I see simple maths isn't your fortay... lol

 

 

to be a majority.. it would have to be more than 50%-- correct? That constitutes as 'more than less'.... lol

 

how and when have I EVER said anything racist towards whites?? lol LIke I said before.. I'm an Anglophile!!! How can I be?? lol

 

 

I love hispanic and black culture...yet you call me one;) goes both ways.

not really.... you've shown otherwise on here with your lovely posts... :dozey:

I love hispanic and black culture...

What? all of it? You can't like both reggae and motown

^ OI!

 

thats not what we're all about!! Latinos don't do reggae.... they do reggaeton!!!!! :P lol

not really.... you've shown otherwise on here with your lovely posts... :dozey:

 

You wish. ive shown ive liked from my post. you've yet to do the same:\

 

you assume because im agaisnt illegal invasion i dislike the culture, ive grown up around latino and black culture my whole life. its apart of my life and i love it.

I'm not going to argue the obvious.... there's a reason you had a mini intervention last week.... so lets end it here, shall we.

No, tell me what ive said that is agaisnt hispanic and or black culture...you cant so you make things up like usual. all ive talked about is illegal immigration, not about a culture or race. Quote me saying something agiasnt it....

As usual you dont back your claims up.

I said I wasn't going to argue the obvious..... and I don't have the time to look back, some of us have jobs, you know...

I have looked back and have NEVER said anything bad about black or hispanic culture...nice dodge. you've perfected it.

fuck off....seriously.

good one...like always avoid the question or go around it. when you cant back your shit up just say fuck off! im not surprised at all. you have no case.:smug:

 

so you fuck off if you cant back up your shit talking! how about that?

I'M TRYING TO WORK HERE...... i DON'T HAVE THE TIME TO LOOK BACK 57845857 PAGES OF YOUR JARGON TO PROVE YOU WRONG.... WHEN i GET HOME, THATS ANOTHER STORY... CAN YOU WAIT 4 HOURS??? THEN I'LL MAKE YOU LOOK LIKE THE SCHMUCK YOU ARE... :nice:

Then dont say something that isnt true if you cant back it up.

 

sorry camille you'll be wasting your time, ive never bashed black or hispanic culture but look if you want, it'll be funny, like it is most the time when you talk:smug:

 

Sorry but the only schmuck on here is narrowminded people like you;)

Ok you're not the only one, but one of the few.

I will back it up... as soon as I get home.. :)

Have fun...But when you try to take things out of context dont get mad when i make you look dumb.

 

 

Heather Mac Donald

Time to Take Illegal Immigration Seriously

The newsweekly dramatically breaks with elite orthodoxy.

16 September 2004

 

The cover says it all: two fists ripping a hole in the American flag. And with that striking image, Time magazine just may have started a revolution in the mainstream press’s attitude towards illegal immigration.

 

For decades, public outrage over illegal immigration met only scorn or indifference from the elite media. The New York Times recently dismissed opponents of border trespassing as the

“ ‘what part of illegal don’t you understand’ crowd.” But with its September 20 cover story, WHO LEFT THE DOOR OPEN?, Time magazine has crossed over to the other side. The 9,000-plus-word article meticulously documents the destruction wrought by illegal aliens. More important, it seethes with indignation at the Bush administration’s unwillingness to stop that destruction. The story’s tone—calling border trespassers “invaders,” who seek to “mask their unlawful presence”—was once confined to the ghetto of talk radio. No longer. And if Time—that venerable voice of the establishment—can fume that it is “outrageously easy to sneak in,” maybe politicians will start to pay attention when the public voices the same complaint.

 

WHO LEFT THE DOOR OPEN? explodes every myth that open-borders proponents churn out. The most crucial one is the “we can’t turn off the flow” myth. According to this lie, the border invasion is an unstoppable fact of nature that has nothing to do with government action or inaction. The only solution, say the apologists, is to legalize illegality.

 

Time is having none of it. “Who’s to blame for all the intruders?” the magazine asks. “The problem is one of the U.S.’s own making. The government doesn’t want to fix it.” The biggest cause of border trespassing, argues Time, is the government’s decades-long refusal to enforce the law against employing illegal aliens. Simple solutions—like a fraud-proof Social Security card—have never been tried.

 

Second biggest myth of the open-borders advocates: illegals take jobs Americans spurn. Wrong again, says Time. It’s bottom-of-the-barrel wage rates, not hard work, that American workers reject.

 

Third myth: illegal aliens are an economic plus for the country because they cheerfully provide inexpensive services that raise everyone’s standard of living. Give me a break! guffaws Time. WHO LEFT THE DOOR OPEN? catalogues the costs to the public: increased risk of terrorism; local hospitals driven out of business by border interlopers demanding free care; police forces and county jails reeling under the burden of illegal-alien rapists, murderers, bank robbers, and car thieves; Southwestern ranchers and homeowners who daily face “revolting mounds of personal refuse” on their property, not to mention broken fences and missing property; and a corrosive assault on the “U.S. tradition of encouraging legal immigration.”

 

Fourth myth: the demonization of Proposition 187. No lie is dearer to the elite press than the charge that only a nativist bigot would object to illegals’ exploitation of America’s public largesse. So California’s 1994 passage of Proposition 187—denying taxpayer-funded goods like free education and free hospital treatment to illegal aliens—has until now been characterized as one of the darkest moments in America’s long history of racism towards “people of color.” And along comes Time and actually sympathizes with public anger over the illegal capture of benefits. The government’s failure to enforce immigration laws “breeds anger and resentment among citizens who can’t understand why illegal aliens often receive government-funded health care, education benefits and subsidized housing,” says the magazine. Presumably, Time is not joining the assault on a current Arizona referendum to require proof of citizenship for voting and welfare receipt—a cheeky populist demand to obey existing law.

 

Time’s groundbreaking story shreds the Bush administration’s justification for its recent amnesty proposal: we’ve tried enforcement of entry laws, and it doesn’t work. No, responds Time: neither yours nor any previous administration has ever tried enforcement. And what is worse, notes the magazine, the recent amnesty proposal has served only to double the rate of illegal entry.

riddle me this then Batman... why did you get a board intervention????

Because anyone who is not for illegal immigration is a racist. and you were the only one who intervened. You seem to think everything is a race issue

 

you cant win an arguement, you turn it into a race issue and yell racist. Its a pathetic stratigy.

Because anyone who is not for illegal immigration is a racist. and you were the only one who intervened. You seem to think everything is a race issue

 

you cant win an arguement, you turn it into a race issue and yell racist. Its a pathetic stratigy.

 

 

uh.. I've got news for you buddy.. lol ONLY the admins can intervene that way... and they got loads of complaints about you and your racist remarks.. so, actually.. I can't take any credit for this one... :nice: --But you did offend me with your poor people are expected to steal comment...

Yes, i never take offence when liberals call me a racist. Because that is the only card they can play on this issue. like i said turn it into a race issue and cry racist.

 

I never said poor people are expected to steal. That would imply all poor people steal.

 

Like is said this isnt about race, but illegal immigration. This has nothing to do with race, but you seem to make it into that

Illegal immigration and race are not related. Being anti illegal immigration is not being racist. Liberal pinheads just make it that because they have no counter points to the facts. IE adding crime, hurting the economy, safety issues.....so lets drop the race bullshit if you have anything credible to add do so. Like showing how a bad economy is ok, or letting terrorist in is ok, or taking american jobs is ok, or millions of extra crimes are ok.....you seem to think so.

Evil. being poor does not make one commit a sex crime...its a mental problem not a economic. i could see how being poor would make someone rob or steal' date=' but not just go out and do a sex crime.[/u']

 

But we could avoid this mess by gaurding our borders.

 

 

*ehem* exhibit A

Yes, i could see how someone being poor would lead them to steal..did not say all poor people steel. nice try

 

If i was poor i'd be more likely to rob or steel because im poor. but the majority of poor people do not...i never said they did. i told you i'd call you out when you try to add stuff on or take statements out of context. nice try

93 sex offender enter america EACH DAY by the border of mexico....this is not just a threat to the economics of america, but the safety, terrorist coming in, and 93 sex offender per day..something needs to be done

 

not to mention recent polls show the majority of hispanic people believe the south is their land by right. we're seeing an invasion and the mexican goverment is helping it out.

 

 

*ehem* exhibit B

and umm...that has nothing to do with race....