rf_ucsd

:lol: @ thread title

hahah lots of people!! True ... I don't have a "thing" for you, Mandy. That would be incestuous. If I were 16 ... who knows.

which is why you need to trick him into tell ing you :wink3:

you THINK he has a thing for you? Oh, Mandy.

Yeah ... I know you'd probably bust up, but that's cool. As long as you and Matt keep progressing, there isn't much I can offer but my happiness for you ... ... thought I think it would help if you two actually talked about it. Trick him into telling you how he feels about you!

baaaaaaaaahahahahhahahahahah!!!! :lol: I thought you'd already seen that! You wanna see him blush? Just ask him tomorrow: "Hey Matt, what would you do it I just came up and pinched your butt?"

(must wait to make card)

The tickle idea is a good idea. Hugs are nice, too.

ahhahahahahahaha ... that is funny. well, i'm glad we're making progress, sis. you've played the situation very well! lucky guy, that matt. he got a good one :wink3:

That's true, but the poll MSNBC is reporting on says while 63% are opposed to gay marraige only 36% support a Constitutional Amendment. It seems that people like the idea of it being handled on a state-by-state basis.

He's not a loser ... he's just ignorant ... ihe should know that he doesn't have to be so contrived. But it's very cool. And it's kind of a natural course. The aggressive move of shoulder rubbing followed by the passive "arm around" once the physical connection is established. hee hee

You two are SO silly! He's trying to be all smooth. Nice try, Matt! That's cool, though. I wonder how long he thought about that move before going for it :D You two are cool.

Love in Toronto sounds like a beautiful thing. If they're lucky they'll get to that level.

No Doubt, "It's My Life"

What does it have to do with now? Christians in the U.S. keep trying to portray homosexuality as unnatural. That's an underlying current in this debate: The demonization of these people. And it's wrong. what you said :) Btw, I think it's really good that we can talk about this without ending up in arguments. *thumbs up* I agree. And I totally see punk's point of view. I hope we can maintain civility moving forward. i think we can....and u can call me nikki if u want :) Cool! That's good to know. I'm Richard.

I watch Fox sometimes. I watch CNN sometimes. I watch Chris Matthews. I watch Tim Russert. I watch George Stephanopolous. I watch Jim Lehrer. I think that's about it. Probably my favorite political pundit right now is Peggy Noonan.

What does it have to do with now? Christians in the U.S. keep trying to portray homosexuality as unnatural. That's an underlying current in this debate: The demonization of these people. And it's wrong. what you said :) Btw, I think it's really good that we can talk about this without ending up in arguments. *thumbs up* I agree. And I totally see punk's point of view. I hope we can maintain civility moving forward.

So Fox is objective and CNN is now? OK. That's your opinion. I would suggest worrying more about the content of the news and less on how it's being delivered. It really sounds like you're towing a party line. Towing a Party Line?? Yes. I'm not suggesting that's a bad or a good thing.

People are always throwing around conservative, liberal, etc ... I don't see much of a difference between CNN, Fox, MSNBC, the networks ... I don't know. It just seems like this big blame game to start labeling them.

What does it have to do with now? Christians in the U.S. keep trying to portray homosexuality as unnatural. That's an underlying current in this debate: The demonization of these people. And it's wrong.

So Fox is objective and CNN is now? OK. That's your opinion. I would suggest worrying more about the content of the news and less on how it's being delivered. It really sounds like you're towing a party line.

hahahahaha ... that was funny. i actually thing Arnold is doing an OK job as governor.

That (the sanctity thing) sounds so medieval. :stunned: It reminds me of the times when red-haired women were considered witches. :-/ That's really what it comes down to. Basically, Christians in this country strongly feel that marriage is a certain thing, and allowing homosexuals to be "married" destroys that concept.

I didn't mean to compare you to Rush ... just automatically called CNN liberal or Fox conservative doesn't seem to be a clear, let alone stipulated, concept. Yeah, a lot of people do believe it is morally wrong. But is it right for those people to legislate that?