'Condistas' want Rice for president

Disparate groups want to elect Condoleezza Rice in 2008

The Associated Press

 

 

Updated: 12:31 a.m. ET July 5, 2006

COLUMBUS, Ohio - Their names are varied: Team Condi. Rice for America. The Draft Rice movement. Condistas.

 

But this disparate group of Internet gurus, politics junkies and Hillary haters shares a common goal: Elect Republican Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice president in 2008.

 

Mick Wright, a professional webmaster in Memphis, Tenn., was one of more than a dozen people to register a draft-Rice Web site in the year after President Bush was re-elected. He said he was driven by the "post-election blues."

 

 

For more go here: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/13690273/

 

--tough one.. but I think I would vote for her... she's tough yet reasonable. And she can speak! I like that in a leader...

I'd vote for her.

Better than Bush, but i would vote for the democratic candidate

whata shocker.

She's worse than Bush by a mile!!

 

She shares all the goals of Bush's regime but she actually knows what she is doing.....she's always calling for military action...........gosh, scary thought.

 

Voting democrat makes no difference anyway......the are all owned, funded and controlled by the same central banks. So either way.....the candidate is going to continue what was previously started. Obviously, on the surface they have to be seemingly having this fake 'war of words' but underneath it's all the same.

If gazeboflossUK in against her, I'll campaign for her. She is very smart and has more knowledge in her pinkie than all of us on this board combined. Put her against Hillary and the debates would be a JOKE.

I'm not suprised your think in such ways. It's your loss.

 

All I can say is don't support her.

 

But then that's what makes you want to support her isn't it?? the fact I said you shouldn't??

 

Maybe this is how you make all your decisions.

 

You should make your decisions based on research of the candidate and what their position is on matters.

 

But, again.....I said you should do that.....so you won't...

 

 

Where do you people come from, seriously.

I'm not suprised your think in such ways. It's your loss.

 

All I can say is don't support her.

 

But then that's what makes you want to support her isn't it?? the fact I said you shouldn't??

 

Maybe this is how you make all your decisions.

 

You should make your decisions based on research of the candidate and what their position is on matters.

 

But, again.....I said you should do that.....so you won't...

 

 

Where do you people come from, seriously.

 

Not the same place as you.....haha. most of us dont buy into conspiracy theories. sorry.

Rice is the American Dream. A black girl from Alabama grows up to be the first woman and first black to be President. Speaks 4 languages and plays the harp. Incredible intellect and an IQ off the charts. And I LOVE her policies. Damned right I'd vote for her.

too bad most of america wouldnt vote for a woman candidate, and sadly a candidate of color. Dont get me wrong, i know that she is a very smart lady, and i would gladly trade her for bush any day, but i just dont like republican policies, and therefor i would vote Hilary if she runs

too bad most of america wouldnt vote for a woman candidate' date=' and sadly a candidate of color. Dont get me wrong, i know that she is a very smart lady, and i would gladly trade her for bush any day, but i just dont like republican policies, and therefor i would vote Hilary if she runs[/quote']

 

 

werent you the one who said you were a republican?

i wouldn't like to see her as pres, but my that would be a milestone, if a black lady were to become president.

no absolutely not lol i am 100% liberal

this is what i said earlier

 

" Better than Bush, but i would vote for the democratic candidate"

Yeah she's smart, but she's in arguably the most corrupt administration America's ever suffered through (even worse than Harding). If she were elected, it would be 4+ more years of these same (failed) policies and lawbreaking "freedom protection" programs.

 

Still, there's hope: being a member of an administration who has <33% approval rating, I don't think she has much chance at being elected.

I would vote for her BUTi would like someone else to run instead of her.

Not the same place as you.....haha. most of us dont buy into conspiracy theories. sorry.

 

Conspiracy theories??

 

I just said that it would probably be worse than it is now if she ever gets in power (which she wont).

 

At every chance you guys throw in the 'conspiracy theories' line in a bad attempt to make my points less accepted....

 

I would prefer a more credible response......is that too much to ask.

She's worse than Bush by a mile!!

 

She shares all the goals of Bush's regime but she actually knows what she is doing.....she's always calling for military action...........gosh, scary thought.

 

Voting democrat makes no difference anyway......the are all owned, funded and controlled by the same central banks. So either way.....the candidate is going to continue what was previously started. Obviously, on the surface they have to be seemingly having this fake 'war of words' but underneath it's all the same.

 

 

hmmm I'm going to disagree on this one just a bit.. I think she goes along with some of the Bush's crazy ideas because 'she's expected to'... in some of her answers to interviews.. you can almost see the look of disagreement in her eyes with Bush's policies and antics.. it kinda gives me the sense that if she were running the show.. she'd do it differently.

 

Of course I would have to see her entire platform and what she would bring to the table.. so I won't pledge my alligence to her campaign just yet... lol I want to see what Hilary would offer as well.. :P

 

 

But Condi is iiiight in my book.

 

... wow imagine that.. voting for a candidate based on issues and not political party membership... genius. ;)

yea that is a good point you make

hmmm I'm going to disagree on this one just a bit.. I think she goes along with some of the Bush's crazy ideas because 'she's expected to'... in some of her answers to interviews.. you can almost see the look of disagreement in her eyes with Bush's policies and antics.. it kinda gives me the sense that if she were running the show.. she'd do it differently.

 

Of course I would have to see her entire platform and what she would bring to the table.. so I won't pledge my alligence to her campaign just yet... lol I want to see what Hilary would offer as well.. :P

 

 

But Condi is iiiight in my book.

 

... wow imagine that.. voting for a candidate based on issues and not political party membership... genius. ;)

 

 

Ok, Ok.....yeah, I see your point.

 

BUT (you knew there was a 'but' right? lol)...

 

She is for the war and has stated she think a military attack on Iran might be on the table.

 

She's also part of the '911 Whitewash' crew.......also with reports linking her to the sept. 10th 2001 phone call warning to San Francisco's mayor Willie Brown to not fly to NY the next day (sept 11th)........he described it as airport security -- a full eight hours before the attacks -- advising him that Americans should be cautious about their air travel.

 

But, we shall wait and see whether she does run..

 

there's plenty of websites set up to get her to...

 

http://www.rice2008.com

http://www.4condi.com

http://www.condoleezzaforpresident.com

condi2008.org (coming soon)

 

 

We could have a bitch fight on our hands.

 

I personally really hope not.......

^ true true... I almost forgot about the 'whitewash' thing.... but I'll still hear her out.. ;)

I'd vote for her, but I can't, because I'm not old enough.

 

And if she runs, my dad is NOT going to drag me to speeches and stuff. =/

Conspiracy theories??

 

I just said that it would probably be worse than it is now if she ever gets in power (which she wont).

 

At every chance you guys throw in the 'conspiracy theories' line in a bad attempt to make my points less accepted....

 

I would prefer a more credible response......is that too much to ask.

 

 

Sorry but your conspiracy theories already do that.

^ that was a crap response.... and it further proves Gareth's point.....

^ that was a crap response.... and it further proves Gareth's point.....

 

Sorry crap's your forte. ive shown enough evidence to prove the towers fell because of terrorist. anyways i was stating something true, people dont buy his crap because its conspiracy theories, most people write it off as bullshit. not a crap response, common sense. oh wait thats crap to you. sorry i forgot.

 

p.s. you're one to talk about crap responses....

blah blah blah.... THIS TOPIC IS ABOUT CONDI!!!!!!!! NOT 9/11!!!