young Pony Club - 'Fantastic Playroom' Basquiat Strings - 'Basquiat Strings' Worst List Ever.
  20. Yeah, I've been wondering about this for years. I think a section of it was shown on TV once but everyone seemed to miss it.
  21. Cheers Dave :)
  22. Indeed. Put me on the panel. Then you'd get the rightful winner.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.