GazeboflossUK

I got that list in an email too! Plus, were we attacked? Hardly.

Just ignore him from now on. Seriously. It's far better. Ignore who?, I hear you say. :)

I hate to see overweight kids.....but no, no, they really shouldn't be fined. Parents and people in general need to be better educated about food consumption. Giving out fines will not offer a long term solution. So Gordon....I don't mind your TV show.....but shut your f**king mouth.

I blame nothing. We just need to get on with it and stop complaining about every single weather event. Sure, we have had a lot of rain but when we have a lot of sun the reaction in the media is the same "Oh no, how awful are lives are!!!" They need to get a grip. And with regard to the flooding in the UK............bulid on flood plains and your gonna get floods! Also, the government removing a large chunk of the money for flood defenses also didn't help.

Ok.:laugh3: I guess adding something useful to this is way beyond you. A man with such a vocabulary as you obviously needs higher mental stimulation.

Exactly. That's why everyone must question the motive behind making a huge deal out of this. IRA bombs were, in comparison, played down by the government/media because they did not want to cause pubic hysteria and panic as this is a primary objective of terrorism. Now all we see/hear on the news is a burning jeep and talk of Al-Qaeda and the war and all that bollocks. It was even worse in the US - having watched their news channels throughout I must say they reported in an irresponsible fashion. This was, as described by experts, a none event - in which our security forces actually tracked down the people involved 6 hours before the Glasgow incident. And they were already known to MI5 prior. Just like they always are! I've had enough of this crap. It's looking like LIHOP. (Google it)

A TV talking head has finally characterized last week's non-events in Britain for what they were, in the face of a blitz of frenzied hype, hysterics and fearmongering from the government and media, former Scotland Yard detective John O'Connor described the botched attacks as "hopeless," "incompetent" "almost laughable," and amounting to nothing more than a bonfire. Watch the video below. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhJZqtta3c4 "This was a hopeless, incompetent terrorist attack, I mean when you see the ludicrous situation when none of the bombs were able to be detonated and these guys are then trying to set fire to petrol," "All they got was a bonfire, they set fire to fuel - well that in its own way is not going to detonate the gas cylinders and it's not going to cause an explosion - it was just a fire, I mean that is so incompetent as to be almost laughable." O'Connor also insisted that the perpetrators of the attack should be referred to as "jihadists" rather than Al-Qaeda, which is what the frothing media hurriedly declared them to be just hours after the dud "bombs" were discovered in London. Others have been less sympathetic, labeling the goons who attempted to ram a Jeep into an airport terminal in Glasgow as "Beavis and Butthead" or, as Register writer Lewis Page, a former armed forces bomb-disposal operator, calls them, "Krazy Klown jihadis" who were engaged in "slapstick idiocy". "These have to be some of the most pathetic terror attacks ever," writes Page, "difficult to distinguish from minor accidents. For goodness' sake, a car is full of petrol anyway; and gas cylinders too often enough. People drive cylinders of gas around all the time. Now and again - oh my god! - they probably carry boxes of nails, bolts, tools or whatever in the same vehicle. (Aiee!)" "This kind of event happens on the motorways almost every day, at least the petrol fires and often enough with the other hazards added. The roads get closed off as a result, sometimes for hours - just like the Haymarket did on Friday morning. It causes massive inconvenience to lots and lots of people." "But the perimeter is manned by firemen and traffic cops, not bomb teams and terror-feds. And so this weekend a minor news story - one injured in bunt-out car / suicide attempt causes travel chaos - becomes a big international media frenzy, a "test of the new Prime Minister's mettle," if you please." The hysteria continued in the UK today after Stansted Airport was temporarily shut down following the discovery of an unattended bag whose owner had presumably deserted it to visit the toilet. And a new level of absurdity was reached when authorities decided to carry out controlled explosions on a car that was parked outside a Glasgow Mosque last night - no dangerous materials were found in the vehicle. Because obviously one of the primary targets for Muslim terrorists are Muslim Mosques! While in America, pipe bombs at a Disney theme park that blew off doors later turned out to be firecrackers in a trash can that fizzed and spluttered. Now every discarded pack of sandwiches is a potentially "suspicious device" as Britain cowers in fear of the next terrorist atrocity - who knows, maybe they'll set off a firework or knock over a stack of bean cans in the supermarket. While the majority of Brits are more interested in putting up shelves than some retards setting fire to a car, the media has deserted common sense for good and welcomed another opportunity to terrify the public, providing terror where there was none and thereby facilitating the amateur jihadist's agenda by hyping a peril that simply doesn't exist. News anchors devour every breaking detail about the dastardly doctor bombers while an endless loop of Beavis and Butthead's car crash dominates the background, blown up and overpixelated in a desperate ploy to beef up its significance. They also revel in yet another excuse to show burly cops with machine guns, the enforcers ordering people around, searching cars and demanding complete compliance. The reality is that accident causing deer, peanut allergies and swimming pools are allmore likely to seal your fate than a terrorist attack. As Ohio State University's John Mueller concludes in a report entitled A False Sense Of Insecurity, "For all the attention it evokes, terrorism actually causes rather little damage and the likelihood that any individual will become a victim in most places is microscopic." But the sensationalist media, the power hungry government and the bottom line fretting "experts" who head up profitable anti-terror companies all need to feed the beast and they'll exploit every morsel on offer. Terrorism can only be effective if the relatively minor acts of violence that are perpetrated are given false prominence and artificially inflated to the point where the dread of what's coming next fundamentally alters the way we go about our lives, travel, commerce, and the way we treat others, until we ultimately acquiesce to the terrorist's goal - relinquishing our freedoms and living in fear. Since that is the very definition of terrorism, recent events only confirm that the terrorists have already won and that their victory was secured with the enthusiastic support of the government and the media.

Yeah, how would you go about doing that??? ;)

Yep...Motorists, Air Travellers, people without double glazing........that's what 'global warming' is being used for. Imagine the money they can gain from adding new taxes to cars, aeroplane tickets? Plus tax money from cigarettes will not fall too much - at least not in the next few years. That's a lot of war money.

Yep, and it kills. Cashback!

I thought it was awful. Gervais is good, obviously.

6 million dead in the UK though....job done.

NOTE: I actually think that these "attacks" are probably real Terror and probably not the government. But that is always something that elite sections of government rely on. We actually piss people of so much that they do what the government want......plant bombs etc. Thing is these guys we pretty stupid and didn't do much physical damage. Although the Government/Media have taken advantage of the events by linking everything to Al-Qaeda used disgusting psychological techniques and used the events further push their police state plans. Which is perfect for them. It's the governments attitude and solution that is disgusting. It's all about scaring us into submission.

Countering the frothing rabid hysteria that is being whipped up by a fervent media in response to three failed car "bomb" attacks in the last few days in the UK, ex-CIA agent Larry Johnson joined Keith Olbermann to underscore the truth behind the madness - that the so-called bombs were primitive at best and would not have killed anybody. Watch the video below. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK5-jIfOBjQ Guy speaks sense. Still a bit mute on the government sponsored stuff but listen to what they say. In the immediate aftermath of the discovery of a Mercedes parked outside a London night club containing up to 60 litres of petrol and a similar second vehicle, authorities claimed that the bombs would have caused "carnage" had they been detonated, killing hundreds of people. A burning Jeep that was driven into a terminal building at Glasgow Airport yesterday was also believed to contain petrol, but failed to explode beyond simply burning out the interior of the vehicle. The truth about the "deadly" car bombs that led to airports and other transit systems being closed across the country as well as the UK terror threat level being raised to critical is that they displayed an almost laughable level of proficiency and would not have killed anyone. "This is not one of the truck bombs or car bombs we see going off in Iraq - what's really striking about this today is that you had two non-bombs in London when we had at least five bombs in Baghdad in which U.S. soldiers were killed in one of those so I think it's just out of proportion - this was an incendiary, this was not a high explosive," said Johnson. Johnson said that had the gas been ignited properly, there would have been a loud boom that would have split the tank but that no projectiles would have even exited the vehicle. "If someone was within 20, 30 feet of it they would have ear damage but not much more," said Johnson. Johnson contrasted how the media glaze over deadly car bombings in Iraq which occur every day "And then you have a non-event in London and we're going to battle quarters and beginning to give the hairy eyeball to every Muslim." Olbermann called the terrorists, "the graduating Al-Qaeda bomb squad that need remedial work" while attacking the concept that we're fighting them in Iraq so as to not have to fight them over here." He also called out the so-called counter-terrorism experts who have hyped this non-event on television to enhance the profile of the counter-terror companies that they head up. As Johnson outlines, fewer than 50,000 people worldwide have died as a result of terror attacks since the 60's, and as we recently highlighted, accident causing deer, swimming pools and peanut allergies have all proven more deadly than international terrorism. The true extent of the damage that could have been caused by these recent attacks pales in comparison to the overblown exaggerated hype that the authorities have claimed and that the media has willingly parroted. Similar attacks were a staple of the 60's and 70's but the government and the media downplayed them because they were of minimal threat to anyone and to hype such non-events was handing a propaganda victory to the terrorists. Since the very definition of terrorism is to influence government policy not by the attack itself but by hyping fear of new attacks, the government of Gordon Brown is engaging in terrorism by strongly intimating that fresh attacks are inevitable. Brown came to power with an agenda to push through new anti-terror laws including wiretaps being admissible in court and extending the 28-day detention without charge law to 90 days. Though such proposals failed under Blair and Brown was expecting a fight to get them passed, expect them to breeze through Parliament with little opposition following the outright panic that has been generated as a result of recent events.

Haha, Dave, you're right.........But I'd say that Dubya is like the goofy guy in the club that everyone knows is a bit of a tosser but they find him amusing.

I think you'll find it'll be the best start Gordon Brown could have 'asked' for. Labour support will be the highest in many, many months....if not years. And he now has something he get his teeth into. I'm not buying it. And for ugadawg5 - the news is having a frenzy talking about Al-Qaeda, Religion, Muslims, Bin Laden ( :rolleyes:) about Iraq, and they are even showing side by side pictures with Iraq cars burning on one side and the UK news on the other - BUT, if you listen ever so hard, the news channels say "we have been given no proof of who did this, yet"...SO WHY ARE THEY TALKING AS IF THEY HAVE DETAILS ABOUT WHO DID IT!!??!! It's like, for example, if there was a child murder and then the news just started talking about YOU for hours and hours on end, showing pictures YOU on TV when they don't have any proof of it actually being you. Then everyone just assumes it IS you who committed the crime. Your name is like dirt. People hate you, people want you to kill you and they then find out that it might not have been you. How about that? It's disgusting that we have a media who act in such a way. And that WE have Gordon Brown acting as our saviour, our god - giving speeches saying that people who hate us "for our freedoms".......OUR FREEDOMS?!? The same freedoms that our being are being taken away from us day by day while the government only gains more power over us? It's wrong. And whoever indeed was behind this attack (be it state sponsored *likely*, or be it a couple of idiots who have been brainwashed in thinking they are fighting a just cause) the government will always use it to ratchet up the military style police until we really face a situation that can only be described as 'martial law'. THIS IS WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO!!! And they have been at it since the dawn of the government.....they ALWAYS become corrupt, they always abuse their power and I really hope people realise who actually stands to gain from terror.......it's certainly not "the terrorists".

I've been monitoring this story - and it's an odd one.

I checked the worst news channel in the world (Fox News) and they have people on who already seem to know who is behind the attacks. After less than two seconds of switching on I heard 'Al-Qaeda' mentioned, 'Terror Cells' and the words "Well, I believe it is terrorism"... What the hell does "I believe it is terrorism" mean? Because obviously, if ANYONE fills a car with explosive materials that has a detonator it IS terrorism. What the guy meant was "I believe it is 'Islamic/Muslim' terrorism" I thought the American news channels would be having a terrorism frenzy over this and I am right. Nobody knows who was behind it yet.

I knew that these rules were being discussed and it's sickening to see them come into effect. What's next - holding hands? shaking hands? It's beyond control. People need to say NO, NO, NO to this!!!! STOP DEHUMANISING US!!! SCUM.

Norman Mineta Confirms That Dick Cheney Ordered Stand Down on 9/11 Norman Mineta Confirms That Dick Cheney Ordered Stand Down on 9/11 Former Transportation Secretary Disputes 9/11 Commission Report Timetable for Dick Cheney and Reveals Lynn Cheney Was Also in PEOC Bunker Before Attack Aaron Dykes / JonesReport | June 26, 2007 Former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta answered questions from members of 9/11 Truth Seattle.org about his testimony before the 9/11 Commission report. Mineta says Vice President Cheney was "absolutely" already there when he arrived at approximately 9:25 a.m. in the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) bunker on the morning of 9/11. Mineta seemed shocked to learn that the 9/11 Commission Report claimed Cheney had not arrived there until 9:58-- after the Pentagon had been hit, a report that Mineta definitively contradicted. Norman Mineta revealed that Lynn Cheney was also in the PEOC bunker already at the time of his arrival, along with a number of other staff. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-5PKQTUz5o Mineta is on video testifying before the 9/11 Commission, though it was omitted in their final report. He told Lee Hamilton: “During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President…the plane is 50 miles out…the plane is 30 miles out….and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president “do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said “Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!? Mineta confirmed his statements with reporters, saying "When I overheard something about 'the orders still stand' and so, what I thought of was that they had already made the decision to shoot something down." Norman Mineta made it clear to reporters-- who verified his quotes in written text alongside him-- that Mineta was indeed talking about a stand down order not to shoot down hijacked aircraft headed for the Pentagon. After no shoot down took place, it became clear that Cheney intended to keep NORAD fighter jets from responding-- evidence that Cheney is guilty of treason, not negligence for allowing the Pentagon to be hit. (Click each document for a larger image) The idea that "the order still stands" matches up with a change in NORAD and Pentagon orders-- issued on June 1, 2001, only months before 9/11. The document revoked the default standing orders to shoot down errant or hijacked aircraft and instructed them instead to stand down until they were given orders by the President, Vice President or Secretary of Defense. SEE ALSO: Did Dick Cheney Lie About His 9/11 Whereabouts? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHqozc0QjpA Mineta was still in the PEOG bunker when the plane was reported down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. "I remember later on when I heard about the Shanksville plane going down, the Vice President was right across from me, and I said, 'Do you think that we shot it down ourselves?' He said, 'I don't know.' He said, 'Let's find out.' So he had someone check with the Pentagon. That was about maybe, let's say 10:30 or so, and we never heard back from the DoD until probably about 12:30. And they said, 'No, we didn't do it.'" Of course, though whether it was a mistatement or a freudian slip of the truth is arguable. It certainly would seem that the story presented in United 93-- a dramatized account of the official government story-- is much, much less plausible than the plane simply being shot down. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y ABOVE VIDEO Norman Mineta's Testimony Before the 9/11 Commission-- which was NOT included in the final report and which DISPUTES the Commission's timetable for Vice President Dick Cheney on 9/11 Also, the two hour time delay is suspicious given the Vice President's own account of the dedicated video communications available that morning, as he told it to Tim Russert of Meet the Press on September 16, 2001. "We had access, secured communications with Air Force One, with the secretary of Defense over in the Pentagon. We had also the secure videoconference that ties together the White House, CIA, State, Justice, Defense--a very useful and valuable facility. We have the counterterrorism task force up on that net. And so I was in a position to be able to see all the stuff coming in, receive reports and then make decisions in terms of acting with it." At a bare minimum, this confirmation by Norman Mineta is in gross contradiction to the 9/11 Commission Report and poses serious questions about the Vice President's role in ordering NORAD to stand down on 9/11.

Children Assaulted by Police in Arkansas http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EH6AYVn2yw4 Nice cop huh? Tough guy - made the whole thing worse by his actions. Kids were maybe a bit mouthy and one legged it after saying something the cop didn't like but imagine if he had NOT gotten them in a headlock? Situation would have been far more calm. He must feel like a real man after man-handling some kids.

I would have preferred a chimp. Hail to the chimp.

Annoying huh?

UK Fans... This is a good deal: If you can't wait to get yours, you can preorder and get 3 physical singles, a free digital download and a special Interpol sticker pack, all for £5. Order here: Click Here The Heinrich Maneuver is now available on iTunes UK: Click Here If you preorder Our Love to Admire with Insound, you can receive a free limited edition lithograph poster along with your order. Choose from CD, Deluxe CD, or LP: Click Here For three single formats it cost me £4.57 inc. postage. Bit like the deal they had on Thom Yorke singles.

Someone needs to pay some bills.