Prince Myshkin

Sof you whore!!

DNA breakthrough heralds new medical era – and opens ethical Pandora's box http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/the-163400-test-that-tells-you-how-long-youll-live-2284639.html The results of the tests might also be of interest to companies offering life-insurance policies or medical cover that depend on a person's lifetime risk of falling seriously ill or dying prematurely.

I would be against it, for some of the reasons you gave there and others. But it's never going to happen so it doesn't matter, as you say. I think they are more concerned with other rivalries right now. Try not to be jealous.

Why? They should definitely not be. Swansea should only be in because it was a decision made so long ago and it's happened.

?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/may/16/sir-alex-ferguson-manchester-united-blackpool Alex Ferguson may escape sanction if he rests players against Blackpool Sir Alex Ferguson said he had to balance resting players while keeping others fresh for the Champions League final. Photograph: Dean Mouhtaropoulos/Getty Images

They deserve to be in the final. It's a little rich to say they can play in England but not in the Premier League. It shouldn't only become an issue when they get to the top league (on merit I add). People should have fought this case for the last hundred years if they felt so strongly.

Swansea through.

I put that in the how to get to heaven thread. I especially like the last quote.

I can run 5 miles in the wind and rain in 41 minutes, 30 seconds and 52 milliseconds.

I think you should re-read the article in which it explains exactly why it means so much to Americans, and then re-read some comments and understand the jokey nature of them. Chill out.

Oooooh, it's aaaawn!

I presume the only reason you haven't done so far is because you cannot match my egotism :wink3:

Swansea two up with two very good goals.

Which is exactly why Al Qaeda have agreed with America and said that he has just been killed. Do you not think they would revel in debunking this American conspiracy instead of agreeing with them? It's now common knowledge he wanked himself blind, then wandered out of the compound giving the game away. Keep up.

I'm glad you are in this thread Imke :) When I post on my own about these things my words only get twisted and people take the argument down routes that don't matter.

According to this thread page he's already now a 'complete porn addict'. And people have already forgotten that he did not use his wife to protect him. These 'truths' stick though, and that is why they are printed. They plant those little ideas in your head and people forget about what is true and what isn't.

Like I said, he would be a hypocrite, but everybody knows he is a hypocrite. Do you remember 9/11 for example? But it would not be a damning revelation for his followers because they would not believe it. It would simply be something for the west to s****** (edit - sniggger) at and associate him with. As of yet I've not seen anything conclusive to prove he did it, and whilst I'm not saying not to look in to it, I'll wait until I see some actual evidence. All I've seen is an article without a name, which is what you get in the transfer rumours section of a tabloid during the transfer window. I have a suspicion that a lot more journalists from more respectable areas would be jumping on this and following it if there was some hard evidence available right now. I'm not saying it couldn't come about in the future. Re-read my last post as well Mark, regarding why this is different to the human rights 'ifs'. I'm sure you did read it first time, but your simplistic response sometimes makes me wonder.

Well what you are forgetting is that nobody is saying that Osama Bin Laden isn't the biggest hypocrite because of his other actions. Watching pornography would not be very high on his list of atrocities. His religion was often used as a veil for his atrocities, as well as perhaps influencing them but he broke plenty of Islam's key principles before that. Do you honestly believe that his followers will believe the findings of pornography? They believe nothing that comes from the west anyway. It is different from the human rights 'ifs' because if his human rights had been violated then that is something that we have to look into as it would people representing us who are at fault. On the other hand it is not illegal to view pornography, so it's kind of irrelevant in the great scheme of things, especially when considered amongst what else he has done. Your main misunderstanding is thinking that this is the piece of evidence that makes him into a hypocrite. It's merely another example, and it's far from proved yet.

Yup.

Follow the links I showed you. Particularly the write up on them. People like hippies stood/stand for something. These people are not hippies. They don't even pretend to be like them. They aren't anything.

Not The Strokes, but Julian covering Buddy Holly: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2011/may/16/julian-casablancas-buddy-holly-rave-on

http://www.newscientist.com/special/the-grand-delusion

Tell us more!

Sent mine. Could have done with it being a Top 15.