yeah i agree. i liked to think gonzalez had a chance. however it wasn't as big a drubbing as the roddick match. gonzalez just lost because he didnt take advantage of breaks etc....

first set was amazing,but who is Federer against Rod Laver?

Such a shame. Had Gonzalez won that break in the 1st set, it could've been a totally different game. Price of experience I guess :(

first set was amazing,but who is Federer against Rod Laver?

 

i said federer is second best all time

Laver is the one i put him behind. If Roger's dominance continues, however, federer will move up to number one. Laver himself said that federer was the most complete player he has ever seen

i said federer is second best all time

Laver is the one i put him behind. If Roger's dominance continues, however, federer will move up to number one. Laver himself said that federer was the most complete player he has ever seen

i dont think